nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Seismic Analysis and Response of Structures

verfasst von : Junbo Jia

Erschienen in: Modern Earthquake Engineering

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The major objective of seismic analysis is to develop a quantitative measure or a transfer function that can convert the strong ground motions at a structure’s foundation to loading and displacement demands of the structure, which provide essential input for a reliable assessment of structural capacity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Design Philosophy

Nächstes Kapitel Sudden Subsidence and Its Assessment

Ghobarah A (2001) Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Eng Struct 23(8):878–884CrossRef

Kelly TE (2004) Analysis paralysis: a 2003 state-of-the-art report on seismic analysis. Bull NZ Soc Earthq Eng 37(1):23–34

Jia J (2012) Seismic analysis for offshore industry: promoting state of the practice toward state of the art. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international ocean and polar engineering conference (ISOPE), Rhodes, Greece

Jia J (2014) Essentials of applied dynamic analysis. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefMATH

Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6):452–464CrossRef

Kalkan E, Graizer V (2007) Multi-component ground motion response spectra for coupled horizontal, vertical, angular accelerations, and tilt. ISET J Earthq Technol 44(1):259–284

Wilson Ed (2013) Comments on the response spectrum analysis method. In: Presentation at SAB Meeting, 28 August, 2013

Moran R, Wang Y, Chokslhi N, Kenneally R, Norris W (1999) Evaluation of modal combination methods for seismic response spectrum analysis, Paper ID K4-A4-US, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Rosenblueth E (1951) A basis for aseismic design. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana

10.

Chopra AK (2000) Dynamics of structures: theory and application to earthquake engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

11.

Barltrop NDP, Adams AJ (1991) Dynamics of fixed marine structures, 3rd edn. MTD Ltd., London

12.

Wilson EL, Der Kiureghian A, Bayo ER (1981) A replacement for SRSS method in seismic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:187–192CrossRef

13.

Der Kiureghian A (1981) A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9:419–435CrossRef

14.

Rosenblueth E, Elorduy J (1969) Responses of linear systems to certain transient disturbances. In: Proceedings of the fourth world conference on earthquake engineering, santiago, Chile, vol I, pp 185–196

15.

NORSOK N-003 (2007) Actions and action effects, 2nd edn. Standards Norway, Lysaker, Norway

16.

ISO19901-2 (2004) Petroleum and natural gas industries—specific requirements for offshore structures—part 2: seismic design procedures and criteria, 1st edn. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

17.

Wilson Ed (2015) Termination of the response spectrum method (RSM)

18.

Freeman SA, Nicoletti JP, Tyrdl JV (1975) Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk: a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. In: Proceedings of US national conference on earthquake engineering, Berkeley, pp 113–122

19.

Bozorgnia Y, Bertero V (2004) Non-linear dynamic analysis, in earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based design. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–17CrossRef

20.

Seifi M, Noorzaei J, Jaafar MS, Yazdan Panah E (2008) Non-linear static pushover analysis in earthquake engineering: state of development. In: International conference on construction and building technology, ICCBT 2008, Kuala Lumpur, pp 69–80

21.

Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

22.

ATC 40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, vol 1. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, USA

23.

FEMA-356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA, Washington DC

24.

GDPK Seneviratna (1995) Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design. PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University

25.

Ghobarah A (2001) Review article: performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Eng Struct 23:878–884CrossRef

26.

Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Eilbeck DH, Freeman SA (1996) Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Disc 2, Paper No. 966

27.

Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF (1998) Multi-mode pushover procedure (MMP): a method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of the sixth US national conference on earthquake engineering

28.

Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):561–582CrossRef

29.

Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures. J Earthq Eng 8(4):497–522

30.

Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661

31.

Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(8):903–927CrossRef

32.

FEMA-273 (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA, Washington DC

33.

FEMA-274 (1997) NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA, Washington, DC

34.

FEMA-450 (2004) NEHRP recommended provisions and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA, Washington DC

35.

Lu X, Ye L, Miu Z (2009) Elastic-plastic analysis for earthquake resistant building structures: theory, modeling and applications. In: ABAQUS, MSC.MARC, and SAP2000 (In Chinese), China Architecture and Building Press

36.

Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2004) Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of buildings. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada

37.

Habibullah A, Pyle S (1998) Practical three dimensional non-linear static pushover analyses. Structure Magazine, Berkley

38.

Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12(1):51–69CrossRef

39.

Mwafy AA, Elnashai AS (2001) Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC frames. Eng Struct 23:407–424CrossRef

40.

Gupta B, Kunnath SK (2000) Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthq Spectra 20(4–6):452–464

41.

Seifried AE (2013) Response spectrum compatibilization and its impact on structural response assessment. PhD thesis, Stanford University

42.

China Net for Engineering Construction Standardization (2010) Code for seismic design of buildings, GB 50011-2010. China Building Industry Press, Beijing

43.

NORSAR, NGI (1998) Seismic zonation for Norway. Report for the Norwegian Council for Building Standardization

44.

SHAKE 2000 (2008) A computer program for the 1-D analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problem. University of California, Berkeley 2008

45.

Eurocode 3 (2005) Design of steel structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

46.

Jia J (2016) Soil dynamics and foundation modeling: offshore and earthquake engineering. Springer, Heidelberg

47.

Lauritzsen R, Kvitrud A, To P (1985) User manual for computer program CAP, NGI, Report No. 52406

48.

Kubo T, Penzien J (1979) Analysis of three-dimensional strong ground motions along principal axes, San Fernando earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:265–278CrossRef

49.

Kubo T, Penzien J (1979) Simulation of three-dimensional strong ground motions along principal axes, San Fernando Earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:279–294CrossRef

50.

Penzien J, Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3:365–374CrossRef

51.

Hadjian AH (1978) On the correlation of the components of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of second international conference on microzonation, vol. III, San Francisco

52.

Bertero VV (1977) Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. Struct Eng Struct Mech 53(1):29–79

53.

Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2000) Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis, Report No. RMS-55, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford

54.

Vamvatsikos D (2002) Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

55.

Asgarian B, Aghakouchak AA, Alanjari P, Assareh MA (2008) Incremental dynamic analysis of jacket type offshore platforms considering soil–pile interaction. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

56.

Mander JB, Dhakal RP, Mashiko N, Solberg KM (2007) Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Eng Struct 29(10):2662–2672CrossRef

57.

Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzuro P, Carballo JE (1998) Earthquakes, records, and non-linear responses. Earthq Spectra 14:469–500CrossRef

58.

FMA 350 (2000) Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. FEMA 350, Washington DC

59.

Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2004) Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Spectra 20(2):523–553CrossRef

60.

Vamvatsikos D (2011) Performing incremental dynamic analysis in parallel. Comput Struct 89(1-2):170–180

61.

Shome N, Cornell CA (1999) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of non-linear structures, Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford

62.

Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):491–514CrossRef

63.

Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters, Technical Note No. 902, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC

64.

Estekanchi HE, Vafai A, Sadeghazar M (2004) Endurance time method for seismic analysis and design of structures. Sci Iran 11:361–370

65.

Razavi M (2007) Evaluation of endurance time method compared to spectral dynamic analysis method in seismic analysis of steel frames. Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

66.

Mirzai A (2007) Usage of ET method in performance-based design of steel frames. Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

67.

Estekanchi HE, Riahi HT, Vafai A (2008) Endurance time method: exercise test for seismic assessment of structures. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

68.

Riahi HT, Estekanchi HE (2010) Seismic assessment of steel frames with the endurance time method. J Constr Steel Res 66(6):780–792CrossRef

69.

Estekanchi HE, Vafai A, Valamanesh V, Mirzaee A, Nozari A, Bazmuneh A (2011) Recent advances in seismic assessment of structures by endurance time method. In: Proceedings of a US–Iran–Turkey seismic workshop: seismic risk management in urban areas; PEER report 2011/07, 14–16 December 2010, pp 289–301, Istanbul, Turkey

70.

Estekanchi HE, Riahi HT, Vafai A (2011) Application of endurance time method in seismic assessment of steel frames. Eng Struct 33(9):2535–2546CrossRef

71.

Estekanchi HE, Alembagheri M (2012) Seismic analysis of steel liquid storage tanks by endurance time method. Thin Walled Struct 50(1):14–23CrossRef

72.

Jahanmard V, Diznab MAD, Mehdigholi H, Tabeshpour MR, Seif MS (2015) Performance-based assessment of steel jacket platforms by wave endurance time method. J Ships Offshore Struct, articles in press

73.

Takewaki I (2007) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering. Elsevier, Oxford

74.

Takewaki I (2004) Critical envelope functions for non-stationary random earthquake input. Comput Struct 82(20–21):1671–1683CrossRef

75.

Singh JP (1984) Characteristics of near-field ground motion and their importance in building design, ATC-10-1 critical aspects of earthquake ground motion and building damage potential, ATC, 23–42

76.

Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724CrossRef

77.

Geller RJ, Jackson DD, Kagan YY, Mulargia F (1997) Earthquakes cannot be predicted. Science 275:1616CrossRef

78.

Takewaki I (2002) Critical excitation method for robust design: a review. J Struct Eng 128(5):665–672CrossRef

79.

Stein RS (2003) Earthquake conversations. Sci Am 288(1):72–79CrossRef

80.

Drenick RF (1970) Model-free design of aseismic structures. J Eng Mech Div 96(4):483–493

81.

Shinozuka M (1970) Maximum structural response to seismic excitations. J Eng Mech Div 96(EM5):729–738

82.

Shinozuka M (1970) Chapter 5: maximum structural response to earthquake accelerations. In: Lind NC (ed) Structural reliability and codified design. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, pp 73–85

83.

Iyengar RN (1970) Matched inputs, Report No. 47, Series J, Center for Applied Stochastics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

84.

Yang JN, Heer E (1971) Maximum dynamic response and proof testing. J Eng Mech Div 97(4):1307–1313

85.

Takewaki I (2007) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford

86.

Yang Z, Lu X, Hwu T-H, Xu Y (2004) Effect of linking fluid dampers on whipping effect and torsional response of tower-podium system. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver

87.

Gusella V, Spadaccini O, Vignoli A (1996) In-service dynamic behavior of a drilling derrick on a jacket platform. Int J Offshore Polar Eng, 6(3):184–194

88.

Joseph LM, Poon D, Shieh S (2006) Ingredients of high rise design, Taipei 101 the world’s tallest building. Structure Magazine, 6

89.

Tabeshpour MR, Komachi Y, Golafshani AA (2012) Assessment and rehabilitation of jacket platforms. In: Moustafa A (ed) Earthquake-resistant structures: design, assessment and rehabilitation. Intech, Rijeka, Croatia

Titel: Seismic Analysis and Response of Structures
verfasst von: Junbo Jia
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Modern Earthquake Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31853-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-31854-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31854-2_15

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"