nach oben

Social Justice Research

Erschienen in:

01.03.2008

Social Norms and the Feeling of Justice about Unequal Family Practices

verfasst von: Gabrielle Poeschl

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

After briefly retracing the origins of the present day unbalanced division of family work, this paper article summarizes results from three studies conducted with married adults and unmarried young adults from northern Portugal. The data support the idea that (a) unequal family practices do not change because traditional practices are social norms that orientate individuals’ behavior; (b) individuals do not comply passively to these social norms but consider that the normative practices are fair; (c) normative family practices are considered to be fair because women, as well as men, seem to gain benefits from traditional family organization. The social consequences for women of the maintenance of normative family practices are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Justice in Our World and in that of Others: Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Victims

Nächster Artikel When Fairness is Especially Important: Reactions to Being Inequitably Paid in Communal Relationships

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

As we are interested in the impact of social comparison on family practices, we analyze here only the data obtained from the married respondents, although the study also included the participation of 178 young unmarried adults.

Subjects were asked also to rate the spouse’s participation in ten family decisions.

Bacon, C., & Lerner, R. M. (1975). Effects of maternal employment status on the development of vocational-role perception in females. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 126, 187–193.

Baudelot, C., & Establet, R. (1992). Allez les filles! Paris: Editions du Seuil.

Baxter, J., & Western, M. (1998). Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox. Sociology, 32, 101–120.CrossRef

Chombart de Lauwe, M. J. (1984). La représentation sociale des catégories sociales dominées: Rôle social, intériorisation. Bulletin de Psychologie, 37, 877–886.

Doise, W. (1990). Les représentations sociales. In Ghiglione, R., Bonnet, C., & Richard, J. F. (Eds.), Traité de psychologie cognitive (pp. 113–174). Paris: Dunod.

Giddens, A. (1982). Sociology: A brief but critical introduction. London: MacMillan.

Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.CrossRef

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2005). Striking the balance: Women, men, work and family. Discussion paper 2005, Sidney.

Kellerhals, J., Troutot, P. Y., & Lazega, E. (1993). Microsociologie de la famille. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (1994). Divergent worlds: The daily emotional experience of mothers and fathers in the domestic and public spheres. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1034–1046.PubMedCrossRef

Mikula, G. (1998). Justice in the family—Multiple perspectives in the division of labor: Introduction. Social Justice Research, 11, 211–213.CrossRef

Mikula, G., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2002). Division of tasks and duties and the perception of injustice: The case of household chores. Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 567–584.

Moghaddam, F. M. (1998). Social psychology. Exploring universals across cultures. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.

Miller, D. T., Monin, B., & Prentice, D. A. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. In Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context. The role of norms and group membership (pp. 95–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Müller, U. (1998). The micropolitics of gender differences in family life. In Ferreira, V., Tavares, T., & Portugal, S. (Eds.), Shifting bonds, shifting bounds (pp. 329–344). Oeiras: Celta Editora.

Nielsen, J. M. (1990). Sex and gender in society. Perspectives on stratification. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Parsons, T. (1964). Family structure and the socialization of the child. In Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 35–133). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Poeschl, G. (2000). Trabalho doméstico e poder familiar: Práticas, normas, e ideais. Análise Social, 35, 695–719.

Poeschl, G. (2003a). Inégalités sexuelles dans la mémoire collective et représentations des différences entre les sexes. Connexions, 80, 101–119.

Poeschl, G. (2003b). Représentations des différences entre les sexes et jeux de pouvoir. Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 2, 77–86.

Poeschl, G., Múrias, C., & Costa, E. (2004). Desigualdades sociais e representações das diferenças entre os sexos. Análise Social, 39, 365–387.

Poeschl, G., Pinto, I., Múrias, C., Silva, A., & Ribeiro, R. (2006). Representations of family practices, belief in sex differences and sexism. Sex Roles, 55, 111–121.CrossRef

Roux, P. (1999). Couple et égalité: un ménage impossible. Lausanne: Réalités sociales.

Saraceno, C. (1997). Sociologia da Família. Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.

Shields, S. A. (1986). Fonctionnalisme, darwinisme et psychologie des femmes. Etude d’un mythe social. In Hurtig, M.C., & Pichevin, M.F. (Eds.), La différence des sexes (pp. 29–61). Paris: Tierce Sciences.

Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67.CrossRef

Silva, A., & Poeschl, G. (2001–2002). Representações das semelhanças e das diferenças entre os sexos. Cadernos de Consulta Psicológica, 17/18, 153–159.

Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In Lindzey, G., & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 149–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Stohs, J. H. (1995). Predictors of conflict over the household division of labor among women employed full-time. Sex Roles, 33, 257–275.CrossRef

Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In Lindzey, G., & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 311–378). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wille, D. E. (1995). The 1990s: Gender differences in parenting roles. Sex Roles, 33, 803–817.CrossRef

Yogev, S. (1981). Do profession women have egalitarian marital relationship? Journal of Marriage and the Family, November, 865–870.CrossRef

Titel: Social Norms and the Feeling of Justice about Unequal Family Practices
verfasst von: Gabrielle Poeschl
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2008
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0057-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Justice in Our World and in that of Others: Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Victims

On the Normativity of Expressing the Belief in a Just World: Empirical Evidence

Justice, Morality, and the Dehumanization of Refugees

When Fairness is Especially Important: Reactions to Being Inequitably Paid in Communal Relationships

Introduction: Social Justice, Categorization, and Intergroup Relations

“Not So Much As Place to Lay Our Head...”: Moral Inclusion and Exclusion in the American Civil War Reconstruction

Premium Partner