Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 6/2010

01.11.2010 | Original paper

Soil/Geotextile Interface Behaviour in Direct Shear and Pullout Movements

verfasst von: M. L. Lopes, R. Silvano

Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper deals with soil/reinforced geotextile interface behaviour in direct shear and pullout movements. A soil/geosynthetic direct shear apparatus, developed in accordance to EN ISO 12957-1 (2004) and ASTM D5321-92 (1992) standards, is presented. Some details of the test (like: specimen fixation, influence of the vertical stress on the registered horizontal force, type of test and measurement of the vertical displacement) are discussed and modifications in the test procedures are adopted. Then, the reinforced geotextile and the residual soil of granite used in the research are described. The behaviour of soil/geosynthetic interface in direct shear is characterized based on modified direct shear tests and maximum interface shear stress is determined at peak and residual for a confining stress of 50 kPa. The modification in the pullout test apparatus described by Lopes and Ladeira (1996a; 1996b) and by Lopes and Lopes (1999) are noticed. The behaviour of soil/geosynthetic interface in pullout is characterized based on pullout tests performed, in accordance EN 13738 (2004), and interface shear stress at maximum pullout force is defined for a confining stress of 50 kPa. Finally, the values of interface coefficient at soil/geosynthetic interface are obtained in direct shear and in pullout and then compared. The main conclusions that can be outlined from the present study are the following: modifications should be made to EN ISO 12957-1 (2004) standard, namely in what concerns the dependence of the measured horizontal force from the vertical stress, the difficulties to perform constant area direct shear test with the lower half box filled with soil and on the measurement of the vertical displacement of the load plate; on the contrary to which is normally accepted the characteristics of the behaviour of soil/geosynthetic interface in pullout, when the geosynthetic has a full plane contact area with the soil, are not able to be obtained based on results of direct shear tests, as in this type of tests the contribution of the geosynthetic deformation on the characteristics of the interface in pullout is not considered.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bemben SM, Schulze DA (1998) The influence of equipment style and setup dimensions on sand/geomembrane direct shear test measurements. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 453–458 Bemben SM, Schulze DA (1998) The influence of equipment style and setup dimensions on sand/geomembrane direct shear test measurements. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 453–458
Zurück zum Zitat Blümel W, Stoewahse C (1998) Geosynthetic interface friction testing in Germany—effect of test setups. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 447–452 Blümel W, Stoewahse C (1998) Geosynthetic interface friction testing in Germany—effect of test setups. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 447–452
Zurück zum Zitat Blümel W, Stoewahse C, Dixon N, Kamugisha P, Jones DRV (2000) British-German cooperative research on geosynthetic friction testing methods. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European geosynthetics conference, Bologna, vol. 2, pp 923–927 Blümel W, Stoewahse C, Dixon N, Kamugisha P, Jones DRV (2000) British-German cooperative research on geosynthetic friction testing methods. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European geosynthetics conference, Bologna, vol. 2, pp 923–927
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon N, Jones DRV, Fowmes GJ (2006) Interface shear strength and its use in reliability-based landfill stability analysis. Geosynth Int J 13(1):1–14CrossRef Dixon N, Jones DRV, Fowmes GJ (2006) Interface shear strength and its use in reliability-based landfill stability analysis. Geosynth Int J 13(1):1–14CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gourc JP, Lalarokotson S (1997) Research and intercomparison tests for the harmonization of standards on geotextiles. EC Measurement and Testing Programme Project 0169, Task 3.2-Friction, Report No. 3 Gourc JP, Lalarokotson S (1997) Research and intercomparison tests for the harmonization of standards on geotextiles. EC Measurement and Testing Programme Project 0169, Task 3.2-Friction, Report No. 3
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh C, Hsieh MW (2003) Load plate rigidity and scale effects on the frictional behavior of sand/geomembrane interfaces. Int J Geotext Geomembr 21(1):25–47CrossRef Hsieh C, Hsieh MW (2003) Load plate rigidity and scale effects on the frictional behavior of sand/geomembrane interfaces. Int J Geotext Geomembr 21(1):25–47CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jewell R (1996) Soil reinforcement with geotextiles. CIRIA and Thomas Telford Ltd, London, p 332 Jewell R (1996) Soil reinforcement with geotextiles. CIRIA and Thomas Telford Ltd, London, p 332
Zurück zum Zitat Jones DRV, Dixon N (1998) Shear strength properties of geomembrane/geotextile interfaces. Int J Geotext Geomembr 16(1):45–71CrossRef Jones DRV, Dixon N (1998) Shear strength properties of geomembrane/geotextile interfaces. Int J Geotext Geomembr 16(1):45–71CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones DRV, Dixon N (2000) A comparison of geomembrane/geotextile interface shear strength by direct shear and ring shear. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European geosynthetics conference, Bologna, vol. 2, pp 929–932 Jones DRV, Dixon N (2000) A comparison of geomembrane/geotextile interface shear strength by direct shear and ring shear. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European geosynthetics conference, Bologna, vol. 2, pp 929–932
Zurück zum Zitat Koerner GR, Narejo D (2005) Direct shear database of geosynthetic-to-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-to-soil interfaces. GRI Report #30, Geosynthetic Research Institute, USA Koerner GR, Narejo D (2005) Direct shear database of geosynthetic-to-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-to-soil interfaces. GRI Report #30, Geosynthetic Research Institute, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes MJ, Lopes ML (1999) Soil-geosynthetic interaction–influence of soil particles size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynth Int J 6(4):261–282 Lopes MJ, Lopes ML (1999) Soil-geosynthetic interaction–influence of soil particles size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynth Int J 6(4):261–282
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes ML, Ladeira M (1996a) Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soil-geogrids interaction. Int J Geotext Geomembr 14(10):543–554CrossRef Lopes ML, Ladeira M (1996a) Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soil-geogrids interaction. Int J Geotext Geomembr 14(10):543–554CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes ML, Ladeira M (1996b) Role of specimen geometry, soil height, and sleeve length on the pull-out behaviour of geogrids. Geosynth Int J 3(6):701–719 Lopes ML, Ladeira M (1996b) Role of specimen geometry, soil height, and sleeve length on the pull-out behaviour of geogrids. Geosynth Int J 3(6):701–719
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes ML (2002) Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) Geosynthetics and their applications, Thomas Telford Ltd Editors, ISBN 0 7277 3117 3, pp 55–79 Lopes ML (2002) Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) Geosynthetics and their applications, Thomas Telford Ltd Editors, ISBN 0 7277 3117 3, pp 55–79
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Mitachi T, Ikeura I (1999) Direct shear testing method as a means for estimating geogrid-sand interface shear-displacement behaviour. Soils Found 39(4):1–8 Nakamura T, Mitachi T, Ikeura I (1999) Direct shear testing method as a means for estimating geogrid-sand interface shear-displacement behaviour. Soils Found 39(4):1–8
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes PC, Lopes ML, Lopes MP (2001) The inclined plane shear behaviour of geosynthetics—influence of soil particles size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynth Int J 8(4):327–342 Lopes PC, Lopes ML, Lopes MP (2001) The inclined plane shear behaviour of geosynthetics—influence of soil particles size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynth Int J 8(4):327–342
Zurück zum Zitat Sia AHI, Dixon N (2007) Distribution and variability of interface shear strength and derived parameters. Int J Geotext Geomembr 25(3):139–154CrossRef Sia AHI, Dixon N (2007) Distribution and variability of interface shear strength and derived parameters. Int J Geotext Geomembr 25(3):139–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silvano R, Lopes ML (2005) Soil/geosynthetic interface characterization through direct shear tests. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on ground improvement techniques, Coimbra, pp 555–560 Silvano R, Lopes ML (2005) Soil/geosynthetic interface characterization through direct shear tests. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on ground improvement techniques, Coimbra, pp 555–560
Zurück zum Zitat Silvano R, Lopes ML (2006) Soil/geosynthetic interface characterization—the influence of some aspects of the test procedure. In: Proceedings of the eight international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, vol. 4, pp 1459–1462 Silvano R, Lopes ML (2006) Soil/geosynthetic interface characterization—the influence of some aspects of the test procedure. In: Proceedings of the eight international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, vol. 4, pp 1459–1462
Zurück zum Zitat Stoewahse C, Dixon N, Jones DRV, Blümel W, Kamugisha P (2002) Geosynthetic interface shear behaviour: part 1 test methods. Ground Eng 35(2):35–41 Stoewahse C, Dixon N, Jones DRV, Blümel W, Kamugisha P (2002) Geosynthetic interface shear behaviour: part 1 test methods. Ground Eng 35(2):35–41
Zurück zum Zitat Takasumi DL, Green KR, Holtz RD (1991) Soil-Geosynthetics interface strength characteristics: a review of state-of-the-art testing procedures. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’91, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 87–101 Takasumi DL, Green KR, Holtz RD (1991) Soil-Geosynthetics interface strength characteristics: a review of state-of-the-art testing procedures. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics’91, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp 87–101
Zurück zum Zitat Wasti Y, Özdüzgün ZB (2001) Geomembrane-geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and shear box tests. Int J Geotext Geomembr 19(1):45–57CrossRef Wasti Y, Özdüzgün ZB (2001) Geomembrane-geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and shear box tests. Int J Geotext Geomembr 19(1):45–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ASTM D5321-92 (1992) Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia ASTM D5321-92 (1992) Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Zurück zum Zitat BS 6906 Part 8 (1991) Methods of test for geotextiles, Part 8: Determination of sand-geotextile frictional behaviour by direct shear. British Standards Institution, London BS 6906 Part 8 (1991) Methods of test for geotextiles, Part 8: Determination of sand-geotextile frictional behaviour by direct shear. British Standards Institution, London
Zurück zum Zitat EN 13738 (2004) Geotextiles and geotextile-related products—Determination of pullout resistance in soil. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels EN 13738 (2004) Geotextiles and geotextile-related products—Determination of pullout resistance in soil. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat EN ISO 12957-1 (2004) Geotextiles and geotextile-related products–Determination of friction characteristics–Part 1: Direct shear test. European Committee for Standardization in collaboration with the International Standardization Organization, Brussels EN ISO 12957-1 (2004) Geotextiles and geotextile-related products–Determination of friction characteristics–Part 1: Direct shear test. European Committee for Standardization in collaboration with the International Standardization Organization, Brussels
Metadaten
Titel
Soil/Geotextile Interface Behaviour in Direct Shear and Pullout Movements
verfasst von
M. L. Lopes
R. Silvano
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9339-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 6/2010 Zur Ausgabe