nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Soziale Einflüsse durch Zuschauende im Sport

verfasst von : Bernd Strauß, Kathrin Staufenbiel

Erschienen in: Sportpsychologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Wie Menschen durch die Anwesenheit anderer in Verhalten und Leistung beeinflusst werden, wird bereits mehr als 100 Jahre lang erforscht und gehört zu den wichtigsten sozialpsychologischen Fragestellungen im Sport. Dieses Kapitel stellt die Forschung zu sozialen Einflüssen durch Zuschauende dar. Es werden unterschiedliche Arten sozialer Einflussnahme beschrieben und Modelle zur Erklärung sozialer Einflüsse dargestellt. Neben Forschung zur bloßen Anwesenheit von Zuschauenden stellt das Kapitel auch Forschung zu aktiven Verhaltensweisen von Zuschauenden dar. Dies wird insbesondere im Zusammenhang mit dem Heimvorteil im Sport erforscht, da die höhere Siegeswahrscheinlichkeit von Heimmannschaften häufig den zahlenmäßig überlegenen Fans im eigenen Stadion zugeschrieben wird. Forschungsergebnisse stellen dies jedoch infrage.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Körperliche Aktivität über die Lebensspanne – Persönlichkeit und körperliche Aktivität

Nächstes Kapitel Gruppenleistungen im Sport

Agnew, G. A., & Carron, A. V. (1994). Crowd effects and the home advantage. Effets de la presence du public et avantage du terrain. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 53–62.

Allen, M. S., & Jones, M. V. (2014). The “Home Advantage” in athletic competitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413513267.CrossRef

Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0067891.CrossRef

Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Anderson, M., Wolfson, S., Neave, N., & Moss, M. (2012). Perspectives on the home advantage: A comparison of football players, fans and referees. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.11.012.CrossRef

Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1–40.

Baron, R. S., Moore, D., & Sanders, G. S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.816.CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxial effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610.CrossRefPubMed

Baumeister, R. F., Hamilton, J. C., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1447–1457.CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage in sports championships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.85.CrossRef

Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social “facilitation” as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.68.CrossRefPubMed

Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 28, S. 1–51). San Diego: Academic Press.

Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265.CrossRefPubMed

Boyko, R. H., Boyko, A. R., & Boyko, M. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English Premiership football. Journal of Sports Science, 25(1), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601038576.CrossRef

Butler, J. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The trouble with friendly faces: Skilled performance with a supportive audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1213.CrossRefPubMed

Burnham, W. H. (1910). The group as a stimulus to mental activity [zitiert aus Hollingworth, H. L., 1935]. Science, 31(803), 761–767.

Carron, A. V., Loughhead, T., & Bray, S. R. (2005). The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron’s (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021542.CrossRefPubMed

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgreen, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 24, S. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press.

Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250.CrossRefPubMed

Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competition: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.14.1.13.CrossRef

Dashiell, J. F. (1930). An experimental analysis of some group effects. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00751444.CrossRef

Dashiell, J. F. (1935). Experimental studies of the influence of social situations on the behavior of individual human adults. In C. Murchison (Hrsg.), A handbook of social psychology (S. 1097–1158). Worcester: Clark University Press.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRef

Epting, L. K., Riggs, K. N., Knowles, J. D., & Hanky, J. J. (2011). Cheers vs. jeers: Effects of audience feedback on individual athletic performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 299–312.

Fothergill, M., Wolfson, S., & Little, L. (2014). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of venue: Do professional soccer players and managers concur with the conceptual home advantage framework? International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2014.932826.CrossRef

Greer, D. L. (1983). Spectator booing and the home advantage: A study of social influence in the basketball arena. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(3), 252–261.CrossRef

Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Guttmann, A. (1986). Sports spectators. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef

Heaton, A. W., & Sigall, H. (1989). The “Championship Choke” revisited: The role of fear of acquiring a negative identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(12), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01236.x.CrossRef

Hewstone, M., & Martin, R. (2014). Sozialer Einfluss. In K. Jonas, M. Hewstone, & W. Stroebe (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie (6. Aufl., S. 269–313). Berlin: Springer.

Husband, R. W. (1931). Analysis of methods in human maze learning. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 39(2), 258–278.CrossRef

Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1819–1848.CrossRef

Jones, M. B. (2013). The home advantage in individual sports: An augmented review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 397–404.CrossRef

Jones, M. B. (2014). The home disadvantage in championship competitions: Team sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.002.CrossRef

Jones, M. B. (2018). Differences in home advantage between sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 34, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.012.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.CrossRef

Koppett, L. (9. Januar 1972). The Sports Game. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/01/09/archives/the-sports-game-no-virginia-there-never-was-a-club-owner-santa.html.

Kozar, B. (1973). The effects of a supportive and nonsupportive audience upon learning a gross motor skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(1), 27–38.

Laird, D. A. (1923). Changes in motor control and individual variations under the influence of razzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6(3), 236–246.CrossRef

Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.CrossRef

Lehman, D. R., & Reifman, A. (1987). Spectator influence on basketball officiating. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 673–675.

Marchant, D., Maher, R., & Wang, J. (2014). Perspectives on choking in sport. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to sport and exercise psychology (S. 446–459). London: Routledge.

MacMahon, C., & Strauß, B. (2014). The psychology of decision making in sport officals. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to sport and exercise psychology (S. 223–235). London: Routledge.

Mesagno, C., & Hill, D. M. (2013). Defintion of choking in sport: Re-conceptualization and debate. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44, 267–277.

Meumann, E. (1904). Haus- und Schularbeit. Leipzig: Barth.

Moede, W. (1920). Experimentelle Massenpsychologie. Leipzig: Hirzel.

Moore, J. T., & Brylinsky, J. (1993). Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball. Journal of Sport Behavior, 16(2), 77–84.

Murray, E. G., Neumann, G. L., Moffitt, R. L., & Thomas, P. R. (2016). The effects of the presence of others during a rowing exercise in a virtual reality environment. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 22, 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.007.CrossRef

Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N., & Williams, M. (1999). Crowd influence on decisions in association football. The Lancet, 353, 1416.CrossRef

Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N., & Williams, M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261–272.

Nevill, A, M., Newell, S. M., & Gale, S. (1996). Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer matches. Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 181–186.

Pessin, J., & Husband, R. W. (1933). Effects of social stimulation on human maze learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(2), 148–154.CrossRef

Pollard, R., & Pollard, G. (2005). Long-term trends in home advantage in professional team sports in North America and England (1876– 2003). Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021559.CrossRefPubMed

Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Components of home advantage in 157 national soccer leagues worldwide. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12, 218–233.CrossRef

Pollard, R., & Armatas, V. (2017). Factors affecting home advantage in football World Cup qualification. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304031.CrossRef

Salminen, S. (1993). The effect of the audience on the home advantage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(3), 1123–1128.CrossRef

Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774–786.CrossRef

Schlenker, B. R., Philipps, S. T., Boniecki, K. A., & Schlenker, D. R. (1995). Championship pressures: Choking or triumphing in one’s own territory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 632–643.CrossRef

Schwartz, B., & Barsky, S. F. (1977). The home advantage. Social Forces, 55(3), 641–661.CrossRef

Snyder, A. L., Anderson-Hanley, C., & Arciero, P. J. (2012). Virtual and live social facilitation while exergaming: Competitiveness moderates exercise intensity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(2), 252–259.CrossRefPubMed

Spence, K. W. (1958). A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. American Psychologist, 13(4), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045054.CrossRef

Staufenbiel, K. (2015). Home advantage in sports from a social cognitive perspective. Dissertation thesis. University of Muenster, Germany.

Staufenbiel, K., Lobinger, B., & Strauß, B. (2015). Home advantage in soccer – A matter of expectations, goal setting and tactical decisions of coaches? Journal of Sports Sciences, 33, 1932–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1018929.CrossRefPubMed

Staufenbiel, K., Riedl, D., & Strauss, B. (2018). Learning to be advantaged: Home advantage in high-level youth soccer. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1142463.CrossRef

Strauß, B. (1999). Wenn Fans ihre Mannschaft zur Niederlage klatschen. Lengerich: Pabst.

Strauß, B. (2002a). The impact of supportive spectator behavior on performance in team sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33(4), 372–390.

Strauß, B. (2002b). Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), 237–256.CrossRef

Strauß, B., & Bierschwale, J. (2008). Zuschauer und der Heimvorteil in der Handballbundesliga. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 15, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010.15.3.96.CrossRef

Strauß, B., & Höfer, E. (2001). The home advantage in team sports. In A. Papaioammou, M. Goudas, & Y. Theodorakis (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Sport Psychology (Bd. 4, S. 210–212). Thessaloniki: Christodoulidi Publications.

Strauß, B., Riedl, D., Staufenbiel, K., & Heuer, A. (2014). Global home advantage in soccer. Paper presented at the SCAPPS 2014 Annual Conference, London Ontario.

Strauß, B., & MacMahon, C. (2014). The influence of spectators in sports. In A. G. Papaioannou & D. Hackfort (Hrsg.), An introduction to Sport and Exercise Psychology (S. 213–222). London: Routledge.

Strauß, B., & MacMahon, C. (in press). Heimvorteil. In A. Güllich & M. Krüger (Hrsg.), Sport in Kultur und Gesellschaft. Springer.

Thirer, J., & Rampey, M. (1979). Effects of abusive spectator behavior on the performance of home and visiting intercollegiate basketball teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(3), 1047–1053.CrossRef

Travis, L. E. (1925). The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20(2), 142–146.CrossRef

Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412188.CrossRef

Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2010). Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(4), 483–498.CrossRefPubMed

van de Ven, N. (2011). Supporters are not necessary for the home advantage: Evidence from same-stadium derbies and games without an audience. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2785–2792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00865.x.CrossRef

Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.CrossRefPubMed

Zajonc, R. B. (Hrsg.). (1969). Animal social psychology. New York: Wiley.

Titel: Soziale Einflüsse durch Zuschauende im Sport
verfasst von: Bernd Strauß
Kathrin Staufenbiel
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Sportpsychologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56801-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56802-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_16

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner