Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. State of the Art

verfasst von : Evren Samur

Erschienen in: Performance Metrics for Haptic Interfaces

Verlag: Springer London

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Haptic interfaces generate the sense of touch in the form of force or tactile feedback and allow us to touch and manipulate objects either within a virtual environment or in a real world through a slave of a teleoperated system, such as for surgical robotics. There has been considerable amount of research on the haptic technology, which brought it into computer games, surgical simulators, mobile phones etc. A closer investigation of these devices and studies on their performance evaluation shows that type of evaluations, aim of methods and performance metrics vary considerably depending on the device. We have, therefore, reviewed the evaluation methods in the literature that have been applied to haptic devices. In this chapter, first, commercially available haptic interfaces and their application areas are reviewed. Then, haptic interface evaluation studies in the literature are discussed and categorized into two groups: physical and psychophysical evaluation studies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Human Haptic Perception
Literatur
1.
Adams, R.J., Hannaford, B.: Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(3), 465–474 (1999) CrossRef
2.
3.
Ahlberg, G., Enochsson, L., Gallagher, A.G., Hedman, L., Hogman, C., McClusky, D.A. III, Ramel, S., Smith, C.D., Arvidsson, D.: Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am. J. Surg. 193(6), 797–804 (2007) CrossRef
4.
Avizzano, C.A., Solis, J., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M.: Motor learning skill experiments using haptic interface capabilities. In: Proc. of 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 198–203 (2002)
5.
Bajka, M., Tuchschmid, S., Streich, M., Fink, D., Szekely, G., Harders, M.: Evaluation of a new virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy. Surg. Endosc. 23(9), 2026–2033 (2009) CrossRef
6.
Basdogan, C., Ho, C., Srinivasan, M.A., Slater, M.: An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(4), 443–460 (2000) CrossRef
7.
Bergamasco, M., Frisoli, A., Avizzano, C.: Exoskeletons as man-machine interface systems for teleoperation and interaction in virtual environments. In: Ferre, M., Buss, M., Aracil, R., Melchiorri, C., Balaguer, C. (eds.) Advances in Telerobotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 31, pp. 61–76. Springer, Berlin (2007) CrossRef
8.
Berkelman, P.J., Hollis, R.L.: Lorentz magnetic levitation for haptic interaction: device design, performance, and integration with physical simulations. Int. J. Robot. Res. 19(7), 644–667 (2000) CrossRef
9.
Berkley, J., Vollenweider, M., Kim, S.: Haptic systems employing force feedback. Patent Pub. No.:WO/2008/070584 (2008)
10.
Botturi, D., Castellani, A., Moschini, D., Fiorini, P.: Performance evaluation of task control in teleoperation. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 4, pp. 3690–3695 (2004). doi:10.​1109/​ROBOT.​2004.​1308833
11.
Brooks, T.L.: Telerobotic response requirements. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 113–120 (1990)
12.
13.
14.
Cavusoglu, M.C., Feygin, D., Tendick, F.: A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the phantom haptic interface and improvements for high-performance control. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(6), 555–568 (2002). doi:10.​1162/​1054746023210506​95 CrossRef
15.
Chapuis, D.: Application of ultrasonic motors to MR-compatible haptic interfaces. PhD thesis, EPFL, No. 4317 (2009)
16.
Chun, K., Verplank, B., Barbagli, F., Salisbury, K.: Evaluating haptics and 3d stereo displays using Fitts’ law. In: Proc. of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on HAVE, pp. 53–58 (2004)
17.
Colgate, J.E., Brown, J.M.: Factors affecting the Z-width of a haptic display. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 3205–3210 (1994)
18.
19.
de Visser, H., Passenger, J., Conlan, D., Russ, C., Hellier, D., Cheng, M., Acosta, O., Ourselin, S., Salvado, O.: Developing a next generation colonoscopy simulator. Int. J. Image Graph. 10(2), 203–217 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Durlach, N.I., Delhorne, L.A., Wong, A., Ko, W.Y., Rabinowitz, W.M., Hollerbach, J.: Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method. Percept. Psychophys. 46(1), 29–38 (1989) CrossRef
21.
Ellis, R., Ismaeil, O., Lipsett, M.: Design and evaluation of a high-performance haptic interface. Robotica 14, 321–327 (1996) CrossRef
22.
Eppinger, S.D.: Modeling robot dynamic performance for endpoint force control. PhD thesis, MIT (1988)
23.
Faulring, E.L., Colgate, J.E., Peshkin, M.A.: The cobotic hand controller: design, control and performance of a novel haptic display. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25, 1099–1119 (2006) CrossRef
24.
Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47, 381–391 (1954) CrossRef
25.
26.
Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M.: Experimental identification and evaluation of performance of a 2 dof haptic display. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 3260–3265 (2003)
27.
Gassert, R., Moser, R., Burdet, E., Bleuler, H.: MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 11(2), 216–224 (2006) CrossRef
28.
Guerraz, A., Loscos, C., Widenfeld, H.R.: How to use physical parameters coming from the haptic device itself to enhance the evaluation of haptic benefits in user interface? In: Proc. of Eurohaptics’03 (2003)
29.
30.
Hagn, U., Konietschke, R., Tobergte, A., Nickl, M., Joerg, S., Kuebler, B., Passig, G., Groeger, M., Froehlich, F., Seibold, U., Le-Tien, L., Albu-Schaeffer, A., Nothhelfer, A., Hacker, F., Grebenstein, M., Hirzinger, G.: DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. Int. J. Comput. Assisted Radiol. Surg. 5(2), 183–193 (2010) CrossRef
31.
Hannaford, B., Ryu, J.: Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18(1), 1–10 (2002) CrossRef
32.
Hannaford, B., Wood, L., McAffee, D., Zak, H.: Performance evaluation of a six axis generalized force reflecting teleoperator. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 21, 620–633 (1991) CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
Harders, M., Barlit, A., Akahane, K., Sato, M., Szkely, G.: Comparing 6dof haptic interfaces for application in 3d assembly tasks. In: Proc. of Eurohaptics’06 (2006)
36.
Harders, M., Bachofen, D., Bajka, M., Grassi, M., Heidelberger, B., Sierra, R., Spaelter, U., Steinemann, D., Teschner, M., Tuchschmid, S., Zatonyi, J., Szekely, G.: Virtual reality based simulation of hysteroscopic interventions. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 17(5), 441–462 (2008) CrossRef
37.
Hayward, V., Astley, O.: Performance measures for haptic interfaces. In: Robotics Research: The 7th International Symposium, pp. 195–207 (1996)
38.
Hayward, V., Gregorio, P., Astley, O., Greenish, S., Doyon, M., Lessard, L., Mcdougall, J., Sinclair, I., Boelen, S., Chen, X., Demers, J.-P., Poulin, J., Benguigui, I., Almey, N., Makuc, B., Zhang, X.: Freedom-7: a high fidelity seven axis haptic device with application to surgical training. In: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, vol. 232, pp. 445–456. Springer, Berlin (1997)
39.
Hellier, D., Samur, E., Passenger, J., Spaelter, U., Frimmel, H., Appleyard, M., Bleuler, H., Ourselin, S.: A modular simulation framework for colonoscopy using a new haptic device. In: Proc. of the 16th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference (MMVR), vol. 132, pp. 165–170 (2008)
40.
41.
Hollerbach, J.M., Hunter, I.W., Ballantyne, J.: A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics. In: The Robotics Review, vol. 2, pp. 299–342. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
42.
43.
44.
Kappers, A.M., Koenderink, J.J., Lichtenegger, I.: Haptic identification of curved surfaces. Percept. Psychophys. 56 (1), 53–61 (1994) CrossRef
45.
King, C.-H., Culjat, M.O., Franco, M.L., Bisley, J.W., Carman, G.P., Dutson, E.P., Grundfest, W.S.: A multielement tactile feedback system for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans. Haptics 2(1), 52–56 (2009) CrossRef
46.
Kirkpatrick, A.E., Douglas, S.A.: Application-based evaluation of haptic interfaces. In: Proc. of the 10th Haptic Symposium, p. 32 (2002)
47.
Kitagawa, M., Dokko, D., Okamura, A.M., Yuh, D.D.: Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 129(1), 151–158 (2005) CrossRef
48.
Lawrence, D.A., Pao, L.Y., Salada, M.A., Dougherty, A.M.: Quantitative experimental analysis of transparency and stability in haptic interfaces. In: Proc. of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division. DSC, vol. 58, pp. 441–449 (1996)
49.
Lawrence, D.A., Pao, L.Y., Dougherty, A.M., Salada, M.A., Pavlou, Y.: Rate-hardness: a new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 16(4), 357–371 (2000) CrossRef
50.
Leskovsky, P., Cooke, T., Ernst, M., Harders, M.: Using multidimensional scaling to quantify the fidelity of haptic rendering of deformable objects. In: Proc. of Eurohaptics, pp. 289–295 (2006)
51.
52.
Massie, T.H., Salisbury, J.K.: The PHANTOM haptic interface: a device for probing virtual objects. In: Proc. of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (1994)
53.
McAffee, D.A., Fiorini, P.: Hand controller design requirements and performance issues in telerobotics. In: Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR, vol. 1, pp. 186–192 (1991)
54.
McMahan, W., Gewirtz, J., Standish, D., Martin, P., Kunkel, J.A., Lilavois, M., Wedmid, A., Lee, D.I., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Tool contact acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery. IEEE Trans. Haptics 4(3), 210–220 (2011) CrossRef
55.
56.
57.
58.
Morrell, J.B., Salisbury, J.K.: Parallel-coupled micro-macro actuators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 17, 773–791 (1998) CrossRef
59.
60.
Murray, A.M., Klatzky, R.L., Khosla, P.K.: Psychophysical characterization and testbed validation of a wearable vibrotactile glove for telemanipulation. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12(2), 156–182 (2003). CrossRef
61.
62.
Novint Technologies, Inc.: Novint Falcon®
63.
Oakley, I., McGee, M.R., Brewster, S.A., Gray, P.D.: Putting the feel in ‘look and feel’. CHI, pp. 415–422 (2000)
64.
O’Malley, M., Goldfarb, M.: The effect of force saturation on the haptic perception of detail. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 7, 280–288 (2002) CrossRef
65.
Peer, A., Buss, M.: A new admittance-type haptic interface for bimanual manipulations. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 13 (2008)
66.
67.
Ruffaldi, E., Morris, D., Edmunds, T., Barbagli, F., Pai, D.K.: Standardized evaluation of haptic rendering systems. In: Proc. of IEEE Haptic Symposium, pp. 225–232 (2006)
68.
Salisbury, C., Gillespie, R.B., Tan, H., Barbagli, F., Salisbury, J.K.: Effects of haptic device attributes on vibration detection thresholds. In: Proc. of World Haptics’09, pp. 115–120 (2009)
69.
Salisbury, C.M., Gillespie, R.B., Tan, H.Z., Barbagli, F., Salisbury, J.K.: What you can’t feel won’t hurt you: evaluating haptic hardware using a haptic contrast sensitivity function. IEEE Trans. Haptics 4(2), 134–146 (2011) CrossRef
70.
Samur, E., Flaction, L., Bleuler, H.: Design and evaluation of a novel haptic interface for endoscopic simulation. IEEE Trans. Haptics (2011). doi:10.​1109/​TOH.​2011.​70
71.
72.
Santos-Carreras, L., Beira, R., Sengul, A., Gassert, R., Bleuler, H.: Influence of force and torque feedback on operator performance in a vr-based suturing task. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 7(3), 217–238 (2010) CrossRef
73.
Semere, W., Kitagawa, M., Okamura, A.M.: Teleoperation with sensor/actuator asymmetry: task performance with partial force feedback. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS’04, pp. 121–127. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)
74.
75.
76.
Spaelter, U.: Haptic interface design and control with application to surgery simulation. PhD thesis, EPFL, No. 3529 (2006)
77.
Stocco, L.J., Salcudean, S.E., Sassani, F.: Optimal kinematic design of a haptic pen. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 6(3), 210–220 (2001) CrossRef
78.
79.
80.
Taati, B., Tahmasebi, A.M., Hashtrudi-Zaad, K.: Experimental identification and analysis of the dynamics of a PHANToM premium 1.5A haptic device. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 17(4), 327–343 (2008) CrossRef
81.
Tan, H.: Identification of sphere size using the phantom: towards a set of building blocks for rendering haptic environment. In: ASME Annual Meeting, pp. 197–203 (1997)
82.
Tobergte, A., Passig, G., Kuebler, B., Seibold, U., Hagn, U.A., Froehlich, F.A., Konietschke, R., Joerg, S., Nickl, M., Thielmann, S., Haslinger, R., Groeger, M., Nothhelfer, A., Le-Tien, L., Gruber, R., Albu-Schaeffer, A., Hirzinger, G.: MiroSurge—advanced user interaction modalities in minimally invasive robotic surgery. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 19(5, SI), 400–414 (2010) CrossRef
83.
Ueberle, M., Mock, N., Buss, M.: Vishard10, a novel hyper-redundant haptic interface. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS’04, pp. 58–65 (2004) CrossRef
84.
Ueberle, M.W.: Design, control, and evaluation of a family of kinesthetic haptic interfaces. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2006)
85.
Unger, B.J., Nicolaidis, A., Berkelman, P.J., Thompson, A., Klatzky, R.L., Hollis, R.L.: Comparison of 3-d haptic peg-in-hole tasks in real and virtual environments. In: IEEE/RSJ, IROS, pp. 1751–1756 (2001)
86.
Van der Linde, R.Q., Lammertse, P., Frederiksen, E., Ruiter, B.: The hapticmaster, a new high-performance haptic interface. In: Proc. of Eurohaptics’02 (2002)
87.
Veneman, J.F., Ekkelenkamp, R., Kruidhof, R., van der Helm, F.C.T., van der Kooij, H.: A series elastic- and Bowden-cable-based actuation system for use as torque actuator in exoskeleton-type robots. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25, 261–281 (2006) CrossRef
88.
89.
Vollenweider, M.: High quality virtual reality system with haptic feedback. PhD thesis, EPFL, No. 2251 (2000)
90.
Wagner, C.R., Stylopoulos, N., Jackson, P.G., Howe, R.D.: The benefit of force feedback in surgery: examination of blunt dissection. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 16(3), 252–262 (2007) CrossRef
91.
Wall, S.A., Harwin, W.: A high bandwidth interface for haptic human computer interaction. Mechatronics 11, 371–387 (2001) CrossRef
92.
Wall, S.A., Harwin, W.S.: Quantification of the effects of haptic feedback during a motor skills task in a simulated environment. In: Proc. of the 2nd PHANToM Users Research Symposium, pp. 61–69 (2000)
93.
Weir, D.W., Colgate, J.E., Peshkin, M.A.: Measuring and increasing z-width with active electrical damping. In: Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 169–175 (2008)
94.
Weisenberger, J., Kreier, M., Rinker, M.: Judging the orientation of sinusoidal and square-wave virtual gratings presented via 2-dof and 3-dof haptic interfaces. Haptics-e 1(4) (2000)
95.
Yoon, J., Ryu, J.: Design, fabrication, and evaluation of a new haptic device using a parallel mechanism. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 6(3), 221–233 (2001) CrossRef
96.
Zinn, M., Khatib, O., Roth, B., Salisbury, J.K.: Large workspace haptic devices—a new actuation approach. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, HAPTICS’08, pp. 185–192. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2008). doi:10.​1109/​HAPTICS.​2008.​4479941 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
State of the Art
verfasst von
Evren Samur
Copyright-Jahr
2012
Verlag
Springer London
Buch
Performance Metrics for Haptic Interfaces

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4224-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-4225-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2012

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4225-6_2

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise