Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

14. Structure, Process, and Agency in the Evaluation of Risk Governance

verfasst von : Urbano Fra.Paleo

Erschienen in: Risk Governance

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Risk governance is an approach adopted to understand and comprehensively handle the complexity of the decision-making processes involved in risk production and reduction. In this chapter, it is argued that the evaluation of risk governance may go beyond the measurement of performance and advancement in disaster risk reduction—it can also act to increase social learning and risk awareness, to reach consensus over the equitable distribution of risks and to negotiate a preferred level of risk. Thus, participatory evaluation is proposed to increase the exchange and sharing of the different concerns, knowledges, interests, and values of societal players. Finally, an evaluation framework based on a mixed hierarchical and networked structure of criteria, components, and the dimensions of risk governance is advanced to complete the evaluation system. In this framework, criteria should measure not just policy development but also organizational structure, as well as the role of societal actors and the intervention of formal and informal arrangements.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Leadership and Collaborative Governance in Managing Emergencies and Crises
Nächstes Kapitel Climate Governance and Climate Change and Society
Fußnoten
Literatur
Andriessen, J.H.E. 2003. Working with groupware. Understanding and evaluating collaboration technology. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Balkin, J.M. 2004. Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review 79(1): 1–55.
Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90(5): 1692–1702.CrossRef
Birkmann, J., and K. von Teichman. 2010. Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Key challenges—Scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science 5: 171–184.CrossRef
Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2002. Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: GL Assessment.
Brand, R., and A. Karvonen. 2007. The ecosystem of expertise: Complementary knowledges for sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 3(1): 21–31.
Burby, R.J., and P.J. May. 2009. Command or cooperate? Rethinking traditional central governments’ hazard mitigation policies. In Building safer communities. Risk governance, spatial planning, and responses to natural hazards, ed. U. Fra.Paleo, 34–43. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Burton, I., R.W. Kates, and G.F. White. 1993. The environment as hazard, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Cardona, O.D. 2006. A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas. In Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, ed. J. Birkmann, 189–209. New York: UNU Press.
Carlarne, C., and J. Carlarne. 2006. In-credible government: Legitimacy, democracy, and non-governmental organizations. Public Organizations Review 6: 347–371.CrossRef
Carreño, M.L., O.D. Cardona, and A.H. Barbat. 2007. A disaster risk management performance index. Natural Hazards 41: 1–20.CrossRef
Chambers, R. 1997. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRef
Chen, H.T. 1996. A comprehensive typology for program evaluation. Evaluation Practice 17(2): 121–130.CrossRef
Cutter, S.L. 2003. GI science, disasters, and emergency management. Transactions in GIS 7(4): 439–445.CrossRef
DARA. 2011. Análisis de capacidades y condiciones para la reducción del riesgo de desastres. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panamá y República Dominicana. Informe sumario. Madrid: DARA.
de Boer, H., J. Enders, and U. Schimank. 2008. Comparing higher education governance systems in four European countries. In Governance and performance of education systems, ed. N.C. Soguel and P. Jaccard, 35–54. Berlin: Springer.
deLeon, P. 1992. The democratization of the policy sciences. Public Administration Review 52(125–1): 29.
Estrella, M., and J. Gaventa. 1998. Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review, IDS working paper no. 70. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Fetterman, D.M. 1994. Empowerment evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 15: 1–45.CrossRef
Fischer, F. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26(3): 165–187.CrossRef
Fra.Paleo, U. 2009. On exposure to natural hazards: Revisiting a neglected primal action. In Building safer communities. Risk governance, spatial planning, and responses to natural hazards, ed. U. Fra.Paleo, 61–78. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Fra.Paleo, U. 2013. A functional risk society? Progressing from management to governance while learning from disasters. ISC and UNESCO. In World social science report 2013. Changing global environments, 434–438. Paris: OECD/UNESCO.CrossRef
Fra.Paleo, U. 2014. Principles for the measurement and evaluation of risk governance. In Earthquake hazard impact and urban planning, ed. M. Bostenaru, I. Armas, and A. Goretti. Berlin: Springer.
Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the public domain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fung, A., and E.O. Wright. 2001. Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society 29(1): 5–41.CrossRef
Glasius, M., and G. Pleyers. 2013. The global moment of 2011: Democracy, social justice and dignity. Development and Change 44(3): 547–567.CrossRef
Gonsalves, J.F., IIRR, and J. Gaventa. 2000. Preface. In Learning from change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation, ed. M. Estrella, xi–xiii. Londres: IDS. Institute of Development Studies.
Greene, J. 2006. Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In The Sage handbook of evaluation, ed. I.F. Shaw, J. Greene, and M. Mark, 118–140. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hamilton, S., and N.L. Chervany. 1981. Evaluating information system effectiveness—Part I: Comparing evaluation approaches. MIS Quarterly 5(3): 55–69.CrossRef
Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.CrossRef
House, E. 1991. Evaluation and social justice: Where are we? In Evaluation and education: At quarter century, ed. M.W. McLaughlin and D.C. Phillips, 233–247. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hyde, S.D. 2007. The observer effect in international politics: Evidence from a natural experiment. World Politics 60(01): 37–63.CrossRef
Hyde, S.D. 2010. Experimenting in democracy promotion: International observers and the 2004 presidential elections in Indonesia. Perspectives on Politics 8(02): 511–527.CrossRef
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 2010. Indicators of disaster risk management. Program for Latin America and the Caribbean Summary Report. Washington, DC: IDB.
Iverson, T., and C. Perrings. 2012. Precaution and proportionality in the management of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 22(1): 161–177.CrossRef
Johansen, R. 1988. Groupware. Computer support for business teams. New York: The Free Press.
Jonassen, D.H., and H.I. Kwon. 2001. Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 49(1): 35–51.CrossRef
Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2010. The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues, World Bank policy research working paper no. 5430. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution – World Bank.
Keen, M., V.A. Brown, and R. Dyball. 2005. Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. London: EarthScan.
Kettl, D.F. 2000. The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 60(6): 488–497.CrossRef
King, C.S., K.M. Feltey, and B.O.N. Susel. 1998. The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review 58(4): 317–326.CrossRef
Kuhlman, S. 2003. Evaluation of research and innovation policies: A discussion of trends with examples from Germany. International Journal of Technology Management 26(2/3/4): 131–149.CrossRef
Kushner, S. 2001. Culture, standards, and program qualities. In Vision of quality: How evaluators define, understand and represent program quality, ed. A.P. Benson, D.M. Hinn, and C. Lloyd, 121–134. Bingley: Emerald.
MacDonald, B. 1976. Evaluation and the control of education. In Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications, ed. D. Tawney, 125–136. London: Macmillan.
Mathison, S. 1996. The role of deliberation in evaluation. Annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Atlanta, November 1996.
Mathison, S. 2000. Deliberation, evaluation, and democracy. New Directions for Evaluation 85: 85–89.CrossRef
May, B., and R. Plummer. 2011. Accommodating the challenges of climate change adaptation and governance in conventional risk management: Adaptive collaborative risk management (ACRM). Ecology and Society 16(1): 47.
McCarthy, D. 2009. A critical systems approach to socio-ecological systems: Implications for social learning and governance. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
McKnight, K.M., and L. Sechrest. 2004. Program evaluation. In Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 3: Behavioral assessment, ed. S.N. Haynes and E.M. Heiby, 246–266. Hoboken: Wiley.
Medsker, L., M. Tan, and E. Turban. 1995. Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts: Problems and issues. Expert Systems with Applications 9(1): 35–40.CrossRef
Mileti, D.S., T.E. Drabek, and J.E. Haas. 1975. Human systems in extreme environments: A sociological perspective. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science.
Mitchell, B. 1997. Resource and environmental management. Toronto: Longman.
Mitchell, T. 2003. An operational framework for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction, Disaster studies working paper 8. London: Benfield Hazard Research Centre, University College London.
Mitchell, B. (ed.). 2004. Resource and environmental management in Canada: Addressing conflict and uncertainty, 3rd ed. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Moote, M.A., M.P. McClaran, and D.K. Chickering. 1997. Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management 21(6): 877–889.CrossRef
Morgan, M.G., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Morrison, J. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. British Medical Journal 326: 385–387.CrossRef
Newman, J., M. Barnes, H. Sullivan, and A. Knops. 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33(2): 203–223.CrossRef
Nordhaus, W.D. 1994. Expert opinion on climate change. American Scientist 82: 45–51.
Parker, D. 1999. Criteria for evaluating the condition of a tropical cyclone warning system. Disasters 23(3): 193–216.CrossRef
Quarantelli, E. 1991. Patterns of sheltering and housing in American disasters, Preliminary paper no. 170. Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
Rallis, S.F., and G. Rossman. 2000. Dialogue for learning: Evaluator as a critical friend. New Direction in Program Evaluation 86: 81–92.CrossRef
Rauschmayer, F., A. Berghöfer, I. Omann, and D. Zikos. 2009. Examining processes or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 159–173.CrossRef
Renn, O. 2004. The challenge of integrating deliberation and expertise. Participation and discourse in risk management. In Risk analysis and society: An interdisciplinary characterization of the field, ed. T.L. McDaniels and M.J. Small, 289–366. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renn, O., A. Klinke, and M. van Asselt. 2011. Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio 40(2): 231–246.CrossRef
Rice, S.E., and S. Patrick. 2008. Index of state weakness in the developing world. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Roughgarden, T., and S. Schneider. 1999. Climate change policy: Quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes. Energy Policy 37: 415–429.CrossRef
Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1): 3–29.CrossRef
Saward, M. 1992. Co-optive politics and state legitimacy. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Simpson, D.M., and M. Katirai. 2006. Indicator issues and proposed framework for a disaster preparedness index (DPi), Working paper 06–03. Louisville: Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville.
Springett, J., and N. Wallerstein. 2008. Issues in participatory evaluation. In Community based participatory research for health: Process to outcomes, 2nd ed, ed. M. Minkler and N. Wallerstein, 199–220. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Stallings, R.A. 1990. Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Social Problems 37(1): 80–95.CrossRef
Stetler, C.B., M.W. Legro, C.M. Wallace, C. Bowman, M. Guihan, H. Hagedorn, B. Kimmel, N.D. Sharp, and J.L. Smith. 2006. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21(2): S1–S8.CrossRef
Stivers, C. 1990. Active citizenship and public administration. In Refounding public administration, ed. G.L. Wamsley, R.N. Bacher, C.T. Goodsell, P.S. Kronenberg, J.A. Rohr, C.M. Stivers, O.F. White, and J.F. Wolf, 246–273. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weibelzahl, S. 2005. Problems and pitfalls in evaluating adaptive systems. In Fourth workshop on the evaluation of adaptive systems, ed. S. Weibelzahl, A. Paramythis, and J. Masthoff, 57–64. Edinburgh.
Weichselgartner, J. 2001. Disaster mitigation: The concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster Prevention and Management 10(2): 85–95.CrossRef
Weiler, H. 1983. Legalization, expertise and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy. Comparative Education Review 27(2): 259–277.CrossRef
Wolter, S.C. 2007. Purpose and limits of a national monitoring of the education system through indicators. In Governance and performance of education systems, ed. N.C. Soguel and P. Jaccard, 57–84. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Woodward, R.T., and R.C. Bishop. 1997. How to decide when experts disagree: Uncertainty-based choice rules in environmental policy. Land Economics 73(4): 492–507.CrossRef
Worthen, B.R., J.R. Sanders, and J.L. Fitzpatrick. 1997. Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines, 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Metadaten
Titel
Structure, Process, and Agency in the Evaluation of Risk Governance
verfasst von
Urbano Fra.Paleo
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Risk Governance

Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9327-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-017-9328-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9328-5_14