Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: Where Does Private Governance Go? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Sustainability, Ethical Business, and Party Politics in Brazil

verfasst von : Alejandro M.Peña

Erschienen in: Transnational Governance and South American Politics

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The chapter argues that the dense and centralized participation pattern found in Brazil reflects, first, the overlapping of private governance frames with relevant dimensions of the local political agenda since the late 1990s, and second, the close ideational and institutional links developed between a particular faction of businesspersons, civil society, and the political system, particularly around the Workers’ Party PT. As a result, global sustainability norms and initiatives have not been restricted by domestic cultural political cleavages: on the contrary, they benefited from being perceived as an extension of domestic campaigns, struggles, and political discourses. Due to this, the sustainability agenda in Brazil has assumed a more public and assertive political orientation, often surpassing regulatory ambitions and mechanisms found at the global level.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Mapping Participation in Argentina and Brazil
Nächstes Kapitel Politics, Ideology, and Indifference in Argentina
Literatur
Abrahão, J. (2011, September). Controle Social, Tranparência E Integridade. Esse é O Nome Do Jogo. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil.
Aguilar-Platas, A., & Raufflet, E. (2010). Desviación Positiva Y Responsabilidad Social Empresarial (RSE): La Experiencia de Ethos En Brasil. Revista Innovar, 20(37), 21–32.
Alonso, A., & Maciel, D. (2010). From protest to professionalization: Brazilian environmental activism after Rio-92. The Journal of Environmental Development, 19(3), 300–317.CrossRef
Alves, G. (2000). Do ‘Novo Sindicalismo’ à ‘Concertação Social’: Ascensão (e Crise) Do Sindicalismo No Brasil (1978–1998). Revista Sociologia E Politica, 15, 111–124.
Avritzer, L. (2006). Civil society in Latin America in the twenty-first century: Between democratic deepening, social fragmentation, and state crisis. In R. Feinberg, C. Waisman, & L. Zamosc (Eds.), Civil society and democracy in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Avritzer, L. (2010). Living under a democracy: Participation and its impact on the living conditions of the poor. Latin American Research Review, 45, 167–185.CrossRef
Azevedo, S. (2009). The greening of Petrobras. Harvard Business Review, 87(3), 43–47.
Ban, C. (2013). Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy? Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 298–331.CrossRef
Becker, J. (2010). Crisis Financieras En Los Noventa Y Sus Salidas: Argentina, Brasil Y Uruguay En Comparación. Indic. Econ. FEE, 37(4), 121–142.
Bianchi, A. (2001). Crise E Representacao Empresarial: O Surgimento Do Pensamento Nacional Das Bases Empresariais. Revista de Sociologia E Política, 16, 123–142.
Bianchi, A., & Braga, R. (2005). Brazil: The Lula government and financial globalization. Social Forces, 83(4), 1745–1762.CrossRef
Boito, A. (2007). Class relations in Brazil’s new neoliberal phase. Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 115–131.CrossRef
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2015). State-society cycles and political pacts in a national-dependent society: Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 3–22.CrossRef
Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2003). The economic history of Latin America since independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Capellin, P., & Giuliani, G. (2004). The political economy of corporate responsibility in Brazil – Social and environmental dimensions. Programme. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Capobianco, E. (1998, January 7). “São Paulo Contra a Violência.” Folha de S. Paulo.
Cardoso, F. (1968). Empresarios Industriales Y Desarrollo Económico En Brasil. Desarrollo Económico, 8(29), 31–60.CrossRef
Cardoso, E. (1991). From inertia to megainflation: Brazil in the 1980s. In M. Bruno, S. Fischer, E. Helpman, & N. Liviatan (Eds.), Lessons of economic stabilization and its aftermath. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cardoso, A., & Gindin, J. (2009). Industrial relations and collective bargaining: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico compared. Geneva: ILO.
Carter, M. (2010). The landless rural workers movement and democracy in Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 45(Special Issue), 186–217.CrossRef
Chesters, S. (2004). Global complexity and global civil society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(4), 323–342.CrossRef
Clausen, M. (2012). Corruption and democracy in Brazil: An interview with Prof. Timothy Power. Brasiliana – Journal of Brazilian Studies, 1(1), 107–120.
Collier, R., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Cook, M. (2002). Labor reform and dual transitions in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(1), 1–34.CrossRef
De Oliveira, F. (2006). Lula in the Labyrinth. New Left Review, 46, 5–22.
De Souza, A. (2013). The politics of personality in Brazil. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 75–88.CrossRef
Diaz, L. (2006). Resources for creating another world: Financial strategies of the world social forum. Development, 49(2), 93–101.CrossRef
Dillman, C. D. (1976). Land and labor patterns in Brazil during the 1960s. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 35(1), 49–70.CrossRef
Diniz, E. (2010). Empresariado Industrial, Representação de Interesses E Ação Política: Trajetória Histórica E Novas Configurações. Politica E Sociedade, 9(17), 101–139.CrossRef
Diniz, E., & Boschi, R. (2004). As Eleições de 2004 Na FIESP: A Politização Recente Das Relações Empresário-Estado. Conference Paper – XXVIII Encontro Nacional Da ANPOCS.
Diniz, E., & Boschi, R. (2007). A Difícil Rota Do Desenvolvimento: Empresários E Agenda Pós-Neoliberal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
Doctor, M. (2007). Lula’s Development Council Neo-Corporatism and Policy Reform in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 24(6), 131–148.CrossRef
Drake, P. (1996). Labor movements and dictatorships: The southern cone in comparative perspective. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Economist. (2013, October). Power couple. The Economist.
Ethos. (2004). O Compromisso Das Empresas Com as Metas Do Milênio. Sao Paulo.
Ethos, 2011. Proposals from the Signatories Institutions for Brazil, Civil Society and Government positioning to the negotiations to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20). Available at: http://​siteuniethos.​org.​br/​ci2012en/​wp-content/​uploads/​2012/​05/​Instituto-Ethos-and-Partners-Rio+20-Position.​pdf [Accessed August 18, 2016].
Falk, R. (2004). The declining world order: America’s imperial geopolitics. New York: Routledge.
Ferreira da Souza, P. (2012). Poverty, inequality, and social policies in Brazil, 1995–2009. International centre for inclusive growth (IPC-CG) – Working Paper 87. Brasilia: United Nations Development Programme – Brasil.
Folha. (2001, January 25). Brizola Pretende Investigar Gasto Do PT No Fórum. Folha de S. Paulo.
Friedman, E., & Hochstetler, K. (2002). Assessing the third transition in Latin American democratization: Representational regimes and civil society in Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Politics, 35(1), 21–42.CrossRef
Gantman, E. (2010). Scholarly management knowledge in the periphery: Argentina and Brazil in comparative perspective (1970–2005). Brazilian Administration Review, 7(2), 115–135.CrossRef
Gerchmann, L. (2002, February 6). Prefeito de Porto Alegre Acusa Governador Do RS de Ser ‘Stalinista.’ Folha de S. Paulo.
GIFE, 2013. O GIFE [online], available from: http://​www.​gife.​org.​br/​ogife.​asp, accessed 2 May 2011.
Gomes, E., & Guimaraes, F. (2004). Entrepreneurs: The PNBE. In M. Font & P. Spanakos (Eds.), Reforming Brazil. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Goncalves Couto, C. (1994). Mudanca E Crise: O PT No Governo de Sao Paulo. Lua Nova, 33, 145–164.
Gouvea Neto, R. (1998). Mercosur: Fostering regional economic integration. International Business Review, 40(6), 585–604.
Grajew, O. (1998, July 30). O Candidato Dos Empresarios. Folha de S. Paulo.
Grajew, O. (2002, May 6). O Candidato Dos Empresarios. Folha de S. Paulo.
Grajew, O. (2010). NGOs and the United Nations Global Compact: The link between civil society and corporations. In A. Rasche & G. Kell (Eds.), The United Nations global compact: Achievements, trends, and challenges (pp. 182–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Grün, R. (2005). Convergência Das Elites E Inovações Financeiras: A Governança Corporativa No Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 20(58), 68–90.
Hallewell, L., & Bianchi, A. (2006). Constructing hegemony: The evolution of the Pensamento Nacional Das Bases Empresariais. Latin American Perspectives, 33(3), 51–66.CrossRef
Halliday, F. (2010). Third world socialism: 1989 and after. In G. Lawson, C. Ambruster, & M. Cox (Eds.), The global 1989: Continuity and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hochstetler, K. (2008). Organized civil society in Lula’s Brazil. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil revisited (pp. 33–51). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hochstetler, K., & Viola, E. (2012). Brazil and the politics of climate change: Beyond the global commons. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 753–771.
Houtzager, P. (2001). Collective action and political authority: Rural workers, church, and state in Brazil. Theory and Society, 30(1), 1–45.CrossRef
Hunter, W. (2007). The normalization of an anomaly: The workers’ party in Brazil. World Politics, 59(3), 440–475.CrossRef
Iazzetta, O. (1996). Las Privatizaciones En Brasil Y Argentina: Una Aproximación Desde La Técnica Y La Política. Rosario: Homo Sapiens Ediciones.
IOS, 2013. Missão e História, Instituto Observatorio Social [online], available on: http://​www.​observatoriosoci​al.​org.​br/​portal/​missao-e-historia, accessed 13 March 2013.
Jaime, P. (2006). O Empresariado Ea Questão Social: Apontamentos Para a Interpretação de Um Novo Associativismo Empresarial No Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 39(4), 939–976.
Karides, M., & Ponniah, T. (2008). In defense of the world social forum VII. In J. Blau & M. Karides (Eds.), The world and US social forums: A better world is possible and necessary (pp. 7–20). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishing.
Keck, M. (1992). The workers’ party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kingstone, P. (1998). Corporatism, neoliberalism, and the failed revolt of big business: Lessons from the case of IEDI. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40(4), 73–95.CrossRef
Kingstone, P. (1999). Crafting coalitions for reform: Business preferences, political institutions, and neoliberal reform in Brazil. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Koslinski, M., & Reis, E. (2009). Transnational and domestic relations of NGOs in Brazil. World Development, 37(3), 714–725.CrossRef
Kröger, M. (2014). Contentious agency and natural resource politics. Basingstoke: Routledge.
Lazzarini, S. (2011). Capitalismo de Laços – Os Donos Do Brasil E Suas Conexões. São Paulo: Campus.
Leite, J. (2005). The world social forum: Strategies of resistance. Chicago: Haymarket.
López, R., Van Koolwijk, T., & Shah, N. (2006). World social forum financial strategy – Report and recommendations.
Louette, A. (2007). Sustainability compendium: Social and environmental responsibility management tools. São Paulo: Willis Harman House.
Lucas, J. (1997). The politics of business associations in the developing world. The Journal of Developing Areas, 32(1), 71–96.
Macaulay, F. (1996). ‘Governing for everyone’: The workers’ party administration in Sao Paulo 1989–1992’. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 15(2), 211–229.
Machado, U. (2010, October 17). Sociólogo E Fundador Do PT Afirma Que ‘Lula é Mais Privatista Que FHC.’ Folha de S. Paulo.
Magalhaes, J., & Flor, A. (2009, January 29). Patrdireito Autoral. Não Reproduza O Conteúdo Do Jornal Em Qualquer Meio de Comunicação, Eletrônico Ou Impresso, Sem Autorização Da Folhapress (pesquisa@folhapress.com.br). As Reocínio de Estatais Para Fórum Social é de R$ 850 Mil.” Folha de S. Paulo.
Mainwaring, S., & Viola, E. (1984). New social movements, political culture, and democracy: Brazil and Argentina in the 1980s. Telos, 61, 17–52.CrossRef
Mancuso, W. (2007). O Empresariado Como Ator Politico No Brasil: Balanco Da Literatura E Agenda de Pesquisa. Revista de Sociologia E Política, 28, 131–146.CrossRef
Mattar, H., & Young, R. (2009, July). The greening of Petrobras – Letter to the editor. Harvard Business Review.
Maybury-Lewis, B. (1994). The politics of the possible: The Brazilian rural workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Mollo, R., & Saad-Filho, A. M. (2006). Neoliberal economic policies in Brazil (1994–2005): Cardoso, Lula and the need for a democratic alternative. New Political Economy, 11(1), 99–123.CrossRef
Moody, K. (1997, September). Towards an international social-movement unionism. New Left Review, I/225, 52–72.
Morais, L., & Saad-Filho, A. (2005). Lula and the continuity of neoliberalism in Brazil: Strategic choice, economic imperative or political Schizophrenia. Historical Materialism, 13(1), 3–32.CrossRef
Morais, L., & Saad-Filho, A. (2012). Neo-developmentalism and the challenges of economic policy-making under Dilma Rousseff. Critical Sociology, 38(6), 789–798.CrossRef
N/A. (2014, December). The big oily. The Economist.
Navarro, Z. (2010). The Brazilian landless movement (MST): Critical times. REDES, 15(1), 196–223.
Nylen, W. (1993). Selling neoliberalism: Brazil’s Instituto Liberal. Journal of Latin American Studies, 25(2), 301–311.CrossRef
O’Donnell, G. (1988). Challenges to democratization in Brazil. World Policy Journal, 5(2), 281–300.
Payne, L. (1995). Brazilian business and democratic transition: New attitudes and influence. In E. Bartel & L. Payne (Eds.), Business and democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Pearce, J. (1997). Civil society, the market and democracy in Latin America. Democratization, 4(2), 57–83.CrossRef
Peña, A. M. (2014b). The political trajectory of the Brazilian CSR movement. Critical Perpectives on International Business, 10(4), 310–328.CrossRef
Peña, A. M., & Davies, T. (2014). Globalisation from above? Corporate social responsibility, the workers’ party and the origins of the world social forum. New Political Economy, 19(2), 258–281.CrossRef
Pereira, C., Power, T., & Raile, E. (2011). Presidentialism, coalitions, and accountability. In T. Power & M. Taylor (Eds.), Corruption and democracy in Brazil: The struggle for accountability. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Pinheiro, A. (2002). The Brazilian privatization experience: What’s next? Working Paper Number CBS-30-02, Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford.
Pinto, C. (2006). As ONGs Ea Política No Brasil: Presença de Novos Atores. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 49(3), 651–613.
Polis-Inesc. (2011). Arquitetura Da Participação No Brasil: Avanços E Desafios.
Pomar, W. (1995, June). Nacional: Empresários No PT. Teoria E Debate.
Prestes Rabelo, A. (2006). A Participação Política Em Tempos de Globalização: O Fórum Social Mundial Inaugura O Movimento Social Global. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
PT. (2002). Um Brasil Para Todos. Programa de Governo 2002 Coligaçao Lula Presidente: 1–73.
Quintão, T. (2011). A Relação Entre O (neo)patrimonialismo E a Sociedade Civil No Caso Collor. Revista Habitus – IFCS/UFRJ, 9(1), 91–108.
Raufflet, E., & do Amaral, C. G. (2007). Bridging business and society : The Abrinq foundation in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(1), 119–128.CrossRef
Ribeiro, P. (2008). Dos Sindicatos Ao Governo: A Organização Nacional Do PT de 1980 a 2005. Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos.
Ribeiro De Oliveira, P. A. (1979). The Romanization of Catholicism and Agrarian capitalism in Brazil. Social Compass, 26(2–3), 309–329.CrossRef
Roniger, L., & Sznajder, M. (2003). The legacy of human rights violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile & Uruguay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossi, C. (2002, October 28). Governo Pode Ser Enorme ca ´mara Setorial’. Folha de S. Paulo2.
Saad-Filho, A. (2013). Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, June–July 2013. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 657–669.CrossRef
Samuels, D. (2001). Money, elections, and democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(2), 27–48.CrossRef
Samuels, D. (2004). From socialism to democracy: Party organization and the transformation of the workers’ party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 999–1024.CrossRef
Santos Elias, G. (2013). A Relação Dos Partidos Políticos Com Os Movimentos Sociais: O Caso Do PT E O Fórum Social Mundial. In M. von Bulow (Ed.), forthcoming Fórum Social Mundial: A Transnacionalização Da Sociedade Civil Brasileira. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
Sartore, M. S. (2012). From philanthropy to socially responsible investment: New distinctions. Caderno CRH, 25(66), 451–464.CrossRef
Schneider, B. (1997). Organized business politics in democratic Brazil. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 39(4), 95–127.CrossRef
Schneider, B. (2004). Business politics and the state in twentieth century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Schneider, B. (2009). Big business in Brazil: Leveraging natural endowments and state support for international expansion. In L. Martinez-Diaz (Ed.), Brazil as an emerging economic superpower (pp. 159–186). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Schneider, B., & Soskice, D. (2009). Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: Coordinated, liberal and hierarchical systems. Economy and Society, 38(1), 17–52.CrossRef
Scinocca, A. (2006, June 4). Grajew Desiste de Ajudar Lula. O Estado de S. Paulo.
Scipes, K. (1992). Understanding the new labor movements in the ‘third world’: The emergence of social movement unionism’. Critical Sociology, 19(2), 81–101.CrossRef
Scolese, E. (2005, October 6). Caixa 2 é Como Jogo Do Bicho, Diz Ministro. Folha de S. Paulo.
Singer, A. (2009). Raízes Sociais E Ideológicas Do Lulismo. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 85, 83–102.
Skidmore, T. (2009). Brazil: Five centuries of change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sola, L. (2008). Politics, markets, and society in Lula’s Brazil. Journal of Democracy, 19(2), 31–45.CrossRef
Souza, C. (2001). Construção E Consolidação de Instituções Democráticas: Papel Do Orçamento Participativo. São Paulo Em Perspectiva, 15(4), 84–97.CrossRef
Teivainen, T. (2002). The world social forum and global democratisation: Learning from Porto Alegre. Third World Quarterly, 23(4), 621–632.CrossRef
Torres, C., & Mansur, C. (2008). Balanço Social, Dez Anos: O Desafio Da Transparência. Rio de Janeiro: IBASE.
UNGC, 2006. Bovespa Launches Sustainability Index. Available at: http://​www.​unglobalcompact.​org/​NewsAndEvents/​news_​archives/​2006_​01_​13.​html.​
Vergara, S., & V. Ferreira. (2010). ONGs No Brasil: Expansão, Problemas E Implicações. Revista Gestão E Tecnologia, 5(2), 41–63.
Vernengo, M. (2007). Fiscal squeeze and social policy during the Cardoso Administration (1995–2002). Latin American Perspectives, 34(5), 81–91.CrossRef
Viola, E. (2013). Transformations in Brazilian deforestation and climate policy since 2005. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14(1), 109–124.CrossRef
Viola, E., & Franchini, M. (2013). Brasil Na Governança Global Do Clima, 2005–2012 : A Luta Entre Conservadores E Reformistas. Contexto Internacional, 35(1), 43–76.CrossRef
Whitaker, F. (2004). The WSF as open space. In J. Sen, A. Anand, A. Escobar, & P. Waterman (Eds.), World social forum: Challenging empires. New Delhi: Viveka Foundation.
Williamson, J. (1993). Democracy and the ‘Washington Consensus’. World Development, 21(8), 1329–1336.CrossRef
Wirth, J. (1970). The politics of Brazilian development 1930–1954. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Young, R. (2004). Dilemmas and advances in corporate social responsibility in Brazil: The work of the Ethos institute. Natural Resources Forum, 28, 291–301.CrossRef
Zucco, C. (2008). The President’s new constituency: Lula and the pragmatic vote in Brazil’s 2006 Presidential elections. Journal of Latin American Studies, 40(1), 29–49.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sustainability, Ethical Business, and Party Politics in Brazil
verfasst von
Alejandro M.Peña
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Transnational Governance and South American Politics

Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53862-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-53863-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53863-5_5

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise