nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Teachers' Beliefs Towards Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study

verfasst von : María Cruz Sánchez-Gómez, Antonio V. Martín-García, Juanjo Mena

Erschienen in: Learning Technology for Education Challenges

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyse the main beliefs, expectations and attitudes of university teachers regarding the acceptance and adoption of blended learning (BL) methodologies using a quantitative and qualitative approach. A mixed-method design (DEXPLIS sequential explanatory model) was applied to lead the empirical analysis. A total of 982 teachers from different Spanish universities (quantitative part) and a subsample of 86 (for the qualitative study) participated in the study. The results identify a series of beliefs (advantages and disadvantages), as well as the main demands of these teachers related to the implementation of BL.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Computer Application for the Evaluation of Mathematical Competence in Secondary Education: A Case Study

Nächstes Kapitel Motivating Engineer Students in E-learning Courses with Problem Based Learning and Self-Regulated Learning on the apT2CLE4‘Research Methods’ Environment

Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R.: The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2005)

Garrison, D.R., Vaughan, N.D.: Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558.fmatterCrossRef

Margulieux, L.E., McCracken, W.M., Catrambone, R.: A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning. Educ. Res. Rev. 19, 104–118 (2016)CrossRef

Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A., Sicilia, N.: Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 15(1), 3 (2018)CrossRef

Becker, S.A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C.G., Ananthanarayanan, V.: NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition, pp. 1–60. The New Media Consortium (2017)

Lim, C.P., Wang, L.: Blended Learning for Quality Higher Education: Selected Case Studies on Implementation from Asia-Pacific. UNESCO, Bangkok (2017)

Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Bodily, R.G., Sandberg, D.S.: A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 28, 17–27 (2016)CrossRef

Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A., Picciano, A.: A study of faculty governance leaders’ perceptions of online and blended learning. Online Learn. 20(3), 52–73 (2016)CrossRef

Duarte Hueros, A., Guzmán Franco, M.D., Yot Domínguez, C.R.: Aportaciones de la formación blended learning al desarrollo profesional docente. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 21(1), 155–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.19013CrossRef

10.

Ellis, R.A., Steed, A.F., Applebee, A.C.: Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 22(3), 312–335 (2006). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.128CrossRef

11.

Jokinen, P., Mikkonen, I.: Teachers’ experiences of teaching in a blended learning environment. Nurse Educ. Pract. 13(6), 524–528 (2013)CrossRef

12.

Martín García, A.V., Sánchez Gómez, M.C.: Modelo predictivo de la intención de adopción de Blended learning en profesores universitarios. Universitas Psychologica 13(2), 601–614 (2014)CrossRef

13.

Venezky, R.L., Davis, C.: Quo vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Version 8c. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris (2002). www.OECD.org/pdf/M00027000/M00027107.pdf

14.

Eickelmann, B., Vennemann, M.: Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 16(6), 733–761 (2017)CrossRef

15.

Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef

16.

Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008CrossRef

17.

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRef

18.

Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.xCrossRef

19.

Al-Busaidi, K.A.: An empirical investigation linking learners’ adoption of blended learning to their intention of full e-learning. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32(11), 1168–1176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.774047CrossRef

20.

Chen, J.L.: The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Comput. Educ. 57, 1501–1511 (2011)CrossRef

21.

Konak, A., Kulturel-Konak, S., Nasereddin, M., Bartolacci, M.R.: Impact of collaborative work on technology acceptance: a case study from virtual computing. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 16(1), 15–29 (2017)

22.

Teo, T.: Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers’ acceptance of technology: assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Comput. Educ. 83, 22–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015CrossRef

23.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.L., Xu, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 328–376 (2016). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800121

24.

Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R.: Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(4), 748–762 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12269CrossRef

25.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., Baptista Lucio, P.: Metodología de la investigación, 6a edn. Editorial Mc Graw Hill, México (2014)

26.

Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)

27.

Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.): Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)

28.

Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., García, A.V.M.: Convergence between quantitative and qualitative methodological orientations: mixed models. In: Costa, A.P., Reis, L.P., Souza, F.N., Moreira, A. (eds.) ISQR 2017. AISC, vol. 621, pp. 341–357. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_29CrossRef

29.

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press, New York (2011)CrossRef

30.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540CrossRef

31.

Brown, S.A., Dennis, A.R., Venkatesh, V.: Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 9–54 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201CrossRef

32.

Teo, T., Fan, X., Du, J.: Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: does gender matter? Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 31, 235–251 (2015)

33.

Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Duyck, W., Duyck, P.: Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: a crosssectional study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 568–575 (2011)CrossRef

34.

Šumak, B., Šorgo, A.: The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: differences in UTAUT determinants between pre-and post-adopters. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 602–620 (2016)CrossRef

35.

Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry, vol. 75. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1985)

36.

Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S.: Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1989)

37.

Sánchez Gómez, M.C., Delgado, M.C., Santos, M.C.: El proceso de la investigación cualitativa. Manual de procedimiento: ejemplificación con una tesis doctoral. Editras, Salamanca (2012)

38.

Palacios Vicario, B., Sánchez Gómez, M.C., Gutiérrez García, A.: Evaluar la calidad en la investigación cualitativa. Guías o checklists. In: Actas del 20 Congreso Nacional sobre Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación, vol. 3, pp. 581−596 (2013)

39.

García-Peñalvo, F.J., Moreno López, L., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: Qual. Quant. 52, 2427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0808-4CrossRef

Titel: Teachers' Beliefs Towards Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study
verfasst von: María Cruz Sánchez-Gómez
Antonio V. Martín-García
Juanjo Mena
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Learning Technology for Education Challenges
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20797-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-20798-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_16

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"