Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 3/2021

01.09.2021 | Original Paper

Temperature Influence on High-Density Polyethylene Geomembrane and Soil Interface Shear Strength

verfasst von: Ö. Bilgin, B. Shah

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The effect of temperature on soil–geomembrane interface shear strength is investigated using a large direct shear device placed inside a walk-in temperature chamber. Geomembranes with different thicknesses and surfaces (smooth and textured) were used in this study. The tests were performed under range of varying normal stresses. The influence of the temperature on both peak and residual interface shear strength, as well as the displacement characteristics was analyzed. The study results show that the soil–geomembrane interface shear strength is lower at higher temperatures. A reduction in the interface shear strength of as much as 20% was observed in the tests performed at 42 °C compared to the tests performed at 3 °C. The results also show that much larger displacements are needed at higher temperatures to mobilize peak interface shear strength.
Vorheriger Artikel A Non-conventional Durability Test for Simulating Creep of Geosynthetics Under Accelerated Degradation
Nächster Artikel Constitutive Modelling of Short-Term Tensile Response of Geotextile Subjected to Mechanical and Abrasion Damages

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
2.
Mitchell JK, Seed RB, Seed HB (1990) Kettleman hills waste landfill slope failure. I. Liner-system properties. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 116(4):647–668CrossRef
3.
Martin JP, Koerner RM, Whitty JE (1984) Experimental friction evaluation of slippage between geomembranes, geotextiles, and soils. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Geomembranes, Denver, CO, pp 191–196
4.
Saxena SK, Wong YT (1984) Friction characteristics of a geomembrane. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Geomembranes, Denver, CO, pp 187–190
5.
Williams ND, Houlihan MF (1987) Evaluation of interface friction properties between geosynthetics and soils. Geosynthetics 87:616–627
6.
O’Rourke TD, Druschel SJ, Netravali AN (1990) Shear strength characteristics of sand-polymer interfaces. J. Geotech Eng ASCE 116:451–469CrossRef
7.
Dove JE, Frost JD (1999) Peak friction behavior of smooth geomembrane-particle interfaces. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 125(7):544–555CrossRef
8.
Dove JE, Jarrett JB (2002) Behavior of dilative sand interfaces in a geotribology framework. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 128(1):25–37CrossRef
9.
DeJong JT, Westgate ZJ (2005) Role of overconsolidation on sand-geomembrane interface response and material damage evolution. Geotext Geomembr 23:486–512CrossRef
10.
Dove JE, Bents DD, Wang J, Gao B (2006) Particle-scale surface interactions of non-dilative interface systems. Geotext Geomembr 24:156–168CrossRef
11.
Bilgin Ö, Stewart HE (2006) Effect of temperature on surface hardness and soil interface shear resistance of geosynthetics. Proc Int Conf Geosynth 1:251–254
12.
Lefebvre X, Lanini S, Houi D (2000) The role of aerobic activity on refuse temperature rise, landfill experimental study. Waste Manag Res 18:444–452CrossRef
13.
Yesiller N, Hanson JL, Liu W-L (2005) Heat generation in municipal solid waste landfills. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(11):1330–1344CrossRef
14.
Bilgin Ö, Stewart HE, O’Rourke TD (2007) Thermal and mechanical properties of polyethylene pipes. J Mater Civil Eng ASCE 19(12):1043–1052CrossRef
15.
Karademir T, Frost JD (2011) Comparison of direct and indirect assessments of temperature effects on interface shear strength between sand and HDPE geomembranes. In: Proceedings of 2011 Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, Toronto, Canada, CD-ROM
16.
Shooter KV, Tabor D (1952) The frictional properties of plastics. Proc Phys Soc Ser B 65:661–671CrossRef
17.
Bowden FP, Tabor D (1956) Friction and lubrication. Methuen, LondonMATH
18.
Adamson AW (1982) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Wiley, New York
19.
Briscoe BJ (1992) Friction of organic polymers. In: Singler IL, Pollock HM (eds) Fundamentals of friction: macroscopic and microscopic processes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 167–182CrossRef
20.
Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW (1993) Engineering tribology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
21.
Akpinar MV, Benson CH (2005) Effect of temperature on shear strength of two geomembranes-geotextile interfaces. Geotext Geomembr 23:443–453CrossRef
22.
ASTM D5199 (2019) Standard test method for measuring the nominal thickness of geosynthetics. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
23.
ASTM D1505 (2018) Standard test method for density of plastics by the density-gradient technique. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 08.01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
24.
ASTM D6693 (2020) Standard test method for determining tensile properties of nonreinforced polyethylene and nonreinforced flexible polypropylene geomembranes. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
25.
ASTM D1004 (2018) Standard test method for initial tear resistance of plastic film and sheeting. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 08.01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
26.
ASTM D4833 (2020) Standard test method for index puncture resistance of geotextiles, geomembranes and related products. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
27.
ASTM D2487 (2020) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). 2020 Annual Book of Standards, D2487. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
28.
ASTM C778 (2016) Standard specification for standard sand. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
29.
ASTM D5321 (2020) Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
Metadaten
Titel
Temperature Influence on High-Density Polyethylene Geomembrane and Soil Interface Shear Strength
verfasst von
Ö. Bilgin
B. Shah
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00311-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Laboratory Degradation of a Reinforcement PET-PP Geocomposite Under Accelerated Weathering Conditions

Original Paper

Strengthening of Slope by Soil Nailing Using Finite Difference and Limit Equilibrium Methods

Correction

Correction to: Application of Jute–Polypropylene Blended Geotextile in Black Cotton Soil Subgrade for Low Volume Road Construction

Original Paper

Improving the Stability of High Embankments Founded on Soft Marine Clay by Utilizing Prefabricated Vertical Drains and Controlling the Pace of Construction

Technical Note

Evaluating the Degradation of a Nonwoven Polypropylene Geotextile Exposed to Natural Weathering for 3 Years

Original Paper

Application of Jute–Polypropylene Blended Geotextile in Black Cotton Soil Subgrade for Low Volume Road Construction