Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
In AI We Trust: Characteristics Influencing Assortment Planners’ Perceptions of AI Based Recommendation Agents Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Testing the Convergent Validity of Continuous Self-Perceived Measurement Systems: An Exploratory Study

verfasst von : Sébastien Lourties, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Sylvain Sénécal, Marc Fredette, Shang Lin Chen

Erschienen in: HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper explores the convergent validity of instruments that can provide higher temporal resolution when measuring user experience: the continuous self-perceived measurement system and psychophysiological measures. Specifically, we explore the extent to which primacy and recency effects may have an impact on the convergent validity of two constructs: valence and arousal. Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, results suggest that users self-evaluate their valence more accurately at the end of each of the sequences than at the beginning while they evaluate their arousal more accurately at the beginning of each of the sequences. This suggests that the recency effect has more impact on valence and the primacy effect has more impact on arousal. These findings contribute to human-computer interaction research by providing more information about the psychophysiological measures that cause recency and primacy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Kansei Operation: The Application of Kansei Engineering Technology to the Operating Activities of Financial Products in the Big Data Era
Nächstes Kapitel Towards Measuring the Potential for Semantically Enriched Texts in Knowledge Working Environments
Literatur
1.
Bartlett, M.S., Littlewort, G., Lainscsek, C., Fasel, I., Movellan, J.: Machine learning methods for fully automatic recognition of facial expressions and facial actions. In: IEEE International Conference Systems, Man Cybernetics, pp. 592–597 (2004)
2.
3.
Bradley, M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment semantic differential manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)CrossRef
4.
Bradley, M.M., Greenwald, M.K., Petry, M.C., Lang, P.J.: Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18(2), 379–390 (1992)CrossRef
5.
Burke, A., Heuer, F., Reisberg, D.: Remembering emotional events. Memory Cogn. 20(3), 277–290 (1992)CrossRef
6.
Cahill, L., McGaugh, J.L.: A novel demonstration of enhance memory associated with emotional arousal. Conscious. Cogn. 4, 410–421 (1995)CrossRef
7.
Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., Gutwin, C.: Examining the peak-end effects of subjective experience. In: CHI 2015, pp. 357–366 (2015)
8.
Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., Gutwin, C.: The effects of interaction sequencing on user experience and preference. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 108, 89–104 (2017)CrossRef
9.
Colombetti, G.: Appraising valence. J. Conscious. Stud. 12(24), 103–126 (2005)
10.
Conway, M.A.: Cognitive Models of Memory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
11.
Courtemanche, F., Léger, P.-M., Dufresne, A., Fredette, M., Labonté-LeMoyne, É., Sénécal, S: Physiological heatmaps: a tool for visualizing users’ emotional reactions. Multimed Tools Appl. 77, 1–28 (2017)
12.
Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Savvidou, S., Mcmahon, E., Sawey, M., Schröder, M.: “Feeltrace”: an instrument for recording perceived emotion in real time. In: ISCA ITRW on Speech and Emotion, pp. 19–24 (2000)
13.
Craik, F.I.M., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11(6), 671–684 (1972)CrossRef
14.
Dirican, A.C., Göktürk, M.: Psychophysiological measures of human cognitive states applied in Human Computer Interaction. Procedia Comput. Sci. 3, 1361–1367 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Ekman, P.: Facial expression and emotion. Am. Psychol. 48(4), 384–392 (1993)CrossRef
16.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.: Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17(2), 124–129 (1972)CrossRef
17.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Unmasking the Face. Prentice Hall, Cambridge (2003)
18.
Foster, I., Kesselman, C.: The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2004)
19.
Fredette, M., Labonté-LeMoyne, É., Léger, P.-M., Courtemanche, F., Sénécal, S.: Research directions for methodological improvement of the statistical analysis of electroencephalography data collected in NeuroIS. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience. LNISO, vol. 10, pp. 201–206. Springer, Cham (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-18702-0_​27CrossRef
20.
Fredrickson, B.L., Kahneman, D.: Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65(1), 45–55 (1993)CrossRef
21.
22.
Girard, J.M.: CARMA: software for continuous affect rating and media annotation. J. Open Res. Softw. 2, 1–11 (2017)
23.
Girard, J.M., Aidan, A.G.: DARMA: software for dual axis rating and media annotation. Behav. Res. Methods 1–8 (2017)
24.
Hamann, S.: Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5(9), 394–400 (2001)CrossRef
25.
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRef
26.
Ortiz de Guinea, A., Webster, J.: An investigation of information systems use patterns: technological events as triggers, the effect of time, and consequences for performance. MIS Q. 37(4), 1165–1188 (2013)CrossRef
27.
Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., Cacioppo, J.T.: Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75(4), 887–900 (1998)CrossRef
28.
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B.L., Schreiber, C.A., Redelmeier, D.: When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end. Psychol. Sci. 4(6), 401–405 (1993)CrossRef
29.
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M.: Principles of Neural Science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, New York (2000)
30.
Kensinger, E.A., Corkin, S.: Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101(9), 3310–3315 (2004)CrossRef
31.
Lallemand, C., Gronier, G.: Méthodes de design UX: 30 méthodes fondamentales pour concevoir et évaluer les systèmes interactifs. Eyrolles (2015)
32.
Lane, R.D., Chua, P.M.-L., Dolan, R.D.: Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia 37(9), 989–997 (1999)CrossRef
33.
Laurans, G., Desmet, P.M.A., Hekkert, P.: The emotion slider: a self-report device for the continuous measurement of emotion. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, ACII 2009, 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, pp. 1–6 (2009)
34.
Léger, P.-M., Davis, F.D., Cronan, T.P., Perret, J.: Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive absorption in an enactive training context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 273–283 (2012)CrossRef
35.
Léger, P.-M., Titah, R., Sénecal, S., Fredette, M., Courtemanche, F., Labonté-LeMoyne, É., De Guinea, A.O.: Precision is in the eye of the beholder: application of eye fixation-related potentials to information systems research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 651–678 (2014). Suppl. Special Issue on Methods, Tools, and Measurement
36.
Mather, M., Sutherland, M.R.: Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6(2), 114–133 (2011)CrossRef
37.
McGaugh, J.L.: The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 1–28 (2004)CrossRef
38.
McGaugh, J.L., Cahill, L., Roozendaal, B.: Involvement of the amygdala in memory storage: interaction with other brain systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93(24), 13508–13514 (1996)CrossRef
39.
Mello, S.K.D., Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Franklin, S., Picard, R., Graesser, A.C.: Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop at 2005 International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 7–13. ACM Press, New York (2005)
40.
Murdoch, B.B., Lissner, E., Marvin, C.: The serial position effect of free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 64(5), 482–488 (1962)CrossRef
41.
Nagel, F., Kopiez, R., Grewe, O., Altenmuller, E.: EMuJoy: software for continuous measurement. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 283–290 (2007)CrossRef
42.
Ortiz de Guinea, A., Titah, R., Leger, P.-M.: Explicit and implicit antecedents of users’ information systems behavioral beliefs: a neuropsychological investigation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 179–210 (2014)CrossRef
43.
Ortiz de Guinea, A., Titah, R., Léger, P.-M.: Measure for measure: a two study multi-trait multi-method investigation of construct validity in IS research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 833–844 (2013)CrossRef
44.
Plutchik, R.: A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In: Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, pp. 189–217. Academic Press, New York (1980)CrossRef
45.
Posner, J., Russell, J.A., Peterson, B.S.: The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev. Psychopathol. 17(3), 715–734 (2008)
46.
Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., Kivikangas, M.: Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: does it matter with whom you play? Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 15(4), 381–392 (2006)CrossRef
47.
Redelmeier, D.A., Kahneman, D.: Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66(1), 3–8 (1996)CrossRef
48.
49.
Russel, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRef
50.
Sas, C., Dix, A., Hart, J., Ronghui, S.: Emotional experience on Facebook site. In: CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4345–4350 (2009)
51.
Shteingart, H., Neiman, T., Loewenstein, Y.: The role of first impression in operant learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(2), 476–488 (2013)CrossRef
52.
Den Uyl, M.J., Van Kuilenburg, H.: The FaceReader: online facial expression recognition. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior, pp. 589–590 (2005)
53.
Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Law, E.L., Roto, V.: User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, pp. 521–530 (2010)
54.
Zauberman, G., Diehl, K., Ariely, D.: Hedonic versus informational evaluations: Task dependent preferences for sequences of outcomes. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 19(3), 191–211 (2006)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Testing the Convergent Validity of Continuous Self-Perceived Measurement Systems: An Exploratory Study
verfasst von
Sébastien Lourties
Pierre-Majorique Léger
Sylvain Sénécal
Marc Fredette
Shang Lin Chen
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91715-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91716-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91716-0_11