Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Banking and Insurance Sector

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter focuses on procedures and mechanisms to control foreign direct investments into the EU banking and insurance sector. It explains and analyzes the relationship between the prudential ownership control procedures under EU supervisory law and the proposed FDI screening mechanisms under Regulation 2019/452. In the outset, an overview on prudential ownership control and the FDI screening mechanisms under Regulation 2019/452 is given. Then the main areas and principles of prudential supervision are described for credit institutions, insurance companies and investment firms, followed by a detailed explanation of prudential ownership control requirements and procedures. On this basis, an analysis of the new framework for the screening of foreign direct investments under Regulation 2019/452 is undertaken with regard to the possible design of the screening mechanisms, the application of such mechanisms to financial institutions in addition to the prudential ownership control procedures and the new cooperation mechanisms between Member States and the Commission. The analysis shows that Member States are not obliged to adopt an FDI screening mechanism for foreign direct investments into financial institutions. As prudential ownership control requirements always apply, a Member State may refrain from setting up an additional FDI screening mechanism if security and public order in the sense of Regulation 2019/452 are effectively protected by prudential ownership control procedures. This may be the case with regard to the protection of the financial infrastructure of the Member States and the Union against risks posed by certain foreign investments; the same could be held with regard to the protection of sensitive data collected by financial institutions and to the defence against foreign investors involved in criminal activities. So far, the prudential ownership control procedures may be described as a hidden investment screening mechanism already in place. However, as the prudential ownership control is neutral as to the origin of a foreign investor and does not discriminate against certain foreign states, it may be necessary for Member States to set up an FDI screening mechanism at least to screen the proposed acquisition of qualifying holdings in financial institutions by certain foreign states and state funds. Furthermore, Regulation 2019/452 provides for cooperation mechanisms between Member States and the Commission with regard to foreign direct investments, independent of whether such investments are subject to FDI screenings or not, for which there is no corresponding concept under supervisory law.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
For a discussion of market access for financial services providers in case of Brexit, see Berger and Badenhoop (2018).
 
2
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, pp. 1–337.
 
3
Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC, OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, pp. 338–436.
 
4
Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, pp. 349–496.
 
5
Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance, OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, pp. 1–155.
 
6
European Banking Authority (EBA) et al. (20 December 2016), Joint Guidelines on the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in the financial sector, JC/GL/2016/01.
 
7
Art. 2(4), Regulation 2019/452.
 
8
Copenhagen Economics (2018), Screening of FDI towards the EU, p. 10.
 
9
See Below Sect. 4.2.1.
 
10
Lippert (2019), p. 1538.
 
11
Recital 8, Regulation 2019/452.
 
12
Recital 17, Regulation 2019/452. Currently 15 Member States have established national screening mechanisms, which will in future need to comply with the framework under Regulation 2019/452.
 
13
Lippert (2019), p. 1540.
 
14
Directives and regulations in the sense of Art. 288 TFEU.
 
15
Art. 4 (1) no. 1 CRR.
 
16
Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC, OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, pp. 338–436.
 
17
In Germany, e.g., the CRD IV-requirements are transposed in the Kreditwesengesetz (German Banking Act).
 
18
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, pp. 1–337.
 
19
Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions, OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, pp. 63–89.
 
20
The Single Rulebook contains prudential rules for all banks supervised in the European Union. It consists of all directly applicable European Regulations, national supervisory laws implementing EU Directives, as well as guidelines and recommendations of the European Banking Authority (EBA); Berger (2018), p. 1909.
 
21
European Commission Fact Sheet (16 April 2019), Adoption of the banking package: revised rules on capital requirements (CRRII/CRD V) and resolution (BRRD/SRM), http://​europa.​eu/​rapid/​press-release_​MEMO-19-2129_​en.​htm.
 
22
Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, pp. 349–496.
 
23
In Germany, the MIFID II-requirements are transposed in the Kreditwesengesetz (German Banking Act) and the Wertpapierhandelsgesetz (German Securities Trading Act).
 
24
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, pp. 84–148.
 
25
Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, pp. 1–155.
 
26
Directive No. 2014/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directives 2003/71/EC and 2009/138/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, pp. 1–61.
 
27
In Germany, the Solvency II-requirements are transposed in the Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz (German Insurance Supervision Act).
 
28
Ohler (2013), p. 647.
 
29
Berger (2018), p. 1908; Badenhoop (2020).
 
30
Recital 73 of Solvency II.
 
31
Art. 176 of Solvency II.
 
32
Recital 10 of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/1946 of 11 July 2017 supplementing Directives 2004/39/EC and 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for an exhaustive list of information to be included by proposed acquirers in the notification of a proposed acquisition of a qualifying holding in an investment firm, OJ L 276, 26.10.2017, pp. 32–43.
 
33
Art. 5 (2) Commission Delegated Regulation 2017/1946.
 
34
Berger (2018), p. 684.
 
35
For details see below Sect. 3.
 
36
Berger (2016a), p. 2326.
 
37
Lackhoff (2017), p. 1.
 
38
Art.4 (1) no. 20 CRR.
 
39
Art. 4 (1) no. 21 CRR.
 
40
Lackhoff (2017), p. 138.
 
41
Art. 6 (4) SSMR, Lackhoff (2017), p. 159.
 
42
Art. 6 (4) SSMR, Lackhoff (2017), p. 137.
 
43
Berger (2016a), p. 2326.
 
44
Moloney (2014), p. 407.
 
45
Steck (2018), p. 155.
 
46
Steck (2018), p. 156.
 
47
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC, OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, pp. 12–47.
 
48
While some Member States may implement JC/GL/2016/01 into national law (for Germany see Herz (2019), p. 64), they are not obliged to do so and may also set deviating national law, as long as they comply with Art. 16 of Regulation No. 1093/2010. As to sector-specific information requirements see below under Sect. 3.2.3.3.
 
49
Art. 22 (1) CRD IV; Art. 4 (1) no. 36 CRR.
 
50
Art. 4 (1) no. 36 CRR.
 
51
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 12.
 
52
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 12.
 
53
Steck (2018), p. 160.
 
54
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) (27 November 2015), Merkblatt zur Inhaberkontrolle, II 1).
 
55
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 14.
 
56
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 15.
 
57
BaFin (27 November 2015), Merkblatt zur Inhaberkontrolle, IV.1.
 
58
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 16.
 
59
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 10.
 
60
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 16.
 
61
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 17.
 
62
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 17.
 
63
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 18.
 
64
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 18.
 
65
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 18; a good overview over equivalence rules in financial services is provided by European Parliament Economic Governance Support Unit from DG Internal Policies, Briefing of 12 July 2017, ’Third-country equivalence in EU banking legislation’, PE 587.369; Berger and Badenhoop (2018), p. 684; Ceyssens and Tarde (2019), p. 805.
 
66
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 29.7.2019, COM(2019) 349 final: https://​eur-lex.​europa.​eu/​resource.​html?​uri=​cellar:​989ca6f3-b1de-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1.​0001.​02/​DOC_​1&​format=​PDF.
 
67
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 17.
 
68
Steck (2018), p. 157.
 
69
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 20.
 
70
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 20.
 
71
See Sect. 2.2.
 
72
For details of the ownership control procedure within the SSM see below Sect. 3.3.1.
 
73
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 19.
 
74
Art. 22 (2) CRD IV.
 
75
Art. 23 (4) CRD IV.
 
76
See Sect. 3.1.
 
77
Section 5 (3) of Annex I of the JC/GL/2016/01, p. 38.
 
78
Section 5 (4) of Annex I of the JC/GL/2016/01, p. 38.
 
79
Art. 23 CRD IV, Art. 13 MiFID II, Art. 59 Solvency II.
 
80
European Commission Communication (11 February 2013), Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Application of Directive 2007/44/EC amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector, COM/2013/64/Final, p. 8.
 
81
Lackhoff (2017), p. 174.
 
82
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 21.
 
83
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 21.
 
84
Steck (2018), p. 173.
 
85
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 24.
 
86
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 24.
 
87
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 25.
 
88
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 21.
 
89
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 26.
 
90
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 27.
 
91
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 29.
 
92
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 29.
 
93
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 30.
 
94
JC/GL/2016/01, pp. 30–31.
 
95
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 27.
 
96
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 28.
 
97
Lackhoff (2017), p. 174.
 
98
JC/GL/2016/01, p. 30.
 
99
Art. 53 CRD IV, Art. 75 MiFID II, Art. 64 Solvency II.
 
100
Art. 53 (2) CRD IV.
 
101
Smits and Badenhoop (2019), pp. 299–313.
 
102
Smits and Badenhoop (2019), pp. 314–318.
 
103
Art. 27 (1) SSMR.
 
104
Smits and Badenhoop (2019), p. 303.
 
105
Art. 86 (1) SSMFR.
 
106
Art. 15 (3) SSMR.
 
107
Art. 15 (3) SSMR.
 
108
Berger (2016b), p. 2362.
 
109
Art. 177 (2) b) Solvency II.
 
110
Art. 24 SSMR applies within the SSM. Outside of the SSM, national laws determine the available legal remedy pursuant to Art. 19 (1) 2nd sub-paragraph TEU.
 
111
Art. 263 4th sub-paragraph TFEU or respectively national procedural laws pursuant to Art. 19 (1) 2nd sub-paragraph TEU.
 
112
Lackhoff (2017), p. 248.
 
113
See footnote 115.
 
114
Art. 263 (2), (4) TFEU.
 
115
Art. 264 TFEU, Lackhoff (2017), p. 253.
 
116
See above Sect. 1.4.3.
 
117
See above Sect. 1.4.4.
 
118
See Sect. 1.4.4.
 
119
See above Sect. 1.4.2.
 
120
This could include major CRR Credit Institutions supervised by the ECB within the SSM as well as major insurance and reinsurance undertakings.
 
121
See above Sect. 2.1.2.
 
122
See above Sect. 4.2.1.
 
123
See above Sect. 3.3.5.1.
 
124
See above Sect. 3.2.3.5 Reputation and Reliability and 3.2.3.5 Suspicion of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing.
 
125
See above Sects. 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.
 
126
See above Sect. 3.3.5.1.
 
127
Recital 16 Regulation 2019/452.
 
128
See Sects. 3.2 and 3.3.
 
129
With regard to macro-prudential oversight the EU has created the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) by Regulation (EU) No. 1092/2010 (OJ L 331/1), which, however, does not participate in individual prudential decisions.
 
130
Hindelang (2009), pp. 294–297.
 
131
Art. 8 of Directive 89/646/ECC of 15 December 1989 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions and amending Directive 77/780/EEC, OJ L 386, 30.12.1989, pp. 1–13.
 
132
Art. (2) of Directive 2004/39/EG of 21 April 2004 on markets and financial instruments amending Council Directive 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC, OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, pp. 1–44.
 
133
See above Sect. 3.3.2.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Badenhoop N (2020) Individual protection goals in EU prudential regulation - a process towards private law enforcement. In: Grundmann S, Sirena P (eds) European contract law in the banking and financial union. Intersentia, Cambridge (in press) Badenhoop N (2020) Individual protection goals in EU prudential regulation - a process towards private law enforcement. In: Grundmann S, Sirena P (eds) European contract law in the banking and financial union. Intersentia, Cambridge (in press)
Zurück zum Zitat Berger H (2016a) Rechtsanwendung durch die EZB im Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), Teil I. Wertpapiermitteilungen 49:2325–2336 Berger H (2016a) Rechtsanwendung durch die EZB im Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), Teil I. Wertpapiermitteilungen 49:2325–2336
Zurück zum Zitat Berger H (2016b) Rechtsanwendung durch die EZB im Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), Teil II. Wertpapiermitteilungen 50–52:2362–2369 Berger H (2016b) Rechtsanwendung durch die EZB im Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), Teil II. Wertpapiermitteilungen 50–52:2362–2369
Zurück zum Zitat Berger H (2018) Bankaufsichtsrecht. In: Lieder J, Wilk C, Ghassemi-Tabar N (eds) Münchner Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Band 8, Umwandlungsrecht, 5th edn. C.H. Beck, München Berger H (2018) Bankaufsichtsrecht. In: Lieder J, Wilk C, Ghassemi-Tabar N (eds) Münchner Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Band 8, Umwandlungsrecht, 5th edn. C.H. Beck, München
Zurück zum Zitat Berger H, Badenhoop N (2018) Financial services and Brexit: navigating towards future market access. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 19:679–714CrossRef Berger H, Badenhoop N (2018) Financial services and Brexit: navigating towards future market access. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 19:679–714CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ceyssens H, Tarde A (2019) Äquivalenz im Finanzdienstleistungsrecht der Europäischen Union. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 30:805–812 Ceyssens H, Tarde A (2019) Äquivalenz im Finanzdienstleistungsrecht der Europäischen Union. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 30:805–812
Zurück zum Zitat Herz B (2019) Die Entwicklung des europäischen Bankaufsichtsrecht in den Jahren 2017/2018. Teil II. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 30:60–67 Herz B (2019) Die Entwicklung des europäischen Bankaufsichtsrecht in den Jahren 2017/2018. Teil II. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 30:60–67
Zurück zum Zitat Hindelang S (2009) The free movement of capital and foreign direct investment-the scope of protection in EU law. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Hindelang S (2009) The free movement of capital and foreign direct investment-the scope of protection in EU law. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lackhoff K (2017) Single supervisory mechanism- European banking supervision by the SSM-A practitioner’s guide. C.H. Beck, München Lackhoff K (2017) Single supervisory mechanism- European banking supervision by the SSM-A practitioner’s guide. C.H. Beck, München
Zurück zum Zitat Lippert A (2019) Investitionskontrolle reloaded – Auswirkungen der neuen EU-Verordnung zur Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen. Betriebsberater:1538–1543 Lippert A (2019) Investitionskontrolle reloaded – Auswirkungen der neuen EU-Verordnung zur Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen. Betriebsberater:1538–1543
Zurück zum Zitat Moloney N (2014) EU securities and financial markets regulation, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Moloney N (2014) EU securities and financial markets regulation, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ohler C (2013) Finanzmarktregulierung und –aufsicht. In: Hatje A, Müller-Graff PC, Ruffert M (eds) Enzyklopädie Europarecht, vol. 5, Europäisches Sektorales Wirtschaftsrecht. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 611–669 Ohler C (2013) Finanzmarktregulierung und –aufsicht. In: Hatje A, Müller-Graff PC, Ruffert M (eds) Enzyklopädie Europarecht, vol. 5, Europäisches Sektorales Wirtschaftsrecht. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 611–669
Zurück zum Zitat Smits R, Badenhoop N (2019) Towards a single standard of professional secrecy for financial sector supervisory authorities: a reform proposal. Eur Law Rev 44:295–318 Smits R, Badenhoop N (2019) Towards a single standard of professional secrecy for financial sector supervisory authorities: a reform proposal. Eur Law Rev 44:295–318
Zurück zum Zitat Steck A (2018) Beteiligungskontrolle. In: Binder J, Glos A, Riepe J (eds) Handbuch Bankenaufsichtsrecht. RWS Verlag Kommunikationsforum GmbH, Köln Steck A (2018) Beteiligungskontrolle. In: Binder J, Glos A, Riepe J (eds) Handbuch Bankenaufsichtsrecht. RWS Verlag Kommunikationsforum GmbH, Köln
Metadaten
Titel
The Banking and Insurance Sector
verfasst von
Henning Berger
Copyright-Jahr
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/16495_2020_18

Premium Partner