nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. The Capability-Expectations Gap: A Double Reading

verfasst von : Henrik Larsen

Erschienen in: Gaps in EU Foreign Policy

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter first analyses the principal texts in which Hill describes the Capability-Expectations Gap (CEG). The aim is to identify the dominant discourse in these texts. The chapter then turns to a deconstructivist reading of the texts. The aim here is to identify tensions in the texts that challenge the dominant discourse in the first reading of Hill’s texts. The purpose is to carry out a double reading of the texts on the CEG. The double reading draws on the theoretical considerations in Chapter 2.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Performativity of Theories

Nächstes Kapitel The Performativity of the Capability-Expectations Gap

Throughout this section on Hill’s 1993 article, I refer to the EC in accordance with Hill’s usage before the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty.

The reference to Hill 1998a in the quote corresponds to Hill 1998 in the reference list in this chapter.

The definition in the Oxford English Dictionary online also sheds light on this double meaning, although it puts up six meanings of the term gap.http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/76658?rskey=NOa9zT&result=1#eid

Hill refers to articles by Holland (1995) and Allen (1989) for his functionalist vocabulary.

Hill takes the term “credibility gap” from Regelsberger (1997).

Allen, D. 1989. “The Context of Foreign Policy Systems: The Contemporary International Environment.” In Understanding Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy Systems Approach, eds. M. Clarke and B. White (chapter 5). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Hill, C. 1993. “The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualising’s Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 305–328.CrossRef

Hill, C. 1998. “Closing the Capability-Expectations Gap?” In A Common Foreign Policy For Europe?, eds. J. Peterson and H. Sjursen, 18–38. London: Routledge.

Hill, C. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hill, C. 2004, March. “Renationalising or Regrouping? EU Foreign Policy since 11 September 2001.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 1.CrossRef

Hill, C. 2007. “The Future of the EU as a Global Actor.” In Managing a Multilevel Foreign Policy: The EU in International Affairs, eds. P. Foradori, P. Rosa and R. Scartezzini, 3–21. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Hill, C. 2016. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave: London.

Hill, C., and M. Smith eds. 2011a. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hill, C., and M. Smith. 2005. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hill, C., and M. Smith. 2011b. “International Relations and the European Union: Themes and Issues.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C. Hill and M. Smith, 4–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holland, M. 1995. “Bridging the Capability-Expectation Gap: A Case Study of the CFSP Joint Action on South Africa.” Journal of Common Market Studies 33(4): 555–572.CrossRef

Peterson, J., and H. Sjursen eds. 1998. A Common Foreign Policy For Europe?. Routledge: London.

Regelsberger, E. 1997. “From EPC to CFSP: Does Maastrict Push the EU Towards a Role as a Global Power?” In Foreign Policy of the European Union: from EPC to CFSP and Beyond, eds. E. Regelsberger, P. De Schouteete, and W. Wessels, 1–19. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.

Van Parijs, W. 1981. Evolutionary Explanations in the Social Sciences. Totowa, NJ: Rowmand and Littlefield.

White, Brian. 2001. Understanding European Foreign Policy. Houndsmills: Palgave.CrossRef

Titel: The Capability-Expectations Gap: A Double Reading
verfasst von: Henrik Larsen
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Buch: Gaps in EU Foreign Policy
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95165-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-349-95166-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95166-6_3