nach oben

Demography

Erschienen in:

08.09.2020

The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood

verfasst von: Yasamin Kusunoki, Jennifer S. Barber

Erschienen in: Demography | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We investigate the immediate social context of contraceptive behaviors: specifically, the intimate relationship. We use the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study (2008–2012), based on a random sample of 1,003 women ages 18–19 residing in a Michigan county. Women were interviewed weekly for 2.5 years, resulting in an age range of 18–22. We test three sets of hypotheses about change over time within a relationship, using relationship-level within-between models, which compare a couple’s contraceptive behaviors across different times in the relationship. First, we find that a couple is less likely to use contraception when the relationship is more intimate and/or committed and that a couple becomes less likely to use contraception over time, regardless of intimacy and commitment. Second, we find that a couple using contraception becomes increasingly likely to choose hormonal over coital methods, but this change occurs as a relationship endures and is unrelated to intimacy and/or commitment. Third, we find that a condom-using couple’s consistency does not decline when there is conflict; rather, consistency of condom use declines over time regardless of the relationship’s characteristics. We also demonstrate that conflict and power imbalance increase reliance on hormonal methods among those using contraception; conflict decreases consistency among withdrawal (but not condom) users; and nonmonogamy increases reliance on condoms and decreases withdrawal consistency. The strong and consistent link between duration and contraceptive behaviors—regardless of intimacy, commitment, conflict, or power imbalance—suggests that the continual vigilance required for long-term contraceptive use is difficult during early emerging adulthood.

Vorheriger Artikel Preferences, Partners, and Parenthood: Linking Early Fertility Desires, Marriage Timing, and Achieved Fertility

Nächster Artikel Recent Trends in U.S. Childbearing Intentions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We focus here on contraceptive use to prevent pregnancy and thus analyze only heterosexual intercourse. Other research has documented lower levels of contraceptive use among nonheterosexual women (compared with heterosexual women) in their heterosexual sexual encounters (Ela and Budnick 2017).

One important exception is Edin and Kefalas’ (2005) study of unmarried mothers, which documented their recollections of becoming less consistent coital contraceptive users over time as their relationship with the father reached “the next level of commitment.”

One exception is the Continuity and Change in Contraceptive Use study, a four-wave, nationally representative longitudinal study (2012–2014) of ~4,500 women ages 18–39 (Jones 2018; Jones et al. 2015). Another is the Border Contraceptive Access Study, which selected ~1,000 women using two pharmacies for oral contraceptives and interviewed them four times over nine months (Potter et al. 2010). These data sets have not been used to study the links between changing intimate relationships and contraceptive use.

Guttmacher (2018) reported that among current contraceptive users aged 15–19, 55% were using condoms, 35% used oral contraceptives, 20% used withdrawal, 8% used hormonal injectable/patch/ring, and only 3% used an IUD.

When choosing the RDSL sample, the sampling statisticians at the University of Michigan’s Survey Research Center calculated that 95% of women ages 18–19 in the census were included in the sampling frame. We do not know the differences between women who were included in the sampling frame and those who were not, but we suspect that the excluded women are poorer and less stably housed than the included women. A driver’s license costs $25 in Michigan. However, one must have a driver’s license or personal ID card to receive public assistance in Michigan, and a personal ID card costs only $10. The fee is waived for those who receive public assistance or for other “good cause.” Thus, the financial barrier is fairly low for obtaining an ID card.

The RDSL women are slightly more religious, more likely to have a mother who gave birth as a teen, and more likely to have experienced a teen pregnancy themselves. However, the proportion of the sample that is Black in RDSL is nearly double the proportion of Black respondents in the NSFG sample, which likely at least partially explains these discrepancies. Also, a slightly smaller proportion of the RDSL young women had first sexual intercourse before age 17, relative to the NSFG respondents.

In other words, women who reported a desire for pregnancy at some point during the study are still included, but the weeks when they reported that desire are excluded from our analytic sample. In our main analyses, we define “want to get pregnant” (the excluded weeks) as those in which the woman gave a response of 5 to the question, “How much do you want to become pregnant in the upcoming month?,” where the response options were 0 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). We conducted sensitivity analyses with three additional definitions of wanting to get pregnant; see footnote 12.

We also conducted sensitivity analyses including these 42 relationships, which are described in the Results section.

In the 1% of weeks when a respondent had more than one partner, only the “most important or most serious” one was discussed in detail.

A sensitivity analysis replacing this with an indicator of not growing up in a family with two biological parents (i.e., including a stepparent) is described in the Results section.

Recall that we define “want a pregnancy” as giving a response of 5 (on a scale from 0 to 5) to the question, “How much do you want to get pregnant during the next month?” We reestimated our models three times, using three alternative definitions of wanting a pregnancy: (1) any nonzero response to the question about desire for pregnancy, (2) anything but the strongest antinatalism (a response of 0 for desire to get pregnant and 5 for a parallel question about wanting to avoid pregnancy), and (3) a response of 0 for desire to avoid pregnancy. Sensitivity analyses with these three sample restrictions produced very similar results. Coefficients that differed from those presented in Tables 2 and 3 are as follows: coefficients for engaged/married → any contraceptive were sometimes not statistically significant (although the p values increase to only ~ .13), cohabiting/stayover → hormonal versus coital method were marginally insignificant in one model (p = .08), cohabiting/stayover → withdrawal consistency and fighting → withdrawal consistency were significant with two of the three alternative specifications of pregnancy desire. These differences do not change our substantive conclusions.

Recall that we exclude the 42 (5%) longest relationships. Sensitivity analyses including them produced very similar results, with one exception: the coefficients for duration and duration squared predicting withdrawal consistency. Rather than –0.17 (nonsignificant) and –0.03 (nonsignificant), respectively, they became 1.56 (significant at p < .01) and –0.09 (nonsignificant). Thus, the 42 longest relationships were particularly consistent in their use of withdrawal.

The equation indicates that this increase would occur around four years, but few relationships in RDSL were observed at the four-year point. Our models should not be interpreted beyond the duration of the study (2.5 years).

A sensitivity test replacing “did not grow up with two parents” with “did not grow up with two biological parents” produced results that were very similar in magnitude and statistical significance to the models shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Alternatively, coital method use may appear to decline over time because couples shift from using only coital methods to using dual methods (coital and hormonal methods)—that is, they continue using coital methods but become increasingly likely to add a hormonal method—which would appear as shifting from coital to hormonal methods in our coding scheme. To test this, we estimated models of coital method use without a hormonal method separately from coital method use with a hormonal method. Both types of coital method use declined over time.

The equation indicates that this decrease would occur around three years, but few relationships in the RDSL were observed at the three-year point. Our models should not be interpreted beyond the duration of the study (2.5 years).

Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Arnett, J. J. (2010). Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), Bridging cultural and developmental approaches to psychology: New syntheses in theory, research, and policy (pp. 255–275). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Barber, J. S., Kusunoki, Y., Gatny, H. H., & Budnick, J. L. (2018). The dynamics of intimate partner violence and the risk of pregnancy during the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 83, 1020–1047.

Barber, J. S., Kusunoki, Y., Gatny, H., & Schulz, P. (2016). Participation in an intensive longitudinal study with weekly web surveys over 2.5 years. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e105. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5422CrossRef

Barber, J. S., Miller, W. B., Kusunoki, Y., Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2019). Intimate relationship dynamics and changing desire for pregnancy among young women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 51, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12119CrossRef

Boardman, L. A., Allsworth, J., Phipps, M. G., & Lapane, K. L. (2006). Risk factors for unintended versus intended rapid repeat pregnancies among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 597.e1–597.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.03.017

Brady, S. S., Tschann, J. M., Ellen, J. M., & Flores, E. (2009). Infidelity, trust, and condom use among Latino youth in dating relationships. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36, 227–231.

Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011 (Surveillance Summaries, Vol. 63 No. 8). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25188037/

Campbell, J. C., Pugh, L. C., Campbell, D., & Visscher, M. (1995). The influence of abuse on pregnancy intention. Women’s Health Issues, 5, 214–223.

Carter, M., Kraft, J. M., Hock-Long, L., & Hatfield-Timajchy, K. (2013). Relationship characteristics and feelings about pregnancy among Black and Puerto Rican young adults. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45, 148–156.

Coleman-Minahan, K., Dillaway, C. H., Canfield, C., Kuhn, D. M., Strandberg, K. S., & Potter, J. E. (2018). Low-income Texas women’s experiences accessing their desired contraceptive method at the first postpartum visit. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 50, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12083CrossRef

de Bocanegra, H., Rostovtseva, D. P., Khera, S., & Godhwani, N. (2010). Birth control sabotage and forced sex: Experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women, 16, 601–612.

Dehlendorf, C., Reed, R., Fox, E., Seidman, D., Hall, C., & Steinauer, J. (2018). Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy. Contraception, 98, 4–7.

Dieleman, J. L., & Templin, T. (2014). Random-effects, fixed-effects and the within-between specification for clustered data in observational health studies: A simulation study. PLoS One, 9(10), e110257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110257CrossRef

Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ela, E. J., & Budnick, J. (2017). Non-heterosexuality, relationships, and young women’s contraceptive behavior. Demography, 54, 887–909.

England, P., Caudillo, M. L., Littlejohn, K., Bass, B. C., & Reed, J. (2016). Why do young, unmarried women who do not want to get pregnant contracept inconsistently? Mixed-method evidence for the role of efficacy. Socius, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116629464

Ewing, S. F., & Bryan, A. D. (2015). A question of love and trust? The role of relationship factors in adolescent sexual decision-making. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 36, 628–634.

Finer, L. B., Jerman, J., & Kavanaugh, M. L. (2012). Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 893–897.

Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 843–852.

Gibbs, L. (2013). Gender, relationship type and contraceptive use at first intercourse. Contraception, 87, 806–812.

Guttmacher Institute. (2014). American teens’ sexual and reproductive health (Fact sheet). New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/FB-ATSRH.pdf

Guttmacher Institute. (2018). Contraceptive use in the United States (Fact sheet). New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/contraceptive-use-united-states

Guzzo, K. B., Eickmeyer, K., & Hayford, S. R. (2018). Does postpartum contraceptive use vary by birth intendedness? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 50, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12074CrossRef

Halpern-Meekin, S., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2013a). Relationship churning, physical violence, and verbal abuse in young adult relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 2–12.

Halpern-Meekin, S., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2013b). Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: On/off relationships and sex with an ex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28, 166–188.

Harvey, S. M., Washburn, I., Oakley, L., Warren, J., & Sanchez, D. (2017). Competing priorities: Partner-specific relationship characteristics and motives for condom use among at-risk young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 665–676.

Henshaw, S. K. (2009). Unintended pregnancy and abortion in the USA: Epidemiology and public health impact. In M. Paul, E. S. Lichtenberg, L. Borgatta, D. A. Grimes, P. G. Stubblefield, & M. D. Creinin (Eds.), Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy (pp. 24–35). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

Higgins, J. A. (2017). Pregnancy ambivalence and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young adult women: A qualitative study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12025CrossRef

Higgins, J. A., Popkin, R. A., & Santelli, J. S. (2012). Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 236–243.

Higgins, J. A., & Smith, N. K. (2016). The sexual acceptability of contraception: Reviewing the literature and building a new concept. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 417–456.

Hock-Long, L., Henry-Moss, D., Carter, M., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., Erickson, P. I., Cassidy, A., . . . Chittams, J. (2012). Condom use with serious and casual heterosexual partners: Findings from a community venue-based survey of young adults. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 900–913.

Ihongbe, T. O., & Masho, S. W. (2018). Changes in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. nulliparous women: Results from the 2006–2010, 2011–2013, and 2013–2015 National Survey of Family Growth. Journal of Women’s Health, 27, 245–252.

Jamison, T. B., & Ganong, L. (2011). “We’re not living together:” Stayover relationships among college-educated emerging adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 536–557.

Jones, J., Mosher, W., Daniels, K., & Division of Vital Statistics. (2012). Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995 (National Health Statistics Reports, No. 60). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Jones, K. A., Cornelius, M. D., Silverman, J. G., Tancredi, D. J., Decker, M. R., Haggerty, C. L., . . . Miller, E. (2016). Abusive experiences and young women’s sexual health outcomes: Is condom negotiation self-efficacy a mediator? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8616

Jones, R. K. (2018). Is pregnancy fatalism normal? An attitudinal assessment among women trying to get pregnant and those not using contraception. Contraception, 98, 255–259.

Jones, R. K., Tapales, A., Lindberg, L. D., & Frost, J. (2015). Using longitudinal data to understand changes in consistent contraceptive use. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1363/47e4615CrossRef

Kost, K., & Zolna, M. (2019). Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy: A response. Contraception, 100, 5–9.

Ku, L., Sonenstein, F. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1994). The dynamics of young men’s condom use during and across relationships. Family Planning Perspectives, 26, 246–251.

Kusunoki, Y., & Barber, J. S. (2019). Intimate relationship dynamics and women’s expected control over sex and contraception. Contraception, 100, 484–491.

Kusunoki, Y., Barber, J. S., Ela, E. J., & Bucek, A. (2016). Black-White differences in sex and contraceptive use among young women. Demography, 53, 1399–1428.

Kusunoki, Y., Barber, J. S., Gatny, H., & Budnick, J. (2010, August). Relationship characteristics and conflict reported in an online weekly survey: Preliminary results. Paper presented at the 2010 American Sociological Association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.

Kusunoki, Y., Barber, J. S., Gatny, H. H., & Melendez, R. (2018). Physical intimate partner violence and contraceptive behaviors among young women. Journal of Women’s Health, 27, 1016–1025.

Kusunoki, Y., & Upchurch, D. M. (2011). Contraceptive method choice among youth in the United States: The importance of relationship context. Demography, 48, 1451–1472.

Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2014). Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 74–85.

Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The Second Demographic Transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32, 669–698.

Littlejohn, K. E. (2012). Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: Differences by race and education. Demography, 49, 1433–1452.

Littlejohn, K. E. (2013). “It’s those pills that are ruining me”: Gender and the social meanings of hormonal contraceptive side effects. Gender & Society, 27, 843–863.

Manlove, J., Ryan, S., & Franzetta, K. (2007). Contraceptive use patterns across teens’ sexual relationships: The role of relationships, partners, and sexual histories. Demography, 44, 603–621.

Manlove, J., Welti, K., Barry, M., Peterson, K., Schelar, E., & Wildsmith, E. (2011). Relationship characteristics and contraceptive use among young adults. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 119–128.

Manlove, J., Welti, K., Wildsmith, E., & Barry, M. (2014). Relationship types and contraceptive use within young adult dating relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e0514CrossRef

Manning, W. D., Flanigan, C. M., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2009). Relationship dynamics and consistency of condom use among adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 181–190.

Martinez, G., Copen, C. E., & Abma, J. C. (2011). Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (Vital and Health Statistics Report, Series 23 No. 31). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Miller, E., Decker, M. R., McCauley, H. L., Tancredi, D. J., Levenson, R. R., Waldman, J., . . . Silverman, J. G. (2010a). Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 81, 316–322.

Miller, E., Decker, M. R., Raj, A., Reed, E., Marable, D., & Silverman, J. G. (2010b). Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 910–917.

Miller, E., Decker, M. R., Reed, E., Raj, A., Hathaway, J. E., & Silverman, J. G. (2007). Male partner pregnancy-promoting behaviors and adolescent partner violence: Findings from a qualitative study with adolescent females. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7, 360–366.

Miller, S., Williams, J., Cutbush, S., Gibbs, D., Clinton-Sherrod, M., & Jones, S. (2013). Dating violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: Longitudinal profiles and transitions over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 607–618.

Miller, W. B. (1973). Psychological vulnerability to unwanted pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 5(4), 199–201.

Moreau, C., Hall, K. S., Trussell, J., & Barber, J. S. (2012). Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan. Human Reproduction, 28, 642–650.

Ott, M. A., Adler, N. E., Millstein, S. G., Tschann, J. M., & Ellen, J. M. (2002). The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 6–14.

Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.

Potter, J. E., Hopkins, K., Aiken, A. R. A., Hubert, C., Stevenson, A. J., White, K., & Grossman, D. (2014). Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas. Contraception, 90, 488–495.

Potter, J. E., White, K., Hopkins, K., Amastae, J., & Grossman, D. (2010). Clinic versus over-the-counter access to oral contraception: Choices women make along the US–Mexico border. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1130–1136.

Raine, T. R., Gard, J. C., Boyer, C. B., Haider, S., Brown, B. A., Ramirez Hernandez, F. A., & Harper, C. C. (2010). Contraceptive decision-making in sexual relationships: Young men’s experiences, attitudes and values. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12, 373–386.

Randolph, M. E., Pinkerton, S. D., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Abramson, P. R. (2007). Sexual pleasure and condom use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 844–848.

Reed, E., Raj, A., Miller, E., & Silverman, J. G. (2010). Losing the “gender” in gender-based violence: The missteps of research on dating and intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 16, 348–354.

Reed, J., England, P., Littlejohn, K., Bass, B. C., & Caudillo, M. L. (2014). Consistent and inconsistent contraception among young women: Insights from qualitative interviews. Family Relations, 63, 244–258.

Roberson, P. N. E., Norona, J. C., Zorotovich, J., & Dirnberger, Z. (2017). Developmental trajectories and health outcomes among emerging adult women and men. Emerging Adulthood, 5, 128–142.

Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., Ali, N., Posner, S., & Poindexter, A. N. (2006). Disparities in contraceptive knowledge, attitude and use between Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites. Contraception, 74, 125–132.

Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2017). Cohabitation nation: Gender, class, and the remaking of relationships. Oakland: University of California Press.

Sayegh, M. A., Fortenberry, J. D., Shew, M., & Orr, D. P. (2006). The developmental association of relationship quality, hormonal contraceptive choice and condom non-use among adolescent women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 388–395.

Schunck, R., & Perales, F. (2017). Within- and between-cluster effects in generalized linear mixed models: A discussion of approaches and the xthybrid command. Stata Journal, 17, 89–115.

Scott, M. E., Steward-Streng, N. R., & Manlove, J. (2011). Characteristics of young adult sexual relationships: Diverse, sometimes violent, often loving (Research Brief No. 2011-01). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

Senn, T. E., Carey, M. P., Vanable, P. A., Coury-Doniger, P., & Urban, M. (2009). Sexual partner concurrency among STI clinic patients with a steady partner: Correlates and associations with condom use. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 85, 343–347.

Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39.

Trussell, J. (2011). Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception, 83, 397–404.

Upadhyay, U. D., Raifman, S., & Raine-Bennett, T. (2016). Effects of relationship context on contraceptive use among young women. Contraception, 94, 68–73.

Weitzman, A., Barber, J., & Kusunoki, Y. (2019). Sexual concurrency and contraceptive use among young adult women. Demography, 56, 549–572.

Weitzman, A., Barber, J. S., Kusunoki, Y., & England, P. (2017). Desire for and to avoid pregnancy during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1060–1075.

Wildsmith, E., Manlove, J., & Steward-Streng, N. (2015). Relationship characteristics and contraceptive use among dating and cohabiting young adult couples. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1363/47e2515CrossRef

Titel: The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood
verfasst von: Yasamin Kusunoki
Jennifer S. Barber
Publikationsdatum: 08.09.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Demography / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0070-3370
Elektronische ISSN: 1533-7790
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00916-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

A Cautionary Tale of Using Data From the Tail

Material Hardship and Contraceptive Use During the Transition to Adulthood

Landfall After the Perfect Storm: Cohort Differences in the Relationship Between Debt and Risk of Heart Attack

The Levels and Trends in Deep and Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1993–2016

The Enduring Case for Fertility Desires

Preferences, Partners, and Parenthood: Linking Early Fertility Desires, Marriage Timing, and Achieved Fertility