Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 3/2009

01.09.2009

The Effect of Union Type on Work-Life Conflict in Five European Countries

verfasst von: Kairi Kasearu

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper explores the strategies for reconciling family and work in different union types. The focus here is on investigating how cohabiting and married individuals perceive the work-life conflict in different European countries. To test the union type impact on work-life balance in the context of different societal conditions, this paper draws on 2004 ESS data from Sweden, Germany, United Kingdom, Slovenia and Estonia (European Social Survey 2004). The pooled country data are examined to analyze the association between work-life conflict and socio-demographic, as well as family-level characteristics of individuals. The findings did not demonstrate uniform differences in the work-life conflict of married and cohabiting couples. However, a higher degree of work-life conflict among Swedish cohabiting women was still significant when controlling for individual characteristics, household composition and working conditions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Batalova, J. A., & Cohen, P. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 743–755.CrossRef Batalova, J. A., & Cohen, P. N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 743–755.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter, J. (2005). To marry or not to marry. Marital status and the household division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 300–321.CrossRef Baxter, J. (2005). To marry or not to marry. Marital status and the household division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 300–321.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRef Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bracher, M., & Santow, G. (1998). Economic independence and union formation in Sweden. Population Studies, 52, 275–294.CrossRef Bracher, M., & Santow, G. (1998). Economic independence and union formation in Sweden. Population Studies, 52, 275–294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355.CrossRef Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615–625.CrossRef Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615–625.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRef Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crompton, R., & Lyonnette, C. (2006). Work-life balance in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49, 379–393.CrossRef Crompton, R., & Lyonnette, C. (2006). Work-life balance in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49, 379–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., & Gerteisen Marks, J. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246–1272.CrossRef Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., & Gerteisen Marks, J. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246–1272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dex, S., & Bond, S. (2005). Measuring work-life balance and its covariates. Work, Employment & Society, 19, 627–637.CrossRef Dex, S., & Bond, S. (2005). Measuring work-life balance and its covariates. Work, Employment & Society, 19, 627–637.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duvander, A.-Z. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 698–717.CrossRef Duvander, A.-Z. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 698–717.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fu, C. K., & Shaffer, M. A. (2001). The tug of work and family. Personnel Review, 30, 502–522.CrossRef Fu, C. K., & Shaffer, M. A. (2001). The tug of work and family. Personnel Review, 30, 502–522.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.CrossRef Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenstein, T. N. (1995). Gender ideology, marital disruption, and the employment of married women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 31–42.CrossRef Greenstein, T. N. (1995). Gender ideology, marital disruption, and the employment of married women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 31–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grönlund, A. (2007). More control, less conflict? Job demand-control, gender and work-family conflict. Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 476–497.CrossRef Grönlund, A. (2007). More control, less conflict? Job demand-control, gender and work-family conflict. Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 476–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.CrossRef Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51, 28–36.CrossRef Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51, 28–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haskey, J. (2001). Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 51–67.CrossRef Haskey, J. (2001). Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 51–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herman, J. B., & Gyllstrom, K. K. (1977). Working men and women: Inter- and intra-role conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 319–333.CrossRef Herman, J. B., & Gyllstrom, K. K. (1977). Working men and women: Inter- and intra-role conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 319–333.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.CrossRef Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43, 144–150.CrossRef Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Lee, C. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 43, 144–150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy (pp. 3–31). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy (pp. 3–31). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawning the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 980–987.CrossRef Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawning the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 980–987.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lye, D., & Waldron, I. (1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 199–225. Lye, D., & Waldron, I. (1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 199–225.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyonette, C., Crompton, R., & Wall, K. (2007). Gender, occupational class and work-life conflict. Community, Work and Family, 10, 283–308.CrossRef Lyonette, C., Crompton, R., & Wall, K. (2007). Gender, occupational class and work-life conflict. Community, Work and Family, 10, 283–308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12, 53–65. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12, 53–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparsion of marriages and cohabiting relatsionships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.CrossRef Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparsion of marriages and cohabiting relatsionships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ostner, I. (2001). Cohabitation in Germany—rules, reality and public discourses. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 88–101.CrossRef Ostner, I. (2001). Cohabitation in Germany—rules, reality and public discourses. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 88–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, married, single. Aldershot: Avebury. Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, married, single. Aldershot: Avebury.
Zurück zum Zitat Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703–726.CrossRef Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703–726.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1247–1268.CrossRef Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1247–1268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seltzer, J. A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921–928.CrossRef Seltzer, J. A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921–928.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401–420.CrossRef Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401–420.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.CrossRef South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strandh, M., & Nordenmark, M. (2006). The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: Perceived work-household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology, 57, 597–617.CrossRef Strandh, M., & Nordenmark, M. (2006). The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: Perceived work-household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology, 57, 597–617.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, N., & Cousins, C. (2005). Working time, gender and family: An east-west-European comparison. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 527–550.CrossRef Tang, N., & Cousins, C. (2005). Working time, gender and family: An east-west-European comparison. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 527–550.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tausig, M., & Fenwick, R. (2001). Unbinding time: Alternate work schedules and work-life balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22, 101–119.CrossRef Tausig, M., & Fenwick, R. (2001). Unbinding time: Alternate work schedules and work-life balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22, 101–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power. Family in the world, 1900–2000. New York: Routledge. Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power. Family in the world, 1900–2000. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography, 35, 315–322.CrossRef Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography, 35, 315–322.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628–651.CrossRef Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628–651.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. London: University of Chigaco Press. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. London: University of Chigaco Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and faciliation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 398–412.CrossRef Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and faciliation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 398–412.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1981). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRef West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1981). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Windebank, J. (2001). Dual-earner couples in Britain and France. Work, Employment & Society, 15, 269–290.CrossRef Windebank, J. (2001). Dual-earner couples in Britain and France. Work, Employment & Society, 15, 269–290.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of Union Type on Work-Life Conflict in Five European Countries
verfasst von
Kairi Kasearu
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9432-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Social Indicators Research 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner