Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.01.2013 | POLICY CORNER
The enhanced LCA Resources Directory: a tool aimed at improving Life Cycle Thinking practices
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 1/2013
EinloggenAktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Abstract
Purpose
To support life cycle-based EU policies, the European Commission created the “European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (EPLCA).” The platform aims at providing coherent and quality-assured life cycle data, methods, and studies. The LCA Resources Directory (RD), one of the deliverables of the EPLCA, has so far consisted of lists of services, tools, databases, and providers. It has been decided to extend its scope to contain a section on LCA studies with metadata to characterize them. The research question addressed in this paper is “which structure and features should the RD have to store LCA studies so that it can efficiently support and promote robust Life Cycle Thinking practices?”
Methods
Existing tools with similar aims and objectives have been identified and analyzed to identify current performances and missing functionalities. A literature review concerning LCA studies in scientific and technical literature has been carried out in order to define relevant and consistent patterns. Following this analysis, it has been decided to develop a collaborative platform and an original structure has been proposed for the new section. The structure has been tested with a few LCA studies.
Results
A new collaborative web platform of the resources directory has been developed and launched online. Contributors are now able to characterize LCA studies according to 43 fields of metadata, distributed among seven categories: general, goal, scope, inventory, impact assessment, interpretation, and review and compliance. Some fields are mandatory, and the fill-in boxes are either enumeration list or free text. The platform also contains a search tool to identify relevant LCA studies with their metadata. The administrator of the directory performs a consistency check before entries are shared with others.
Conclusions
The EPLCA now contains a new collaborative web platform where LCA studies can be characterized and stored. It has been possible to identify a list of criteria for which LCA studies should be characterized. These criteria form the structure of the platform. It is too early to assess the actual usefulness of this new platform; this will be possible only when the directory is populated by contributors. With this new section in the RD, the EPLCA expands its aim of promoting Life Cycle Thinking and robust practices.