Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. The Humanitarian Initiative: A Critical Appreciation

verfasst von : Nina Tannenwald

Erschienen in: Non-Nuclear Peace

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This essay offers a critical evaluation of the campaign on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and the resulting 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. It highlights both accomplishments and limitations of the treaty. The treaty is a major achievement but is best seen as a stigmatization rather than a disarmament treaty. While the treaty may strengthen the nuclear taboo, the ultimate challenge is to undermine nuclear weapons as a currency of power. The essay reflects on four themes illustrated by the movement of civil society and non-nuclear states to achieve the ban treaty: processes of stigmatization, the democratization of disarmament politics, the advantages and disadvantages of codification, and normative strategies of disarmament more broadly.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acheson, R. (2012). Nuclear weapons modernization: Aspiring to ‘indefinite retention’? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(5), 88–95.CrossRef Acheson, R. (2012). Nuclear weapons modernization: Aspiring to ‘indefinite retention’? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(5), 88–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Borrie, J. (2014). Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban. International Affairs, 90(3), 625–646.CrossRef Borrie, J. (2014). Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban. International Affairs, 90(3), 625–646.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Borrie, J., & Coughley, T. (Eds.). (2013). Viewing nuclear weapons through a humanitarian lens. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Borrie, J., & Coughley, T. (Eds.). (2013). Viewing nuclear weapons through a humanitarian lens. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowler, T. W., & Howard, J. S., III. (1991). Countering the threat of the well-armed tyrant: A modest proposal for small nuclear weapons. Strategic Review, 19(4), 34–40. Dowler, T. W., & Howard, J. S., III. (1991). Countering the threat of the well-armed tyrant: A modest proposal for small nuclear weapons. Strategic Review, 19(4), 34–40.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman, L. (1989). The evolution of nuclear strategy. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRef Freedman, L. (1989). The evolution of nuclear strategy. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Highsmith, N., & Stewart, M. (2018, January 29). The nuclear ban treaty: A legal analysis. Survival, 60(1), 129–152. Highsmith, N., & Stewart, M. (2018, January 29). The nuclear ban treaty: A legal analysis. Survival, 60(1), 129–152.
Zurück zum Zitat Hindustan Times. (2017, July 18). Committed to nuclear disarmament but can’t be party to UN treaty, says India. Hindustan Times. (2017, July 18). Committed to nuclear disarmament but can’t be party to UN treaty, says India.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehler, R. (2017, November 14). Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Congress. Kehler, R. (2017, November 14). Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Congress.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritchie, N. (2014). Waiting for Kant: Devaluing and delegitimizing nuclear weapons. International Affairs, 90(3), 601–623.CrossRef Ritchie, N. (2014). Waiting for Kant: Devaluing and delegitimizing nuclear weapons. International Affairs, 90(3), 601–623.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ritchie, N. (2016, May 11). Pathways to nuclear disarmament: Delegitimizing nuclear violence (Working Paper). Open-Ended Working Group. Ritchie, N. (2016, May 11). Pathways to nuclear disarmament: Delegitimizing nuclear violence (Working Paper). Open-Ended Working Group.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauer, T., & Reveraert, M. (2018, June–July). The potential stigmatizing effect of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(5–6), 437–455. Sauer, T., & Reveraert, M. (2018, June–July). The potential stigmatizing effect of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(5–6), 437–455.
Zurück zum Zitat Tannenwald, N. (2018). The great unraveling: The future of the nuclear normative order. In N. Tannenwald & J. M. Acton (Eds.), Meeting the challenges of the new nuclear age. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Tannenwald, N. (2018). The great unraveling: The future of the nuclear normative order. In N. Tannenwald & J. M. Acton (Eds.), Meeting the challenges of the new nuclear age. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Thakur, R. (2018). The nuclear ban treaty: Recasting a normative framework for disarmament. The Washington Quarterly, 40(4), 71–95.CrossRef Thakur, R. (2018). The nuclear ban treaty: Recasting a normative framework for disarmament. The Washington Quarterly, 40(4), 71–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vadillo, A. P. (2016, May). Beyond the ban: The humanitarian initiative of nuclear disarmament and advocacy of no first use nuclear doctrines. British-American Security Information Council. Vadillo, A. P. (2016, May). Beyond the ban: The humanitarian initiative of nuclear disarmament and advocacy of no first use nuclear doctrines. British-American Security Information Council.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfsthal, J. (2017, October 4). More than paper: How nuclear ban treaty advocates can really advance disarmament. War on the Rocks blog. Wolfsthal, J. (2017, October 4). More than paper: How nuclear ban treaty advocates can really advance disarmament. War on the Rocks blog.
Metadaten
Titel
The Humanitarian Initiative: A Critical Appreciation
verfasst von
Nina Tannenwald
Copyright-Jahr
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26688-2_6

Premium Partner