nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. The Implications for Container Port Security

verfasst von : Xufan Zhang, Michael Roe

Erschienen in: Maritime Container Port Security

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss the findings from the secondary data collected in the literature review and the primary data from the Delphi survey. It starts with a discussion of the Delphi technique and then gives a critical analysis of its implementation. The conceptual model will be discussed to establish if it has succeeded in capturing the complexities and relations among the variables identified in the current maritime security area, namely maritime transport risk; maritime security regimes; implementation of the CSI and EU container seaport competition, and integrating with the results of the Delphi study. The discussion will make specific reference to the five conceptual assumptions developed in Chapter 4. This chapter also takes into consideration any changes that have continued to occur in maritime security.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Delphi Results

Nächstes Kapitel Maritime Governance, Security Measures and Port Competition in the EU

Alexander, J., & Kroposki, M. (1999). Outcomes for community health nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 29, 49–56.CrossRef

Allen, N. H. (2006). The container security initiative costs, implications and relevance to developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 26(5), 439–447.CrossRef

Altiok, T. (2011). Port security/safety, risk analysis, and modelling. Annals of Operations Research, 187, 1–3.CrossRef

American Shipper. (2014). CSI’s Evolution. Available at http://www.americanshipper.com/main/news/csis-evolution57536.aspx?taxonomy=Security. Accessed 10 December 2016.

Aronietis, R., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2010). Port Competitiveness Determinants of Selected European Ports in the Containerised Cargo Market. International Association of Maritime Economists Conference IAME (Vol. 10), Lisbon, Portugal.

Banomyong, R. (2005). The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply chain management. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(1), 3–13.CrossRef

Bennett, A. C., & Chin, Y. Z. (2008). 100% Container Scanning: Security Policy Implications for Global Supply Chains (Master of Science Dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Bichou, K. (2004). The Isps Code and the cost of port compliance: An initial logistics and supply chain framework for port security assessment and management. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 322–348.CrossRef

Bichou, K. (2008). Security and risk-based models in shipping and ports: Review and critical analysis. In ITF, Terrorism and International Transport: Towards Risk-Based Security Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Bichou, K. (2011). Assessing the impact of procedural security on container port efficiency. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(1), 1–28.CrossRef

Bosk, L. B. (2006). Port and supply chain security initiatives in the United States and Abroad. The University of Texas at Austin Policy Research Report, 150, 1–192.

Bove, V., Elia, L., & Sekeris, P. (2014). US security strategy and the gains from bilateral trade. Review of International Economics, 22(5), 863–885.CrossRef

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caldwell, S. L. (2007). Maritime Security: Observations on Selected Aspects of the SAFE Port Act: GAO-07-754T (GAO Reports), p. 1.

CBP. (2003a). Container Security Initiative: Update. United States Department of Homeland Security 2003. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/. Accessed 17 October 2014.

CBP. (2003b). Enforcement of 24 Hour Rule Begins February 2. Available at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/archives/cbp_press_releases/012003/01302003.xml. Accessed 30 July 2013.

Ceriotto, L. (2004). Buscantecnologia china para la aduana. Available at www.clarin.com. Accessed 30 October 2014.

Chang, C., & Thai, V. (2016). Do port security quality and service quality influence customer satisfaction and loyalty? Maritime Policy and Management, 43(6), 720–736.CrossRef

Clark, X., Dollar, D., & Micco, D. (2004). Port efficiency, maritime transport costs and bilateral trade (NBER Working Paper No. 10353). Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w10353.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2017.

Congressional Budget Office. (2016). Scanning and Imaging Shipping Containers Overseas: Costs and Alternatives. Available at http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/51478-Shipping-Containers.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2017.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Cornick, P. (2006). Nitric oxide education survey—Use of a Delphi survey to produce guidelines for training neonatal nurses to work with inhaled nitric oxide. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 12(2), 62–68.CrossRef

Cottam, H. (2012). An Analysis of Eastern European Liner Shipping During the Period of Transition (PhD thesis). Plymouth University, UK.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.

De Martino, M., & Morvillo, A. (2008). Activities, resources and inter-organisational relationships: Key factors in port competitiveness. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 571–589.CrossRef

Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.

Dinwoodie, J., Landamore, M., & Rigot-Muller, P. (2014). Dry bulk shipping flows to 2050: Delphi perceptions of early career specialists. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 64–75.CrossRef

Diop, A., Hartman, D., & Rexrode, D. (2007). C-TPAT Partners Cost/Benefit Survey. Washington, DC: CBP.

Donner, M., & Kruk, C. (2009). Supply Chain Security Guide. The World Bank/DFID, 1, pp. 1–107. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPRAL/Resources/SCS_Guide_Final.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2016.

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.

Engels, T. C. E., & Kennedy, H. P. (2007). Enhancing a Delphi study on family-focused prevention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 433–451.CrossRef

Fiander, M., & Burns, T. P. (1998). Essential components of schizophrenia care: A Delphi approach. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98, 400–405.CrossRef

Fleming, D. K., & Baird, A. J. (1999). Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Western Europe. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(4), 383–394.CrossRef

Fowles, J. (1978). Handbook of Futures Research. Westport, CO: Greenwood Press.

Fung, K. F. (2001). Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: A structural vector error correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services. Maritime Policy and Management, 27(1), 3–22.CrossRef

GAO. (2003). Container Security: Expansion of Key Customs Programs Will Require Greater Attention to Critical Success Factors 2003 (United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reports), p. 1. Accessed 28 October 2016.

Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1695–1704.CrossRef

Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015.

Haynes, J., Hough, P., Malik, S., & Pettiford, L. (2011). World Politics. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Hill, K. Q., & Fowles, J. (1975). The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 7, 179–192.CrossRef

Holmes, J. L. (2004). The container security initiative. Fleet Equipment, 30, 15.

Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 2.

Huybrechts, M., Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., Van Hooydonk, E., Verbeke, A., & Winkelmans, W. (Eds.). (2002). Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports. Antwerp: De Boeck Ltd.

Jeon, I.-S., Kim, H.-S., & Kim, B.-J. (1993). Strategy for Improvement of Competitive Power in Korea Container Port. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.

Kim, H.-S. (1993). Decision Components of Shippers’ Port Choice in Korea. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.

Kumar, R. (2010). Research Methodology: A Step-By-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1991). Two approaches to service quality dimensions. The Service Industries Journal, 11(3), 287–303.CrossRef

Limao, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479.CrossRef

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Available at http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/delphibook.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2013.

Ludwig, B. G. (1994). Internationalizing Extension: An Exploration of the Characteristics Evident in a State University Extension System That Achieves Internationalization (PhD thesis). The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Marchais-Roubelat, A., & Roubelat, F. (2011). The Delphi method as a ritual: Inquiring the Delphic Oracle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1491–1499.CrossRef

Martonosi, S. E., Ortiz, D. S., & Willis, H. H. (2005). Evaluating the viability of 100 percent container inspections at America’s ports. In H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon, & J. E. Moore (Eds.), The Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

McCalla, R. (1999). Global change, local pain: Intermodal seaport terminals and their service areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 247–254.CrossRef

Metaparti, P. (2010). Rhetoric, rationality and reality in post-9/11 maritime security. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(7), 723–736.CrossRef

Miller, J. (2007, October 25). New shipping law makes big waves in foreign ports. Wall Street Journal.

Mitchell, V. (1996). Assessing the reliability and validity of questionnaires: An empirical example. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 5(2), 199–207.

Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Baker.

Nijdam, M., de Jong, O., van der Horst, M., van den Bossche, M., de Swart, L., & Buckmann, E. (2014). Level Playing Field: Study on Distorted Cross-Border Competition Between Seaports, RHV-Erasmus University/Ecorys, Available at https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documents/reports/2014/02/01/level-playing-field/level-playing-field-eindrapport-engels.pdf+&cd=1&hl=zh-CN&ct=clnk&gl=uk. Accessed 4 March 2016.

Notteboom, T., & Yap, W. Y. (2012). Port competition and competitiveness. In W. Talley (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics (pp. 549–570). Blackwell: Oxford.CrossRef

OECD. (2003). Maritime Transport Committee Security in Maritime Transport: Risk Factors and Economic Impact. Available at https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/4375896.pdf.

Oksenberg, L., Cannell, C., & Kalton, G. (1991). New strategies for presenting survey questions. Journal of Official Statistics, 7(3), 349–365.

Orient Overseas Container Line. (2016). Local Surcharges. Available at http://www.oocl.com/netherlands/eng/localinformation/localsurcharges/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 15 September 2016.

Pantouvakis, A. (2006). Port-service quality dimensions and passenger profiles: An exploratory examination and analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(4), 402–418.CrossRef

Parola, F., Risitano, M., Ferretti, M., & Panetti, E. (2017). The drivers of port competitiveness: A critical review. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 116–138.CrossRef

Port of Rotterdam. (2015). Port of Rotterdam Statistics. Available at https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/downloads/factsheets-brochures/port-statistics-2015. Accessed 14 February 2017.

Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.

Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage.

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present and future prospects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1487–1490.CrossRef

Saunders, M., Thornhill, A., & Lewis, P. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students (6th ed.). London: Prentice Hall Publishing.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Song, D. W., & Yeo, K.-T. (2004). A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 34–52.CrossRef

Sumsion, T. (1998). The Delphi technique: An adaptive research tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(4), 153–156.CrossRef

Thai, V. V. (2007). Impacts of security improvements on service quality in maritime transport: An empirical study of Vietnam. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9(4), 335–356.CrossRef

Thai, V. V. (2009). Effective maritime security: Conceptual model and empirical evidence. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(2), 147–163.CrossRef

Thibault, M., Brooks, M., & Button, K. (2006). The response of the US maritime industry to the new container security initiatives. Transportation Journal, 45(1), 5–15.

Tiwari, P., Itoh, H., & Doi, M. (2003). Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: A discrete choice analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(1), 23–39.CrossRef

Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatisation, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A, 39(5), 405–424.

Van de Voorde, E., & Winkelmans, W. (2002). A general introduction to port competition and management. In M. Huybrechts, H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, E. Van Hooydonk, A. Verbeke, & W. Winkelmans (Eds.), Port Competitiveness (pp. 1–15). De Boeck: Antwerp.

Veldman, S., & Buckmann, E. H. (2003). A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 3–22.CrossRef

Von der Gracht, H. A. (2008). The Future of Logistics: Scenarios for 2025. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRef

Wilson, B. (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and Conducting Needs Assessment: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

WSC. (2007). Statement Regarding Legislation to Require 100% Container Scanning. http://www.worldshipping.org/pdf/wsc_legislation_statement.pdf.

Yang, Y. C. (2011). Risk management of Taiwan’s maritime supply chain security. Safety Science, 49(3), 382–393.CrossRef

Yeo, G. T. (2007). Port Competitiveness in North East Asia: An Integrated Fuzzy Approach to Expert Evaluations (PhD thesis). Plymouth University, UK.

Titel: The Implications for Container Port Security
verfasst von: Xufan Zhang
Michael Roe
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Maritime Container Port Security
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03824-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-03825-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03825-0_8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner