Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. The Jury and Potential for Corruption

verfasst von : Graham Brooks

Erschienen in: Criminal Justice and Corruption

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter will consider the development and effect of the internet on the jury system. It offers a contemporary understanding of how the jury is subverted and corrupted. Whilst corruption is external—bribery, threats, etc.—to a jury or individual members—I examine the internal—individual jury members searching for information on the internet which is populated with bias, prejudicial, sham ‘news’ and articles and the extent to which this can corrupt criminal justice. I then consider how courts currently employ ‘negative rules’ to prevent independent research. Finally I suggest other options for courts to consider as our use of the internet and other devices will increase in the future and put the ‘black box’ of the jury deliberation under threat.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Law Enforcement, Security and Corruption
Nächstes Kapitel Judicial Corruption: Magistrates, Judges and Prosecutors
Literatur
Baguley, C., McKimme, B., & Masser, B. (2017). Deconstructing the Simplification of the Jury: How Simplifying the Complexities Affects Jurors. Law and Human Behaviour, 41(3), 284–304.CrossRef
Bankowski, Z. (1988). The Jury and Reality. In M. Findlay & P. Duff (Eds.), The Jury Under Attack. London: Butterworths.
Bartels, L., & Lee, J. (2013). Jurors Using Social Media in Our Courts: Challenges and Responses. Journal of Judicial Administration, 23, 35–57.
Beare, M. E. (2017). The Failures of Police Legitimacy: Attacks from Within. In V. Mitslegas, P. Alldridge, & L. Cheliotis (Eds.), Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bell, D. W. (2010). Juror Misconduct and the Internet. American Journal of Criminal Law, 38(1), 81–99.
Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury Decision Making: Implications for and from Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63–67.CrossRef
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRef
Braun, K. (2017). Yesterday is History, Tommorrow is a Mystery—the Fate of the Australian Jury System in the Age of Social Media Dependency. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 40(4), 1642–1662.
Brewer, N., & Williams, K. (2005). Psychology and the Law: An Empirical Perspective. London: Guildford Press.
Brooks, G. (2016). Criminology of Corruption: Theoretical Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Browning, J. G. (2010). When All That Twitters Is Not Told. Texas Bar Journal, 73(3), 216–220.
Campbell, L. (2013). Organised Crime and the Law: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Crosby, K. (2012). Controlling Devlin’s Jury: What the Jury Thinks and What the Jury Sees Online. Criminal Law Review, 1, 15–29.
Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. D. (2010). Jury Decision-Making Biases and How to Counter Them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 133–154.CrossRef
Dann, M. B. (1993). “Learning Lessons” and “Speaking Rights”: Creating Educated and Democratic Juries. Indiana Law Journal, 68(4), 1229–1261.
DeBarba, K. (2002). Maintaining the Adversarial System: The Practice of Allowing Jurors to Question Witnesses During Trial. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55(5), 1521–1548.
Frankel, M. A. (1990). A Trial Judge’s Perspective on Providing Tools for Rational Jury Decision-Making. Northwestern University Law Review, 85(1), 221–224.
Greene, R. R., & Spaeth, J. M. (2010, February 1–10). Are Tweeters or Googlers in Your Jury Box? Arizona Attorney, 46, 38–45.
Harvey, D. (2014). The Googling Juror: The Fate of the Jury Train in the Digital Paradigm. New Zealand Law Review, 203, 203–238.
Kiernan, M. K., & Colley, E. (2012). Juror Misconduct in the Age of Social Networking. Federation of Insurance and Corporate Counsel, Tampa, 62(2) (Quarterly/Winter), 179–193.
Kim, Y., Chen, H. T., & de Zuniga, H. G. (2013). Stumbling Upon News on the Internet: Effects of Incidental News Exposure and Relative Entertainment Use on Political Engagement. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(6), 2607–2614.CrossRef
Leiberman, J. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2016). Jury Psychology: Social Aspects of Trial Processes: Psychology in the Courtroom (Vol. 1). Abingdon: Routledge.
Levett, L. M., Danielsen, E. M., Bull Kovera, M., & Cutler, B. L. (2005). The Psychology and Jury and Juror Decision Making. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and The Law: An Empirical Perspective (pp. 365–406). London: Guildford Press.
Manhas, R. (2014). Responding to Independent Juror Research in the Internet Age: Positive Rules, Negative Rules, and Outside Mechanisms. Michigan Law Review, 112(5), 809–831.
Matravers, M. (2004). ‘More Than Just Illogical’: Truth and Jury Nullification. In A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall, & V. Tadros (Eds.), The Trial on Trial: Truth and Due Process (Vol. 1, pp. 71–83). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Mckimme, B., Antrobus, E., & Baguley, C. (2014). Objective and Subjective Comprehensions of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials. New Criminal Law Review, 17(2), 163–183.
Morrison, C. M. (2010). Jury 2.0. Hasting Law Journal, 62(6), 1579–1632.
Morrison, C. M. (2011). Can the Jury Trial Survive Google. Criminal Justice, 25(4) (Winter), 4–15.
Page, M., Taylor, J., & Blenkin, M. (2011). Uniqueness in the Forensic Identification Sciences—Fact or Fiction? Forensic Science International, 206(1–3), 12–18.CrossRef
The Economist. (2018, October 27–November 2). Trial by Media, pp. 28–29.
The Secret Barrister. (2018). The Secret Barrister: Stories of the Law and How It’s Broken. London: Macmillan.
Metadaten
Titel
The Jury and Potential for Corruption
verfasst von
Graham Brooks
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Criminal Justice and Corruption

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16037-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-16038-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16038-8_5

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise