Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Multi-Criteria Approach Decision Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. The Multi-Criteria Approach Assessment Human Risks: Application the Analytical Hierarchy Process and PROMETHEE Methods

verfasst von : Lotfi Azzabi, Dorra Azzabi, Abdessamad Kobi

Erschienen in: The Multi-Criteria Approach for Decision Support

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Current security systems are more and more complex, as they integrate a variety of technologies, these systems often require a long period of development. When we change the requirements, the goals are to improve the functionality, cost, or delay of the systems; but unfortunately, this change may be affected by an issue with other system security requirements.
This chapter helps to improve safety with the evaluation of human risk by applying a multi-criteria approach to help decision-making by analytical hierarchy process methods and the PROMETHE method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Multi-Criteria Approach to Classification Systems of Control Aircraft Flight: Application PROMETHEE Method
Literatur
Ayadi, D., Azzabi, L., Kobi, A., Robledo, C., & Chabchoub, H. (2008). Classification of human risks with the method analytical hierarchy process. In Quality and dependability the 11th international conference, September.
Bernhard, K., Catharina, G., & Marc, F. (2007). State/event fault trees—A safety analysis model for software-controlled systems. International journal of Reliability Engineering and system safety, 92(11), 1521–1537.CrossRef
Brans, J. P., Vincke, P. H., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228–238.CrossRef
Colson, G. (2000). The OR's prize winner and the software ARGOS: How a multijudge and multicriteria ranking GDSS helps a jury to attribute a scientific award. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 741–755.CrossRef
Fadier, E., & Ciccotelli, J. (1999). How to integrate safety in design: Methods and models. Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in manufacturing, 9(4), 367–380.CrossRef
Fadier, E., Garza, C., & Didelot, A. (2003). Safe design and human activity: Construction of a theoretical framework from an analysis of a printing sector. Safety Science, 41, 759–789.CrossRef
Goetsch, D. L. (1997). Implementing Total safety management. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gregoriades, A., & Sutcliffe, A. (2008). Workload prediction for improved design and reliability of complex systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 530–549.CrossRef
Hale, A., Kirwan, B., & Kjellén, U. (2003). Safe by design: Where are we now. Safety Science, 45(2007), 305–327.
Health & Safety Executive. (1999). HSG48, reducing error and influencing behaviour. HSE Books.
Health and Safety Executive. (2006). Five steps to risk assessment. INDG163(rev2) 06/06.
Huacan, F., & Menglan, D. (2014). Safety System Engineering for Offshore Oil Offshore Operation Facilities Equipment and Procedures, Pages e183-e347.
Hughes, G., & Weichel, M. K. (2004). Whose fault is it anyway? A practical illustration of human factors in process safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 115, 127–132.CrossRef
Huylenbroeck, G. V. (1995). “The conflict analysis method” bridging the gap between ELI CTRE, PROMETHEE and ORESTE. European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 490–502.CrossRef
Ingram, S. (2003). Risk assessment. In Fact sheet- Umatilla chemical agent disposal facility. State of Oregon: Department of environmental Quality.
Larsen, R. F., & Buede, D. M. (2002). Theoretical framework the continuous early validation (CEAVA) method. Journal Systems Engineering, 5(3), 223–241.CrossRef
Leena N, Paula S. (2004). Usability evaluation of complex system: a literature review. STUK-YTO-TR.
Marc, M.J. (1999). Multicriterion decision aid: methods and applications. In CORS-SCRO, Annual conference, Windsor, Ontario.
Neathey, F., Sinclair, A., Rick, J., Ballard William Hunt, J., & Denvir, A (2006). An evaluation of the five steps to risk assessment. In Institute for Employment Studies Mantell Building Falmer Brighton BN1 9RF, HSE BOOKS.
Neboit, M. (2003). A support to prevention integration since design phase: The concepts of limit conditions and limit activities tolerated by use. Safety Science, 41, 95–109.CrossRef
Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijk, H. F. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531–548.CrossRef
Osborn, A.F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd Revised ed.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Papadopoulos, Y. Maruhn, M. (2001). Model-based automated synthesis of fault trees from Matlab-Simulink models. In DSN’01, Int’l Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (pp. 77–82). Götenborg.
Pate-Cornell, M. E. (1998). Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54(2-3), 95–111.CrossRef
Haimes, Y. Y. (1996). Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. New York: Wiley.
Pierre, B. J., & Bertrant, M. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 44, 1–10.CrossRef
Rasmussen, J. (1999). The concept of human error: Is it useful for the design of safe systems. Safety science monitor, special edition.
Roy, B. (2000). Multicriteria aid for decisions. A French–English decision aiding glossary. Newsletter of the European Working Group Series 3, vol. 1.
Saaty, T. L. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP in the analytic hierarchy process: Application and studies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.CrossRef
Saaty, T. L. (2002). Fundamentals of decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. edition, revised.
Saaty, T. L. (2007). Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 860–891.CrossRef
Sylvain, D., Elie, F., Olivier, C., & Jean-Marc, P. (2003). Complexité des interactions entre un modèle de sécurité et un modèle d’organisation. Qualita, -Swaminathan.
Villemeur, A. (1992). Methods and techniques, reliability, availability, maintainability and safety assessment. New York: Wiley.
Metadaten
Titel
The Multi-Criteria Approach Assessment Human Risks: Application the Analytical Hierarchy Process and PROMETHEE Methods
verfasst von
Lotfi Azzabi
Dorra Azzabi
Abdessamad Kobi
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
The Multi-Criteria Approach for Decision Support

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57261-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-57262-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57262-4_5

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise