Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The NRC Human Performance Test Facility: An Approach to Data Collection Using Novices and a Simplified Environment

verfasst von : Niav Hughes, Amy D’Agostino, Lauren Reinerman-Jones

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the spring of 2012, as part of a ‘hub and spoke’ model of research to address the human performance concerns related to current as well as new and advanced control room designs and operations, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored a project to procure a low cost simulator to empirically measure and study human performance aspects of control room operations. Using this simulator, the Human Factors and Reliability Branch (HFRB) in the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began a program of research known as the NRC Human Performance Test Facility (HPTF) to collect empirical human performance data with the purpose of measuring and ultimately better understanding the various cognitive and physical elements that support safe control room operation. To accomplish this, HFRB first procured two 3-loop Westinghouse pressurized water reactor simulators with the capability to run a full range of power operation scenarios. HFRB staff work as co-investigators along with a team of researchers at the University of Central Florida (UCF) to design and carry-out a series of experiments aimed at measuring and understanding the human performance aspects of common control room tasks through the use of a variety of physiological and self-report metrics. The intent was to design experiments that balanced domain realism and laboratory control sufficiently to collect systematic, yet meaningful human performance data related to execution of common main control room (MCR) tasks. Investigators identified and defined three types of tasks that are examined in the present project: Checking, Detection, and Response Implementation. Task type presentation was partially counterbalanced to maintain ecologic validity with experimental control. A variety of subjective and physiological measures were used to understand performance of those tasks in terms of workload. The simulator used to collect these data was a digital representation of a generic analog NPP MCR interface. The data resulting from this experimentation enhances the current information gathering process, allowing for more robust technical bases to support regulatory guidance development and decision making. The present paper describes the approach behind this research effort.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Situational assessment tasks consist of evaluating current state of NPP systems to determine whether they are within required parameters. Response planning refers to deciding upon a course of action to address the plant’s current situation [4]. The use of an EOP and the SRO to direct participant actions remove the cognitive activity associated with situational assessment and response planning and therefore, determined to be outside the scope of the present work.
 
2
O’Hara et al. [5] identify monitoring and detection as one task, but their definition of the two tasks are separate. Monitoring requires checking the plant to determine whether it is functioning properly by verifying parameters indicated on the control panels, observing the readings displayed on screens, and obtaining verbal reports from other personnel. Detection occurs when the operator recognizes that the state of the plant has changed. Through discussions with a SME, the team separated and defined the checking task described in the text.
 
3
Dynamic response of simulator refers to the resulting change to the state (i.e., the physics) of the simulator based on operator input.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lackey, S., Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Salcedo, J.: Equal but different: 5 research strategies for improving conclusions drawn from novice populations. Proceedings of the 2014 MODSIM World Conference, Hampton, VA (April, 2014) Lackey, S., Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Salcedo, J.: Equal but different: 5 research strategies for improving conclusions drawn from novice populations. Proceedings of the 2014 MODSIM World Conference, Hampton, VA (April, 2014)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Guznov, S., Mercado, J., D’Agostino, A.: Developing methodology for experimentation using a nuclear power plant simulator. Foundations of Augmented Cognition 8027, 181–188 (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39454-6_19 CrossRef Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Guznov, S., Mercado, J., D’Agostino, A.: Developing methodology for experimentation using a nuclear power plant simulator. Foundations of Augmented Cognition 8027, 181–188 (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-39454-6_​19 CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whaley, A.M., Xing, J., Boring, R.L., Hendrickson, S.T.L., Joe, J.C., Le Blanc, K.L.: Building a psychological foundation for human reliability analysis, NUREG-2114. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2015) Whaley, A.M., Xing, J., Boring, R.L., Hendrickson, S.T.L., Joe, J.C., Le Blanc, K.L.: Building a psychological foundation for human reliability analysis, NUREG-2114. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2015)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Brown, W.S.: Human factors considerations with respect to emerging technology in nuclear power plants, NUREG/CR-6947 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (2008) O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Brown, W.S.: Human factors considerations with respect to emerging technology in nuclear power plants, NUREG/CR-6947 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (2008)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hara, J., Higgins, J., Fleger, S., Barnes, V.: Human-system interfaces for automatic systems (No. BNL–93950-2010-CP). Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) (2010) O’Hara, J., Higgins, J., Fleger, S., Barnes, V.: Human-system interfaces for automatic systems (No. BNL–93950-2010-CP). Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) (2010)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Pieringer, P.A., Fleger, S.A.: Human factors engineering program review model, NUREG-0711, Rev. 3. Washington, DC (2012) O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C., Pieringer, P.A., Fleger, S.A.: Human factors engineering program review model, NUREG-0711, Rev. 3. Washington, DC (2012)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 81 (1956)CrossRef Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 81 (1956)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Leis, R., Reinerman-Jones, L.: Methodological implications of confederate use for experimentation in safety-critical domains. Proceedings of the International Meeting of Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Las Vegas, NV (2015) Leis, R., Reinerman-Jones, L.: Methodological implications of confederate use for experimentation in safety-critical domains. Proceedings of the International Meeting of Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Las Vegas, NV (2015)
Metadaten
Titel
The NRC Human Performance Test Facility: An Approach to Data Collection Using Novices and a Simplified Environment
verfasst von
Niav Hughes
Amy D’Agostino
Lauren Reinerman-Jones
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41950-3_16