Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Focus groups to investigate new ideas are widely used in many research fields. The use of focus groups in design science research poses interesting opportunities and challenges. Traditional focus group methods must be adapted to meet two specific goals of design research. For the evaluation of an artifact design, exploratory focus groups (EFGs) study the artifact to propose improvements in the design. The results of the evaluation are used to refine the design and the cycle of build and evaluate using EFGs continues until the artifact is released for field test in the application environment. Then, the field test of the design artifact may employ confirmatory focus groups (CFGs) to establish the utility of the artifact in field use. Rigorous investigation of the artifact requires multiple CFGs to be run with opportunities for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analyses across the multiple CFGs. In this chapter, we discuss the adaptation of focus groups to design science research projects. We demonstrate the use of both EFGs and CFGs in a design research doctoral thesis in the health-care field.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Al-Shorbaji, N. (2001) Health and Medical Informatics: Technical Chapter, in Health Information Support, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
Baker, T. and D. A. Collier (2005) The Economic Payout Model for Service Guarantees, Decision Sciences 36 (2), p. 197. CrossRef
Ballou, D., R. Wang, H. Pazer, and G. K. Tayi (1998) Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality, Management Science 44 (4), pp. 462–484. CrossRef
Ballou, D. P. and H. L. Pazer (1985) Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems, Management Science 31 (2), pp. 150–162. CrossRef
Basili, V. R. (1996) The role of experimentation in software engineering: past, current, and future, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, Germany, IEEE Computer Society.
Baskerville, R. and M. D. Myers (2004) Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice-foreword, MIS Quarterly 28 (3), p. 329.
Benbasat, I. and R. Weber (1996) Research commentary: rethinking “diversity” in information systems research, Information Systems Research 7 (4), p. 389. CrossRef
Berndt, D. J., A. R. Hevner, and J. Studnicki (2003) The CATCH data warehouse: support for community health care decision-making, Decision Support Systems 35 (3), p. 367. CrossRef
Bloor, M., J. Frankland, M. Thomas, and K. Robson (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research, Sage, London.
Chapman, G. B. and A. S. Elstein (2000) Cognitive Processes and Biases in Medical Decision Making, in G. B. Chapman and F. A. Sonnenberg (eds.) Decision Making in Healthcare: Theory, Psychology and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1), pp. 37–46.
Cole, R., S. Purao, M. Rossi, and M. k. Sein. (2005) Being proactive: where action research meets design research, in Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas , 2005.
Debreceny, R., M. Putterill, L.-L. Tung, and A. L. Gilbert (2003) New tools for the determination of e-commerce inhibitors, Decision Support Systems 34 (2), p. 177. CrossRef
Derose, S. F. and D. B. Petitti (2003) Measuring quality of care and performance from a population health care perspective, Annual Review of Public Health 24 (1), pp. 363–384. CrossRef
Derose, S. F., M. A. Schuster, J. E. Fielding, and S. M. Asch (2002) Public health quality measurement: concepts and challenges, Annual Review of Public Health 23 (1), pp. 1–21. CrossRef
Desanctis, G. and R. B. Gallupe (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Science 33 (4), pp. 589–609. CrossRef
Friede, A., H. L. Blum, and M. McDonald (1995) Public health informatics: how information-age technology can strengthen public health, Annual Review of Public Health 16 (1), pp. 239–252. CrossRef
Galliers, R. D. (1991) Choosing appropriate information systems research approaches: a revised taxonomy, in H. E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Elsevier Science Pub., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hevner, A., S. March, J. Park, and S. Ram (2004) Design science research in information systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly 28 (1), pp. 75–105.
Hevner, A. R. (2007) A three cycle view of design science research, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19 (2), pp. 87–92.
Iversen, J. H., L. Mathiassen, and P. A. Nielsen (2004) Managing risk in software process improvement: an action research approach, MIS Quarterly 28 (3), p. 395.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. and K. R. Lang (2005) Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology, Information Systems Management 22 (4), p. 7. CrossRef
King, N. (1998) Template Analysis, in G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, Sage Publications, London.
Kitzinger, J. (1994) The methodology of Focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health 16 (1), pp. 103–121.
Kontio, J., L. Lehtola, and J. Bragge (2004) Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences, International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering , IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp. 271–280.
Krueger, R. A. and M. A. Casey (2000) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
LeRouge, C. and F. Niederman (2006) Information systems and health care Xi: public health knowledge management architecture design: a case study, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18, p. 15.
Lindgren, R., O. Henfridsson, and U. Schultze (2004) Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study, MIS Quarterly 28 (3), p. 435.
Maibach, E. and D. R. Holtgrave (1995) Advances in public health communication, Annual Review of Public Health 16 (1), pp. 219–238. CrossRef
Manning, P. K. (1996) Information technology in the police context: the “sailor” phone, Information Systems Research 7 (1), p. 52. CrossRef
Mantei, M. M. and T. J. Teorey (1989) Incorporating behavioral techniques into the systems development, MIS Quarterly 13 (3), p. 257. CrossRef
Markus, M. L., A. Majchrzak, and L. Gasser (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes, MIS Quarterly 26 (3), pp. 179–212.
Massey, A. P. and W. A. Wallace (1991) Focus groups as a knowledge elicitation technique: an exploratory study, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 3 (2), pp. 193–200. CrossRef
Merton, R. K. and P. L. Kendall (1946) The focused interview, The American Journal of Sociology 51 (6), pp. 541–557. CrossRef
Morgan, D. L. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Nielsen, J. (1997) The use and misuse of focus groups, IEEE Software 14 (1), pp. 94–95. CrossRef
Shankaranarayan, G., M. Ziad, and R. Y. Wang (2003) Managing data quality in dynamic decision environments: an information product approach, Journal of Database Management 14 (4), pp. 14–32. CrossRef
Smith, H. J., S. J. Milberg, and S. J. Burke (1996) Information privacy: measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices, MIS Quarterly 20 (2), p. 167. CrossRef
Stewart, D. W., P. N. Shamdasani, and D. W. Rook (2007) Focus Groups: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn., vol. 20, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Torkzadeh, G., J. C.-J. Chang, and G. W. Hansen (2006) Identifying issues in customer relationship management at Merck-Medco, Decision Support Systems 42 (2), p. 1116. CrossRef
Tremblay, M. C., R. Fuller, D. Berndt, and J. Studnicki (2007) Doing more with more information: changing healthcare planning with OLAP tools, Decision Support Systems 43 (4), pp. 1305–1320. CrossRef
U.S. Congress (1995) Bringing Health Care Online: The Role of Information Technologies, Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Venable, J. R. (2006) The role of theory and theorizing in design science research, in DESRIST Conference, Claremont, CA, 2006.
Wang, R. Y. and D. M. Strong (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers, Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4), pp. 5–34.
Wellner, A. S. (2003) The new science of focus groups, American Demographics 25 (2), p. 29.
Xia, W. and G. Lee (2005) Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development, Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (1), p. 45. CrossRef
- The Use of Focus Groups in Design Science Research
Monica Chiarini Tremblay
Alan R. Hevner
Donald J. Berndt
- Springer US
- Chapter 10
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA