Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Introduction to Practical Panarchy: Linking Law, Resilience, and Adaptive Water Governance of Regional Scale Social-Ecological Systems Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

17. Theory and Research to Study Principles of Social Cognition and Decision-Making in Adaptive Environmental Governance

verfasst von : Daniel A. DeCaro, Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold, Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah, Ahjond S. Garmestani

Erschienen in: Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Environmental governance systems must adapt to address increased uncertainty and new social-ecological conditions posed by stressors like climate change. This chapter presents several principles of social cognition and decision-making that influence adaptive governance. The principles are illustrated with examples from six US river basins. Future research opportunities are also outlined.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Theory and Research to Study the Legal and Institutional Foundations of Adaptive Governance
Nächstes Kapitel Adaptive Water Governance: Summary and Synthesis
Literatur
Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. Br J Soc Psychol 29:97–119CrossRef
Agrawal A, Ribot J (2014) Are Ostrom’s design principles sufficient for design? Policy Matters 19:111–115
Armitage D (2007) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int J Commons 2(1):7–32CrossRef
Arnold CA (2004) Working out an environmental ethic: anniversary lessons from Mono Lake. Wyoming Law Rev 4:1–55
Arnold CA (2014) Framing watersheds. In: Kirokawa K (ed) Environmental law and contrasting ideas of nature: a constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–302CrossRef
Arnold CA, Gunderson LH (2013) Adaptive law and resilience. Environ Law Rep 43:10426–10443
Arnold CA, Green OO, DeCaro DA, Chase A, Ewa JG (2014) The social-ecological resilience of an easter urban-suburban watershed: the anacostia river basin. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):29–90
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35:216–224CrossRef
Bailey K, Grossardt T (2010) Toward structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative/geovisual decision support systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(1):57–86CrossRef
Beach LR (1998) Image theory: theoretical and empirical foundations. Routledge, Mahwah
Bingham LB (2009) Collaborative governance: emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. J Dispute Resolution 2(2):1–58
Bingham LB (2010) The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wisconsin Law Rev 2010(2):297–356
Bingham LB, Nabatchi T, O’Leary R (2005) The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Adm Rev 65(5):547–558CrossRef
Bingham LB, Sandfort J, O’Leary R (2008) Learning to do and doing to learn: teaching managers to collaborate in networks. In: Bingham LB, O’Leary R (eds) Big ideas in collaborative public management. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 270–286
Birge HE, Allen CR, Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Hamm JA, Babbitt C, Nemec K, Schlager E (2014) Social-ecological resilience and law in the platte river basin. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):229–327
Bowles S (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320:1605–1609CrossRef
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Chang 14(2):125–136CrossRef
Brehm SS, Brehm JW (1981) Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic, New York
Bullard RD, Johnson GS (2000) Environmental justice: grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. J Soc Issues 56(3):555–578CrossRef
Castro P (2012) Legal innovation for social change: exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Polit Psychol 33(1):105–121CrossRef
Castro P, Batel S (2008) Social representation, change and resistance: on the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychol 14(4):475–497CrossRef
Castro P, Mouro C (2011) Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: insights from biodiversity conservation. Am J Commun Psychol 47(3-4):362–373CrossRef
Chaffin BC, Gunderson LH (2016) Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 165:81–87CrossRef
Chaffin BC, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2014a) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin social-ecological system. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):157–183
Chen XP, Pillutla MM, Yao X (2009) Unintended consequences of cooperation inducing and maintaining mechanisms in public goods dilemmas: sanctions and moral appeals. Group Process Intergroup Relat 12(2):241–255CrossRef
Chess C, Purcell K (1999) Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Technol 33(16):2685–2692CrossRef
Clarvis MH, Fatichi S, Allan A, Fuhrer J, Stoffel M, Romerio F, Gaudard L, Burlando P, Beniston M, Xoplaki E, Toreti A (2014) Governing and managing water resources under changing hydro-climatic contexts: the case of the upper Rhone basin. Environ Sci Pol 43:56–67CrossRef
Clement F (2010) Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci 43(2):129–156CrossRef
Cornforth A (2009) Behaviour change: insights for environmental policy making from social psychology and behavioural economics. Policy Q 5(4):21–28
Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489CrossRef
Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Arnold CA, Birgé H, DeCaro DA, Fremier AK, Gosnell H, Schlager E (2017) Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecol Soc 22(2):3. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5751/​ES-08983-220203
DeCaro DA, Stokes M (2008) Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conserv Biol 22(6):1443–1451CrossRef
DeCaro DA, Janssen MA, Lee A (2015) Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma. Judgm Decis Mak 10(6):511–537
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRef
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2010) Climate change denial: sources, actors, strategies. In: Lever-Tracy C (ed) Routledge handbook of climate change and society. Routledge, London, pp 240–259
Edelman M (1960) Symbols and political quiescence. Am Polit Sci Rev 54(03):695–704CrossRef
Entman RM (2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J Commun 57(1):163–173CrossRef
Farrell J (2016) Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(1):92–97CrossRef
Gächter S (2007) Conditional cooperation. In: Frey BS, Stutzer A (eds) Economics and psychology: a promising new cross-disciplinary field. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 19–50
Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In: Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (eds) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 2–34
Green OO, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gunderson LH, Ruhl JB, Arnold CA, Graham NA, Cosens BA, Angeler DG, Chaffin BC, Holling CS (2015) Barriers and bridges to the integration of social-ecological resilience and law. Front Ecol Environ 13(6):332–337
Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(23):9314–9319CrossRef
Gunderson LH, Garmestani A, Rizzardi KW, Ruhl JB, Light A (2014) Escaping a rigidity trap: governance and adaptive capacity to climate change in the everglades social ecological system Idaho Law Rev 51:127–156
Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(13):1243–1248
Hardisty DJ, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2010) A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol Sci 21(1):86–92CrossRef
Hilbe C, Traulsen A, Röhl T, Milinski M (2014) Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(2):752–756CrossRef
Howard JL (2010) Managing for justice in community-based water planning: a conceptual framework. Environ Conserv 37(3):356–363CrossRef
Hunt L, Haider W (2001) Fair and effective decision making in forest management planning. Soc Nat Resour 14:873–887CrossRef
Irvin RA, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm Rev 64(1):55–65CrossRef
Johnson-Laird PN (2013) Mental models and cognitive change. J Cognit Psychol 25(2):131–138CrossRef
Jung JY, Mellers BA (2016) American attitudes toward nudges. Judgm Decis Mak 11(1):62–74
Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58(9):697–720CrossRef
Kelley CP, Mohtadi S, Cane MA, Seager R, Kushnir Y (2015) Climate change in the fertile crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(11):3241–3246CrossRef
Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–198CrossRef
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRef
Larson KL, Wiek A, Keeler LW (2013) A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ. J Environ Manag 116:58–71CrossRef
Leach WD, Sabatier PA (2005) To trust an adversary: integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. Am Polit Sci Rev 99(04):491–503CrossRef
Lee VK, Harris LT (2013) How social cognition can inform social decision making. Front Neurosci 7(259):1–13
Lever-Tracy C (ed) (2010) Routledge handbook of climate change and society. Routledge, New York
Levine JM (1999) Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 3(4):358–364CrossRef
Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 4:551–578CrossRef
Lind EA, Van den Bos K (2002) When fairness works: toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Res Organ Behav 24:181–223CrossRef
Lockwood M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: a framework, principles and performance outcomes. J Environ Manag 91:754–766CrossRef
Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127(2):267–286CrossRef
Lubell M (2004) Collaborative environmental institutions: all talk and no action? J Policy Anal Manag 23(3):549–573CrossRef
Lubell M, Henry AD, McCoy M (2010) Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. Am J Polit Sci 54(2):287–300CrossRef
Marshall G (2008) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. Int J Commons 2(1):75–97CrossRef
McComas KA, Stedman R, Hart PS (2011) Community support for campus approaches to sustainable energy use: the role of “town–gown” relationships. Energy Policy 39:2310–2318CrossRef
McCright AM, Xiao C, Dunlap RE (2014) Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. Soc Sci Res 48:251–260CrossRef
McGinley PC (2011) Climate change and the war on coal: exploring the dark side. Vermont J EnviroN Law 13:255–331CrossRef
Moller AC, Ryan RM, Deci EL (2006) Self-determination theory and public policy: improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. J Publ Policy and Mark 25(1):104–116CrossRef
Moscovici S (1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. Eur J Soc Psychol 18(3):211–250CrossRef
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107(51):22026–22031CrossRef
Mulder LB, van Dijk E, DeCremer D, Wilke HAM (2006) Undermining trust and cooperation: the paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. J Exp Soc Psychol 42:147–162CrossRef
Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220CrossRef
O’Leary R, Bingham LB, Choi Y (2010) Teaching collaborative leadership: ideas and lessons for the field. J Public Affairs Edu 16(4):565–592CrossRef
Opotow S, Brook A (2003) Identity and exclusion in rangeland conflict. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 249–272
Ostrom E (1965) Public entrepreneurship: a case study in ground water management. Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles
Ostrom V (1971) The political theory of a compound republic: designing the American experiment, 2nd edn. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Am Polit Sci Rev 91:1–22CrossRef
Ostrom E (2005) Animating institutional analysis. In: Ostrom E (ed) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 99–133
Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:1–33CrossRef
Ostrom E (2014) Do institutions for collective action evolve? J Bioecon 16:3–30CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19(3):354–365CrossRef
Parks C, Joireman J, Lange P (2013) Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: how public goods are promoted. Psychol Sci Public Interest 14(3):119–165CrossRef
Peluso NL (1993) Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Chang 3(2):199–217CrossRef
Rachlinski JJ (1998) Limits of social norms. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 74:1537–1567
Reed M (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431CrossRef
Sarker A (2013) The role of state-reinforced self-governance in averting the tragedy of the irrigation commons in Japan. Public Adm 91(3):727–743
Sarkki S, Rantala L, Karjalainen TP (2015) Fit between conservation instruments and local social systems: cases of co-management and payments for ecosystem services. Change and Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst 2(1):59–78
Schlager E, Heikkila T (2011) Left high and dry? Climate change, common-pool resource theory, and adaptability of Western water compacts. Public Adm Rev 71(3):461–470CrossRef
Schlager E, Heikkila T, Case C (2012) The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: lessons from water compacts in the western United States. Publius, J Federalism 42(3):494–515CrossRef
Schlichting I (2013) Strategic framing of climate change by industry actors: a meta-analysis. Environ Commun, J Nat Culture 7(4):493–511CrossRef
Silverman C (2007) Regret the error: how media mistakes pollute the press and imperil free speech. Union Square Press, New York
Stern PC, Easterling WE (eds) (1999) Making climate forecasts matter. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:161–170CrossRef
Swim JK, Stern PC, Doherty TJ, Clayton S, Reser JP, Weber EU, Gifford R, Howard GS (2011) Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):241–250CrossRef
Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (1999) Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Adm Sci Q 44(4):684–707CrossRef
Turner RA, Fitzsimmons C, Forster J, Mahon R, Peterson A, Stead SM (2014) Measuring good governance for complex ecosystems: perceptions of coral reef-dependent communities in the Caribbean. Glob Environ Chang 29:105–117CrossRef
Tyler TR (1988) What is procedural justice? Law and Soc Rev 22:301–355CrossRef
Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New Haven
Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimization. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400CrossRef
Tyler TR, Degoey P (1995) Collective restraint in social dilemmas: procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(3):482–497CrossRef
Van Ness DW, Strong KH (2013) Restoring justice: an introduction to restorative justice. Bender, New Jersey
Vreudenhil H, Slinger J, Kater E, Thissen W (2010) The influence of scale preferences on the design of a water innovation: a case in Dutch River management. Environ Manag 46(1):29–43CrossRef
Weber EU (2010) What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(3):332–342CrossRef
Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328CrossRef
Winter DD (2000) Some big ideas for some big problems. Am Psychol 55(5):516–522CrossRef
Yamagishi T (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(1):110–116CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Theory and Research to Study Principles of Social Cognition and Decision-Making in Adaptive Environmental Governance
verfasst von
Daniel A. DeCaro
Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold
Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah
Ahjond S. Garmestani
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72470-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-72472-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_17