Toward Guidelines for Modeling Learning Agents in Multiagent-Based Simulation: Implications from Q-Learning and Sarsa Agents

This paper focuses on how simulation results are

sensitive

to agent modeling in multiagent-based simulation (MABS) and investigates such sensitivity by comparing results where agents have different

learning mechanisms

,

i.e.

, Q-learning and Sarsa, in the context of reinforcement learning. Through an analysis of simulation results in a bargaining game as one of the canonical examples in game theory, the following implications have been revealed: (1) even a slight difference has an essential influence on simulation results; (2) testing in static and dynamic environments highlights the different tendency of results; and (3) three stages in both Q-learning and Sarsa agents (

i.e.

, (a) competition; (b) cooperation; and (c) learning impossible) are found in the dynamic environment, while no stage is found in the static environment. From these three implications, the following very

rough

guidelines for modeling agents can be derived: (1) cross-element validation for specifying key factors that affect simulation results; (2) a comparison of results between the static and dynamic environments for determining candidates to be investigated in detail; and (3) sensitive analysis for specifying applicable range for learning agents.