nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Objective Evaluation of User Experience

verfasst von : Carolina Rico-Olarte, Diego M. López, Sara Kepplinger

Erschienen in: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Background: The concept of user experience (UX) involves many aspects and different perspectives, making it difficult to evaluate the whole set of what UX represents. Despite existing standards, a clear definition of the UX evaluation concerning the identification of the different aspects to be evaluated according to the perspectives forming the UX (user and system), taking into account a given context of use is missing. Objective: Propose a conceptual framework for identifying differences between the UX evaluation perspectives and their measurable aspects. Methods: We followed a qualitative method for building conceptual frameworks. Results: The proposed conceptual framework identifies and associates the main UX concepts, from the user and system perspectives. The obtained plane of concepts provides a better overview of the phenomenon studied. The built framework led to the definition of an objective UX evaluation method: physiological signals are the convergence point between the physical state of the user and the measurement of emotions. Conclusion: The evaluation of UX is particularly important in ICT solutions for health since users/patients must maintain the motivation to continue using technology, in order to guarantee adherence to their treatments or interventions. The obtained framework and method are the first step towards finding suitable and according-to-context UX evaluation processes allowing an improved interaction between user and system.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel CHAI: Coding Heuristics for Assessing Intuitive Interaction

Nächstes Kapitel Antetype-Pm: An Integrated Approach to Model-Based Evaluation of Interactive Prototypes

Roto, V., Law, E.L.-C., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User Experience White Paper. Presented at the Dagstuhl, Germany (2011)

Brezinka, V.: Computer games supporting cognitive behaviour therapy in children. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 19, 100–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104512468288CrossRef

Carrillo, I., Meza-Kubo, V., Morán, A.L., Galindo, G., García-Canseco, E.: Processing EEG signals towards the construction of a user experience assessment method. In: Bravo, J., Hervás, R., Villarreal, V. (eds.) AmIHEALTH 2015. LNCS, vol. 9456, pp. 281–292. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26508-7_28CrossRef

Colpani, R., Homem, M.R.P.: An innovative augmented reality educational framework with gamification to assist the learning process of children with intellectual disabilities. In: 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), pp. 1–6 (2015)

Keskinen, T., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Sharma, S., Miettinen, T., Luhtala, M.: Evaluating the experiential user experience of public display applications in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, p. 7. ACM (2013)

Law, E., Roto, V., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J., Hassenzahl, M.: Towards a shared definition of user experience. In: CHI 2008 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 2395–2398. ACM (2008)

Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M.: Now let’s do it in practice: user experience evaluation methods in product development. In: CHI 2008 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3961–3964. ACM (2008)

Law, E.L.-C., Vermeeren, A.P., Hassenzahl, M., Blythe, M.: Towards a UX manifesto. In: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI… but not as We Know it-Volume 2, pp. 205–206. British Computer Society (2007)

ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-1:v1:en

10.

Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 719–728. ACM (2009)

11.

Hassenzahl, M.: The hedonic/pragmatic model of user experience. In: UX Manifesto, vol. 10, pp. 10–14 (2007)

12.

Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11–15. ACM (2008)

13.

Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience-a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 91–97 (2006)CrossRef

14.

Wiklund-Engblom, A., Hassenzahl, M., Bengs, A., Sperring, S.: What us needs tell about user experience. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 666–669. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_71CrossRef

15.

Thüring, M., Mahlke, S.: Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. Int. J. Psychol. 42, 253–264 (2007)CrossRef

16.

Mandryk, R.L.: Physiological measures for game evaluation. In: Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience, pp. 207–235 (2008)

17.

Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., Sengers, P.: How emotion is made and measured. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 275–291 (2007)CrossRef

18.

Allam, A., Dahlan, H.M.: User experience: challenges and opportunities. J. Inf. Syst. Res. Innov. 3, 28–36 (2013)

19.

Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.: User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2005)

20.

Kort, J., Vermeeren, A., Fokker, J.E.: Conceptualizing and measuring user experience. In: UX Manifesto, p. 57 (2007)

21.

Bevan, N.: What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM, pp. 1–4 (2009)

22.

Bevan, N.: International standards for usability should be more widely used. J. Usability Stud. 4, 106–113 (2009)

23.

Jabareen, Y.: Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8, 49–62 (2009)CrossRef

24.

Rico-Olarte, C., López, D., Kepplinger, S.: User experience evaluation methods in games for children with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of 1st International Young Researcher Summit on Quality of Experience in Emerging Multimedia Services (QEEMS 2017), Erfurt, Germany (2017)

25.

Maia, C.L.B., Furtado, E.S.: A systematic review about user experience evaluation. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2016. LNCS, vol. 9746, pp. 445–455. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_42CrossRef

26.

Zarour, M., Alharbi, M.: User experience framework that combines aspects, dimensions, and measurement methods. Cogent Eng. Article no. 1421006 (2017)

27.

Rico-Olarte, C., López, D., Blobel, B., Kepplinger, S.: User experience evaluations in rehabilitation video games for children: a systematic mapping of the literature. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 243, 13 (2017)

28.

Maia, C.L.B., Furtado, E.S.: A study about psychophysiological measures in user experience monitoring and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 7:1–7:9. ACM, New York (2016)

29.

ISO/IEC 25000: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE (2014). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25000:ed-2:v1:en

30.

Miki, H.: User experience and other people: on user experience evaluation framework for human-centered design. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2015. CCIS, vol. 528, pp. 55–59. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21380-4_10CrossRef

31.

ISO/IEC 25022: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) - Measurement of quality in use (2016). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25022:ed-1:v1:en

32.

ISO 9355-2: Ergonomic requirements for the design of displays and control actuators – Part 2: Displays (1999). https://www.iso.org/standard/21920.html

33.

Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, L.G., Berntson, G.: Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRef

34.

Nacke, L.E.: An introduction to physiological player metrics for evaluating games. In: Seif El-Nasr, M., Drachen, A., Canossa, A. (eds.) Game Analytics, pp. 585–619. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_26CrossRef

35.

ISO/IEC 25021: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Quality measure elements (2012). https://www.iso.org/standard/55477.html

36.

Bernhaupt, R.: User experience evaluation methods in the games development life cycle. In: Bernhaupt, R. (ed.) Game User Experience Evaluation. HIS, pp. 1–8. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_1CrossRef

37.

Izard, C.E.: Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations (1992)CrossRef

38.

Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6, 169–200 (1992)CrossRef

39.

Rico-Olarte, C., Narváez, S., Farinango, C., López, D.M., Pharow, P.S.: HapHop-Physio a computer game to support cognitive therapies in children. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 10, 1–9 (2017)CrossRef

40.

Sim, G., Horton, M.: Investigating children’s opinions of games: fun toolkit vs. this or that. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 70–77. ACM, New York (2012)

41.

Montañés, M.C.: Psicología de la emoción: el proceso emocional. Universidad de Valencia (2005)

42.

Hernandez, J., Riobo, I., Rozga, A., Abowd, G.D., Picard, R.W.: Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 307–317. ACM (2014)

43.

Martínez, F., Barraza, C., González, N., González, J.: KAPEAN: understanding affective states of children with ADHD. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 18–28 (2016)

44.

Landowska, A., Miler, J.: Limitations of emotion recognition in software user experience evaluation context. In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1631–1640 (2016)

45.

Yao, L., Liu, Y., Li, W., Zhou, L., Ge, Y., Chai, J., Sun, X.: Using physiological measures to evaluate user experience of mobile applications. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8532, pp. 301–310. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_31CrossRef

46.

Roto, V., Vermeeren, A., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Law, E.: User Experience Evaluation – Which Method to Choose? In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 714–715. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_129CrossRef

Titel: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Objective Evaluation of User Experience
verfasst von: Carolina Rico-Olarte
Diego M. López
Sara Kepplinger
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91796-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91797-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_39

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Nachhaltigkeitsaward Key Visual/© Cometis AG/Global ESG Monitor | Daniel Rupp | Generiert mit KI, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Jonas Klose/© Pine Valley Capital GmbH, Carina Kießling von der Strategieberatung Roland Berger/© Monika Walther Fotografie | ATZ, Beijing Auto Show 2024: Deutsche Hersteller wollen angreifen./© EKH-Pictures / Generated with AI / Stock.adobe.com, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2024/© AndreyPopov / Getty Images / iStock, 2023_Antrieb/© supervisuell, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.