nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards an Integrated Development and Sustainability Evaluation of Energy Scenarios Assisted by Automated Information Exchange

verfasst von : Jan Sören Schwarz, Tobias Witt, Astrid Nieße, Jutta Geldermann, Sebastian Lehnhoff, Michael Sonnenschein

Erschienen in: Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Today, decision making in politics and businesses should aim for sustainable development, and one field of action is the transformation of energy systems. To reshape energy systems towards renewable energy resources, it has to be decided today on how to accomplish the transition. Energy scenarios are widely used to guide decision making in this context. While considerable effort has been put into developing energy scenarios, researchers have pointed out three requirements for energy scenarios that are not fulfilled satisfactorily yet: The development and evaluation of energy scenarios should (1) incorporate the concept of sustainability, (2) provide decision support in a transparent way, and (3) be replicable for other researchers. To meet these requirements, we combine different methodological approaches: story-and-simulation (SAS) scenarios, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), information modeling, and co-simulation. We show how the combination of these methods can lead to an integrated approach for development and sustainability evaluation of energy scenarios assisted by automated information exchange. We concretize this approach with a sustainability evaluation process (SEP) model and an information model. We highlight, which artifacts are developed during the SEP and how the information model can help to automate the information exchange in this process. The objectives are to facilitate a sustainable development of the energy sector and to make the development and decision support processes of energy scenarios more transparent.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Day-Ahead Scheduling of Electric Heat Pumps for Peak Shaving in Distribution Grids

http://www.forschungsradar.de/studiendatenbank.html (accessed August 17, 2017).

Also called multi-criteria decision aiding/analysis (MCDA).

https://undg.org/2030-agenda/sdg-acceleration-toolkit (accessed August 17, 2017).

http://www.isdgs.org (accessed August 17, 2017).

Also called scenario management.

In the remaining sections, definitions are highlighted in bold typesetting at their first occurrence.

http://mosaik.offis.de (accessed August 17, 2017).

For better readability we use the term “step” to describe subprocesses of the SEP.

Alcamo, J.: The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In: Alcamo, J. (ed.) Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis, Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment, vol. 2, pp. 123–150. Elsevier, Amsterdam and Boston (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00406-7CrossRef

Bastian, J., Clauß, C., Wolf, S., Schneider, P.: Master for co-simulation using FMI. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Modelica Conference, pp. 115–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp11063115

Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003)

Blank, M., et al.: Process for simulation-based sustainability evaluation of smart grid future scenarios, version 1.0 (2016). http://neds-niedersachsen.de/uploads/tx_tkpublikationen/Whitepaper-SEP-V1.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2017

BMWi: Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung (2010). https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/E/energiekonzept-2010.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2017. (in German)

Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.: Note–a preference ranking organisation method: (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647CrossRefMATH

Brundtland, G.H.: Our Common Future. Oxford Paperbacks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

Castro, A.G., et al.: The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes-the nutrigenomics use case. BMC Bioinform. 7, 267 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-267CrossRef

Daraio, C., Lenzerini, M., Leporelli, C., Naggar, P., Bonaccorsi, A., Bartolucci, A.: The advantages of an Ontology-Based Data Management approach: openness, interoperability and data quality. Scientometrics 108(1), 441–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1913-6CrossRef

10.

Deutscher Bundestag: German Bundestag. Gesetz über die Elektrizitäts- und Gasverordnung (Energiewirtschaftsgesetz): EnWG (2005). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/enwg_2005/BJNR197010005.html. Accessed 17 Aug 2017. (in German)

11.

Elkington, J.: Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford (2002). Reprint edn

12.

European Commission: Communication from the European Commission: A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030 (2014). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0015. Accessed 17 Aug 2017

13.

Fensel, D.: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic-Commerce. Springer, Berlin (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09083-1CrossRefMATH

14.

Gausemeier, J., Fink, A., Schlake, O.: Scenario management: an approach to develop future potentials. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 59, 111–130 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00166-2CrossRef

15.

Grunwald, A., Dieckhoff, C., Fischedick, M., Höffler, F., Mayer, C., Weimer-Jehle, W.: Consulting with energy scenarios: requirements for scientific policy advice. In: acatech/Leopoldina/Akademienunion (eds.) Series on Science-Based Policy Advice (2016)

16.

Hughes, N., Strachan, N.: Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios. Energy Policy 38(10), 6056–6065 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.061CrossRef

17.

International Energy Agency (IEA): World Energy Outlook 2016: Executive Summary (2016)

18.

Keles, D., Möst, D., Fichtner, W.: The development of the German energy market until 2030—A critical survey of selected scenarios. Energy Policy 39(2), 812–825 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.055CrossRef

19.

Kontchakov, R., Rodríguez-Muro, M., Zakharyaschev, M.: Ontology-based data access with databases: a short course. In: Rudolph, S., Gottlob, G., Horrocks, I., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2013. LNCS, vol. 8067, pp. 194–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39784-4_5CrossRef

20.

Kowalski, K., Stagl, S., Madlener, R., Omann, I.: Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(3), 1063–1074 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049CrossRef

21.

Kronenberg, T., et al.: Energieszenarien für Deutschland: Stand der Literatur und methodische Auswertung. In: Bruhns, H. (ed.) Energiewende - Aspekte, Optionen, Herausforderungen, pp. 132–168. Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft - Arbeitskreis Energie, Berlin (2012). (in German)

22.

Lee, Y.T.: Information modeling: from design to implementation. In: Proceedings of the Second World Manufacturing Congress, pp. 315–321 (1999)

23.

Lehnhoff, S., et al.: Exchangeability of power flow simulators in smart grid co-simulations with mosaik. In: 2015 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems, MSCPES, pp. 1–6, April 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSCPES.2015.7115410

24.

Oberschmidt, J., Geldermann, J., Ludwig, J., Schmehl, M.: Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 4(2), 183–212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/17506221011058696CrossRef

25.

Rehtanz, C., Guillaud, X.: Real-time and co-simulations for the development of power system monitoring, control and protection. In: 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference, PSCC, pp. 1–20, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541030

26.

Robinson, S.: Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

27.

Schlögl, F., Rohjans, S., Lehnhoff, S., Velasquez, J., Steinbrink, C., Palensky, P.: Towards a classification scheme for co-simulation approaches in energy systems. In: International Symposium on Smart Electric Distribution Systems and Technologies, pp. 2–7. IEEE/IES (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEDST.2015.7315262

28.

Schwarz, J.S., Witt, T., Nieße, A., Geldermann, J., Lehnhoff, S., Sonnenschein, M.: Towards an integrated sustainability evaluation of energy scenarios with automated information exchange. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, pp. 188–199. ScitePress (2017). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006302101880199

29.

Simon-Cuevas, A., Ceccaroni, L., Rosete-Suarez, A., Suarez-Rodriguez, A.: A formal modeling method applied to environmental-knowledge engineering. In: International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2009.55

30.

Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K.: An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 15(1), 281–299 (2012)CrossRef

31.

Steinhilber, S.: Exploring options for the harmonisation of renewable energy support policies in the EU using multi-criteria decision analysis. Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (2015)

32.

Stewart, T.J., French, S., Rios, J.: Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning - review and extension. Omega 41(4), 679–688 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003CrossRef

33.

Uslar, M., Specht, M., Rohjans, S., Trefke, J., Vasquez González, J.M.: The Common Information Model CIM. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25215-0CrossRef

34.

van der Heijden, K.: Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Wiley, Chichester, England and New York (1996)

35.

Vysniauskas, E., Nemuraite, L., Paradauskas, B.: Hybrid method for storing and querying ontologies in databases. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 115(9), 67–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.115.9.752CrossRef

36.

Wang, J.J., Jing, Y.Y., Zhang, C.F., Zhao, J.H.: Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13(9), 2263–2278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021CrossRef

37.

Weimer-Jehle, W., et al.: Context scenarios and their usage for the construction of socio-technical energy scenarios. Energy 111, 956–970 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.073CrossRef

Titel: Towards an Integrated Development and Sustainability Evaluation of Energy Scenarios Assisted by Automated Information Exchange
verfasst von: Jan Sören Schwarz
Tobias Witt
Astrid Nieße
Jutta Geldermann
Sebastian Lehnhoff
Michael Sonnenschein
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02906-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-02907-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02907-4_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"