nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards the Development of a Contingent Use of Systems Development Methodologies Model

verfasst von : Benson Moyo, Magda Huisman, Lynette Drevin

Erschienen in: Advances in Information Systems Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Systems development methodologies (SDMs) are divided into two categories: plan-driven SDMs and agile SDMs. Research has shown that no single SDM is suitable for every systems development project situation. This paper aims to present aspects of a study that developed and empirically tested a contingent use of SDMs model to investigate contingent use of SDMs. The developed contingent use of SDMs model is tested using survey data collected from 155 systems development organizations. The findings show that SDMs are adopted and continuously tailored throughout the life cycle of a systems development project. This has theoretical and practical implications for SDM design and deployment. The empirical findings and the model presented in this study can assist researchers to investigate the contingent use of SDMs and improve their implementation in systems development projects. The findings provide insights on how theory and practice co-evolve and inform one another.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Towards Conceptual and Logical Modelling of NoSQL Databases

Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., and Warsta, J.: Agile software development methods: Review and analysis (2071). https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1709/1709.08439.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2019

Agerfalk, P.J., Fitzgerald, B.: Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls? Commun. ACM 49(10), 27–34 (2006)CrossRef

Aitken, A., Ilango, V.: A comparative analysis of traditional software engineering and agile software development. In: System Sciences (HICSS) 46th Hawaii International Conference, pp. 4751–4760. IEEE (2013)

Bannon, W., Jr.: Missing data within a quantitative research study: how to assess it, treat it, and why you should care. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Practitioners 27(4), 230–232 (2015)CrossRef

Barlow, J.B., Giboney, J., Keith, M.J., Wilson, D., Schuetzler, R.M., Lowry, P.B., Vance, A.: Overview and guidance on agile development in large organizations. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 25–44 (2011)

Berente, N., Hansen, S.W., Rosenkranz, C.: Rule formation and change in information systems development: how institutional logics shape isd practices and processes. In: 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5104–5113. IEEE (2015)

Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. In: Proceedings 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 718–719. IEEE (2004)

Brinkkemper, S.: Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf. Softw. Technol. 38(4), 275–280 (1996)CrossRef

Conboy, K., Fitzgerald, B.: Method and developer characteristics for effective agile method tailoring: a study of XP expert opinion. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 20(1), 2:1–2:30 (2010)

10.

Diebold, P., Ostberg, J.P., Wagner, S., Zendler, U.: What do practitioners vary in using scrum? In: International Conference on Agile Software Development, pp. 40–51. Springer, Cham (2015)

11.

Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N.L., O’Kane, T.: Software development method tailoring at Motorola. Commun. ACM 46(4), 65–70 (2003)CrossRef

12.

Gill, A.Q., Henderson-Sellers, B., Niazi, M.: Scaling for agility: a reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies. Inf. Syst. Front.: A J. Res. Innov. 20(2), 315–341 (2018)CrossRef

13.

Goodhue, D.L.: Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage. Sci. 41(12), 1827–1844 (1995)CrossRef

14.

Gruver, G., Mouser, T.: Leading the transformation: applying agile and devops principles at scale. IT Revolution, Portland (2015)

15.

Harb, Y., Noteboom, C., Sarnikar, S.: Evaluating project characteristics for selecting the best-fit agile software development methodology: a teaching case. J. Midwest Assoc. Inf. Syst. (JMWAIS) 1(1), 33–52 (2015)

16.

Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyte, J., Agerfalk, P.J., Rossi, M.: Situational Method Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef

17.

Highsmith, J.A., Highsmith, J.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

18.

Iivari, J., Huisman, M.: The relationship between organisational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies. MIS Q. 31(1), 35–58 (2007)CrossRef

19.

Isaias, P., Issa, I.: High Level Models and Methodologies for Information Systems. Springer, New York (2015)CrossRef

20.

Jun, L., Qiuzhen, W., Qingguo, M.: The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: a vendor perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 29(7), 923–933 (2011)CrossRef

21.

Marks, G., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.M.: The impact of situational context on the software development process–a case study of a highly innovative start-up organization. In: International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, pp. 455–466. Springer, Cham (2017)

22.

Mirza, M.S., Datta, S.: Strengths and weakness of traditional and agile processes-a systematic review. J. Softw. 14(5), 209–219 (2019)CrossRef

23.

Moyo, B.: The contingent use of systems development methodologies in South Africa. Northwest University, Potchefstroom (Unpublished doctoral thesis) (2020)

24.

Oates, B.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage, London (2006)

25.

Pallant, J.: SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS 6th (edn.) McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (2016)

26.

Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2003)

27.

Russo, N.L., Fitzgerald, G., Shams, S.: Exploring adoption and use of agile methods: a comparative case study. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–8. Chicago, Illinois (2013)

28.

Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business, A Skill-Building Approach, 5th edn. Wiley, Haddington (2010)

29.

Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(5), 1041–1051 (2015)CrossRef

30.

Sun, H.: A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. MIS Q. 37(4), 1013–1041 (2013)CrossRef

31.

Turner, R., Zolin, R.: Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manage. J. 43(5), 87–99 (2012)CrossRef

32.

Vavpotic, D., Hovelja, T.: Improving the evaluation of software development methodology adoption and its impact on enterprise performance. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 165–188 (2012)CrossRef

33.

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996)CrossRef

34.

Versionone.: The State of Agile Survey (2018). https://explore.versionone.com/state-of-agile/12th-annual-state-of-agile-report-overview. Accessed 28 Oct 2019

35.

Vijayasarathy, L.R., Butler, C.W.: Choice of software development methodologies: Do organizational, project, and team characteristics matter? IEEE Softw. 33(5), 86–94 (2015)CrossRef

36.

Zhu, Z.: Evaluating contingency approaches to information systems design. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 22(5), 343–356 (2002)CrossRef

Titel: Towards the Development of a Contingent Use of Systems Development Methodologies Model
verfasst von: Benson Moyo
Magda Huisman
Lynette Drevin
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Advances in Information Systems Development
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95353-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-95354-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95354-6_16

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner