Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2018

15.01.2018 | CONFERENCE REPORT

Tracking current and forecasting future land-use impacts of agricultural value chains. 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 3rd of November 2017, Zurich, Switzerland

verfasst von: Michal Kulak, Sarah Sim, Henry King, Wan Yee Lam, Sandra Marquardt, Mark Huijbregts

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), organised by partners of the European project RELIEF (RELIability of product Environmental Footprints), focused on methods for better understanding the impacts of land use linked to agricultural value chains. The first session of the forum was dedicated to methods that help in retrospective tracking of land use within complex supply chains. Novel approaches were presented for the integration of increasingly available spatially located land use data into LCA. The second session focused on forward-looking projections of land use change and included emerging, predictive methods for the modelling of land change. The third session considered impact assessment methods related to the use of land and their application together with land change modelling approaches. Discussions throughout the day centred on opportunities and challenges arising from integrating spatially located land use information into Life Cycle Assessment. Increasing amounts of spatially located land use data are becoming available and this could potentially increase the robustness and specificity of Life Cycle Assessment. However, the use of such data can be computationally expensive and requires the development of skills (i.e. use of geographical information systems (GIS) and model coding) within the LCA community. Land change modelling and ecosystem service modelling are associated with considerable uncertainty which must be communicated appropriately to stakeholders and decision-makers when interpreting results from an LCA. The new approaches were found to challenge aspects of the traditional LCA approach—particularly the division between the life cycle inventory and impact assessment and the assumption of linearity between scale and impacts when deriving characterisation factors. The presentations from the DF-67 are available for download (www.​lcaforum.​ch), and video recordings can be accessed online (http://​www.​video.​ethz.​ch/​events/​lca/​2017/​autumn/​67th.​html).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baitz M, Makishi Colodel C, Kupfer T et al (2012) GaBi database & modelling principles 2012. PE International AG, Leinfelden-Echterdingen Baitz M, Makishi Colodel C, Kupfer T et al (2012) GaBi database & modelling principles 2012. PE International AG, Leinfelden-Echterdingen
Zurück zum Zitat Blonk Consultants (2014) Direct land use change assessment tool. Version 2014.1. Blonk Consultants. Gouda. Netherlands Blonk Consultants (2014) Direct land use change assessment tool. Version 2014.1. Blonk Consultants. Gouda. Netherlands
Zurück zum Zitat Blonk H, Ponsioen T, Kool A, Marinussen M (2012) The Agri-footprint method. Methodological LCA Framework, Assumptions and Applied Data. Blonk Consultants, Gouda. Netherlands. Blonk H, Ponsioen T, Kool A, Marinussen M (2012) The Agri-footprint method. Methodological LCA Framework, Assumptions and Applied Data. Blonk Consultants, Gouda. Netherlands.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaplin-Kramer R, Sim S, Hamel P, Bryant B, Noe R, Mueller C, Rigarlsford G, Kulak M, Kowal V, Sharp R, Clavreul J, Price E, Polasky S, Ruckelshaus M, Daily G (2017) Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nat Commun 8:15065. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15065 CrossRef Chaplin-Kramer R, Sim S, Hamel P, Bryant B, Noe R, Mueller C, Rigarlsford G, Kulak M, Kowal V, Sharp R, Clavreul J, Price E, Polasky S, Ruckelshaus M, Daily G (2017) Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nat Commun 8:15065. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​ncomms15065 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ermolieva T, Havlík P, Ermoliev Y, Mosnier A, Obersteiner M, Leclère D, Khabarov N, Valin H, Reuter W (2016) Integrated management of land use systems under systemic risks and security targets: a stochastic global biosphere management model. J Agric Econ 67(3):584–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12173 CrossRef Ermolieva T, Havlík P, Ermoliev Y, Mosnier A, Obersteiner M, Leclère D, Khabarov N, Valin H, Reuter W (2016) Integrated management of land use systems under systemic risks and security targets: a stochastic global biosphere management model. J Agric Econ 67(3):584–601. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​1477-9552.​12173 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koch P, Salou T (2013) Agribalyse: rapport méthodologique—version 1.1. ADEME, Angers. France Koch P, Salou T (2013) Agribalyse: rapport méthodologique—version 1.1. ADEME, Angers. France
Zurück zum Zitat Moran D, Kanemoto K (2017) Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat Ecol Evol 1:23CrossRef Moran D, Kanemoto K (2017) Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat Ecol Evol 1:23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Rossi V, Humbert S (2014) Methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Version 2.0. Quantis and Agroscope. Lausanne and Zurich. Switzerland Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Rossi V, Humbert S (2014) Methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Version 2.0. Quantis and Agroscope. Lausanne and Zurich. Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Schipper A, Bakkenes M, Meijer J et al (2016) GLOBIO 3.5 technical model description. PBL publication number: 2369, The Hague Schipper A, Bakkenes M, Meijer J et al (2016) GLOBIO 3.5 technical model description. PBL publication number: 2369, The Hague
Metadaten
Titel
Tracking current and forecasting future land-use impacts of agricultural value chains. 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 3rd of November 2017, Zurich, Switzerland
verfasst von
Michal Kulak
Sarah Sim
Henry King
Wan Yee Lam
Sandra Marquardt
Mark Huijbregts
Publikationsdatum
15.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1441-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT

Preface: Recognizing management in LCM