Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Turning Open Government Data into Public Value: Testing the COPS Framework for the Co-creation of OGD-Driven Public Services

verfasst von : Keegan McBride, Maarja Toots, Tarmo Kalvet, Robert Krimmer

Erschienen in: Governance Models for Creating Public Value in Open Data Initiatives

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter aims to demonstrate and understand how open government data can generate public value by allowing any actor to co-create an open government data-driven public service. The chapter takes a holistic approach to understanding open government data-driven co-creation and follows a content-context-process approach for the framework development. The framework proposes a public service co-creation cycle based around the ideas of agile and lean development that should lead to increased usage of open government data. The co-creation cycle is made up of four parts: co-initiation, co-design, co-implementation, and co-evaluation. To test the propositions put forth by the framework, a multi-case study was conducted on five different pilot projects that aimed to use open government data in the co-creation of new public services. The pilots were conducted at different levels of government and across different public domains. The results of the study seem to support the propositions outlined by the framework, though it also emerged that the pilots that engaged in co-implementation had higher levels of user engagement and satisfaction with the service; this warrants future empirical research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Angelopoulos, S., Kitsios, F., Kofakis, P., & Papadopoulos, T. (2010). Emerging barriers in e-government implementation. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic government: Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference, EGOV 2010 (pp. 216–225). Lausanne. Angelopoulos, S., Kitsios, F., Kofakis, P., & Papadopoulos, T. (2010). Emerging barriers in e-government implementation. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic government: Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference, EGOV 2010 (pp. 216–225). Lausanne.
Zurück zum Zitat Barry, E., & Bannister, F. (2014). Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Information Polity, 19, 129–152.CrossRef Barry, E., & Bannister, F. (2014). Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Information Polity, 19, 129–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity, 19, 5–16.CrossRef Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity, 19, 5–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138.CrossRef Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., Diamantopoulou, V., & Androutsopoulou, A. (2016). An open data and open services repository for supporting citizen-driven application development for governance. In 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2016) (pp. 2596–2604). Kauai: IEEE.CrossRef Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., Diamantopoulou, V., & Androutsopoulou, A. (2016). An open data and open services repository for supporting citizen-driven application development for governance. In 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2016) (pp. 2596–2604). Kauai: IEEE.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development: The people factor. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif), 34, 131–133. Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development: The people factor. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif), 34, 131–133.
Zurück zum Zitat Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2017). Value creation, ICT, and co-production in public sector: Bureaucracy, opensourcing and crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 185–194). ACM. Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2017). Value creation, ICT, and co-production in public sector: Bureaucracy, opensourcing and crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 185–194). ACM.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., Mele, V., Valotti, G., Bazurli, R., Cucciniello, M., ... & Bazurli, R. (2014). Determinants and barriers of adoption, diffusion and upscaling of ICT-driven social innovation in the public sector: A systematic review (No. 6). LIPSE Project–Working Paper. Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., Mele, V., Valotti, G., Bazurli, R., Cucciniello, M., ... & Bazurli, R. (2014). Determinants and barriers of adoption, diffusion and upscaling of ICT-driven social innovation in the public sector: A systematic review (No. 6). LIPSE Project–Working Paper.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., Mele, V., Valotti, G., & Bazurli, R. (2015). Determinants and barriers of adoption, diffusion and upscaling of ICT-driven social innovation in the public sector: A systematic review. Rotterdam. Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., Mele, V., Valotti, G., & Bazurli, R. (2015). Determinants and barriers of adoption, diffusion and upscaling of ICT-driven social innovation in the public sector: A systematic review. Rotterdam.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawes, S. S., Vidiasovab, L., Parkhimovichc, O., Dawesa, S., Vidiasovab, L., Parkhimovichc, O., Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 15–27.CrossRef Dawes, S. S., Vidiasovab, L., Parkhimovichc, O., Dawesa, S., Vidiasovab, L., Parkhimovichc, O., Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 15–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146–166.CrossRef De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146–166.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549–559.CrossRef Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat dos Santos Brito, K., da Silva Costa, M. A., Garcia, V. C., & de Lemos Meira, S. R. (2015). Assessing the benefits of open government data: The case of Meu Congresso Nacional in Brazilian elections 2014. In Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on digital government research (dg.o 2015) (pp. 89–96). Phoenix: ACM.CrossRef dos Santos Brito, K., da Silva Costa, M. A., Garcia, V. C., & de Lemos Meira, S. R. (2015). Assessing the benefits of open government data: The case of Meu Congresso Nacional in Brazilian elections 2014. In Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on digital government research (dg.o 2015) (pp. 89–96). Phoenix: ACM.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., & Turki, S. (2014a). How open data are turned into services? In Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 169 LNBIP, pp. 31–39). Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., & Turki, S. (2014a). How open data are turned into services? In Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 169 LNBIP, pp. 31–39).
Zurück zum Zitat Foulonneau, M., Turki, S., Vidou, G., & Martin, S. (2014b). Open data in service design. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 12, 99–107. Foulonneau, M., Turki, S., Vidou, G., & Martin, S. (2014b). Open data in service design. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 12, 99–107.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). Understanding e-democracy: Government-led initiatives for democratic reform. Journal of e-democracy and open government, 5(2), 141–154. Freeman, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). Understanding e-democracy: Government-led initiatives for democratic reform. Journal of e-democracy and open government, 5(2), 141–154.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 441–452.CrossRef Gonzalez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 441–452.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73, 821–830.CrossRef Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73, 821–830.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 446–456.CrossRef Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 446–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 1–5.CrossRef Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 1–5.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29, 258–268.CrossRef Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29, 258–268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, M., Konopnicki, D., Snowdon, J. L., & Ojo, A. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19, 189–195.CrossRef Janssen, M., Konopnicki, D., Snowdon, J. L., & Ojo, A. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19, 189–195.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 508–513.CrossRef Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 508–513.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khayyat, M., & Bannister, F. (2017). Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data. Information Polity, 22, 211–231.CrossRef Khayyat, M., & Bannister, F. (2017). Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data. Information Polity, 22, 211–231.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lember, V. (2018). The increasing role of new technologies in co-production. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public service delivery. London/New York: Routledge. Lember, V. (2018). The increasing role of new technologies in co-production. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public service delivery. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2014). Public procurement and innovation: Theory and practice. In Public procurement, innovation and policy (pp. 13–34). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2014). Public procurement and innovation: Theory and practice. In Public procurement, innovation and policy (pp. 13–34). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454.CrossRef Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lönn, C.-M., & Uppström, E. (2015). Core aspects for value co-creation in public sector. In Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1–12). Lönn, C.-M., & Uppström, E. (2015). Core aspects for value co-creation in public sector. In Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1–12).
Zurück zum Zitat Mcbride, K. D., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. In 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 2453–2462). Mcbride, K. D., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. In 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 2453–2462).
Zurück zum Zitat McBride, K., Aavik, G., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2019). How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 88–97. McBride, K., Aavik, G., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2019). How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 88–97.
Zurück zum Zitat Melin, U. (2016). Challenges and benefits in an open data initiative – a local government case study of myths and realities. In Electronic government and electronic participation: Joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP WG 8.5 EGOV and EPart 2016. Guimarães: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-670-5-111.CrossRef Melin, U. (2016). Challenges and benefits in an open data initiative – a local government case study of myths and realities. In Electronic government and electronic participation: Joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP WG 8.5 EGOV and EPart 2016. Guimarães: IOS Press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3233/​978-1-61499-670-5-111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mergel, I. (2015a). Open collaboration in the public sector: The case of social coding on GitHub. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 464–472.CrossRef Mergel, I. (2015a). Open collaboration in the public sector: The case of social coding on GitHub. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 464–472.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mergel, I. (2015b). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 599–612.CrossRef Mergel, I. (2015b). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 599–612.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 516–523.CrossRef Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 516–523.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mergel, I., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Isett, K. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 76, 928–937.CrossRef Mergel, I., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Isett, K. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 76, 928–937.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne, S. P. (2009). Debate: Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29, 5–7.CrossRef Osborne, S. P. (2009). Debate: Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29, 5–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 135–158.CrossRef Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 135–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. (2008). The GEA: Governance enterprise architecture framework and models. In P. Saha (Ed.), Advances in government enterprise architecture. Hershey: IGI Global. Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. (2008). The GEA: Governance enterprise architecture framework and models. In P. Saha (Ed.), Advances in government enterprise architecture. Hershey: IGI Global.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). The awakening giant (Routledge revivals): Continuity and change in imperial chemical industries 1st edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRef Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). The awakening giant (Routledge revivals): Continuity and change in imperial chemical industries 1st edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G., & Löffler, E. (2006). Making quality sustainable: Co-produce and co-evaluate the quality journey to 4Qc. In 4QC Conference. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G., & Löffler, E. (2006). Making quality sustainable: Co-produce and co-evaluate the quality journey to 4Qc. In 4QC Conference.
Zurück zum Zitat Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business. isbn:978-0-307-88791-7. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business. isbn:978-0-307-88791-7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 45–52.CrossRef Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 45–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schrock, A., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data & Society, 4, 205395171769075.CrossRef Schrock, A., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data & Society, 4, 205395171769075.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soe, R. M., & Drechsler, W. (2018). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 323–335. Soe, R. M., & Drechsler, W. (2018). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 323–335.
Zurück zum Zitat Symons, V. J. (1991). A review of information systems evaluation: Content, context and process. European Journal of Information Systems, 1, 205–212.CrossRef Symons, V. J. (1991). A review of information systems evaluation: Content, context and process. European Journal of Information Systems, 1, 205–212.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R., Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Kalampokis, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2017a). A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In EGOV-EPART2017. St. Petersburg. Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R., Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Kalampokis, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2017a). A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In EGOV-EPART2017. St. Petersburg.
Zurück zum Zitat Toots, M., Mcbride, K., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2017b). Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: Exploring the drivers and barriers. In International conference for e-democracy and open government (pp. 102–112). Krems: IEEE. Toots, M., Mcbride, K., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2017b). Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: Exploring the drivers and barriers. In International conference for e-democracy and open government (pp. 102–112). Krems: IEEE.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 527–540.CrossRef Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 527–540.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357.CrossRef Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 17–29.CrossRef Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 17–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of Electronic Government, 10, 156–172. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of Electronic Government, 10, 156–172.
Metadaten
Titel
Turning Open Government Data into Public Value: Testing the COPS Framework for the Co-creation of OGD-Driven Public Services
verfasst von
Keegan McBride
Maarja Toots
Tarmo Kalvet
Robert Krimmer
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14446-3_1