nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Unforeseen Responses of a Breeding Seabird to the Construction of an Offshore Wind Farm

verfasst von : Andrew J. P. Harwood, Martin R. Perrow, Richard J. Berridge, Mark L. Tomlinson, Eleanor R. Skeate

Erschienen in: Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm (OWF), comprised of 88 3.6 MW turbines, was built within foraging range of Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis breeding at a European designated site. Boat-based surveys (n = 43) were used to investigate changes in tern abundance within the site and within 0–2 and 2–4 km buffer areas before and throughout the construction of the OWF, over a study period between 2009 and 2012. Visual tracking of individual birds (n = 840) was also undertaken to document any changes in behaviour. This study is amongst the few to detail the response of a breeding seabird to the construction of an OWF. Navigational buoys in the 0–2 km buffer were used extensively by resting and socialising birds, especially early in the breeding season. Visual tracking illustrated avoidance of areas of construction activity and birds surprisingly kept their distance from installed monopiles. Avoidance was strengthened during turbine assembly, with around 30% fewer birds entering the wind farm, relative to the pre-construction baseline. Flight lines of birds that entered the site were generally along the centre of rows between turbines. A focus on transit flight meant that feeding activity was lower in the site than the buffer areas. As the site remained permeable to terns flying to and from foraging grounds further offshore, the overall abundance within the site was not significantly reduced. Although a number of the responses observed were unforeseen by Environmental Impact Assessment, the overall conclusion of only minor adverse effects was upheld. Analysis of further data from the operational site is now planned.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Red Kites and Wind Farms—Telemetry Data from the Core Breeding Range

Nächstes Kapitel A Large-Scale, Multispecies Assessment of Avian Mortality Rates at Land-Based Wind Turbines in Northern Germany

Beyer HL (2012) Geospatial modelling environment (Version 0.7.2.1). url:http://www.spatialecology.com/gme/

BSH & BMU (2014) Ecological research at the offshore windfarm alpha ventus—challenges, results and perspectives. Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH), Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). Springer Spektrum, Berlin, 201

Brabant R, Vanermen N, Stienen EWM, Degraer S (2015) Towards a cumulative collision risk assessment of local and migrating birds in North Sea offshore wind farms. Hydrobiologia 756:63–74CrossRef

Breton SPh, Moe G (2009) Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America. Renew Energy 34:646–654CrossRef

Buckland ST, Burt ML, Rexstad EA, Mellor M, Williams AE, Woodward R (2012) Aerial surveys of seabirds: the advent of digital methods. J Appl Ecol 49:960–967CrossRef

Camphuysen CJ, Fox AD, Leopold MF (2004) Towards standardised seabirds at sea census techniques in connection with environmental impact assessments for offshore wind farms in the U.K.: a comparison of ship and aerial sampling for marine birds, and their applicability to offshore wind farm assessments. Report commissioned by COWRIE (Collaborative Offshore Wind Research into the Environment). Available via: www.offshorewindfarms.co.uk

Da Z, Xiliang Z, Jiankun H, Qimin C (2011) Offshore wind energy development in China: current status and future perspective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:4673–4684CrossRef

Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) (2011) National policy statement for renewable energy infrastructure (EN-3). The Stationary Office, London

Desholm M, Kahlert J (2005) Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm. Biol Lett 1:296–298CrossRef

Desholm M, Fox AD, Beasley PDL, Kahlert J (2006) Remote techniques for counting and estimating the number of bird–wind turbine collisions at sea: a review. Ibis 148:76–89CrossRef

Embling CB, IIlian J, Armstrong E, van der Kooij J, Sharples J, Camphuysen CJ, Scott BE (2012) Investigating fine-scale spatio-temporal predator-prey patterns in dynamic marine ecosystems: a functional data analysis approach. J Appl Ecol 49:481–492

Everaert J, Stienen EWM (2007) Impact of wind turbines on birds in Zeebrugge (Belgium): significant effect on breeding tern colony due to collisions. Biodivers Conserv 16:3345–3359CrossRef

Furness RW, Wade HM, Masden EA (2013) Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. J Environ Manage 119:56–66CrossRef

Garthe S, Hüppop O (2004) Scaling possible adverse effects of marine wind farms on seabirds: developing and applying a vulnerability index. J Appl Ecol 41:724–734CrossRef

Gove B, Langston RHW, McCluskie A, Pullan JD, Scrase I (2013) Wind farms and birds: an updated analysis of the effects of wind farms on birds and best practice guidance of integrated planning and impact assessment. RSPB/BirdLife in the UK for BirdLife International on behalf of the Bern Convention, Bern Convention Bureau meeting, 17 Sept 2013, Strasbourg, p 89

Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, New York

Krijgsveld KL, Fijn RC, Japink M, van Horssen PW, Heunks C, Collier MP, Poot MJM, Beukers D, Dirksen S (2011) Effect studies offshore wind farm Egmond aan Zee. Flux, flight altitude and behaviour of flying birds. Bureau Waardenburg report 10-219. Bureau Waardenburg, Culemborg, p 334

Larsen JK, Guillemette M (2007) Effects of wind turbines on flight behaviour of wintering common eiders: implications for habitat use and collision risk. J Appl Ecol 44:516–522CrossRef

Leopold MF, van Bemmelen RSA, Zuur AF (2013) Responses of local birds to offshore wind farms PAWP and OWEZ off the Dutch mainland coast. IMARES Report C151/12 Wageningen, The Netherlands, p 108

Lindeboom HJ, Kouwenhoven HJ, Bergman MJN, Bouma S, Brasseur S, Daan R, Fijn RC, de Haan D, Dirksen S, van Hal R, Hille Ris Lambers R, ter Hofstede R, Krijgsveld KL, Leopold M, Scheidat M (2011) Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone, a compilation. Environ Res Lett 6(3):13CrossRef

Linley EAS, Wilding TA, Black K, Hawkins AJS, Mangi S (2007) Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and their potential for enhancement and mitigation. Report from PML Applications Ltd. and the Scottish Association for Marine Science to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Contract No: RFCA/005/0029P. BERR/DEFRA, London, UK, p 132

Masden EA, Haydon DT, Fox AD, Furness RW, Bullman R, Desholm M (2009) Barriers to movement: impacts of wind farms on migrating birds. ICES J Mar Sci 66:746–753CrossRef

Masden EA, Haydon DT, Fox AD, Furness RW (2010) Barriers to movement: modelling energetic costs of avoiding marine wind farms amongst breeding seabirds. Mar Pollut Bull 60:1085–1091CrossRef

Mitchell PI, Newton S, Ratcliffe N, Dunn TE (2004) Seabird populations of Britain and Ireland (results of the seabird 2000 census 1998–2000). T&D Poyser, London, p 511

Noguchi K, Hui WLW, Gel YR, Gastwirth JL, Miao W (2009) lawstat: an R package for biostatistics, public policy, and law. R package version 2.3

Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society (NNNS) (2007) Norfolk bird and mammal report 2006. Trans Norfolk Norwich Naturalists’ Soc 40(2):145–372. ISSN 0375 7226

Ojowski U, Eidtmann C, Furness RW, Garthe S (2001) Diet and nest attendance of incubating and chick-rearing Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) in Shetland. Mar Biol 139:1193–1200CrossRef

Perrow MR, Skeate ER, Lines P, Brown D, Tomlinson ML (2006) Radio telemetry as a tool for impact assessment of wind farms: the case of Little Terns Sterna albifrons at Scroby Sands, Norfolk, UK. Ibis 148(Suppl. 1):57–75CrossRef

Perrow MR, Gilroy JJ, Skeate ER, Mackenzie A (2010) Quantifying the relative use of coastal waters by breeding terns: towards effective tools for planning and assessing the ornithological impacts of offshore wind farms. ECON Ecological Consultancy Ltd. Report to COWRIE Ltd. ISBN 978-0-9565843-3-5

Perrow MR, Gilroy JJ, Skeate ER (2011a) Effects of the construction of Scroby Sands offshore wind farm on the prey base of little tern Sternula albifrons at its most important UK colony. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1661–1670CrossRef

Perrow MR, Skeate ER, Gilroy JJ (2011b) Visual tracking from a rigid-hulled inflatable boat to determine foraging movements of breeding terns. J Field Ornithol 82:68–79CrossRef

Perrow MR, Harwood AJP, Skeate ER, Praca E, Eglington SM (2015) Use of multiple data sources and analytical approaches to derive a marine protected area for a breeding seabird. Biol Conserv 191:729–738CrossRef

Petersen IK, Fox AD (2007) Changes in bird habitat utilisation around the Horns Rev 1 offshore wind farm, with particular emphasis on common scoter. NERI Report commissioned by Vattenfall A/S, National Environmental Research Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Denmark

Petersen IK, Christensen TK, Kahlert J, Desholm M, Fox AD (2006) Final results of bird studies at the offshore wind farms at Nysted and Horns Rev, Denmark. NERI Report commissioned by DONG Energy and Vattenfall A/S. National Environmental Research Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Rønde, Denmark

Petersen IK, MacKenzie ML, Rexstad E, Wisz MS, Fox AD (2011) Comparing pre- and post-construction distributions of long-tailed ducks Clangula hyemalis in and around the Nysted offshore wind farm, Denmark: a quasi-designed experiment accounting for imperfect detection, local surface features and autocorrelation. CREEM technical report no. 2011-1, University of St Andrews

Petersen IK, Nielsen RD, Mackenzie ML (2014) Post-construction evaluation of bird abundances and distributions in the Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm area, 2011 and 2012. Report commissioned by DONG Energy. Aarhus University, DCE—Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, p 51

Pettersson J (2005) The impact of offshore wind farms on bird life in Southern Kalmar Sound, Sweden. Report to Swedish Energy Agency, p 128

Plonczkier P, Simms C (2012) Radar monitoring of migrating pink-footed geese: behavioural responses to offshore wind farm development. J Appl Ecol 49:1187–1194CrossRef

R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. url:http://www.R-project.org/

Reubens JT, Pasotti F, Degraer S, Vincx M (2013) Residency, site fidelity and habitat use of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) at an offshore wind farm using acoustic telemetry. Mar Environ Res 90:128–135CrossRef

Russell DJF, Brasseur Sophie MJM, Thompson D, Hastie GD, Janik VM, Aarts G, McClintock BT, Matthiopoulos J, Moss SEW, McConnell B (2014) Marine mammals trace anthropogenic structures at sea. Curr Biol 24(14):R638–R239CrossRef

Robertson GS, Bolton M, Grecian WJ, Wilson LJ, Davies W, Monaghan P (2014) Resource partitioning in three congeneric sympatrically breeding seabirds: foraging areas and prey utilization. Auk 131:434–446CrossRef

SCIRA Offshore Energy Ltd (2006) Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Statement. SCIRA Offshore Energy Ltd, London, p 722

Skov H, Leonhard SB, Heinänen S, Zydelis R, Jensen NE, Durinck J, Johansen TW, Jensen BP, Hansen BL, Piper W, Grøn PN (2012) Horns Rev 2 Monitoring 2010–2012. Migrating Birds. Orbicon, DHI, Marine Observers and Biola. Report commissioned by DONG Energy

Stienen EWM, van Beers PWM, Brenninkmeijer A, Habraken JMPM, Raaijmakers MHJE, van Tienen PGM (2000) Reflections of a specialist: patterns in food provisioning and foraging conditions in Sandwich Terns Sterna sandvicensis. Ardea 88:33–49

Strickland D, Erickson W, Young D, Johnson G (2007) Selecting study designs to evaluate the effect of windpower on birds. In: de Lucas M, Janss GFE, Ferrer M (eds) Birds and wind farms: risk assessment and mitigation, Chap 6. Quercus/Servicios Informativos Ambientales, Madrid. ISBN 978-84-87610-18-9

Taylor M, Marchant JH (2011) The Norfolk Bird Atlas: summer and winter distributions 1999-2007. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, 528 pp. ISBN 978-1-906204-82-2

Thaxter CB, Lascelles B, Sugar K, Cook ASCP, Roos S, Bolton M, Langston RHW, Burton NHK (2012) Seabird foraging ranges as a tool for identifying candidate marine protected areas. Biol Conserv 156:53–61CrossRef

Thaxter CB, Ross-Smith VH, Bouten W, Clark NA, Conway GJ, Rehfisch MM, Burton NHK (2015) Seabird–wind farm interactions during the breeding season vary within and between years: a case study of lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus in the UK. Biol Conserv 186:347–358CrossRef

Thelander CG, Smallwood KS (2007) The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area’s effects on birds: a case history. In de Lucas M, Janss GFE, Ferrer M (eds) Birds and wind farms: risk assessment and mitigation. Servicios Informativos Ambientales/Quercus, Madrid, Spain, pp 25–46

Thomsen F, Lüdemann K, Kafemann R, Piper W (2006) Effects of offshore wind farm noise on marine mammals and fish. Biola, Hamburg, Germany on behalf of COWRIE Ltd, p 62

Vanermen N, Stienen EWM, Onkelinx T, Courtens W, Van de walle M, Verschelde P, Verstraete H (2012) Seabirds and offshore wind farms monitoring results 2011. Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels. INBO.R.2012.25

Vanermen N, Onkelinx T, Courtens W, Van de walle M, Verstraete H, Stienen EWM (2015a) Seabird avoidance and attraction at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Hydrobiologia 756:51–61

Vanermen N, Onkelinx T, Verschelde P, Courtens W, Van de walle M, Verstraete H, Stienen EWM (2015b) Assessing seabird displacement at offshore wind farms: power ranges of a monitoring and data handling protocol. Hydrobiologia 756:155–167

Wade HM, Masden EA, Jackson AC, Thaxter CB, Burton NHK, Bouten W, Furness RW (2014) Great skua (Stercorarius skua) movements at sea in relation to marine renewable energy developments. Mar Environ Res 101:69–80CrossRef

Wilson LJ, Black J, Brewer MJ, Potts JM, Kuepfer A, Win I, Kober K, Bingham C, Mavor R, Webb A (2014) Quantifying usage of the marine environment by terns Sterna sp. around their breeding colony SPAs. JNCC report no. 500, Peterborough, p 125. Available via: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/JNCC_Report_500_web.pdf

Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J Roy Stat Soc B 73:3–36CrossRef

Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRef

Titel: Unforeseen Responses of a Breeding Seabird to the Construction of an Offshore Wind Farm
verfasst von: Andrew J. P. Harwood
Martin R. Perrow
Richard J. Berridge
Mark L. Tomlinson
Eleanor R. Skeate
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51270-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-51272-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_2