nach oben

Policy Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.11.2009

What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions

verfasst von: James Meadowcroft

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article is concerned with governance of long term socio-technical transitions required to orient development trajectories of advanced industrial counties along more sustainable lines. It discusses the contribution that ‘transition management’ can make to such processes, emphasizes the irreducibly political character of governance for sustainable development, and suggests that the long-term transformation of energy systems will prove to be a messy, conflictual, and highly disjointed process.

Vorheriger Artikel Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands

Nächster Artikel Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

But for an alternative presentation that refers to ‘the electric society’, the ‘hydrogen society’, and a ‘decentralized energy system’ see Kemp and Loorbach 2003.

In this section, I draw on the argument developed in Meadowcroft and Hellin (2007).

Ashford, N. (2002). Government and environmental innovation in Europe and North America. American Behavioural Scientist, 45, 1417–1434.CrossRef

Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy maker and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 24–41.CrossRef

Braybrooke, D. (2004). Utilitarianism: Restorations; repairs; renovations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Cohen, M., Marsh, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRef

Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elzen, B., Geels, F., & Green, K. (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRef

Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., & O’Connor, M. (1998). Challenges in the use of science for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, 99–107.CrossRef

Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.CrossRef

Geels, F. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.CrossRef

Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2007). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Grin, J. (2006). Reflexive modernization as a governance issue, or designing and shaping Restructuration. In J. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 54–81). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Grin, J. (2008). The multi-level perspective and the design of system innovations. In: van den Bergh, J., & Bruinsma, F. (eds. in association with Vreeker, R., & Idenburg, A.), Managing the transition to renewable energy: Theory and macro-regional practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 47–80.

Grin, J., & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of policy learning: agency, structure and change. In F. Fisher, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press.CrossRef

Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Hendriks, C., & Grin, J. (2008). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. In J. Newig, J. Voß, & J. Monstadt (Eds.), Governance for sustainable development: Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. London: Routledge.

Howlett, M. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Howlett, M., & Bennett, C. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.CrossRef

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2006). World energy outlook 2006. Paris: OECD/IEA.CrossRef

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2008). World energy outlook 2008. Paris: OECD/IEA.CrossRef

IPCC. (2005). In B. Metz, et al. (Eds.), Special report on carbon capture and storage. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPIECA. (2007). Increasing the pace of technology innovation and application: Enabling climate change solutions. London: International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association.

Jordan, A. (2008). Governance for sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 17–33.CrossRef

Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2003). Governance for sustainability through transition management. In: Paper for EAEPA conference, November 7, 2003.

Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14, 78–91.

Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 12–30.CrossRef

Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2005). The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In M. Weber & J. Hemmelskemp (Eds.), Towards environmental innovation systems. Berlin: Springer.

Kemp, R., Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2007). Assessing the Dutch energy transition policy: How does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions? Journal of Environment Policy and Planning, 9, 315–331.CrossRef

Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36, 4093–4103.CrossRef

Lafferty, W. (2004a). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lafferty, W. (2004b). From environmental protection to sustainable development: The challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lafferty, W., & Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.). (2000). Implementing sustainable development: Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lenschow, A. (2002). Environmental policy integration: Greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan.

Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.CrossRef

Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.

MEA. (2006). Ecosystem and human well-being: General synthesis. Washington: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

Meadowcroft, J. (1997). Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literatures of political science. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 427–454.

Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics? In M. Kenny & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Planning for sustainability (pp. 12–38). London: Routledge.

Meadowcroft, J. (2005). Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10, 479–498.CrossRef

Meadowcroft, J. (2007a). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environment Policy and Planning, 9, 299–314.CrossRef

Meadowcroft, J. (2007b). National sustainable development strategies: a contribution to reflexive governance? European Environment, 17, 152–163.CrossRef

Meadowcroft, J. & Bregha F. (2009). ‘Governance for sustainable development: the challenge ahead’, a scoping paper prepared for the Public Research Initiative, January 2009.

Meadowcroft, J., & Hellin, M. (2007). Carbon capture and storage: imagining CCS as a technological transition and/or a magic bullet? In: 10th International conference on technology policy and innovation, Stavanger, June 17–20, 2007.

Mitchell, B., & Van Ham, J. (2006). Canada’s CO ₂ capture and storage road map. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.

NEEP4. (2002). Where there’s a will there’s a world. The Netherlands Forth National Environmental Policy Plan, Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment.

Newig, J., Voß, J., & Monstadt, J. (Eds.). (2008). Governance for sustainable development: Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. London: Routledge.

Nilsson, M., & Eckerberg, K. (2007). Environmental policy integration in practice: Shaping institutions for learning. London: Earthscan.

Pal, L. (2005). Beyond policy analysis. Scarborough: Thomson/Nelson.

Rammel, C., Stagl S. & Wilfing H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems—A coevolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 9–21.CrossRef

Rip, A. (1992). A quasi-evolutionary model of technological development and a cognitive approach to technology policy. RISESST. Rivista di studi epistemologici e sociale sulla scienza e la technologia, 2, 69–102.

Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.CrossRef

Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1989). Implementation and public policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Schot, J. (1992). The policy relevance of the quasi-evolutionary model: The case of stimulating clean technologies. In R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, & V. Walsh (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 185–200). London: Academic Press.

Schot, J. (1998). ‘The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. History and Technology, 14, 173–200.CrossRef

Simbeck, D. R. (2004). CO₂ capture and storage—the essential bridge to the hydrogen economy. Energy, 29, 1633–1641.CrossRef

Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.CrossRef

Stahel, A. (2005). Value from a complex dynamic system’s perspective. Ecological Economics, 54, 370–381.CrossRef

Stirling, A. (2004). Opening up or closing down: Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science, citizenship and globalisation. London: Zed.

Unruh, G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830.CrossRef

Von Goerne, G., & Lundberg, F. (2008). Last gasp of the coal industry. Goteborg: Air Pollution & Climate Secretariat.

Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

WCED. (1987). Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences, 4, 137–153.CrossRef

Titel: What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions
verfasst von: James Meadowcroft
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2009
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector

Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects

Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management

Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland

Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands

Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management

Premium Partner