Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Toward the Rapid Design of Engineered Systems Through Deep Neural Networks Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

What Do Experienced Practitioners Discuss When Designing Product/Service Systems?

verfasst von : Abhijna Neramballi, Tomohiko Sakao, John S. Gero

Erschienen in: Design Computing and Cognition '18

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents empirical results aimed at increasing the understanding of conceptual activities of Product/Service Systems (PSS) design by experienced designers from industry. Results are derived from a protocol analysis of five PSS design sessions, using the Function–Behavior–Structure coding scheme. Sessions included five pairs of professional designers and the task was to redesign a concept for an existing PSS to improve its resource efficiency. The results show (i) the distribution of design issues during PSS design sessions, (ii) on average 47% of the overall cognitive design effort spent by the designers is related to behavior, and (iii) all the design issues except requirements are constantly focused on during the entirety of the design sessions. Major differences compared to product design are the average occurrence of function for PSS design (23%) for product design (4%) and of structure for PSS design (22%) compared to the product design (35%).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Cognitive Style and Field Knowledge in Complex Design Problem-Solving: A Comparative Case Study of Decision Support Systems
Nächstes Kapitel Visual Behaviour During Perception of Architectural Drawings: Differences Between Architects and Non-architects
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Baines TS, Bigdeli AZ, Bustinza OF, Ridgway K (2017) Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. Int J Oper Prod Manage 37(2):256–278CrossRef
2.
Sawhney M (2016) Putting products into services. Harvard Bus Rev 94(9):82–89
3.
Tischner U, Verkuijl M, Tukker A (2002) First draft PSS review. Econcept, Cologne
4.
Sakao T, Napolitano N, Tronci M, Sundin E, Lindahl M (2008) How are product-service combined offers provided in Germany and Italy? Analysis with company sizes and countries. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 17(3):367–381CrossRef
5.
Ulaga W, Chacour S (2001) Measuring customer perceived value in business markets. Ind Mark Manage 30:525–540CrossRef
6.
Sakao T, Lindahl M (2015) A method to improve integrated product service offerings based on life cycle costing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(1):33–36CrossRef
7.
Matschewsky J, Kambanou ML, Sakao T (2017) Designing and providing integrated productservice systems—challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies. Int J Prod Res 56(6):2150–2168CrossRef
8.
Meier H, Roy R, Seliger G (2010) Industrial product-service systems—IPS2. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):607–627CrossRef
9.
Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH, Wallace K, Blessing LTM (2006) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London
10.
Verma R, Fitzsimmons J, Heineke J, Davis M (2002) New issues and opportunities in service design research. J Oper Manage 20(2):117–120CrossRef
11.
Morelli N (2003) Product-service systems, a perspective shift for designers: a case study: the design of a telecentre. Des Stud 24(1):73–99MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Kannengiesser U, Gero JS (2015) Is designing independent of domain? Comparing models of engineering, software and service design. Res Eng Des 26:253–275CrossRef
13.
Gero JS, Jiang H, Vieira S (2013) Exploring a multi-meeting engineering design project. In: Chakrabarti A, Prakash RV (eds) 4th international conference on research into design (ICoRD’13), Springer, Chennai, India, pp 73–84
14.
Jiang H (2012) Understanding senior design students’ product conceptual design activities. National University of Singapore, Singapore
15.
Song T (2014) Expert vs. novice: problem decomposition/recomposition in engineering design. Utah State University, Utah
16.
McDonnell J, Lloyd P (eds) Design meeting protocols. DTRS 72007, University of the Arts, London
17.
Umeda Y, Takata S, Kimura F, Tomiyama T, Sutherland JW, Kara S, Herrmann C, Duflou JR (2012) Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—an environmental perspective. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):681–702CrossRef
18.
Roy R (2000) Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 32:289–299CrossRef
19.
Lindahl M, Sundin E, Sakao T (2014) Environmental and economic benefits of integrated product service offerings quantified with real business cases. J Clean Prod 64:288–296CrossRef
20.
Tukker A (2015) Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy—a review. J Clean Prod 97:76–91CrossRef
21.
Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod 10(3):237–245CrossRef
22.
Kan J, Gero J (2008) Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designers. Des Stud 29(4):315–337CrossRef
23.
Lammi M, Becker K (2013) Engineering design thinking. J Technol Educ 24(2):55–77
24.
Durugbo C, Tiwari A, Alcock JR (2011) A review of information flow diagrammatic models for product–service systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:1193–1208CrossRef
25.
Alonso-Rasgado T, Thompson G (2006) A rapid design process for total care product creation. J Eng Des 17(6):509–531CrossRef
26.
Regan WJ (1963) The service revolution. J Mark 47(July):57–62
27.
Komoto H, Tomiyama T (2008) Integration of a service CAD and a life cycle simulator. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):9–12CrossRef
28.
Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Evans S, Neely A, Greenough R, Peppard J, Roy R, Shehab E, Braganza A, Tiwari A, Alcock JR, Angus JP, Bastl M, Cousens A, Irving P, Johnson M, Kingston J, Lockett H, Martinez V, Michele P, Tranfield D, Walton IM, Wilson H (2007) State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 221:1543–1552CrossRef
29.
Love T (2000) Philosophy of design: a metatheoretical structure for design theory. Des Stud 21:293–313CrossRef
30.
Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis verbal reports as data, revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
31.
van Someren, MW, Bardard YF, Sandberh JAC (1994) The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press, London
32.
Atman CJ, Bursic KM (1996) Teaching engineering design: can reading a textbook make a difference? Res Eng Des 8:240–250CrossRef
33.
Purcell T, Gero JS (1998) Drawings and the design process: a review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Des Stud 19(4):389–430CrossRef
34.
Mc Neill T, Gero JS, Warren J (1998) Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Res Eng Des 10(3):129–140CrossRef
35.
Suwa M, Purcell T, Gero JS (1998) Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designer’s actions. Des Stud 19(4):455–483CrossRef
36.
Tang H-H, Gero JS (2002) A cognitive method to measure potential creativity in designing. In: Workshop 17—creative systems: approaches to creativity in AI and cognitive science (ECAI-02), Lyon
37.
McDonnell J, Lloyd P (eds) About designing: analysing design meetings. CRC Press, USA
38.
Hay L, McTeague C, Duffy AHB, Pidgeon LM, Vuletic T, Grealy M (2016) A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition. In: Gero JS (ed) 7th international conference on design computing and cognition, Springer, Chicago. pp 135–153CrossRef
39.
Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11(4):26–36
40.
Gero JS (2010) Generalizing design cognition research. In: DTRS8: interpreting design thinking, DAB documents, Sydney
41.
Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2014) The function-behaviour-structure ontology of design. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–283CrossRef
42.
Kan WT (2008) Quantitative methods for studying design protocols. The University of Sydney, Sydney
43.
Kan WT, Gero JS (2017) Quantitative methods for studying design protocols. Springer, DordrechtCrossRef
44.
Branki CN (1995) The acts of cooperative design. Concurrent Eng 3(3):237–245CrossRef
45.
Kruchten P (2005) Casting software design in the function-behavior-structure framework. IEEE Softw 22(2):52–58CrossRef
46.
47.
Hofmeister C, Kruchten P, Nord RL, Obbink H, Ran A, America P (2007) A general model of software architecture design derived from five industrial approaches. J Syst Softw 80:106–126CrossRef
48.
Robin V, Rose B, Girard P (2007) Modelling collaborative knowledge to support engineering design project manager. Comput Ind 58(2):188–198CrossRef
49.
Van Wie M, Bryant CR, Bohm MR, McAdams DA, Stone RB (2005) A model of function-based representations. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 19(2):89–111
50.
Kan JWT, Gero JS (2007) Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information. In: McDonnell J, Lloyd P (eds) DTRS7 (Design thinking research symposium), University of the Arts, London, pp 155–165
51.
Kan JWT, Gero JS, Sarkar S (2010) Using a generic method to study software design cognition. In: van der Hoek A, Petre M, Baker A (eds) Workshop on studying professional software design, pp 1–7
52.
Williams CB, Lee Y, Paretti M, Gero JS (2011) Effects of design education on design cognition: a preliminary comparison of engineering students. In: 41st ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education
53.
Widgren M, Sakao T (2016) Unanswered questions in conceptual design towards circular economy. In: The 14th international design conference—(DESIGN 2016), Dubrovnik, pp 571–578
Metadaten
Titel
What Do Experienced Practitioners Discuss When Designing Product/Service Systems?
verfasst von
Abhijna Neramballi
Tomohiko Sakao
John S. Gero
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Design Computing and Cognition '18

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_20

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise