Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Role of Local Open Source Communities in the Development of Open Source Projects Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Who Cares About My Feature Request?

verfasst von : Lukas Heppler, Remo Eckert, Matthias Stuermer

Erschienen in: Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Previous studies on issue tracking systems for open source software (OSS) focused mainly on requests for bug fixes. However, requests to add a new feature or an improvement to an OSS project are often also made in an issue tracking system. These inquiries are particularly important because they determine the further development of the software. This study examines if there is any difference between requests of the IBM developer community and other sources in terms of the likelihood of successful implementation. Our study consists of a case study of the issue tracking system BugZilla in the Eclipse integrated development environment (IDE). Our hypothesis, which was that feature requests from outsiders have less chances of being implemented, than feature requests from IBM developers, was confirmed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Combining FOSS and Kanban: An Action Research
Nächstes Kapitel The Impact of a Low Level of Agreement Among Reviewers in a Code Review Process
Literatur
1.
West, J., O’Mahony, S.: Contrasting community building in sponsored and community founded open source projects. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2005 (2005)
2.
Scacchi, W.: Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Softw. Proc. 149, 24–39 (2002)CrossRef
3.
Anvik, J., Hiew, L., Murphy, G.C.: Who should fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 361–370. ACM, New York (2006)
4.
Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T., Herbsleb, J.D.: Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. TOSEM 11, 309–346 (2002)CrossRef
5.
Runeson, P., Alexandersson, M., Nyholm, O.: Detection of duplicate defect reports using natural language processing. In: 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2007, pp. 499–510. IEEE (2007)
6.
Anvik, J., Hiew, L., Murphy, G.C.: Coping with an open bug repository. In: Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology eXchange, pp. 35–39. ACM, New York (2005)
7.
Grammel, L., Schackmann, H., Schröter, A., Treude, C., Storey, M.-A.: Attracting the community’s many eyes: an exploration of user involvement in issue tracking. In: Human Aspects of Software Engineering, pp. 3:1–3:6. ACM, New York (2010)
8.
Bagozzi, R.P., Dholakia, U.M.: Open source software user communities: a study of participation in Linux user groups. Manag. Sci. 52, 1099–1115 (2006)CrossRef
9.
Iivari, N.: Empowering the users? A critical textual analysis of the role of users in open source software development. AI Soc. 23, 511–528 (2009)CrossRef
10.
Dahlander, L., Magnusson, M.G.: Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy 34, 481–493 (2005)CrossRef
11.
MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin, C.Y.: Exploring the structure of complex software designs: an empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Manag. Sci. 52, 1015–1030 (2006)CrossRef
12.
Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Nishinaka, Y., Kishida, K., Ye, Y.: Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 76–85. ACM (2002)
13.
Kagdi, H., Gethers, M., Poshyvanyk, D., Hammad, M.: Assigning change requests to software developers. J. Softw. Evol. Process. 24, 3–33 (2012)CrossRef
14.
Rahman, M.M., Ruhe, G., Zimmermann, T.: Optimized assignment of developers for fixing bugs an initial evaluation for Eclipse projects. In: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 439–442. IEEE Computer Society (2009)
15.
Xuan, J., Jiang, H., Ren, Z., Zou, W.: Developer prioritization in bug repositories. In: 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 25–35 (2012)
16.
Wang, X., Zhang, L., Xie, T., Anvik, J., Sun, J.: An approach to detecting duplicate bug reports using natural language and execution information. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 461–470. ACM (2008)
17.
Mani, S., Catherine, R., Sinha, V.S., Dubey, A.: Ausum: approach for unsupervised bug report summarization. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, p. 11. ACM (2012)
18.
Rastkar, S., Murphy, G.C., Murray, G.: Summarizing software artifacts: a case study of bug reports. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 505–514. ACM, New York (2010)
19.
Giger, E., Pinzger, M., Gall, H.: Predicting the fix time of bugs. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering, pp. 52–56. ACM, New York (2010)
20.
Panjer, L.D.: Predicting Eclipse bug lifetimes. In: Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, ICSE Workshops MSR 2007, p. 29 (2007)
21.
Marks, L., Zou, Y., Hassan, A.E.: Studying the fix-time for bugs in large open source projects. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, pp. 11:1–11:8. ACM, New York (2011)
22.
Dalle, J.-M., den Besten, M., Masmoudi, H.: Channeling Firefox developers: mom and dad aren’t happy yet. In: Russo, B., Damiani, E., Hissam, S., Lundell, B., Succi, G. (eds.) Open Source Development, Communities and Quality. IFIP, vol. 275, pp. 265–271. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRef
23.
Bissyande, T.F., Lo, D., Jiang, L., Reveillere, L., Klein, J., Le Traon, Y.: Got issues? Who cares about it? A large scale investigation of issue trackers from GitHub. In: 2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp. 188–197 (2013)
24.
Koru, A.G., Tian, J.: Defect handling in medium and large open source projects. IEEE Softw. 21, 54–61 (2004)CrossRef
25.
Raymond, E.S.: The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (1999)CrossRef
26.
Fitzgerald, B.: The transformation of open source software. MIS Q. 30, 587–598 (2006)CrossRef
27.
Spaeth, S., Stuermer, M., Von Krogh, G.: Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: towards a push model of open innovation. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 52, 411–431 (2010)CrossRef
28.
Sampler, J.L.: Redefining industry structure for the information age. Strateg. Manag. J. 19, 343–355 (1998)CrossRef
29.
Rebellabs: Developer Productivity Report 2012: Java Tools, Tech, Devs & Data. Zero Turnaround (2012)
30.
Banerjee, S., Helmick, J., Syed, Z., Cukic, B.: Eclipse vs. Mozilla: a comparison of two large-scale open source problem report repositories. In: 2015 IEEE 16th International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE), pp. 263–270. IEEE (2015)
Metadaten
Titel
Who Cares About My Feature Request?
verfasst von
Lukas Heppler
Remo Eckert
Matthias Stuermer
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39224-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-39225-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39225-7_7