Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Assessment of Sustainability is Essential for Performability Evaluation Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

23. WIB (Which-Is-Better) Problems in Maintenance Reliability Policies

verfasst von : Satoshi Mizutani, Xufeng Zhao, Toshio Nakagawa

Erschienen in: Handbook of Advanced Performability Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There have been many studies of maintenance policies in reliability theory, so that we have to select better policies that are suitable for objective systems in actual fields, such as age replacement, periodic replacement, replacement first and last, replacement overtime, and standby or parallel system, appeared in research areas. This chapter compares systematically maintenance policies and shows how to select one from the point of cost theoretically. The expected cost rates of maintenance policies and optimal solutions to minimize them are given, and their optimal policies such as replacement time \(T^{*}\), number \(N^{*}\) of working cycle, and number \(K^{*}\) of failures are obtained. Furthermore, we discuss comparisons of optimal policies to show which is better analytical and numerically. These techniques and tools used in this chapter would be useful for reliability engineers who are worried about how to adopt better maintenance policies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Reliability and Availability Analysis in Practice
Nächstes Kapitel A Simple and Accurate Approximation to Renewal Function of Gamma Distribution
Literatur
1.
Barlow, R. E., & Proschan, F. (1965). Mathematical theory of reliability. New York: Wiley.MATH
2.
Osaki, S. (2002). Stochastic models in reliability and maintenance. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
3.
Nakagawa, T. (2005). Maintenance theory of reliability. London: Springer.
4.
Nakagawa, T. (2008). Advanced reliability models and maintenance policies. London: Springer.
5.
Nakagawa, T. (2014). Random Maintenance Policies. London: Springer Verlag.CrossRef
6.
Sugiura, T., Mizutani, S., & Nakagawa, T. (2006). Optimal random and periodic inspection policies. In H. Pham (Ed.), Reliability modeling, analysis and optimization (pp. 393–403). Singapore: World Scientific.
7.
Chen, M., Mizutani, S., & Nakagawa, T. (2010). Random and age replacement policies. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 17(1), 27–39.CrossRef
8.
Nakagawa, T., Zhao, X., & Yun, W. (2011). Optimal age replacement and inspection policies with random failure and replacement times. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 18(5), 405–416.CrossRef
9.
Chen, M., Nakamura, S., Nakagawa, T. (2010). Replacement and preventive maintenance models with random working times. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E93-A(2), 500–507.
10.
Chang, C. C. (2014). Optimum preventive maintenance policies for systems subject to random working times, replacement, and minimal repair. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 67, 185–194.CrossRef
11.
Zhao, X., & Nakagawa, T. (2016). Over-time and over-level replacement policies with random working cycles. Annals of Operations Research, 244, 103–116.MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Berrade, M., Scarf, P., & Cavalcante, C. (2017). A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 168, 70–79.CrossRef
13.
Sheu, S., Liu, T., Zhang, Z., & Tsai, H. (2018). The general age maintenance policies with random working times. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 169, 503–514.CrossRef
14.
Zhao, X., & Nakagawa, T. (2012). Optimization problems of replacement first or last in reliability theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 141–149.MathSciNetCrossRef
15.
16.
Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. L. (2015). Optimization of preventive maintenance policies with replacement first and last for system subject to shocks. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 2(1), 35–48.
17.
Nakagawa, T., & Zhao, X. (2015). Maintenance overtime policies in reliability theory. London: Springer.CrossRef
18.
Mizutani, S., Zhao, X., & Nakagawa, T. (2015). Overtime replacement policies with finite operating interval and number. IEICE Transaction, Fundamentals, E98-A(10), 2069–2075.
19.
Zhao, X., & Nakagawa, T. (2014). Comparisons of periodic and random replacement policies. In I. B. Frenkel, A. Karagrigoriou, A. Lisnianski, & A. Kleyner (Eds.), Applied reliability engineering and risk analysis: Probabilistic models and statistical inference. New York: Wiley.
20.
Zhao, X., Mizutani, S., & Nakagawa, T. (2015). Which is better for replacement policies with continuous or discrete scheduled times? European Journal of Operational Research, 242(2), 477–486.MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
22.
Zhao, X., Al-Khalifa, K. N., Hamouda, A. M., & Nakagawa, T. (2016). First and last triggering event approaches for replacement with minimal repairs. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(1), 197–207.CrossRef
23.
Zhao, X., Qian, C., & Nakagawa, T. (2017). Comparisons of replacement policies with periodic times and repair numbers. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 168, 161–170.CrossRef
24.
Zhao, X., Qian, C., & Nakagawa, T. (2019). Periodic replacement policies and comparisons with their extended policies. In Q. L. Li, J. Wang, & H. B. Yu (Eds.), Stochastic models in reliability, network security and system safety. Berlin: Springer. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-981-15-0864-6.
25.
Mizutani, S., Zhao, X., & Nakagawa, T. (2020). Which replacement is better at working cycles or numbers of failures. IEICE Transaction, Fundamentals, E103-A(2), 523–532.
Metadaten
Titel
WIB (Which-Is-Better) Problems in Maintenance Reliability Policies
verfasst von
Satoshi Mizutani
Xufeng Zhao
Toshio Nakagawa
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Handbook of Advanced Performability Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55731-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-55732-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55732-4_23

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise