Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computing
Erschienen in: Computing 12/2020

06.07.2020 | Regular Paper

A BBR-based congestion control for delay-sensitive real-time applications

verfasst von: Sayed Najmuddin, Muhammad Asim, Kashif Munir, Thar Baker, Zehua Guo, Rajiv Ranjan

Erschienen in: Computing | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The current User Datagram Protocol (UDP) causes unfairness and bufferbloats to delay sensitive applications due to the uncontrolled congestion and monopolization of available bandwidth.This causes call drops and frequent communication/connection loss in delay sensitive applications such as VoIP. We present a Responsive Control Protocol using Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round trip propagation time (RCP-BBR) as an alternate solution to UDP. RCP-BBR achieves low latency, high throughput, and low call drops ratio by efficiently customizing Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-trip propagation time (TCP-BBR) congestion control. We conducted comprehensive experiments, and the results show that proposed protocol achieves better throughput over UDP in stable networks. Moreover, in unstable and long-distanced networks, RCP-BBR achieved smaller queues in deep buffers and lower delays as compared to UDP, which performed poorly by keeping delays above the call drop threshold.
Vorheriger Artikel Nash equilibrium based replacement of virtual machines for efficient utilization of cloud data centers
Nächster Artikel Towards a holistic semantic support for context-aware network monitoring

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Scholz D, Jaeger B, Lukas S, Daniel R, Fabien G, Georg C (2018) Towards a deeper understanding of tcp bbr congestion control. In: 2018 IFIP networking conference (IFIP networking) and workshops, pp 1–9. IEEE
2.
Najjari N, Min G, Hu J, Zhao Z, Wu Y (2017) Performance analysis of wlans with heterogeneous and bursty multimedia traffic. In: GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE global communications conference, pp 1–6. IEEE
3.
Gerber A, Doverspike R (2011) Traffic types and growth in backbone networks. In: Optical fiber communication conference, pp OTuR1. Optical Society of America
4.
Mayo JW, Ukhaneva O (2017) International telecommunications demand. Inf Econ Policy 39:26–35CrossRef
5.
Baset SA, Schulzrinne H (2004) An analysis of the skype peer-to-peer internet telephony protocol. arXiv preprint arXiv:​cs/​0412017
6.
Zhang X, Xu Y, Hu H, Liu Y, Guo Z, Wang Y (2012) Profiling skype video calls: rate control and video quality. In: INFOCOM, 2012 proceedings IEEE, pp 621–629. IEEE
7.
Zhang M, Dusi M, John W, Chen C (2009) Analysis of udp traffic usage on internet backbone links. In: Ninth annual international symposium on applications and the internet, 2009. SAINT’09, pp 280–281. IEEE
8.
Chu C-Y, Chen S, Yen Y-C, Yeh S-L, Chu H-H, Huang P (2018) Eq: a qoe-centric rate control mechanism for voip calls. ACM Trans Model Perform Eval Comput Syst 3(1):4:1–4:20CrossRef
9.
Halepoto IA, Arain AA, Hussain U (2018) Evaluation of multimedia streams in internet applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on information systems and technologies, ICIST 18, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery
10.
Giannoulis S, Antonopoulos C, Topalis E, Athanasopoulos A, Prayati A, Koubias S (2009) TCP vs. UDP performance evaluation for CBR traffic on wireless multihop networks. Simulation 14:43
11.
Behrouz AF, Sophia CF (2002) TCP/IP protocol suite. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York
12.
Nor SA, Alubady R, Kamil WA (2017) Simulated performance of tcp, sctp, dccp and udp protocols over 4g network. Proc Comput Sci 111:2–7CrossRef
13.
Braud T, Heusse M, Duda A (2014) Tcp over large buffers: when adding traffic improves latency. In: Teletraffic congress (ITC), 2014 26th international, pp 1–8. IEEE
14.
Issariyakul T, Hossain E (2009) Introduction to network simulator 2 (ns2). In: Introduction to network simulator NS2, pp 1–18. Springer
15.
Hasegawa G, Murata M (2001) Survey on fairness issues in tcp congestion control mechanisms. IEICE Trans Commun 84(6):1461–1472
16.
Gettys J, Nichols K (2011) Bufferbloat: dark buffers in the internet. Queue 9(11):40CrossRef
17.
Neal C, Yuchung C, Stephen GC, Hassas YS, Van J (2017) BBR: congestion-based congestion control. Commun ACM 60(2):58–66CrossRef
18.
Hock M, Bless R, Zitterbart M (2017) Experimental evaluation of BBR congestion control. In: 2017 IEEE 25th international conference on network protocols (ICNP), pp 1–10. IEEE
19.
Allman M, Paxson V, Stevens W et al (1999) TCP congestion control
20.
Zhang X, Schulzrinne H (2004) Voice over TCP and UDP. Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, Tech. Rep. CUCS-033-04
21.
Andrew L, Marcondes C, Floyd S, Dunn L, Guillier R, Gang W, Eggert L, Ha S, Rhee I (2008) Towards a common tcp evaluation suite. In: Proc, PFLDnet
22.
Kiruthiga B, George E, Raj DP (2014) Survey on aqm congestion control algorithms. Int J Comput Sci Mob Appl 2(2):38–44
23.
Dukkipati N, Cheng Y, Vahdat A (2016) Research impacting the practice of congestion control
24.
Katiyar V, Jain AC (2014) A survey on red and some it’s varients incongestioncontrol mechanism. Int J Eng Manag Res 4(4):184–188
25.
Nichols K, Jacobson V, McGregor A, Iyengar J (2013) Controlled delay active queue management. In: Work in progress
26.
Nichols K, Jacobson V, McGregor A, Iyengar J (2015) Controlled delay active queue management: draft-ietf-aqm-codel-03. In: IETF, December
27.
Pan R, Natarajan P, Piglione C, Prabhu MS, Subramanian V, Baker F, VerSteeg B (2013) PIE: a lightweight control scheme to address the bufferbloat problem. In 2013 IEEE 14th international conference on high performance switching and routing (HPSR), pp 148–155. IEEE
28.
Jacobson V (1988) Congestion avoidance and control. In: ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, vol 18, pp 314–329. ACM
29.
Song KTJ, Zhang Q, Sridharan M (2006) Compound TCP: a scalable and TCP-friendly congestion control for high-speed networks. In: Proceedings of PFLDnet 2006
30.
Ha S, Rhee I, Lisong X (2008) CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 42(5):64–74CrossRef
31.
Brakmo LS, Peterson LL (1995) TCP vegas: end to end congestion avoidance on a global internet. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 13(8):1465–1480CrossRef
32.
Cheng Y, Cardwell N (2016) Making linux TCP fast. In: Netdev conference
33.
Abed JB, Sinda L, Mani MA, Mbarek R (2012) Comparison of high speed congestion control protocols. Int J Netw Secur Appl 4(5):15
34.
Cardwell N, Cheng Y, Gunn CS, Yeganeh SH, Jacobson V (2017) BBR congestion control: an update. In: Presentation in ICCRG at IETF 98th meeting
Metadaten
Titel
A BBR-based congestion control for delay-sensitive real-time applications
verfasst von
Sayed Najmuddin
Muhammad Asim
Kashif Munir
Thar Baker
Zehua Guo
Rajiv Ranjan
Publikationsdatum
06.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Computing / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0010-485X
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-5057
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00829-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Computing 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Regular Paper

Enhancing knowledge graph embedding by composite neighbors for link prediction

Regular Paper

HPMaX: heterogeneous parallel matrix multiplication using CPUs and GPUs

Regular Paper

Towards a holistic semantic support for context-aware network monitoring

Regular Paper

QoS evaluation model based on intelligent fuzzy system for vehicular ad hoc networks

OriginalPaper

Nash equilibrium based replacement of virtual machines for efficient utilization of cloud data centers

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise