nach oben

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Erschienen in:

08.03.2021 | Research Article-Civil Engineering

A Bilevel Multiobjective Model for Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in the Punjab Province of Pakistan

verfasst von: Muddasar Masood, Ijaz Ahmad, Muhammad Kaleem Sarwar, Noor Muhammad Khan, Muahmmad Waseem, Ghulam Nabi, Muhammad Saleem

Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, a simple but efficient bilevel multiobjective model (BLMOM) has been formulated for the optimal allocation of available water (AW) among competing water users. Upper-level decision makers (DMs), being the leader in the hierarchy (i.e., river authorities), allocate AW to lower-level DMs (i.e., canal authorities) based on equity and stability, whereas lower-level DMs allocate AW among competing users based on two single- and one multiobjective functions. The first objective function (OF₁) maximizes the satisfaction rate (SR) of various water users, whereas the second objective function (OF₂) maximizes the net economic benefits (NEB). The multiobjective function (OF₁₂) maximizes the combined effect of the first two single objectives. The multiobjective function has been solved by using the simultaneous compromise constraint (SICCON) technique which creates a compromise between single-objective functions. The model was applied at Taunsa Barrage, Pakistan, for the optimal allocation of AW. Various scenarios were analyzed by varying priorities assigned to different objective functions and water users to evaluate the model applicability under various conditions. When OF₁ was considered, maximum SR of 61% was achieved. In case of priority given to OF₂, maximum NEB of 77 million USD was attained. However, in the case of OF₁₂, both SR and NEB were maximized, whereas wheat, cotton, sugarcane, rice, onion and sunflower water users attained NEB of 14.36, 5.03, 22.96, 27.85, 1.34 and 0.13 million USD, respectively, with overall NEB of 72 million USD against satisfaction rate of 52%.

Vorheriger Artikel Numerical Investigation of Particle Shape Effect on Sand Shear Strength

Nächster Artikel Experimental Examination of the Behavior of Shotcrete-Reinforced Masonry Walls and Xgboost Neural Network Prediction Model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

IMF: Issues In Managing Water Challenges and Policy Instruments: Regional Perspectives and Case Studies. Tech. Companion Note. June, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1042/BSE0490001

Khan, M.: Impact of urbanization on water resources of Pakistan. A review. NUST J. Eng. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.24949/NJES.V12I1.230CrossRef

Ahmad, I.; Ahmed, S.M.; Mahmood, S.; Afzal, M.; Yaseen, M.; Saleem, M.; Rizwan, M.: To develop a crop water allocation model for optimal water allocation in the warabandi irrigation system. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03818-6CrossRef

Eliasson, J.: The rising pressure of global water shortages. Nature 517 (2015)

Mirzaei, A.; Zibaei, M.: Water conflict management between agricultural and wetland under climate change: application of economic-hydrological-behavioral modelling. Water Resour. Manag. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02703-4CrossRef

Hall, W.A.: Buras: the dynamic programming approach to water resources development. J. Geophys. Res. 66, 517–520 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i002p00517CrossRef

Wardlaw, R.; Bhaktikul, K.: Application of a genetic algorithm for water allocation in an irrigation system1. Irrig. Drain. 50, 159–170 (2001)CrossRef

Wang, L.Z.; Fang, L.; Hipel, K.W.: Water resources allocation: a cooperative game theoretic approach. J. Environ. Informatics. 2, 11–22 (2015)CrossRef

Reddy, M.J.; Kumar, D.N.: Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour. Manag. 20, 861–878 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-9011-1CrossRef

10.

Aljanabi, A.; Mays, L.; Fox, P.: Optimization model for agricultural reclaimed water allocation using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. Water 10, 1291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101291CrossRef

11.

El-Gafy, I.K.; El-Ganzori, A.M.; Mohamed, A.I.: Decision support system to maximize economic value of irrigation water at the Egyptian governorates meanwhile reducing the national food gap. Water Sci. 27, 1–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2013.12.001CrossRef

12.

Mohammadrezapour, O.; Yoosefdoost, I.; Ebrahimi, M.: Cuckoo optimization algorithm in optimal water allocation and crop planning under various weather conditions (case study: Qazvin plain, Iran). Neural Comput. Appl. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3160-zCrossRef

13.

Divakar, L.; Babel, M.S.; Perret, S.R.; Gupta, A.: Das: optimal allocation of bulk water supplies to competing use sectors based on economic criterion—an application to the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. J. Hydrol. 401, 22–35 (2011)CrossRef

14.

Marzban, Z.; Asgharipour, M.R.; Ghanbari, A.; Ramroudi, M.; Seyedabadi, E.: Evaluation of environmental consequences affecting human health in the current and optimal cropping patterns in the eastern Lorestan Province, Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10905-xCrossRef

15.

Yan, Z.; Li, M.; Li, Z.: Efficient and economical allocation of irrigation water under a changing environment: a stochastic multi-objective nonlinear programming model. Irrig. Drain. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2523CrossRef

16.

Aalami, M.T.; Nourani, V.; Fazaeli, H.: Developing a surface water resources allocation model under risk conditions with a multi-objective optimization approach. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 20, 1167–1177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.025CrossRef

17.

Daghighi, A.; Nahvi, A.; Kim, U.: Optimal cultivation pattern to increase revenue and reduce water use: application of linear programming to arjan plain in fars province. Agriculture 7, 73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7090073CrossRef

18.

Fanuel, I.; Mushi, A.: Multi-Objective Optimization Model For Irrigation Water Allocation: A Case Study of Nduruma Catchment-Arusha, Tanzania. Asian J. Math. Appl. 2018, 1–14 (2018)

19.

Modibbo, U.M.; Ali, I.; Ahmed, A.: Multi-objective optimization modelling for analysing sustainable development goals of Nigeria: agenda 2030. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01022-3CrossRef

20.

Li, M.; Fu, Q.; Singh, V.P.; Liu, D.; Li, T.; Zhou, Y.: Managing agricultural water and land resources with tradeoff between economic, environmental, and social considerations: a multi-objective non-linear optimization model under uncertainty. Agric. Syst. 178, 102685 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102685CrossRef

21.

Xu, Z.; Yao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Dowaki, K.; Long, Y.: Inequality of water allocation and policy response considering virtual water trade: a case study of Lanzhou city, China. J. Clean. Prod. 269, 122326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122326CrossRef

22.

Wang, H., Mei, Z.: Research on the evaluation model of multi-objective optimal allocation of water resources in Guizhou Province. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. p. 012018. IOP Publishing Ltd (2020)

23.

Redi, M.; Thillaigovindan, N.; Dananto, M.: A bilevel fuzzy goal programming approach for two-stage production planning problems. Int. J. Open. Probl. Comput. Sci. Math. 13, 33–67 (2020)

24.

Mozafari, M.; Zabihi, A.: Robust water supply chain network design under uncertainty in capacity. Water Resour. Manag. 34, 4093–4112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02658-6CrossRef

25.

Li, Q.; Hu, G.: Multistage stochastic programming modeling for farmland irrigation management under uncertainty. PLoS ONE 15, e0233723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233723CrossRef

26.

Zhang, F.; Yue, Q.; Engel, B.A.; Guo, S.; Guo, P.; Li, X.: A bi-level multiobjective stochastic approach for supporting environment-friendly agricultural planting strategy formulation. Sci. Total Environ. 693, 133593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133593CrossRef

27.

Guo, Z.; Chang, J.; Huang, Q.; Xu, L.; Da, C.; Wu, H.: Bi-level optimization allocation model of water resources for different water industries. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 14, 470–477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2013.223CrossRef

28.

Tu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Gang, J.; Liechty, M.; Xu, J.; Lev, B.: Resources, conservation and recycling administrative and market-based allocation mechanism for regional water resources planning. Resour. Conserv.. Recycl. 95, 156–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.011CrossRef

29.

Jiang, Y.; Xu, X.; Huang, Q.; Huo, Z.; Huang, G.: Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model. Agric. Water Manag. 178, 76–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.035CrossRef

30.

Hu, Z.; Wei, C.; Yao, L.; Li, C.; Zeng, Z.; Asce, A.M.: Integrating equality and stability to resolve water allocation issues with a multiobjective bilevel programming model. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000640CrossRef

31.

Chen, S.; Shao, D.; Tan, X.; Gu, W.; Lei, C.: An interval multistage classified model for regional inter- and intra-seasonal water management under uncertain and nonstationary condition. Agric. Water Manag. 191, 98–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.005CrossRef

32.

Yao, L.; Xu, Z.; Moudi, M.; Li, Z.: Optimal water allocation in Iran: a dynamic bi-level programming model. Water. Sci. Technol. Water Supply. (2018). https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.165CrossRef

33.

Kia, D.R.: Water requirements for major crops in different agro-climatic zones of Iraqi Kurdistan using by CROPWAT 8.0. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 6, 30–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0633036CrossRef

34.

Gafy, I.E.: Estimating the crop water requirements under the expected climatic change in year 2050 for Egypt Inas. Ain Shams J. Mech. Eng. 2, 181–192 (2009)

35.

Qamar, M.U.; Azmat, M.; Abbas, A.; Usman, M.; Shahid, M.A.; Khan, Z.M.: Water pricing and implementation strategies for the sustainability of an irrigation system: a case study within the command area of the Rakh branch canal. Water (Switzerland). 10, 1–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040509CrossRef

36.

Hussain, I.; Sial, M.H.; Hussain, Z.; Akram, W.: Economic value of irrigation water: evidence from a Punjab Canal. Lahore J. Econ. 14, 69–84 (2009). http://www.lahoreschoolofeconomics.edu.pk/EconomicsJournal/LJEIntro.aspx

37.

Ashfaq, M.; Jabeen, S.; Irfan, A.; Baig, A.: Estimation of the economic value of irrigation water. J. Agric. Soc. Sci. 1, 270–272 (2005)

38.

Wei, C.; Hu, Z.: A water allocation model for Qujiang River Basin of China. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, pp. 1377–1391. Springer, Berlin (2015)

39.

Divakar, L.; Babel, M.S.; Perret, S.R.; Gupta, A.: Das: optimal water allocation model based on satisfaction and economic benefits. Int. J. Water. 7, 363 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJW.2013.056683CrossRef

40.

Babel, M.S.; Gupta, A.D.; Nayak, D.K.: A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour. Manag. 19, 693–712 (2005)CrossRef

41.

Ahmad, I.; Tang, D.: Multi-objective linear programming for optimal water allocation based on satisfaction and economic criterion. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 41, 1421–1433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1954-9CrossRef

42.

Ahmad, I.; Zhang, F.; Liu, J.; Anjum, M.N.; Zaman, M.; Tayyab, M.; Waseem, M.; Farid, H.U.: A linear bi-level multi-objective program for optimal allocation of water resources. PLoS ONE 13, 1–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192294CrossRef

Titel: A Bilevel Multiobjective Model for Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in the Punjab Province of Pakistan
verfasst von: Muddasar Masood
Ijaz Ahmad
Muhammad Kaleem Sarwar
Noor Muhammad Khan
Muahmmad Waseem
Ghulam Nabi
Muhammad Saleem
Publikationsdatum: 08.03.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05480-3

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

Dealing with Multicollinearity Problem in Analysis of Side Friction Characteristics Under Urban Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions

Development of Nonlinear Finite Element Models of Mortar-Free Interlocked Single Block Column Subjected to Lateral Loading

Effect of Carbon Nanotubes on Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Slag-Based Geopolymer

Stiffness Properties of Recycled Concrete Aggregates as Unbound Base and Subbase Materials Under Freeze and Thaw Cycles

Experimental Analysis of the Behavior of Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints

A New Approach to Determine Traffic Peak Periods to Utilize in Transportation Planning

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten