Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 4/2021

Open Access 13.03.2021

A Community-Structure-Based Method for Estimating the Fractal Dimension, and its Application to Water Networks for the Assessment of Vulnerability to Disasters

verfasst von: C. Giudicianni, A. Di Nardo, R. Greco, A. Scala

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 4/2021

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Most real-world networks, from the World-Wide-Web to biological systems, are known to have common structural properties. A remarkable point is fractality, which suggests the self-similarity across scales of the network structure of these complex systems. Managing the computational complexity for detecting the self-similarity of big-sized systems represents a crucial problem. In this paper, a novel algorithm for revealing the fractality, that exploits the community structure principle, is proposed and then applied to several water distribution systems (WDSs) of different size, unveiling a self-similar feature of their layouts. A scaling-law relationship, linking the number of clusters necessary for covering the network and their average size is defined, the exponent of which represents the fractal dimension. The self-similarity is then investigated as a proxy of recurrent and specific response to multiple random pipe failures – like during natural disasters – pointing out a specific global vulnerability for each WDS. A novel vulnerability index, called Cut-Vulnerability is introduced as the ratio between the fractal dimension and the average node degree, and its relationships with the number of randomly removed pipes necessary to disconnect the network and with some topological metrics are investigated. The analysis shows the effectiveness of the novel index in describing the global vulnerability of WDSs.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

In the last decades, in several fields, from statistical physics to computer science and to biology, the topological and dynamical aspects of systems have been investigated from the perspective of the Complexity Science. Accordingly, Complex Networks Theory (CNT) has been the focus of intensive research (D'Agostino and Scala 2014) for analysing real-world systems (Pagani and Aiello 2013; Fiscon et al. 2018). Complexity Science is an emerging approach to research concerning with complex systems characterized by dynamic and nonlinear relationships occurring between their components and exhibiting non-trivial global behaviours at larger scales. Water distribution systems (WDSs) can also be modelled as spatial complex networks and studied within the approach of the CNT (Giudicianni et al. 2018). WDSs are also among the most important urban infrastructures, delivering drinking and industrial water to metropolitan areas, the operability of which is of crucial importance to ensure social development and economic prosperity. These infrastructures continually face natural and man-made threats that cause economic and social disruption. This leads the operators of water companies to continuously work on improving safety and security, from the design phase (Marinho et al. 2020) for efficiently managing repair crews in emergency circumstances (Wang et al. 2017) and speeding up mitigation actions during disasters (Paez et al. 2018), contaminations (Xin et al. 2017), cyber-attacks (Taormina and Galelli 2018). In addition, as city size increases, these infrastructures are getting ever bigger with an ever more complex behaviour. Consequently, the analysis, the management and the maintenance become difficult tasks to be accomplished, often exacerbated by the lack of site-specific information. CNT has proven to be particularly suitable for the analysis of WDSs, especially in the case of limited information about the system, for unveiling common properties and simplify management and monitoring (Giudicianni et al. 2020).

1.1 Fractal Geometry Theory and its Applications

To provide a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of complex systems, many researchers have studied the possible self-similarity of their structure – i.e. their fractality – that represents a remarkable example of non-local property (Song et al. 2005). Fractal theory has been adopted to study many natural and artificial systems that exhibit similar patterning at different scales. Understanding fractals is a crucial aspect for decoding complex systems (Diao et al. 2017), as the behaviour of large systems can be revealed by focusing only on a small part. Mandelbrot (1982) defined a fractal as a set of parts similar to wholeness. The similarity can be exact (i.e. with precise copies of the entirety with successive changes of scales), or, especially for natural and man-made systems, the similarity can be statistical (i.e. subsets are similar to the wholeness, but not identical with it). Such a definition confirms an existence of scale invariance – i.e. an object looks similar at different scales of observation. About fractality of graphs, a network is fractal if groups of adjacent vertices are replaced with hyper-nodes and the obtained network keeps a similar structure to the original one (Akiba et al. 2016). The study of the fractality provided insights into modelling of growth processes of networks (Song et al. 2006), spreading processes (Serrano et al. 2011), vulnerability against failures (Hasegawa and Nemoto 2013), and network topology (Goh et al. 2006). However, only few works have been dedicated to the applications of fractal theory to water engineering. Qi et al. (2014) developed a fractal self-growth model to generate a cost-efficient design strategy for a water system. Kowalski et al. (2015) developed a method for the placement of sensors for water quality and pressure based on network fractal properties. Di Nardo et al. (2017) applied fractal theory for assessing the vulnerability of water networks to single pipe failures. Diao et al. (2017) developed a fractal-based analysis to identify critical pipes in WDSs. A review of the topic can be found in Iwanek et al. (2020), while recently, Caldarola and Maiolo (2020) investigated the opportunities of using fractal theory for the description and interpretation of data and dynamics of real complex systems. Finally, a review of the topic of fractal dimension of complex networks has been done by Wen and Cheong (2021).

1.2 Vulnerability Assessment for Water Distribution Systems

Vulnerability refers to the inability of a system to withstand the effects of a hostile environment, and vulnerability analysis aims at estimating the impact of the negative consequences of an increasing magnitude strain imposed to the system (disregarding the probabilities or frequencies of the strains affecting the system). It represents an emerging approach used within the management of critical infrastructures. Among them, WDSs – that are required to function properly under both normal and abnormal conditions – are currently undergoing large changes due to both urban population explosion and climate change. In the last decades, great effort has been dedicated to the topic of vulnerability assessment of WDSs. Haimes et al. (1998) reviewed needs and opportunities to reduce the vulnerability of WDSs to potential physical, chemical-biological, and cyber-attacks. Michaud and Apostolakis (2006) presented a methodology for ranking the WDS elements based on multi-attribute utility and graph theory algorithms. Gutiérrez-Pérez et al. (2013) introduced a methodology for an efficient WDS vulnerability analysis based on spectral graph theory to establish the relative importance of areas. Herrera et al. (2016) proposed a topology-based framework for large WDSs to estimate the redundancy of all possible routes from demand nodes to their supply sources. Shuang et al. (2014) evaluated the nodal vulnerability of WDSs under cascading failures in terms of loss of connectivity. Christodoulou and Fragiadakis (2015) proposed a methodology for the reliability assessment of WDSs by incorporating historical data on network performance, network component vulnerability against seismic loading, and topological information. Agathokleous et al. (2017) showed the effect of topology on network vulnerability through a betweenness centrality index.
In this work, for several WDSs, the global vulnerability analysis is carried out by removing an increasing number of components and estimating the arising consequences, allowing to evaluate the WDSs ability to resist disasters that highly impact their functioning by causing component mechanical failures (e.g. pipe breakages). Water companies still need strategies to face these emergencies and prioritize the use of available resources to rapidly restore the service. Due to the increasing interest in the management of WDSs during disasters and the frequent scarcity of site-specific information, simplified methods for a preliminary vulnerability evaluation are of crucial importance. Accordingly, the possibility to topologically rank WDSs according to their proneness to be damaged by catastrophic events represents a valid tool for prioritizing the restorations and better managing crews and resources, avoiding more dramatic consequences. Furthermore, during disaster scenarios, the change of topology is dominant over the variation of model boundary conditions (e.g. water request, initial tank levels), that become highly uncertain and of secondary importance. Consequently, a topological approach for the WDS global vulnerability assessment results in a more robust method in face of all the uncertainties about the system, allowing to identify the most disruptive alterations. The definition of such a topology-based tool is the main purpose of this paper. After the detection of the fractality of several WDSs by means a novel algorithm that exploits the community structure principle for the box-covering problem, a novel vulnerability index is proposed, that simultaneously considers the global structure of the graphs of WDSs and their average level of connectivity. This allows for a more comprehensive description of the system behaviour. The main contribution of this work is the investigation of the relationships between fractal feature, topology, and global vulnerability during abnormal extreme events, contributing to the development of topological approaches for the analysis and management of WDSs.

2 Methodology

2.1 Estimating Fractal Dimension from Community Structure

he study of the fractality of a network is based on the so-called box-covering problem (Song et al. 2005). The problem consists of defining the minimum number of boxes of equal size (clusters) NB (each box is constituted by a set of adjacent vertices such that each node is less than lB edges away from another node in the box) necessary to cover the whole network. One seed node is randomly chosen, and a box of nodes separated by at most lB (the size of the box equal to the number of edges on the shortest path between the two farthest nodes) from the seed node is formed. The procedure is repeated by choosing many seeds at random until the boxes cover the whole network. The process is repeated by varying the distance lB of boxes. The fractal dimension dB is given by the following power-law relationship (Song et al. 2005):
$${N}_{B}\approx {l}_{B}^{-dB}$$
(1)
between the number of boxes NB and the box size lB that reveals a self-similarity of the network topology. The problem is known to be NP-hard and computationally burdening (Song et al. 2007) and several heuristic algorithms for its approximate solution have been proposed (Schneider et al. 2012). For networks with uniform node degree distribution (most of the nodes have the same number of connections, like WDSs), fractality can be also defined through the “mass” MB of the boxes (their number of nodes) (Song et al. 2005) and Eq. 1 can be rewritten as:
$${M}_{B}\approx {l}_{B}^{dB}$$
(2)
and the exponents of the two power-law relationships in Eqs. (1) and (2) are equal. Starting from these definitions, the idea behind the proposed novel algorithm, that can be regarded as an approximation of the box-covering problem, is to exploit the community structure principle. Rather than finding the minimum number of boxes NB (with a set size lB) necessary to cover the network, a clustering algorithm is run to define the clusters (boxes) NC in which the network can be split. Accordingly, hereinafter it will be assumed NB = NC, the internal distance lB and the mass MB will be named as lC and MC, respectively. By applying a clustering algorithm, each cluster could have a different size in terms of both lC and MC (Fig. 1). However, since for uniform networks the number of connections for all the nodes is quite similar, it is expected that the mass MC, as well as the average distance between any pairs of nodes (and in turn the internal distance lC), is quite similar for each cluster. Accordingly, it is defined an average size LC for each clustering layout equal to the mean of the sizes lC of all the clusters:
$${L}_{C}=mean({l}_{C})$$
(3)
and by replacing lB with LC and NB with NC, Eq. (1) changes:
$${N}_{C}\approx {L}_{C}^{-dB}$$
(4)
The proposed algorithm consists of the following steps:
1)
setting the number of clustered layouts S. The relationship in Eq. (4) is based on a large number of clustered layouts (herein S = 100); each clustered layout is characterized by a different number of clusters NC. Given n the number of nodes composing the network, for the analysed WDSs, it has been observed that setting the lowest number of clusters NC,min≈0.04n and the highest NC,max≈0.20n is enough for detecting the power-law relationship.
 
2)
dividing the network in NC clusters. The heuristic Louvain clustering algorithm has been chosen (Blondel et al. 2008), that is one of the most performing recently developed. It is based on the optimization of the modularity (ranging between -1 and 1) that measures the density of links inside clusters as compared to links between clusters.
 
3)
calculating the size lC of each cluster and the average size LC (Eq. 3);
 
4)
repeating step 3) for all the clustered layouts S;
 
5)
fitting the obtained couples NC and LC with the power-law equation (Eq. 4), the exponent of which is the estimated fractal dimension dB.
 
It is worth to highlight that the algorithm has been tested on a benchmark network for which the fractal dimension is known and calculated with heuristic box-covering algorithms. Results are very similar, confirming the efficiency and the reliability of the proposed algorithm.

2.2 Vulnerability Assessment to Multiple Random Pipe Failures

The paper investigates the WDS global vulnerability (in terms of loss of connectivity) under multiple random pipe failures to simulate the occurrence of a catastrophic event. The considered triggering condition is a random attack (that plans to impact randomly selected network components). The aim is also to simulate the case in which information about the system in not fully available (that is a common situation for WDSs). Consequently, only network topology is considered, implicitly assuming that all elements are of equal importance. For each WDS, a set of R = 100 pipe failure scenarios has been generated; each of them by randomly removing an increasing number of pipes till the disconnection of the network. For each scenario, the number of pipe failures (pipef) necessary to disconnect the WDS has been calculated and then normalised to the total number of pipes m composing the network. For each WDS, the modal value Fmodal of the normalised pipe failures required to disconnect the network is calculated. The idea is that, if a structural self-similarity (fractality) exists for the analysed WDSs, it can be also revealed in terms of specific number of pipe failures that more likely disconnect the system. This aspect further justifies the assumption of randomly generating the failure scenarios. It is supposed that branched-like structures need smaller numbers of pipe failures than looped-like ones. Accordingly, the Fmodal value can be used for quantifying the global vulnerability of WDSs.

2.3 Topological Metrics

Some robustness topological metrics, borrowed from Complex Network Theory and adopted for the quantification of the global vulnerability of networked systems, have been used for comparison. WDSs can be modelled as undirected graphs G = (V, E), where V is the set of the n nodes, and E is the set of the m links. A mathematical representation is provided by the Adjacency matrix A (symmetric for undirected networks) whose elements aij = aji = 1 if there is a link between nodes i and j, and aij = aji = 0 otherwise. Subsequently, the Laplacian matrix L = D–A is defined, where D = diag(ki) and ki is the node degree (number of connections). The second smallest eigenvalue of L, called algebraic connectivity λ2, quantifies the proneness of a network to be split into independent components. The distance dij between each pair of nodes is computed as the number of links along the shortest path connecting them. Table 1 lists the adopted robustness topological metrics (see Giudicianni et al. (2018) for a detailed description).
Table 1
Name, formulation, and vulnerability interpretation for the adopted topological robustness metrics
Topological metric
Formulation
Vulnerability interpretation
Link density q
\(q=\frac{2m}{n(n-1)}\)
The higher it is, the higher the robustness against failures
Average node degree K
\(K=\frac{2m}{n}\)
The higher it is, the higher the robustness against failures
Average path length l
\(l=\frac{2\sum {d}_{ij}}{n(n-1)}\)
The higher it is, the lower the robustness against failures
Algebraic Connectivity λ2
\({\lambda }_{2}\)
The higher it is, the higher the robustness against failures

2.4 Software and Tools

The adopted algorithms have been implemented in Python 3.6. In particular, the novel algorithm for the definition of the fractal dimension has been developed by iteratively applying the Louvain algorithm using the Python package for complex network analysis NetworkX 2.4. The same package has been used for the calculation of the topological metrics. The simulations of the multiple random failures in WDSs have been carried out with the Python package Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR) v0.2.2. and the statistical analysis have been done with the Python library Scipy 1.5.0.

3 Case Study

For testing the proposed approach, nine graphs of WDSs are analyzed; seven out of nine refer to real WDSs and the other two are synthetic (data-file sources in Giudicianni et al. 2018), with size (number of nodes n) ranging between n = 37 and n = 1893 (see Table 2).
Table 2
Characteristics and simulation results of the analysed WDSs: name, number of pipes m, number of nodes n, density q, average node degree K, average path length l, algebraic connectivity λ2, type, layout, fractal dimension dB and modal Fmodal value of normalised failures
Name
m
n
q
K
l
λ2
Type
Layout
dB
Fmodal (%)
Fossolo
58
37
0.092
3.14
3.67
0.2189
synthetic
looped
1.11
25.86
Monteruscello
231
206
0.011
2.24
20.24
0.0015
real
branched
1.19
1.73
Parete
282
184
0.017
3.07
8.80
0.0212
real
looped
1.41
9.93
Villaricca
249
199
0.013
2.50
11.29
0.0067
real
mixed
1.32
1.20
Modena
317
272
0.009
2.33
14.04
0.0091
real
mixed
1.24
1.26
Celaya
475
339
0.009
2.80
11.81
0.0134
real
mixed
1.48
1.05
Matamoros
1651
1292
0.002
2.56
27.76
0.0010
real
branched
1.52
0.18
Wolf
1985
1786
0.001
2.22
25.94
0.0005
real
branched
1.95
0.05
Exnet
2418
1893
0.001
2.55
21.31
0.0010
synthetic
branched
1.76
0.04

4 Results and Discussion

According to the values of the robustness metrics listed in Table 2, it is evident that, from a topological point of view, the analysed WDSs are very different from each other, especially in terms of link density q and connectivity λ2. The choice of working on very different WDSs from a topological viewpoint is crucial for further validating the proposed approach. In Fig. 2, the simulation results obtained by applying the proposed algorithm to estimate the fractal dimension of WDSs are plotted. The existence of power-law relationships between the number of clusters NC and the average size LC for all the analysed WDSs is confirmed by the linear regression lines in a log–log plane with coefficient of determinations R2 > 0.95. This confirms the spatial self-similarity of WDSs layouts at different scales and in different areas. Accordingly, it can be supposed that also their response (in terms of loss of connectivity) to an event that causes diffuse pipe breakages can be self-similar and a specific attitude to the disconnection can thus be revealed. The last two columns of Table 2 list the values of dB and Fmodal for the analysed WDSs. It is evident that the WDSs, the layout of which is more looped – like Fossolo – show the highest values of Fmodal (highest number of pipe failures necessary to disconnect the graph). On the contrary, branched layout WDSs – like Wolf – show the lowest values of Fmodal. This agrees with the values of the robustness metrics and their interpretations (Table 1). The study of the relationships between the topological robustness metrics and this new index Fmodal, used for expressing the global vulnerability of the WDSs, represents another novel point of the current research.
Fossolo network is characterised by the highest values of link density q, average node degree K and algebraic connectivity λ2, and the lowest values of average path length l, which lead to suppose that it is the most robust from a topological viewpoint. On the other hand, Wolf network shows the lowest values of q, K, and λ2, and the second highest value of l, in agreement with the lowest value of Fmodal. It is evident that Fossolo also shows the lowest value of dB while Wolf is characterised by the highest one. Without loss of generality, Fig. 3 reports the frequency histograms of the number of normalised failures necessary to disconnect the network for two of the analysed WDSs. The plots show two different shapes for the histograms, pointing out two different behaviours in response to the same stress conditions for topologically dissimilar WDSs. In Fig. 3a, the frequency distribution has the shape of an asymmetric bell, while in Fig. 3b the histogram resembles a geometric type distribution. For the analysed WDSs, it has been noticed that the bell-shaped histograms are typical of densely looped systems (like Parete), while the geometric types characterise branched (or partly looped) networks (like Matamoros). This aspect further highlights the influence of the topology on the behaviour of WDSs with respect to failures. Such a dissimilarity can be explained by the fact that looped WDSs can be disconnected by both small and big number of failures (depending on where they occur), while branched WDSs are more likely disconnected by small numbers of failures, owing to the absence of highly interconnected zones.
Since the fractal dimension can be considered a measure of network organization, Fig. 4a shows the relationship between dB and Fmodal for the analysed WDSs. It is evident a decreasing trend of dB as the number of required failures increases, well describing the behaviour of WDSs in terms of leaning to disconnection. Anyway, for some networks this consistency is less clear. In order to enhance this correlation, the fractal dimension dB has been normalised with respect to the average node degree K, and the trend of dB/K against Fmodal is plotted in Fig. 4b. Different reasons led to choose the average node degree for normalization:
  • K represents a crucial topological feature characterising the structure of graphs;
  • K implicitly considers the number of elements composing the network (see Table 1);
  • K shows limited variability for WDSs (between two and four (Giudicianni et al. 2018)).
The latter feature assures easily interpretable values of the normalized fractal dimensions. Indeed, using other topological metrics (e.g. average path length, link density, algebraic connectivity, number of nodes composing the graph), for which lower and upper bounds are not well defined, would result in an extremely wide range for the normalized fractal dimension. The normalised fractal dimension dB/K still decreases as the number of normalised failures increases, but with a clearer trend. Accordingly, WDSs characterised by lower values of dB/K are less vulnerable to be disconnected (or, equivalently, to be cut) by randomly generated multiple failures. For this reason, the normalised fractal dimension dB/K can be assumed as a measure of the global vulnerability to pipe failures. Hence, a novel vulnerability index is proposed, called Cut-Vulnerability Vcut, for which higher values indicate higher vulnerability:
$${V}_{cut}= \frac{{d}_{B}}{K}$$
(5)
The suitability of the proposed Cut-Vulnerability index Vcut has been further validated through the analysis of its relationships with the topological robustness metrics.
Figure 5 shows clear and consistent monotonic trends. Fig. 5a shows that Vcut decreases as the link density q increases; Fig. 5b shows that Vcut increases as the average path length l increases; finally, from Fig. 5c, it is clear that Vcut decreases as the algebraic connectivity λ2 increases. To further validate the effectiveness of the proposed vulnerability index Vcut with respect to the other topological metrics used as proxies of vulnerability, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient ρs (Spearman 1904) between them and Fmodal has been calculated. This coefficient quantifies the strength of a monotonic relationship (either decreasing or increasing) linking two data samples when the structure of the relationship is unknown. The values -1 and 1 indicate perfectly negatively and positively correlated variables, respectively. The Spearman’s correlation coefficients ρs between Fmodal and q, K, l, λ2, and Vcut are 0.93, 0.42, -0.78, 0.82, and -0.94, respectively, with a significance level α = 0.01. While K and l show the weakest correlations with Fmodal, Vcut has the highest absolute value of ρs. Furthermore, with respect to the other topological metrics, Vcut index simultaneously considers the global structure of the graphs, i.e. their self-similar feature (through the fractal dimension dB) and their average level of connectivity (through the average node degree K), providing a more comprehensive information about the structure of the WDSs. This new index highlights how crucial is the combination of connectivity and topological organization for defining network behaviour. Networks with the same connectivity K, but with different values of the fractal dimension dB, behave differently with respect to failures. In this regard, another contribution of this paper is the analysis of the mutual influence between topology and mechanical failures, and how topology affects the response to pipe failures.

5 Conclusions

With the aim to study the criticality of water distribution networks facing natural disasters in the frequent case of scarcity of site-specific information and by defining new modelling tools, the present work brings together different fields, such as the statistical physics of complex networks, the topology of water systems and the fractal theory. The fractal structure of WDS layouts has been detected through a novel algorithm, that can be regarded as an approximation of the classical heuristic box-covering algorithms, which exploits the community structure principle. It results to be particularly appealing for application to big-sized systems. The fractal dimension dB is equal to the exponent of the power-law relationship between the number of clusters necessary for covering the network layout and their average size. The fractality of WDS layouts can be read as a mark of their self-similar topological organization and, consequently, it has been interpreted in terms of their self-similar response to mechanical failures, confirming the crucial role of the topology on the behaviour of water systems facing disasters. The global vulnerability assessment of WDSs under simultaneous failure events, as it could be the case after big disasters (i.e. landslides, floods, sabotages, earthquakes) has been performed. For nine WDSs, several failure scenarios have been generated, unveiling a specific vulnerability for each system, quantified through a novel index Fmodal equal to the specific number of random failures that more frequently lead to the disconnection of the system. Additionally, a novel vulnerability index called Cut-Vulnerability Vcut has been defined as the normalized fractal dimension to the average node degree dB/K. Such index has shown to well describe network topological self-similarity in terms of global vulnerability through its consistency with Fmodal and some other topological robustness metrics. The proposed index results particularly interesting in the case of a preliminary assessment of the vulnerability to disasters of water systems, for which geometric and hydraulic information is only partially available. It should be also stressed that during abnormal circumstances the variations of model boundary conditions for the hydraulic simulation become more uncertain and of secondary importance in comparison with the topological changes. This aspect further supports the assessment of the WDS global vulnerability in terms of loss of connectivity. In this regard, simplified methods based on topological knowledge alone, like that proposed and described in this paper, for a preliminary evaluation of WDSs’ vulnerability can represent effective and economic decision-support tools to drive the search for the most disruptive alterations under abnormal events, to prioritize the use of available resources, and consequently to rapidly restore service. Future works will investigate the possibility of applying the novel fractal algorithm to the weighted graph of the water systems, by considering the hydraulic/geometric characteristics of the pipes, in order to better reproduce their physical behaviour. This could reveal hydraulic self-similarity features in the resulting graph and allow simulating targeted attacks by considering the different hydraulic importance of network elements.

Acknowledgement

The research was conducted as part of the activities financed with the awarding of the V:ALERE:2019 project of the Università degli Studi della Campania ‘L. Vanvitelli’.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

None.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agathokleous A, Christodoulou C, Christodoulou SE (2017) Topological robustness and vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 31(12):4007–4021CrossRef Agathokleous A, Christodoulou C, Christodoulou SE (2017) Topological robustness and vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 31(12):4007–4021CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akiba T, Nakamura K, Takaguchi T (2016) Fractality of massive graphs: Scalable analysis with sketch-based box-covering algorithm. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 769–774). IEEE Akiba T, Nakamura K, Takaguchi T (2016) Fractality of massive graphs: Scalable analysis with sketch-based box-covering algorithm. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 769–774). IEEE
Zurück zum Zitat Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008(10):P10008CrossRef Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008(10):P10008CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caldarola F, Maiolo M (2020) On the topological convergence of multi-rule sequences of sets and fractal patterns. Soft Computing, 24(23):17737–17749 Caldarola F, Maiolo M (2020) On the topological convergence of multi-rule sequences of sets and fractal patterns. Soft Computing, 24(23):17737–17749
Zurück zum Zitat Christodoulou SE, Fragiadakis M (2015) Vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks considering performance data. J Infrastruct Syst 21(2):04014040CrossRef Christodoulou SE, Fragiadakis M (2015) Vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks considering performance data. J Infrastruct Syst 21(2):04014040CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D’Agostino G, Scala A (eds) (2014) Networks of networks: the last frontier of complexity (Vol. 340). Springer, Berlin D’Agostino G, Scala A (eds) (2014) Networks of networks: the last frontier of complexity (Vol. 340). Springer, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Diao K, Butler D, Ulanicki B (2017) Fractalıty ın water dıstrıbutıon networks. 15th international computing & control for the water industry conference, 5–7, September 2017, Sheffield, UK Diao K, Butler D, Ulanicki B (2017) Fractalıty ın water dıstrıbutıon networks. 15th international computing & control for the water industry conference, 5–7, September 2017, Sheffield, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Di Nardo A, Di Natale M, Giudicianni C, Greco R, Santonastaso GF (2017) Complex network and fractal theory for the assessment of water distribution network resilience to pipe failures. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 17(3):767–777CrossRef Di Nardo A, Di Natale M, Giudicianni C, Greco R, Santonastaso GF (2017) Complex network and fractal theory for the assessment of water distribution network resilience to pipe failures. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 17(3):767–777CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fiscon G, Conte F, Farina L, Paci P (2018) Network-based approaches to explore complex biological systems towards network medicine. Genes 9(9):437CrossRef Fiscon G, Conte F, Farina L, Paci P (2018) Network-based approaches to explore complex biological systems towards network medicine. Genes 9(9):437CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giudicianni C, Di Nardo A, Di Natale M, Greco R, Santonastaso GF, Scala A (2018) Topological taxonomy of water distribution networks. Water 10(4):444CrossRef Giudicianni C, Di Nardo A, Di Natale M, Greco R, Santonastaso GF, Scala A (2018) Topological taxonomy of water distribution networks. Water 10(4):444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giudicianni C, Herrera M, Di Nardo A, Adeyeye K (2020) Automatic multiscale approach for water networks partitioning into dynamic district metered areas. Water Resources Management 34(2):835–848 Giudicianni C, Herrera M, Di Nardo A, Adeyeye K (2020) Automatic multiscale approach for water networks partitioning into dynamic district metered areas. Water Resources Management 34(2):835–848
Zurück zum Zitat Goh KI, Salvi G, Kahng B, Kim D (2006) Skeleton and fractal scaling in complex networks. Phys Rev Lett 96(1):018701CrossRef Goh KI, Salvi G, Kahng B, Kim D (2006) Skeleton and fractal scaling in complex networks. Phys Rev Lett 96(1):018701CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gutiérrez-Pérez JA, Herrera M, Pérez-García R, Ramos-Martínez E (2013) Application of graph-spectral methods in the vulnerability assessment of water supply networks. Math Comput Model 57(7–8):1853–1859CrossRef Gutiérrez-Pérez JA, Herrera M, Pérez-García R, Ramos-Martínez E (2013) Application of graph-spectral methods in the vulnerability assessment of water supply networks. Math Comput Model 57(7–8):1853–1859CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haimes YY, Matalas NC, Lambert JH, Jackson BA, Fellows JF (1998) Reducing vulnerability of water supply systems to attack. J Infrastruct Syst 4(4):164–177CrossRef Haimes YY, Matalas NC, Lambert JH, Jackson BA, Fellows JF (1998) Reducing vulnerability of water supply systems to attack. J Infrastruct Syst 4(4):164–177CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa T, Nemoto K (2013) Hierarchical scale-free network is fragile against random failure. Phys Rev E 88(6):062807CrossRef Hasegawa T, Nemoto K (2013) Hierarchical scale-free network is fragile against random failure. Phys Rev E 88(6):062807CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera M, Abraham E, Stoianov I (2016) A graph-theoretic framework for assessing the resilience of sectorised water distribution networks. Water ResourManag 30(5):1685–1699CrossRef Herrera M, Abraham E, Stoianov I (2016) A graph-theoretic framework for assessing the resilience of sectorised water distribution networks. Water ResourManag 30(5):1685–1699CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iwanek M, Kowalski D, Kowalska B, Suchorab P (2020) Fractal geometry in designing and operating water networks. J Ecol Eng 21(6):229–236 Iwanek M, Kowalski D, Kowalska B, Suchorab P (2020) Fractal geometry in designing and operating water networks. J Ecol Eng 21(6):229–236
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalski D, Kowalska B, Kwietniewski M (2015) Monitoring of water distribution system effectiveness using fractal geometry. Bull Pol Ac Tech 63(1):155–161 Kowalski D, Kowalska B, Kwietniewski M (2015) Monitoring of water distribution system effectiveness using fractal geometry. Bull Pol Ac Tech 63(1):155–161
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature, vol 2. WH Freeman, New York Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature, vol 2. WH Freeman, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Marinho LR, das Chagas Moura, M., da Cunha, B. S., & Lins, I. D. (2020) Optimization of investments in the resilience of water distribution systems subject to interruptions. Water Resour Manag 34(3):929–954 Marinho LR, das Chagas Moura, M., da Cunha, B. S., & Lins, I. D. (2020) Optimization of investments in the resilience of water distribution systems subject to interruptions. Water Resour Manag 34(3):929–954
Zurück zum Zitat Michaud D, Apostolakis GE (2006) Methodology for ranking the elements of water-supply networks. J Infrastruct Syst 12(4):230–242CrossRef Michaud D, Apostolakis GE (2006) Methodology for ranking the elements of water-supply networks. J Infrastruct Syst 12(4):230–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paez D, Fillion, Y, Hulley M (2018) Battle of post-disaster response and restauration (BPDRR): problem description and rules. In 1st international water distribution system analysis / computing and control in the water industry joint conference, Kingston, Canada, July 23–25 Paez D, Fillion, Y, Hulley M (2018) Battle of post-disaster response and restauration (BPDRR): problem description and rules. In 1st international water distribution system analysis / computing and control in the water industry joint conference, Kingston, Canada, July 23–25
Zurück zum Zitat Pagani GA, Aiello M (2013) The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Phys A 392(11):2688–2700CrossRef Pagani GA, Aiello M (2013) The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Phys A 392(11):2688–2700CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qi S, Ye J, Gao J, Wu W, Wang J, Zang Z, Chen L, Shi T, Zhou L (2014) Fractal-based planning of urban water distribution system in China. Procedia Eng 89:886–892CrossRef Qi S, Ye J, Gao J, Wu W, Wang J, Zang Z, Chen L, Shi T, Zhou L (2014) Fractal-based planning of urban water distribution system in China. Procedia Eng 89:886–892CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider CM, Kesselring TA, Andrade JS Jr, Herrmann HJ (2012) Box-covering algorithm for fractal dimension of complex networks. Phys Rev E 86:016707CrossRef Schneider CM, Kesselring TA, Andrade JS Jr, Herrmann HJ (2012) Box-covering algorithm for fractal dimension of complex networks. Phys Rev E 86:016707CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Serrano MÁ, Krioukov D, Boguñá M (2011) Percolation in self-similar networks. Phys Rev Lett 106(4):048701CrossRef Serrano MÁ, Krioukov D, Boguñá M (2011) Percolation in self-similar networks. Phys Rev Lett 106(4):048701CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shuang Q, Zhang M, Yuan Y (2014) Node vulnerability of water distribution networks under cascading failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 124:132–141 Shuang Q, Zhang M, Yuan Y (2014) Node vulnerability of water distribution networks under cascading failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 124:132–141
Zurück zum Zitat Song C, Havlin S, Makse HA (2005) Self-similarity of complex networks. Nature 433(7024):392–395 Song C, Havlin S, Makse HA (2005) Self-similarity of complex networks. Nature 433(7024):392–395
Zurück zum Zitat Song C, Havlin S, Makse HA (2006) Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks. Nat Phys 2(4):275CrossRef Song C, Havlin S, Makse HA (2006) Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks. Nat Phys 2(4):275CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song C, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Makse HA (2007) How to calculate the fractal dimension of a complex network: the box covering algorithm. J Stat Mech 03:P03006 Song C, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Makse HA (2007) How to calculate the fractal dimension of a complex network: the box covering algorithm. J Stat Mech 03:P03006
Zurück zum Zitat Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15:72–101CrossRef Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15:72–101CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taormina R, Galelli S (2018) Deep-learning approach to the detection and localization of cyber-physical attacks on water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(10):04018065CrossRef Taormina R, Galelli S (2018) Deep-learning approach to the detection and localization of cyber-physical attacks on water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(10):04018065CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F, Zheng XZ, Chen S, Zhou JL (2017) Emergency repair scope partition of city water distribution network: a novel approach considering the node importance. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3779–3794CrossRef Wang F, Zheng XZ, Chen S, Zhou JL (2017) Emergency repair scope partition of city water distribution network: a novel approach considering the node importance. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3779–3794CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wen T, Cheong KH (2021) Invited review: The fractal dimension of complex networks: A review. Information Fusion Wen T, Cheong KH (2021) Invited review: The fractal dimension of complex networks: A review. Information Fusion
Zurück zum Zitat Xin K, Tao T, Li S, Yan H (2017) Contamination accidents in China’s drinking water distribution networks: status and countermeasures. Water Policy 19(1):13–27CrossRef Xin K, Tao T, Li S, Yan H (2017) Contamination accidents in China’s drinking water distribution networks: status and countermeasures. Water Policy 19(1):13–27CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Community-Structure-Based Method for Estimating the Fractal Dimension, and its Application to Water Networks for the Assessment of Vulnerability to Disasters
verfasst von
C. Giudicianni
A. Di Nardo
R. Greco
A. Scala
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02773-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Water Resources Management 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe