nach oben

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Erschienen in:

30.11.2017 | Original Paper

A comparative study of lignocellulosic ethanol productivities by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

verfasst von: Dania Sandoval-Nuñez, Melchor Arellano-Plaza, Anne Gschaedler, Javier Arrizon, Lorena Amaya-Delgado

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is commonly employed in industrial ethanol production, regardless of the capability of Kluyveromyces marxianus strains to produce ethanol at similar or higher levels and on inhibitory conditions. Therefore, in this work strains of S. cerevisiae (ethanol RED and AR5) and K. marxianus (SLP1 and OFF1) were compared for ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and wheat straw (WS) hydrolysates. As it is known, during the lignocellulosic hydrolysis not only free sugars were obtained (SCB, g L⁻¹: glucose 7.64, xylose 8.38, arabinose 2.43; and WS, g L⁻¹: glucose 6.07, xylose 6.36, arabinose 2.09) but also growth inhibitors of yeast such as hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural that could modify the fermentation capability. The volumetric ethanol productivity (Q _p) was evaluated, and it was observed that the K. marxianus SLP1 was the most efficient for ethanol production reaching a Q _p of 0.292 and 0.250 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹ on SCB and WS hydrolysates, respectively. In contrast, S. cerevisiae AR5 and ethanol RED exhibited a reduced Q _p on SCB, but similar values of Q _p to K. marxianus OFF1 on WS. The results obtained show that it is possible to select K. marxianus yeast strains for ethanol production using SCB and WS hydrolysates obtaining higher Q _p than S. cerevisiae yeast strains. Considering the efficiency of ethanol production and the tolerance to inhibitors, K. marxianus strain SLP1 possesses a great potential as an industrial yeast for lignocellulosic ethanol production.

Vorheriger Artikel Treatment costs of ammonia recovery from biogas digestate by air stripping analyzed by process simulation

Nächster Artikel Design of biorefinery systems for conversion of corn stover into biofuels using a biorefinery engineering framework

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Akinosho H, Rydzak T, Borole A, Ragauskas A, Close D (2015) Toxicological challenges to microbial bioethanol production and strategies for improved tolerance. Ecotoxicology 24(10):2156–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1543-4 CrossRef

Alcázar M, Kind T, Gschaedler A, Silveria M, Arrizon J, Oliver F, Vallejo A, Higuera I, Lugo E (2017) Effect of steroidal saponins from Agave on the polysaccharide cell wall composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus. Food Sci Technol 77:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.048 CrossRef

Amaya-Delgado L, Herrera-López EJ, Arrizon J, Arellano-Plaza M, Gschaedler A (2013) Performance evaluation of Pichia kluyveri, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae at industrial tequila fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:875–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1242-8 CrossRef

Arellano-Plaza M, Gschaedler-Mathis A, Noriega-Cisneros R, Clemente-Guerrero M, Manzo-Ávalos S, González-Hernández JC, Saavedra-Molina A (2013) Respiratory capacity of the Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast isolated from the mezcal process during oxidative stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29(7):1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1291-7 CrossRef

Arrizon J, Fiore C, Acosta G, Romano P, Gschaedler A (2006) Fermentation behaviour and volatile compound production by agave and grape must yeasts in high sugar Agave tequilana and grape must fermentations. Anton Leeuw Int J G 89:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-005-9022-1 CrossRef

Awad OI, Mamat R, Ibrahim TK, Hagos FY, Noor MM, Yusri IM, Leman AM (2017) Calorific value enhancement of fusel oil by moisture removal and its effect on the performance and combustion of a spark ignition engine. Energy Convers Manag 137:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.009 CrossRef

Barchyn D, Cenkowski S (2014) Process analysis of superheated steam pre-treatment of wheat straw and its relative effect on ethanol selling price. J Biofuel Res 4:123–128. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2015.1.4.4 CrossRef

Batalha L, Han Q, Jameel H, Chang H, Colodette JL, Borges Gomes FJ (2015) Production of fermentable sugars from sugarcane bagasse by enzymatic hydrolysis after autohydrolysis and mechanical refining. Bioresour Technol 180:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.060 CrossRef

Bondesson PM, Galbe M (2016) Process design of SSCF for ethanol production from steam-pretreated, acetic acid impregnated wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuel 9:222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0635-6 CrossRef

Chen H, Fu X (2016) Industrial technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.069 CrossRef

Flores JA, Gschaedler A, Amaya-Delgado L, Herrera-López EJ, Arellano M, Arrizon J (2013) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Agave tequilana fructans by Kluyveromyces marxianus yeasts for bioethanol and tequila production. Bioresour Technol 146:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.078 CrossRef

Fonseca GG, Heinzle E, Wittmann C, Gombert AK (2008) The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1458-6 CrossRef

Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010a) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (Lignocellulosic biomass) Part I: lignin protocol. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/1745 CrossRef

Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010b) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (Lignocellulosic biomass) Part II: carbohydrates. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/1837 CrossRef

Hasunuma T, Kondo A (2012) Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering. Biotechnol Adv 30(6):1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.10.011 CrossRef

Heer D, Sauer U (2008) Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbiol Biotechnol 1(6):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00050.x CrossRef

Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N (2013) Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-16 CrossRef

Karagöz P, Özkan M (2014) Ethanol production from wheat straw by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Scheffersomyces stipitis co-culture in batch and continuous system. Bioresour Technol 158:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.022 CrossRef

Karp SG, Woiciechowski AL, Soccol VT, Soccol CR (2013) Pretreatment strategies for delignification of sugarcane bagasse: a review. Braz Arch Biol Technol 56(4):679–689. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013000400019 CrossRef

Kim J, Block DE, Mills DA (2010) Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2839-1 CrossRef

Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2004) Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:10–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1642-2 CrossRef

Lopez A, Sánchez A, De León A (2017) Simultaneous production of bioethanol and biohydrogen by Escherichia coli WDHL using wheat straw hydrolysate as substrate. Fuel 188:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.022 CrossRef

López-Alvarez A, Díaz-Perez AL, Sosa-Aguirre C, Macías-Rodríguez L, Campos-García J (2012) Ethanol yield and volatile compound content in fermentation of agave must by Kluyveromyces marxianus UMPe-1 comparing with Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker’s yeast used in tequila production. J Biosci Bioeng 113(5):614–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.12.015 CrossRef

Monschein M, Nidetzky B (2016) Effect of pretreatment severity in continuous steam explosion on enzymatic conversion of wheat straw: evidence from kinetic analysis of hydrolysis time courses. Bioresour Technol 200:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.020 CrossRef

Morrissey J, Etschmann M, Schrader J, Billerbeck G (2015) Cell factory applications of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus for the biotechnological production of natural flavour and fragrance molecules. Yeast 32:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3054 CrossRef

Mussatto SI, Roberto IC (2004) Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Biores Technol 93(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.005 CrossRef

Nguyen TT, Iwaki A, Izawa S (2014) Vanillin causes the activation of Yap1 and mitochondrial fragmentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 117(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.008 CrossRef

Nielsen F, Zacchi G, Galbe M, Wallberg O (2016) Prefermentation improves ethanol yield in separate hydrolysis and cofermentation of steam-pretreated wheat straw. Sustein Chem Processes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40508-016-0054-9 CrossRef

Oshoma CE, Greetham D, Louis EJ, Smart KA, Phister G, Powell C, Du C (2015) Screening of non-Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for tolerance to formic acid in bioethanol fermentation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135626 CrossRef

Pereira L, Comelli A, Paula A, Marcele L, Henrique M, Silveira L (2015) Enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse using high total solids and low enzyme loadings. Bioresour Technol 175:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.087 CrossRef

Rajan K, Carrier DJ (2014) Effect of dilute acid pretreatment conditions and washing on the production of inhibitors and on recovery of sugars during wheat straw enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 62:222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.013 CrossRef

Ramadoss G, Muthukumar K (2016) Mechanistic study on ultrasound assisted pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse using metal salt with hydrogen peroxide for bioethanol production. Ultrason Sonochem 28:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.07.006 CrossRef

Rocha GJM, Martin C, Soares IB, Souto-Maior AM, Baudel HM, Moraes CA (2011) Dilute mixed-acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for the ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 35:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbiombioe.2010.10.018 CrossRef

Scott F, Quintero J, Morales M, Conejeros R, Cardona C, Aroca G (2013) Process design and sustainability in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials. Electron J Biotechnol 16(3):13

Toquero C, Bolado S (2014) Effect of four pretreatments on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation of wheat straw. Influence of inhibitors and washing. Bioresour Technol 157:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.090 CrossRef

Valdez I, Acevedo J, Hernández C (2010) Distribution and potential of bioenergy resources from agricultural activities in Mexico. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2147–2153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.034 CrossRef

Vallejos ME, Felissia FE, Kruyeniski J, Area MC (2015) Kinetic study of the extraction of hemicellulosic carbohydrates from sugarcane bagasse by hot water treatment. Ind Crop Prod 67:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.058 CrossRef

Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K (2011) Utilization of sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production: Sono-assisted acid hydrolysis approach. Bioresour Technol 102(14):7119–7123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.045 CrossRef

Verdugo-Valdez A, Segura-García L, Kirchmayr M, Ramírez-Rodríguez P, González-Esquinca A, Gschaedler Mathis A (2001) Yeast communities associated with artisanal mezcal fermentations from Agave salmiana. Anton Leeuw Int J G 100(4):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-011-9605-y CrossRef

Wilkinson S, Greetham D, Tucker GA (2016) Evaluation of different lignocellulosic biomass pretreatments by phenotypic microarray-based metabolic analysis of fermenting yeast. Biofuel Res J 3(1):357–365. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2016.3.1.5 CrossRef

Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang L, Yang R, Hou P (2017) Direct bioethanol production from wheat straw using xylose/glucose co-fermentation by co-culture of two recombinant yeasts. Jo Ind Microbiol Biot 44(3):453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-016-1893-9 CrossRef

Titel: A comparative study of lignocellulosic ethanol productivities by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
verfasst von: Dania Sandoval-Nuñez
Melchor Arellano-Plaza
Anne Gschaedler
Javier Arrizon
Lorena Amaya-Delgado
Publikationsdatum: 30.11.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1470-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Correction to: Anaerobic digestion of citrus industry effluents using an Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor

Transformation towards sustainable bioenergy systems

Harnessing lignocellulosic waste for energy storage and generation for off-grid rural areas

An overview of biorefinery-derived platform chemicals from a cellulose and hemicellulose biorefinery

Treatment costs of ammonia recovery from biogas digestate by air stripping analyzed by process simulation

Life cycle assessment of Jatropha curcas biodiesel production: a case study in Mexico