Anzeige
Erschienen in:
1997 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
A Comparison of Aspiration Level Interactive Method (AIM) and Conjoint Analysis in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
verfasst von : Madhukar Angur, Vahid Lotfi
Erschienen in: Essays In Decision Making
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Enthalten in: Professional Book Archive
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
The predictive validity of the two methods, Aspiration-level interactive method (AIM) and conjoint analysis, used for solving decision problems involving discrete alternatives are compared. An empirical analysis based on subjects’ preferences for a multiattribute product (buying a house) and a service (selecting an MBA program for study) indicated that consumer preferences derived from AIM may be more valid than the preferences derived from the full-profile conjoint analysis method.