1996 | ReviewPaper | Buchkapitel
A comparison of optimization techniques for integrated manufacturing planning and scheduling
verfasst von : M. McIlhagga, P. Husbands, R. Ives
Erschienen in: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN IV
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Enthalten in: Professional Book Archive
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
We describe a comparison between Simulated Annealing (SA), Dispatch Rules (DR), and a Coevolutionary Distributed Genetic Algorithm (DGA) solving a random sample of integrated planning and scheduling (IPS) problems. We found that for a wide range of optimization criteria the DGA consistently outperformed SA and DR. The DGA finds 8–9 unique high quality solutions per run, whereas the other techniques find only one. On average, each DGA solution is 10–15% better than SA solutions and 30–35% better than DR solutions.