Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 5/2020

10.02.2020 | Original Paper

A consistent strain-based beam element with quaternion representation of rotations

verfasst von: Damjan Lolić, Dejan Zupan, Miha Brojan

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present a novel consistent singularity-free strain-based finite element formulation for the analysis of three-dimensional frame-like structures. Our model is based on a geometrically exact finite-strain beam theory, quaternion parametrization of spatial rotations, assumption that the strain measures are constant along the length of the element and a proper choice of basis for the translational strain vector representation. As it is common for strain-based elements, the present formulation does not suffer from shear locking. A comparison of our results with the results from the literature and a commercial finite element analysis software demonstrates the advantages of the proposed formulation, especially when the structure is subjected to larger shear deformations. This stems from the fact that our model ensures a mathematically consistent updating procedure for all the quantities describing the beam. This aspect is often overlooked, since most of the numerical cases from other studies on this topic engage rather small-shear strains for which the consistent update is not crucial as the number of elements is increased.
Vorheriger Artikel A nine nodes solid-shell finite element with enhanced pinching stress

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Hover FS (1997) Simulation of stiff massless tethers. Ocean Eng 24(8):765–783
2.
Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM (1990) Three-dimensional nonlinear static analysis of cable-stayed bridges. Comput Struct 34(2):257–271
3.
Coleman BD, Swigon D (2000) Theory of supercoiled elastic rings with self-contact and its application to DNA plasmids. J Elast 60(3):173–221MathSciNetMATH
4.
Nakano A (1999) A rigid-body-based multiple time scale molecular dynamics simulation of nanophase materials. Int J High Perform Comput 13(2):154–162
5.
Spillman J, Teschner M (2008) Cosserat nets. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(2):325–338
6.
Gilles B, Bousquet G, Faure F, Pai DK (2011) Frame-based elastic models. ACM Trans Graph 30(2):15:1–15:12
7.
Horn BKP (1987) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am A 4(4):629–642
8.
Trivedi D, Lotfi A, Rahn CD (2008) Geometrically exact models for soft robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot 24(4):773–780
9.
Reissner E (1972) On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem. Z Angew Math Phys 23(5):795–804MATH
10.
Antman SS (2005) Nonlinear problems of elasticity. Springer, New YorkMATH
11.
Reissner E (1981) On finite deformations of space-curved beams. Z Angew Math Phys 32(6):734–744MATH
12.
Simo JC (1985) A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Comput Method Appl Mech 49(1):55–70MATH
13.
Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L (1986) A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: computational aspects. Comput Method Appl Mech 58(1):79–116MATH
14.
Cardona A, Géradin M (1988) A beam finite element non-linear theory with finite rotations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26(11):2403–2438MATH
15.
Ibrahimbegović A (1995) On finite element implementation of geometrically nonlinear Reissner’s beam theory: three-dimensional curved beam elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech 22(1–2):11–26MATH
16.
Jelenić G, Saje M (1995) A kinematically exact space finite strain beam model—finite element formulation by generalized virtual work principle. Comput Methods Appl Mech 120(1–2):131–161MathSciNetMATH
17.
Smoleński WM (1999) Statically and kinematically exact nonlinear theory of rods and its numerical verification. Comput Methods Appl Mech 178(1–2):89–113MathSciNetMATH
18.
Argyris J (1982) An excursion into large rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech 32(1–3):85–155MathSciNetMATH
19.
Argyris J, Poterasu VF (1993) Large rotations revisited application of Lie algebra. Comput Methods Appl Mech 103(1–2):11–42MathSciNetMATH
20.
Géradin M, Rixen D (1995) Parametrization of finite rotations in computational dynamics: a review. Revue Européenne des Eléments Finis 4(5–6):497–553MathSciNetMATH
21.
Spring KW (1986) Euler parameters and the use of quaternion algebra in the manipulation of finite rotations: a review. Mech Mach Theory 21(5):365–373
22.
Atluri SN, Cazzani A (1995) Rotations in computational solid mechanics. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2(1):49–138MathSciNet
23.
Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2009) The quaternion-based three-dimensional beam theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech 198(49–52):3944–3956MathSciNetMATH
24.
Češarek P, Saje M, Zupan D (2012) Kinematically exact curved and twisted strain-based beam. Int J Solids Struct 49(13):1802–1817
25.
Zupan D, Saje M (2003) Finite-element formulation of geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theories based on interpolation of strain measures. Int J Solids Struct 192(49–50):5209–5248MathSciNetMATH
26.
Stuelpnagel J (1964) On the parametrization of the three-dimensional rotation group. SIAM Rev 6(4):422–430MathSciNetMATH
27.
Pimenta PM, Campello EMB, Wriggers P (2008) An exact conserving algorithm for nonlinear dynamics with rotational DOFs and general hyperelasticity. Part 1: rods. Comput Mech 42(5):715–732MathSciNetMATH
28.
Neto AG, Martins CA, Pimenta PM (2014) Static analysis of offshore risers with a geometrically-exact 3D beam model subjected to unilateral contact. Comput Mech 53(1):125–145MathSciNet
29.
Ibrahimbegović A (1997) On the choice of finite rotation parameters. Comput Methods Appl Mech 149(1–4):49–71MathSciNetMATH
30.
Crisfield MA, Jelenić G (1999) Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation. Proc Roy Soc Lond A Math 455(1–4):1125–1147MathSciNetMATH
31.
Battini JM, Pacoste C (2002) Co-rotational beam elements with warping effects in instability problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech 191(17–18):1755–1789MATH
32.
McRobie FA, Lasenby J (1999) Simo–Vu Quoc rods using Clifford algebra. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(4):377–398MathSciNetMATH
33.
Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2013) Dynamics of spatial beams in quaternion description based on the Newmark integration scheme. Comput Mech 51(1):47–64MathSciNetMATH
34.
Zupan E, Zupan D (2016) Velocity-based approach in non-linear dynamics of three-dimensional beams with enforced kinematic compatibility. Comput Methods Appl Mech 310:406–428MathSciNetMATH
35.
Zupan E, Zupan D (2019) On conservation of energy and kinematic compatibility in dynamics of nonlinear velocity-based three-dimensional beams. Nonlinear Dyn 95(2):1379–1394MATH
36.
Tabarrok B, Farshad M, Yi H (1988) Finite element formulation of spatially curved and twisted rods. Comput Methods Appl Mech 70(3):275–299MATH
37.
Zupan D, Saje M (2006) The linearized three-dimensional beam theory of naturally curved and twisted beams: the strain vectors formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech 195(33–36):4557–4578MATH
38.
Ward JP (2012) Quaternions and Cayley numbers: algebra and applications. Springer, BerlinMATH
39.
Zupan E, Zupan D (2014) On higher order integration of angular velocities using quaternions. Mech Res Commun 55:77–85MATH
40.
Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2013) On a virtual work consistent three-dimensional Reissner–Simo beam formulation using the quaternion algebra. Acta Mech 224(8):1709–1729MathSciNetMATH
41.
Room TG (1952) The composition of rotations in Euclidean three-space. Am Math Mon 59(10):688–692MathSciNetMATH
42.
The Mathworks, Inc (2019) MATLAB version 9.6.0.1150989 (R2019a). Natick, Massachusetts
43.
ANSYS, Inc. (2019) Academic research mechanical, release R2 2019. Help system, element reference
44.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. (2019) ABAQUS documentation 6.13, Providence, RI, USA
45.
Ibrahimbegović A, Taylor RL (2002) On the role of frame-invariance in structural mechanics models at finite rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech 191(45):5159–5176MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
A consistent strain-based beam element with quaternion representation of rotations
verfasst von
Damjan Lolić
Dejan Zupan
Miha Brojan
Publikationsdatum
10.02.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01826-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Computational Mechanics 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

An enriched finite volume formulation for the simulation of ductile material failure under shock loading

Original Paper

Application of PDS–FEM to simulate dynamic crack propagation and supershear rupture

Original Paper

A nine nodes solid-shell finite element with enhanced pinching stress

Original Paper

A phase-field model of thermo-elastic coupled brittle fracture with explicit time integration

Original Paper

Isogeometric analysis of thin Reissner–Mindlin shells: locking phenomena and B-bar method

Original Paper

Mixed peridynamic formulations for compressible and incompressible finite deformations

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise