Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies 3/2023

06.03.2023 | Research Paper

A General Model of Subjective Value and Stimulus-Intensity-Sensitive Hedonic Editing Strategy

verfasst von: Haijiao Cui, Bin Cao, Aimei Li, Zhaohui Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Subjective value is foundational to decision-making processes and people's sense of happiness. To better represent decision-makers' psychological characteristics when subjective value is formed, we establish an attention-and-reference-dependent subjective value model by simultaneously considering the absolute subjective value, relative subjective value, and attention distribution. Our model provides researchers with a theoretical tool for explaining, predicting, and adjusting decision behaviors. Additionally, to maximize the total experienced subjective value brought by multiple events, we compare hedonic editing strategies and demonstrate that the optimal hedonic editing strategy is sensitive to the stimulus intensity. This stimulus-intensity-sensitive strategy is contrary to the hedonic editing strategy inferred from the prospect theory value function when stimulus intensity is relatively small. The results of this study enrich transaction utility theory and expectation-disconfirmation theory and can guide decision-makers in enhancing happiness by rationally dealing with gains and losses.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In our formulation, golfers do not consistently deliver maximum effort for each putt. Golfers may devote different amounts of effort to their putts throughout the Tournament. This conceptualization is consistent with previous works, which found that rather than playing consistently across every hole, golfers' performance varies according to the incentives and pressures they face (Jennifer, 2011; Ozbeklik & Smith, 2017; Elmore & Urbaczewski, 2021).
 
2
For simplicity, Pope & Schweitzer start by assuming that if a golfer misses his first putt, he makes his following putt and earns a lower score x-1 His utility function is: \(U = \left[ { f \left( e \right) + \varepsilon } \right]V \left( x \right) + \left[ {1 - f \left( e \right) - \varepsilon } \right]V \left( {x {-}1} \right) - \cos t\left( e \right)\). Here e is the effort level, f(e) is the shot accuracy, \(\varepsilon\) is an error term, and V(\(x\)) is the value function under the score x. We can see there exists a unique optimum (but not maximum) effort level e that the golfer could generate a maximum utility.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barberis, N., & Xiong, W. (2012). Realization utility. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2), 251–271.CrossRef Barberis, N., & Xiong, W. (2012). Realization utility. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2), 251–271.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatia, S., & Golman, R. (2019). Attention and reference dependence. Decision, 6(2), 145–170.CrossRef Bhatia, S., & Golman, R. (2019). Attention and reference dependence. Decision, 6(2), 145–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2012a). Salience in experimental tests of the endowment effect. The American Economic Review, 102(3), 47–52.CrossRef Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2012a). Salience in experimental tests of the endowment effect. The American Economic Review, 102(3), 47–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2012b). Salience theory of choice under risk. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1243–1285.CrossRef Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2012b). Salience theory of choice under risk. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1243–1285.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bower, G. H. (1961). A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 196.CrossRef Bower, G. H. (1961). A contrast effect in differential conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chai, J. (2021). A model of ambition, aspiration and happiness. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 692–702.CrossRef Chai, J. (2021). A model of ambition, aspiration and happiness. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 692–702.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491–504.CrossRef Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491–504.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowley, E. (2008). The perils of hedonic editing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 71–84.CrossRef Cowley, E. (2008). The perils of hedonic editing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 71–84.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the weber-fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145–147.CrossRef Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the weber-fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145–147.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elmore, R., & Urbaczewski, A. (2021). Loss aversion in professional golf. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(2), 202–217.CrossRef Elmore, R., & Urbaczewski, A. (2021). Loss aversion in professional golf. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(2), 202–217.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Embree, L., & James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44(1). Embree, L., & James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44(1).
Zurück zum Zitat Fan, L., & Suh, Y.-H. (2014). Why do users switch to a disruptive technology? an empirical study based on expectation-disconfirmation theory. Information & Management, 51(2), 240–248.CrossRef Fan, L., & Suh, Y.-H. (2014). Why do users switch to a disruptive technology? an empirical study based on expectation-disconfirmation theory. Information & Management, 51(2), 240–248.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P., & Luce, R. (1996). Joint receipt and thaler’s hedonic editing rule. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1(31), 52.CrossRef Fishburn, P., & Luce, R. (1996). Joint receipt and thaler’s hedonic editing rule. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1(31), 52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2009). Different representations of relative and absolute subjective value in the human brain. NeuroImage, 48(1), 258–268.CrossRef Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2009). Different representations of relative and absolute subjective value in the human brain. NeuroImage, 48(1), 258–268.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant, A., Johnstone, D., & Kwon, O. K. (2021). A cumulative prospect theory explanation of gamblers cashing-out. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 102, 102534.CrossRef Grant, A., Johnstone, D., & Kwon, O. K. (2021). A cumulative prospect theory explanation of gamblers cashing-out. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 102, 102534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Imas, A. (2016). The realization effect: Risk-taking after realized versus paper losses. American Economic Review, 106(8), 2086–2109.CrossRef Imas, A. (2016). The realization effect: Risk-taking after realized versus paper losses. American Economic Review, 106(8), 2086–2109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ingersoll, J. E., & Jin, L. J. (2013). Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Review of Financial Studies, 26(3), 723–767.CrossRef Ingersoll, J. E., & Jin, L. J. (2013). Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Review of Financial Studies, 26(3), 723–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, J. G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2016). A computational model of the attention process in risky choice. Decision, 3(4), 254.CrossRef Johnson, J. G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2016). A computational model of the attention process in risky choice. Decision, 3(4), 254.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296–312.CrossRef Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296–312.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–234.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.CrossRef Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kellen, M., & Leaf, V. B. (2020). Salience theory of mere exposure: Relative exposure increases liking, extremity, and emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1118–1145.CrossRef Kellen, M., & Leaf, V. B. (2020). Salience theory of mere exposure: Relative exposure increases liking, extremity, and emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1118–1145.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knetsch, J. L., Tang, F. F., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing? Experimental Economics, 4(3), 257–269.CrossRef Knetsch, J. L., Tang, F. F., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing? Experimental Economics, 4(3), 257–269.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165. Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehenkari, M. (2009). The hedonic editing hypothesis: evidence from the finnish stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 10(1), 9–18.CrossRef Lehenkari, M. (2009). The hedonic editing hypothesis: evidence from the finnish stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 10(1), 9–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, N., Cui, H., Zhu, C., Zhang, X., & Su, L. (2016). Grey preference analysis of indoor environmental factors using sub-indexes based on Weber/Fechner’s law and predicted mean vote. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(8), 1197–1208.CrossRef Li, N., Cui, H., Zhu, C., Zhang, X., & Su, L. (2016). Grey preference analysis of indoor environmental factors using sub-indexes based on Weber/Fechner’s law and predicted mean vote. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(8), 1197–1208.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linville, P. W., & Fischer, G. W. (1991). Preferences for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 5–23.CrossRef Linville, P. W., & Fischer, G. W. (1991). Preferences for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 5–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, D. M. (1923). Does the reaction to adrenalin obey Weber’s law? Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, 21, 229–235. Lyon, D. M. (1923). Does the reaction to adrenalin obey Weber’s law? Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, 21, 229–235.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G. (1988). Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9(1), 5–24.CrossRef March, J. G. (1988). Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9(1), 5–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183–2205.CrossRef Masatlioglu, Y., Nakajima, D., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2012). Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183–2205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2014). A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 851–883.CrossRef Masatlioglu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2014). A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 851–883.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 389–399.CrossRef Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 389–399.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mourao, P. J. R. (2012). The weber-fechner law and public expenditures impact to the win-margins at parliamentary elections. Prague Economic Papers, 21(3), 291–308.CrossRef Mourao, P. J. R. (2012). The weber-fechner law and public expenditures impact to the win-margins at parliamentary elections. Prague Economic Papers, 21(3), 291–308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519–1520.CrossRef Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519–1520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring Effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1142–1150.CrossRef Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring Effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1142–1150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.CrossRef Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.CrossRef Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Mahony, M. (1986). Sensory adaption. Journal of Sensory Studies, 1(3–4), 237–258.CrossRef O’Mahony, M. (1986). Sensory adaption. Journal of Sensory Studies, 1(3–4), 237–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ordóñez, L. D., Connolly, T., & Coughlan, R. (2000). Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(3), 329–344.CrossRef Ordóñez, L. D., Connolly, T., & Coughlan, R. (2000). Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(3), 329–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ozbeklik, S., & Smith, J. (2017). Risk taking in competition: evidence from match play golf tournaments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 506–523.CrossRef Ozbeklik, S., & Smith, J. (2017). Risk taking in competition: evidence from match play golf tournaments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 506–523.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is tiger woods loss averse? persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129–157.CrossRef Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is tiger woods loss averse? persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129–157.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547.CrossRef Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 183–195.CrossRef Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 183–195.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sicherman, N., Loewenstein, G., Seppi, D. J., & Utkus, S. P. (2015). Financial attention. Review of Financial Studies, 29(4), 863–897.CrossRef Sicherman, N., Loewenstein, G., Seppi, D. J., & Utkus, S. P. (2015). Financial attention. Review of Financial Studies, 29(4), 863–897.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sul, S., Kim, J., & Choi, I. (2013). Subjective well-being and hedonic editing: how happy people maximize joint outcomes of loss and gain. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1409–1430.CrossRef Sul, S., Kim, J., & Choi, I. (2013). Subjective well-being and hedonic editing: how happy people maximize joint outcomes of loss and gain. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1409–1430.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Szeidl, A., & Koszegi, B. (2013). A model of focusing in economic choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 53–104.CrossRef Szeidl, A., & Koszegi, B. (2013). A model of focusing in economic choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 53–104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRef Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660.CrossRef Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, S. D. (1990). The casue of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80(1), 204–217. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, S. D. (1990). The casue of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80(1), 204–217.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, X. T., & Johnson, J. G. (2012). A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 141(4), 743–756.CrossRef Wang, X. T., & Johnson, J. G. (2012). A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 141(4), 743–756.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yates, J.F., & Stone, E.R. (1992). The risk construct. In Risk-taking behavior. (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Yates, J.F., & Stone, E.R. (1992). The risk construct. In Risk-taking behavior. (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Metadaten
Titel
A General Model of Subjective Value and Stimulus-Intensity-Sensitive Hedonic Editing Strategy
verfasst von
Haijiao Cui
Bin Cao
Aimei Li
Zhaohui Li
Publikationsdatum
06.03.2023
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00635-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Journal of Happiness Studies 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe