nach oben

Sustainable Water Resources Management

Erschienen in:

01.10.2021 | Original Article

A geo-ethical logic for citizens and geoscientists

verfasst von: Martin Bohle

Erschienen in: Sustainable Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The impacts of anthropogenic change do call for strengthening the socio-political and socio-economic anchorage of geoethical thinking. Geosciences are more than mere techno-scientific disciplines as, for example, geohydrology shows. Geoscience expertise ties geosciences and people's social lives. Geosciences are relevant for the societies' functioning, namely, to operate a technosphere at local, regional and planetary scales. Therefore, geoscience expertise includes a school of philosophical thinking called geoethics. Although initially designed for professional use, geoethics should support any citizen’s individual, professional and civic dealings. Nowadays, the technosphere is a vital feature of the contemporary Earth System (or ‘human niche’). In these contexts, conceptual benchmarks for geoethical thinking are described to address: (i) the operational limits of aspirational stipulations and (ii) a stronger socio-political anchorage of geoethical thinking. Methodologically, the present study relates geoethical thinking with the political philosophies of Bunge, Jonas and Kohlberg about people's social lives. Their works offer foundations for a broad application of geoethical thinking by providing benchmarks: Kohlberg's ‘hierarchy of societal coordination (moral adequacy)’, Bunge’s ‘balance of individual happiness (well-being) and duty’ and Jonas' ‘imperative of responsibility for agents of change’. These political philosophies can be combined with geoethical thinking (or geoethics). A ‘geo-ethical logic’ can be formulated, calling to act with: agent-centricity, virtue-focus, responsible-focus, reproducible/scientific knowledge, all-agent-inclusiveness and universal-rights-base. Whilst preserving the design of geoethics, the proposed geo-ethical logic strengthens the socio-political anchorage of geoethical thinking, and aspirational stipulations are benchmarked. Further study should aim to complement the given frame of socio-political benchmarks by socio-economic benchmarking.

Vorheriger Artikel Experiences of karstic zones identification using dissolved oxygen as a tracer in the aquifer of Quintana Roo, Mexico

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

For the benefit of the reader, the word ‘geoethics’ is used for a specific configuration of geoethical thinking to distinguish variants of thought.

Considering socio-economic dynamics is subject of ongoing studies of the author.

…system behaviour >> sense-making >> action >> system behaviour >> sense-making >> action >> …

The term ‘relativism’ was replaced by ‘pluralism’ to sharpen the meaning.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/.

Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (2021) Advances in geoethics and groundwater management : theory and practice for a sustainable development. In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Proceedings of the 1st congress on geoethics and groundwater management (GEOETH&GWM’20), Porto, Portugal 2020. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9

Andersson C, Törnberg P (2018) Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity. Futures 95(November 2017):118–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.001CrossRef

Aragão A (2021) Cultural ecosystem services of hydrogeological goods. In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and groundwater management: theory and practice for a sustainable development. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9CrossRef

Arendt H (1958) The human condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Arroyo KK (2017) Creative policymaking: taking the lessons of creative placemaking to scale. Artivate J Arts Innov Entrep 6(2):58–72

Biermann F (2014) The anthropocene: a governance perspective. Anthropocene Rev 1(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019613516289CrossRef

Bohle M (2020) Geo-societal sense-making. In: Di Capua G, Bobrowsky PT, Kieffe S, Palinkas C (eds) Geological society, london, special publications. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2019-213CrossRef

Bohle M (2021a) Citizen, geoscientist and associated terra-former. In: Mercantanti L, Montes S, Geographie S (eds) Global threats in the anthropocene: from COVID-19 to the future. Il Sileno Edizioni, New York, pp 169–186

Bohle M (2021b) Geoethics for Operating in the Human Niche. In: Abrunhosa M, Chamine HI, Chambel A (eds) Advances in geoethics and groundwater management: theory and practice for sustainable development. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9_5CrossRef

Bohle M, Bilham N (2019) The “anthropocene proposal”: a possible quandary and a work-around. Quaternary 2(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat2020019CrossRef

Bohle M, Di Capua G (2019) Setting the scene. In: Bohle M (ed) Exploring geoethics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8_1CrossRef

Bohle M, Marone E (2019) Humanistic geosciences and the planetary human niche. In: Bohle M (ed) Exploring geoethics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8_4CrossRef

Bohle M, Marone E (2021) Geoethics, a branding for sustainable practices. Sustainability 13(2):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020895CrossRef

Bohle M, Di Capua G, Bilham N (2019a) Reframing Geoethics? In: Bohle M (ed) Exploring geoethics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8_5CrossRef

Bohle M, Nauen CE, Marone E (2019b) Ethics to intersect civic participation and formal guidance. Sustainability 11(3):773. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030773CrossRef

Bonneuil C, Fressoz J-B (2013) L’événement Anthropocène - La Terre, l’histoire et Nous. Le Seuil, Paris

Boonstra W (2016) Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07966-210121CrossRef

Bunge MA (1989) Treaties on basic philosophy-ethics: the good and the right. D. Reidel Publishing Company, DordrechtCrossRef

Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gunderson LH, Benson MH, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Cosens B, Craig RK, Ruhl JB, Allen CR (2016) Transformative environmental governance. Ann Rev Environ Resour 41(1):399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085817CrossRef

Colding J, Barthel S (2019) Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecol Soc 24(1):art2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10598-240102CrossRef

Di Baldassarre G, Sivapalan M, Rusca M, Cudennec C, Garcia M, Kreibich H, Konar M et al (2019) Socio-hydrology: scientific challenges in addressing a societal grand challenge. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023901CrossRef

Di Capua G, Peppoloni S (2019) ‘Defining geoethics (http://www.geoethics.org/definition)’. Of the IAPG—International Association for Promoting Geoethics. 2019. https://www.geoethics.org/definition. Accessed 27 July 2021

Di Capua G, Peppoloni S, Bobrowsky P (2017) The cape town statement on geoethics. Ann Geophys 60:1–6. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7553CrossRef

Di Capua G, Bobrowsky PT, Kieffer SW, Palinkas C (2021) Introduction: geoethics goes beyond the geoscience profession. Geol Soc Lond Special Publ. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2020-191CrossRef

Donges JF, Lucht W, Müller-Hansen F, Steffen W (2017) The technosphere in earth system analysis: a coevolutionary perspective. Anthropocene Rev 4(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616676608CrossRef

Dryzek JS (2016) Earth system governance: world politics in the anthropocene. By Frank Biermann. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. 260p. Perspect Polit 14(1):176–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271500345XCrossRef

Dryzek JS, Pickering J (2019) The politics of the anthropocene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Dyer-Witheford N (2018) Struggles in the planet factory: class composition and global warming. Interrogating the anthropocene. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78747-3_2CrossRef

Edenhofer O, Kowarsch M (2015) Cartography of pathways: a new model for environmental policy assessments. Environ Sci Policy 51(August):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017CrossRef

Ellis EC, Richerson PJ, Mesoudi A, Svenning J-C, Odling-Smee J, Burnside WR (2016) Evolving the human niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(31):E4436–E4436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609425113CrossRef

Fressoz J-B (2012) L’Apocalypse Joyeuse - Une Histoire Du Risque Technologique. Le Seuil, Paris

Fuentes A (2017) Human niche, human behaviour, human nature. Interface Focus 7(5):20160136. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0136CrossRef

Fuerth LS, Faber EMH (2012) Anticipatory governance practical upgrades: equipping the executive branch to cope with increasing speed and complexity of major challenges. National Defense University, Washington, DC

Galaz V, Moberg F, Olsson E-K, Paglia E, Parker C (2011) Institutional and political leadership dimensions of cascading ecological crises. Public Adm 89(2):361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01883.xCrossRef

Gundersen LC (ed) (2018) Scientific integrity and ethics: with applications to the geosciences. Wiley, New York

Haff PK (2016) Purpose in the anthropocene: dynamical role and physical basis. Anthropocene 16(December):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANCENE.2016.07.002CrossRef

Haff PK (2017) Being human in the anthropocene. Anthropocene Rev 4(2):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617700875CrossRef

Hake J-F, Fischer W, Venghaus S, Weckenbrock C (2015) The German Energiewende—history and status quo. Energy 92(December):532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.027CrossRef

Hartley J, Herrmann-Pillath C (2018) Towards a semiotics of the technosphere. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3308002CrossRef

Head BW, Xiang W-N (2016) Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: more awareness, greater acceptance, and better adaptation. Landsc Urban Plan 154(October):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.011CrossRef

Homer-Dixon T, Walker B, Biggs R, Crépin A-S, Folke C, Lambin EF, Peterson GD et al (2015) Synchronous failure: the emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecol Soc 20(3):art6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07681-200306CrossRef

Hourdequin M (2015) Environmental ethics—from theory to practice. Bloomsbury Publishing Ülc, LondonCrossRef

Jonas H (1976) Responsibility today: the ethics of an endangered future. Soc Res Baltimore. https://doi.org/10.2307/40970214CrossRef

Jonas H (1981) The concept of responsibility: an inquiry into the foundations of an ethics for our age. In: Callahan D, Engelhardt H (eds) The roots of ethics. Springer, New York, pp 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3303-6_4CrossRef

Knight J (2015) Anthropocene futures: people, resources and sustainability. Anthropocene Rev 2(2):152–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615569318CrossRef

Kohlberg L (1981) The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. Harber & Row, San Francisco

Kowarsch M, Garard J, Riousset P, Lenzi D, Dorsch MJ, Knopf B, Harrs J-A, Edenhofer O (2016) Scientific assessments to facilitate deliberative policy learning. Palgrave Commun 2(1):16092. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.92CrossRef

Lade SJ, Steffen W, de Vries W, Carpenter SR, Donges JF, Gerten D, Hoff H, Newbold T, Richardson K, Rockström J (2020) Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by earth system interactions. Nat Sustain 3(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0454-4CrossRef

Leach M, Reyers B, Bai X, Brondizio ES, Cook C, Díaz S, Espindola G, Scobie M, Stafford-Smith M, Subramanian SM (2018) Equity and sustainability in the anthropocene: a social-ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Global Sustain 1(November):e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.12CrossRef

Leinfelder R (2017) Das Zeitalter Des Anthropozäns Und Die Notwendigkeit Einer Großen Transformation. Zeitschrift Für Umweltrecht 5:259–266

Marone E, Bohle M (2020) Geoethics for nudging human practices in times of pandemics. Sustainability 12(18):7271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187271CrossRef

Marone E, Marone L (2014) A road map for a deontological code for geoscientists dealing with natural hazards. Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 7. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09303-1_8CrossRef

Matteucci R, Gosso G, Peppoloni S, Piacente S, Wasowski J, Matteucci R, Gosso G et al (2014) The “geoethical promise”: a proposal. Ital Fed Earth Sci 37(3):190–191

Meller C, Schill E, Bremer J, Kolditz O, Bleicher A, Benighaus C, Chavot P et al (2018) Acceptability of geothermal installations: a geoethical concept for GeoLaB. Geothermics 73(April):133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.07.008CrossRef

Mogk DW (2020) The intersection of geoethics and diversity in the geosciences. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2020-66CrossRef

Mogk DW, Bruckner MZ (2020) Geoethics training in the earth and environmental sciences. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1(2):81–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0024-3CrossRef

Moores EM (1996) Geology and Culture: A Call for Action. GSA Today 7(1):7–11

Nature Editorial (2018) ‘Power to the People’. Nature

Nurmi PA (2017) Green mining—a holistic concept for sustainable and acceptable mineral production. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7420CrossRef

Otto IM, Donges JF, Cremades R, Bhowmik A, Hewitt RJ, Lucht W, Rockström J et al (2020) Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing earth’s climate by 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900577117CrossRef

Paul H (2018) The scientific self: reclaiming its place in the history of research ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 24(5):1379–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9945-8CrossRef

Peppoloni S (2018) Spreading geoethics through the languages of the world. Translations of the Cape Town statement on geoethics. International Association for Promoting Geoethics. https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/11907. Accessed 27 July 2021

Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2012) Geoethics and geological culture: awareness, responsibility and challenges. Ann Geophys 55(3):335–341. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6099CrossRef

Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2015) The meaning of geoethics. In: Wyss M, Peppoloni S (eds) Geoethics, vol 419. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–14CrossRef

Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2017) Geoethics: ethical, social and cultural implications in geosciences. Ann Geophys 60:1–8. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7473CrossRef

Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2020) Geoethics as global ethics to face grand challenges for humanity. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2020-146CrossRef

Peppoloni S, Bilham N, Di Capua G (2019) Contemporary geoethics within the geosciences. Exploring geoethics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 25–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8_2CrossRef

Preiser R, Woermann M (2018) Conceptual and practical implications for understanding and engaging with complex adaptive systems. In: Galaz V (ed) Handbook on global challenges, governance, and complexity (submitted). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C (2018) Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecol Soc 23(4):art46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10558-230446CrossRef

Purdy J (2015) After nature: a politics for the anthropocene. Harvard University Press, PrincetonCrossRef

Raab T, Frodeman R (2002) What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications. Philos Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/14/26/011CrossRef

Redman CL, Miller TR (2015) The technosphere and earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS, Callicott JB, Pickett STA, Power ME, Armesto JJ, May RH et al (eds) Earth stewardship. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12133-8_17CrossRef

Rosol C, Nelson S, Renn J (2017) Introduction: in the machine room of the anthropocene. Anthropocene Rev 4(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617701165CrossRef

Salvatore S, Mannarini T, Avdi E, Battaglia F, Cremaschi M, Fini V, Davanzati GF et al (2018) Globalization, demand of sense and enemization of the other: a psychocultural analysis of European societies’ sociopolitical crisis. Cult Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18779056CrossRef

Salvatore S, Rochira A, Kharlamov N (2019a) The embodiment of cultural meanings. Symbolic universes as forms of life. In: Salvatore S, Fini V, Mannarini T, Valsiner J, Veltri GA (eds) Symbolic universes in time of (post)crisis. Springer, Cham, pp 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_8CrossRef

Salvatore S, Valsiner J, Veltri GA (2019b) The theoretical and methodological framework. Semiotic cultural psychology, symbolic universes and lines of semiotic forces. In: Salvatore S, Valsiner J, Veltri GA (eds) Symbolic universes in time of (post)crisis. Springer, New York, pp 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_2CrossRef

Schlüter M, Haider LJ, Lade SJ, Lindkvist E, Martin R, Orach K, Wijermans N, Folke C (2019) Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems: an analytical framework. Ecol Soc 24(3):art11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11012-240311CrossRef

Serres M (1995) The natural contract. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRef

Shearman R (1990) The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environ Manage 14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394014CrossRef

Sivapalan M (2015) Debates-perspectives on socio-hydrology: changing water systems and the “tyranny of small problems”-socio-hydrology. Water Resour Res 51(6):4795–4805. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017080CrossRef

Stewart IS, Lewis D (2017) Communicating contested geoscience to the public: moving from “matters of fact” to “matters of concern.” Earth Sci Rev 174(February):122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003CrossRef

Stewart IS, Ickert J, Lacassin R (2017) Communication seismic risk: the geoethical challenges of a people-centred, participatory approach. Ann Geophys 60:1–17

Syvitski J, Waters CN, Day J, Milliman JD, Summerhayes C, Steffen W, Zalasiewicz J et al (2020) Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed anthropocene epoch. Commun Earth Environ 1(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00029-yCrossRef

Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, Biesbroek R (2019) A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice. Policy Soc 38(2):167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1617971CrossRef

Turnhout E, Metze T, Wyborn C, Klenk N, Louder E (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 42(February):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009CrossRef

United Nations (2013) World Social Science Report 2013 Edited by UNESCO. OECD Publishing, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-en.

Walker B, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Gunderson L, Peterson GD, Scheffer M, Schoon M, Westley FR (2020) Navigating the Chaos of an unfolding global cycle. Ecol Soc 25(4):art23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12072-250423CrossRef

Weber M (1919) Politik Als Beruf. Verlag von Dunker & Humblot, Geistige A. München

Weber M (2015) Weber’s rationalism and modern society. In: Tony CA (ed) Waters and dagmar waters. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137365866CrossRef

Williams G (2018) ‘Kant’s Account of Reason’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-reason/. Accessed 27 July 2021

Zalasiewicz J, Waters CN, Williams M, Summerhayes C (2019) The anthropocene as a geological time unit. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108621359CrossRef

Titel: A geo-ethical logic for citizens and geoscientists
verfasst von: Martin Bohle
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Sustainable Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2363-5037
Elektronische ISSN: 2363-5045
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00557-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Understanding the water conservation and management in India: an integrated study

A community-based approach to sustainable transboundary water resources management and governance in the South-West Coastal region of Bangladesh

Groundwater contamination and human health risk assessment in Ikire community, Osun State, Nigeria

Streams, sewage, and shallow groundwater: stream-aquifer interactions in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

Water and wastewater optimization in a food processing industry using water pinch technology

Notes on morphology and spatio-temporal distribution of early-stage juveniles of Acanthopagrus pacificus (Sparidae) in the estuary of northern Vietnam