Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. A Methodological Framework for Nuclear Proliferation in the South

verfasst von : Lucky E. Asuelime, Raquel A. Adekoye

Erschienen in: Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents a methodological framework for nuclear proliferation and how the South African case may be situated. This chapter provides a unique prism through which nuclear proliferation can be methodologically understood. This is important due to the fact that nuclear-related data are largely undefined and states usually carry out nuclear activities in a clandestine manner. Nuclear politics and levels of advancement are shrouded in secrecy. Therefore, to ensure objectivity and the validity of data, a case study approach is projected as a viable method of analyzing nuclear history and politics. We cross-examined different sources of both primary and secondary information on the five recognized nuclear weapons powers—Britain, USA, Soviet Union, China, and France. This ensures the validity of the claims that we make in the study through the analysis of this material in the context of the cases.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Those who considered only an actual nuclear explosive test as nuclear proliferation would have had an optimistic view of proliferation trends, since only six countries had tested their nuclear explosive devices by the end of the 1980s, but others who regarded the possession of nuclear capability as proliferation would have projected 25–30 nuclear countries.
 
2
Note that the data here and in subsequent tables in other chapters reflect the situation during the 1980s and, therefore, do not reflect current policy positions. South Africa is categorized as a latent nuclear country in this study since I proceed as if South Africa had not officially announced that it had built six-and-a-half nuclear bombs. This approach is necessary for the most part of the study, simply for the purpose of analysis. This approach enables identification of the causes of future nuclear proliferation issues. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, the focus is on pre-1993 South Africa, when it was still internationally regarded as a nuclear threshold country.
 
3
North Korea may be included in this list, but it is not considered since no reliable information or data on its level of nuclear development was available at the time of the study.
 
4
In the case of South Africa, there was constant competition between Britain, France, and Germany regarding who would win the bid to supply nuclear infrastructure.
 
5
Testing nuclear explosive devices has been regarded an essential technical element of a nuclear weapons program since testing was known to be one of the critical constraints for any country that wishes to obtain highly reliable nuclear bombs. However, many have recently argued that test explosions are no longer necessary, owing to sophisticated laboratory equipment, pretested bomb plans obtained from advanced nuclear countries, and the technique of zero-yield tests.
 
6
For a review and assessment of the literature dealing with the Israeli case, see Dowth (1978).
 
Literatur
Alder, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground. European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319.CrossRef
Asuelime, L. (2013). Drivers of nuclear proliferation in the global south: A historical analysis of South Africa. A PhD Thesis International Relations, submitted to the College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Unpublished).
Asuelime, L., & Francis, S. (2014). Drivers of nuclear proliferation: South Africa’s incentives and constraints. Journal for Contemporary History, 39(1), 55–68.
Baber, R. J. (1975). LDC nuclear power prospects, 1975–1990: Commercial, economic and security implications. Washington, DC: Baber Associate.
Beaton, L., & Maddox, J. (1962). The spread of nuclear weapon. New York: Praeger.
Brennan, D. (1976). A comprehensive test ban: Everybody or nobody. International Security, 1, 1 (Summer), 108.
Cannizzo, C. (1982). A critique of the technical approach. In W. H. Kincade & C. Bertram (Eds.), Nuclear proliferation in the 1980s: Perspectives and proposals. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: Sage.
Dowth, A. (1978). Nuclear proliferation: The Israeli case. International Studies Quarterly, 22(March), 79–120.CrossRef
Dunn, L., & Overholt, W. (1976). The next phase in nuclear proliferation research. Orbis, 20, 2 (Summer), 1–2.
Filstead, W. J. (1970). Qualitative methodology: Firsthand involvement with the social world. Chicago: Markham.
Goldblat, J. (1986). Will the NPT survive? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 42, 1 (January), 36.
Kegley, C. W., Jr. (1980). International and domestic correlates of nuclear proliferation: A comparative analysis. Korea and World Affairs, 4, 5–37.
Kegley, C. W., Jr., Raymond, G. A., & Skinner, R. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of nuclear armament. In P. McGowan & C. W. Kegley Jr. (Eds.), Threats, weapons and foreign policy (pp. 231–255). London: Sage.
Kramish, A. (1963). The peaceful atom in foreign policy. New York: Harper and Row.
Meyer, S. M. (1984). The dynamics of nuclear proliferation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1977). Nuclear proliferation and safeguards. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.
Potter, W. (1982). Nuclear power and nonproliferation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
Quester, G. (1973). The politics of nuclear proliferation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Reiss, M. (1988). Without the bomb: The politics of nuclear nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosecrance, R. (1966). Problems of nuclear proliferation. Los Angeles: University of California.
Schlesinger, J. R. (1972). The strategic consequence of nuclear proliferation. In M. L. Rakov (Ed.), Arms and foreign policy in the nuclear age (pp. 360–361). New York: Oxford University Press.
Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative methodology: Describing the social world. Aldershot: Brookfield.
Snyder, J. C. (1985). Iraq. In J. C. Snyder & S. F. Wells (Eds.), Limiting nuclear proliferation (pp. 3–42). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Spector, L. (1984). Nuclear proliferation today. New York: Vintage Books.
Spector, L. S. (1985). Nuclear proliferation: The silent spread. Foreign Policy, 58(Spring), 53–78.CrossRef
Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wentz, W. (1963). Nuclear proliferation. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
Metadaten
Titel
A Methodological Framework for Nuclear Proliferation in the South
verfasst von
Lucky E. Asuelime
Raquel A. Adekoye
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33372-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-33373-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33373-1_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise