1 Introduction
2 Approaches to the measurement of poverty and deprivation segregation
2.1 Descriptive segregation measures
2.2 Multilevel modelling for studying segregation
3 Statistical methods
3.1 Latent variable model for household deprivation
3.2 Critique of the DHS wealth index
3.3 Rationale for the construction of a latent variable for household deprivation
3.4 Measurement model
3.5 Multilevel structural model
4 An application to Bolivia
4.1 Potential explanations for geographical segregation of deprivation in Bolivia
4.2 Data and measures
Variable | Source | Values |
---|---|---|
Indigenous village | DHS | Indigenous, non-indigenous |
Community-level mean years of male education | DHS | [0.7; 17] |
Group mean centred years of male education | DHS | [− 13.2; 13.2] |
Administrative region | DHS | Beni, Chuquisaca, Cochabamba, La Paz, Oruro, Pando, Potosí, Santa Cruz, Tarija |
Distance to the closest municipal capital (km) | GeoBolivia | [0.06; 96.51] |
Risk of drought | SINSAAT | Very low, low, medium, high |
4.3 Selection of deprivation indicators
4.4 Measurement model for household deprivation
Item | Discr. (αr1) | SE (αr1) | Diff. (αr0) | SE (αr0) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity | 1.00 | (Constrained) | − 4.05 | 0.12 |
Water | 0.41 | 0.02 | − 6.39 | 0.06 |
Sanitation | 0.43 | 0.02 | − 3.91 | 0.04 |
Floor | 0.72 | 0.04 | − 3.00 | 0.07 |
Cooking fuel | 1.02 | 0.06 | − 2.32 | 0.36 |
Refrigerator | 0.57 | 0.03 | 1.86 | 0.04 |
4.5 Results from the empty multilevel model
4.6 Results from the models including contextual factors of deprivation segregation
Model | Variable | Univariate models | Multivariate model | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coeff. | 95% CI | Coeff. | 95% CI | ||
Indigenous village [Ref. non indigenous] | Indigenous | − 2.67 | [− 3.25; − 2.09] | − 1.47 | [− 1.84; − 1.10] |
(LR test—versus empty model) | X2 = 86.23 | d.f. = 1 | |||
Male education | Community-level mean years of male education | 1.08 | [0.99; 1.17] | 0.92 | [0.84; 1.01] |
Group mean centred years of male education | 0.19 | [0.17; 0.20] | 0.19 | [0.17; 0.20] | |
(LR test—versus empty model) | X2 = 1720.81 | d.f. = 2 | |||
Administrative region [Ref. La Paz] | Chuquisaca | − 0.66 | [− 1.76; − 0.43] | ||
Cochabamba | 0.48 | [− 0.49; 1.45] | |||
Oruro | − 0.70 | [− 1.77; 0.37] | |||
Potosí | − 1.44 | [− 2.49; − 0.40] | |||
Tarija | 0.53 | [− 0.56; 1.62] | |||
Santa Cruz | 0.76 | [− 0.15; 1.68] | |||
Beni | − 2.40 | [− 3.77; − 1.13] | |||
Pando | 0.94 | [− 0.72; 2.60] | |||
(LR test—versus empty model) | X2 = 40.31 | d.f. = 8 | |||
Distance to the closest municipal capital | Distance | − 0.19 | [− 0.21; − 0.16] | − 0.07 | [− 0.08; − 0.05] |
(LR test—versus empty model) | X2 = 269.15 | d.f. = 1 | |||
Risk of drought [Ref. High] | Very low | 2.14 | [− 0.46; 4.73] | 0.30 | [− 1.16; 1.70] |
Low | 4.92 | [2.33; 7.52] | 2.03 | [0.60; 3.47] | |
Medium | 3.89 | [1.36; 6.43] | 1.53 | [0.14; 2.92] | |
(LR test—versus empty model) | X2 = 43.50 | d.f. = 3 |