Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Supercomputing 3/2021

12.06.2020

A new multi-level trust management framework (MLTM) for solving the invalidity and sparse problems of user feedback ratings in cloud environments

verfasst von: Golnaz Aghaee Ghazvini, Mehran Mohsenzadeh, Ramin Nasiri, Amir Masoud Rahmani

Erschienen in: The Journal of Supercomputing | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Choosing a trusted cloud service provider (CSP) is a major challenge for cloud users (CUs) in the cloud environment, as many CSPs offer cloud services (CSs) with the same functionality. Trust evaluation of CSPs is often based on information from quality of service (QoS) monitoring and CUs’ feedback ratings. Despite the volume of feedback ratings received in trust management systems, the quality of feedback storage is very low, as many CUs do not send their feedback ratings when using CSs. Additionally, a percentage of existing feedback ratings may not be valid, since some malicious CUs send unfair feedback ratings to change the trust evaluation results. As these lead to poor data quality, the accuracy of trust evaluation results might be affected. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a new multi-level trust management framework, which completes previous frameworks by defining new components to improve the data quality of feedback storage. In our framework, new components were defined to solve the invalidity and sparse problems of feedback storage. Certainly, the trust assessment of CSP would be more accurate based on high-quality feedback ratings. The performance of the MLTM was evaluated using two different datasets based on a real Quality of Web Services dataset (QWS) and an artificial data set (Cloud-Armor), whose quality was reduced for the purpose of this study. Analytical values revealed that our proposed approach significantly outperformed other approaches even with the poor data quality of feedback storage.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Quality Web Service (QWS)—http://​www.​uoguelph.​ca/​~qmahmoud/​qws/​ and Cloud_Armor (Feedback Web Service Cloud Armor—http://​cs.​adelaide.​edu.​au/​~cloudarmor/​ds.​html).
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fareghzadeh N, Seyyedi MA, Mohsenzadeh M (2018) Dynamic performance isolation management for cloud computing services. J Supercomput 74(1):417–455CrossRef Fareghzadeh N, Seyyedi MA, Mohsenzadeh M (2018) Dynamic performance isolation management for cloud computing services. J Supercomput 74(1):417–455CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghavipour M, Meybodi MR (2018) Trust propagation algorithm based on learning automata for inferring local trust in online social networks. Knowl Based Syst 143:307–316CrossRef Ghavipour M, Meybodi MR (2018) Trust propagation algorithm based on learning automata for inferring local trust in online social networks. Knowl Based Syst 143:307–316CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramachandra G, Iftikhar M, Khan FA (2017) A comprehensive survey on security in cloud computing. Procedia Comput Sci 110:465–472CrossRef Ramachandra G, Iftikhar M, Khan FA (2017) A comprehensive survey on security in cloud computing. Procedia Comput Sci 110:465–472CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Serrano D, Bouchenak S, Kouki Y, de Oliveira Jr FA, Ledoux T, Lejeune J, Sens P (2016) SLA guarantees for cloud services. Future Gener Comput Syst 54:233–246CrossRef Serrano D, Bouchenak S, Kouki Y, de Oliveira Jr FA, Ledoux T, Lejeune J, Sens P (2016) SLA guarantees for cloud services. Future Gener Comput Syst 54:233–246CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner J, Westphall CM, Westphall CB (2017) Cloud identity management: a survey on privacy strategies. Comput Netw 122:29–42CrossRef Werner J, Westphall CM, Westphall CB (2017) Cloud identity management: a survey on privacy strategies. Comput Netw 122:29–42CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbadi IM, Alawneh M (2012) A framework for establishing trust in the cloud. Comput Electr Eng 38(5):1073–1087CrossRef Abbadi IM, Alawneh M (2012) A framework for establishing trust in the cloud. Comput Electr Eng 38(5):1073–1087CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Navimipour NJ, Rahmani AM, Navin AH, Hosseinzadeh M (2015) Expert cloud: a cloud-based framework to share the knowledge and skills of human resources. Comput Hum Behav 46:57–74CrossRef Navimipour NJ, Rahmani AM, Navin AH, Hosseinzadeh M (2015) Expert cloud: a cloud-based framework to share the knowledge and skills of human resources. Comput Hum Behav 46:57–74CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang C, Liu J (2015) Selecting a trusted cloud service provider for your SaaS program. Comput Secur 50:60–73CrossRef Tang C, Liu J (2015) Selecting a trusted cloud service provider for your SaaS program. Comput Secur 50:60–73CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan WJ, Yang SL, Perros H, Pei J (2015) A multi-dimensional trust-aware cloud service selection mechanism based on evidential reasoning approach. Int J Autom Comput 12(2):208–219CrossRef Fan WJ, Yang SL, Perros H, Pei J (2015) A multi-dimensional trust-aware cloud service selection mechanism based on evidential reasoning approach. Int J Autom Comput 12(2):208–219CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong SK, Abawajy J, Hamid IRA, Ahmad M (2014) A multilevel trust management framework for service oriented environment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 129:396–405CrossRef Chong SK, Abawajy J, Hamid IRA, Ahmad M (2014) A multilevel trust management framework for service oriented environment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 129:396–405CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaikh R, Sasikumar M (2015) Trust model for measuring security strength of cloud computing service. Procedia Comput Sci 45:380–389CrossRef Shaikh R, Sasikumar M (2015) Trust model for measuring security strength of cloud computing service. Procedia Comput Sci 45:380–389CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhanahnah M, Bertok P, Tari Z, Alouneh S (2018) Context-aware multifaceted trust framework for evaluating trustworthiness of cloud providers. Future Gener Comput Syst 79:488–499CrossRef Alhanahnah M, Bertok P, Tari Z, Alouneh S (2018) Context-aware multifaceted trust framework for evaluating trustworthiness of cloud providers. Future Gener Comput Syst 79:488–499CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan W, Perros H (2014) A novel trust management framework for multi-cloud environments based on trust service providers. Knowl Based Syst 70:392–406CrossRef Fan W, Perros H (2014) A novel trust management framework for multi-cloud environments based on trust service providers. Knowl Based Syst 70:392–406CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang M, Dai X, Liu J, Chen J (2017) Towards a trust evaluation middleware for cloud service selection. Future Gener Comput Syst 74:302–312CrossRef Tang M, Dai X, Liu J, Chen J (2017) Towards a trust evaluation middleware for cloud service selection. Future Gener Comput Syst 74:302–312CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirgahi H, Mohsenzadeh M, Javadi HHS (2018) A new method of trust mirroring estimation based on social networks parameters by fuzzy system. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(7):1153–1168CrossRef Shirgahi H, Mohsenzadeh M, Javadi HHS (2018) A new method of trust mirroring estimation based on social networks parameters by fuzzy system. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(7):1153–1168CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiregi M, Navimipour NJ (2018) Cloud computing and trust evaluation: a systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art mechanisms. J Electr Syst Inform Technol 5(3):608–622CrossRef Chiregi M, Navimipour NJ (2018) Cloud computing and trust evaluation: a systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art mechanisms. J Electr Syst Inform Technol 5(3):608–622CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JH, Chan K, Adali S (2015) A survey on trust modeling. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 48(2):1–40CrossRef Cho JH, Chan K, Adali S (2015) A survey on trust modeling. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 48(2):1–40CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dictionary MW (2006) The Merriam-Webster dictionary. Merriam-Webster (incorporated) Dictionary MW (2006) The Merriam-Webster dictionary. Merriam-Webster (incorporated)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirgahi H, Mohsenzadeh M, Haj Seyyed Javadi H (2017) Trust estimation of the semantic web using semantic web clustering. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(3):537–556CrossRef Shirgahi H, Mohsenzadeh M, Haj Seyyed Javadi H (2017) Trust estimation of the semantic web using semantic web clustering. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(3):537–556CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mui L, Mohtashemi M, Halberstadt A (2002) A computational model of trust and reputation for E-businesses. In: HICSS’02: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’02). IEEE Computer Society, 188 Mui L, Mohtashemi M, Halberstadt A (2002) A computational model of trust and reputation for E-businesses. In: HICSS’02: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’02). IEEE Computer Society, 188
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizvi S, Karpinski K, Kelly B, Walker T (2015) Utilizing third party auditing to manage trust in the cloud. Procedia Comput Sci 61:191–197CrossRef Rizvi S, Karpinski K, Kelly B, Walker T (2015) Utilizing third party auditing to manage trust in the cloud. Procedia Comput Sci 61:191–197CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Sidhu J (2017) Compliance-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. Future Gener Comput Syst 67:109–132CrossRef Singh S, Sidhu J (2017) Compliance-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. Future Gener Comput Syst 67:109–132CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu LH, Hauswirth M, Aberer K (2005) QoS-based service selection and ranking with trust and reputation management. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”. Springer, Berlin, pp 466–483 Vu LH, Hauswirth M, Aberer K (2005) QoS-based service selection and ranking with trust and reputation management. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”. Springer, Berlin, pp 466–483
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yau SS, Huang J, Yin Y (2010) Improving the trustworthiness of service QoS information in service-based systems. In: International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–218 Yau SS, Huang J, Yin Y (2010) Improving the trustworthiness of service QoS information in service-based systems. In: International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–218
25.
Zurück zum Zitat He Q, Yan J, Jin H, Yang Y (2009) ServiceTrust: supporting reputation-oriented service selection. In: Service-Oriented Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–284 He Q, Yan J, Jin H, Yang Y (2009) ServiceTrust: supporting reputation-oriented service selection. In: Service-Oriented Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–284
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Muchahari MK, Sinha SK (2012) A new trust management architecture for cloud computing environment. In: 2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing. IEEE, pp 136–140 Muchahari MK, Sinha SK (2012) A new trust management architecture for cloud computing environment. In: 2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing. IEEE, pp 136–140
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E (2010) Sla-based trust model for cloud computing. In: 2010 13th international conference on network-based information systems, Sept 2010. IEEE, pp 321–324 Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E (2010) Sla-based trust model for cloud computing. In: 2010 13th international conference on network-based information systems, Sept 2010. IEEE, pp 321–324
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Habib SM, Ries S, Muhlhauser M (2010) Cloud computing landscape and research challenges regarding trust and reputation. In: 2010 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 7th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. IEEE, pp 410–415 Habib SM, Ries S, Muhlhauser M (2010) Cloud computing landscape and research challenges regarding trust and reputation. In: 2010 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 7th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. IEEE, pp 410–415
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Trapero R, Modic J, Stopar M, Taha A, Suri N (2017) A novel approach to manage cloud security SLA incidents. Future Generat Comput Syst 72:193–205CrossRef Trapero R, Modic J, Stopar M, Taha A, Suri N (2017) A novel approach to manage cloud security SLA incidents. Future Generat Comput Syst 72:193–205CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Siadat S, Rahmani AM, Navid H (2017) Identifying fake feedback in cloud trust management systems using feedback evaluation component and Bayesian game model. J Supercomput 73(6):2682–2704CrossRef Siadat S, Rahmani AM, Navid H (2017) Identifying fake feedback in cloud trust management systems using feedback evaluation component and Bayesian game model. J Supercomput 73(6):2682–2704CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8):30–37CrossRef Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8):30–37CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A new multi-level trust management framework (MLTM) for solving the invalidity and sparse problems of user feedback ratings in cloud environments
verfasst von
Golnaz Aghaee Ghazvini
Mehran Mohsenzadeh
Ramin Nasiri
Amir Masoud Rahmani
Publikationsdatum
12.06.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
The Journal of Supercomputing / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0920-8542
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0484
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03348-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

The Journal of Supercomputing 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe