Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 1/2021

18.01.2021

A Novel Hybrid Fault Tolerance Architecture in the Internet of Things

verfasst von: Mehdi Nazari Cheraghlou, Ahmad Khadem-Zadeh, Majid Haghparast

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The most important challenge of the IoT is how to manage it. The presence of different technologies rendered IoT management much more complicated. DMTF has collected the management parameters in five FCAPS capacities. Regarding FCAPS, Fault Tolerance Capacity should be viewed as the first parameter among the top management characteristics. The objective of the present study is providing a new hybrid architecture of Fault Tolerance in the second layer of the IoT. The maximum use of the Reactive and Proactive policies and applying all methods of Fault Detection has been explored in the structure of the proposed architecture. In Fault Recovery Phase, most of the strategies in this field are implemented. The architecture proposed in this paper is implemented in both Cloudsim and Pegasus-WMS simulators. The results of the simulation demonstrate the positive impact of applying Proactive and Reactive Policies in combination in the proposed architecture. Also, fuzzy logic and fuzzy inference systems are used to model and analyse the reliability of architectures. The results obtained in this area show an increase in the fault tolerance of the proposed architecture completely transparent and tangible.
Vorheriger Artikel An Efficient Low Computational Cost Method of R-Peak Detection
Nächster Artikel User Selection in MU-MIMO System with Limited CSI Feedback

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, 17(4), 2347–2376.CrossRef
2.
Cheraghloua, M. N., Khadem-Zadeh, A., & Haghparast, M. (2016). A survey of fault tolerance architecture in cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 61, 81–92.CrossRef
3.
4.
Zhang, Y., Zheng, Z., Lyu, M. R. (2011). BFTCloud: A Byzantine Fault tolerance framework for voluntary-resource cloud computing. In 2011 IEEE international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD) (pp. 444–451).
5.
Lim, J., Suh, T., Gil, J., & Yu, H. (2013). Information systems frontiers. Berlin: Springer.
6.
Kaur, J., & Kinger, S. (2013). Analysis of different techniques used for fault tolerance. IJCSIT International Journal of Computers and Technology, 4(2), 737–741.
7.
Bala, A., Chana, I. (2012). Fault tolerance-challenges, techniques and implementation in cloud computing. In IJCSI international journal of computer science issues (Vol. 9, No. 1), ISSN (Online): 16940814. www.​IJCSI.​org.
8.
9.
Feng, Q., Han, J., Gao, Y., Meng, D. (2012). Magi-cube: High reliability and low redundancy storage architecture for cloud computing. In 2012 IEEE seventh international conference on networking, architecture, and storage. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​nas.​2012.​15.
10.
Sudha, L. S. (2013). Fault tolerance in cloud computing. In ACICE (Vol. 04).
11.
12.
Abadi, D. J. (2009). Data management in the cloud: limitations and opportunities. In Bulletin of the IEEE computer society technical committee on data engineering.
13.
Inukollu, V., Arsi, S., & Ravuri, S. (2014). Security issues associated with big data in cloud computing. In International journal of network security and its applications (IJNSA) (Vol. 6, No. 3).
14.
Ahuja, S. P., & Moore, B. (2013). State of big data analysis in the cloud. Network and Communication Technologies, 2(1), 54.CrossRef
15.
Hashem, I., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Ullah, K. S. (2015). The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues (pp. 98–115). London: Elsivier.
16.
Purcell, B. M. (2013). Big data using cloud computing. Journal of Technology Research, 10, 683.MathSciNet
17.
Das, P., & Khilar, P. M. (2013). VFT: A virtualization and fault tolerance approach for cloud computing. In IEEE conference on information and communication technologies (ICT).
18.
Ganesh, A., Sandhya, M., & Shankar, S., (2014). A study on fault tolerance methods in cloud computing. In IEEE international advance computing conference (IACC).
19.
20.
Emesowum, H., Paraskelidis, A., & Adda, M. (2017). Fault tolerance capability of cloud data center. In 2017 13th IEEE international conference on intelligent computer communication and processing (ICCP).
21.
Wang, S., Tseng, S., Yan, K., & Tsai, Y. (2018). Reaching agreement in an integrated fog Cloud IoT. IEEE Access, 6, 64515–64524.CrossRef
22.
Oyekanlu, E. (2018). Fault-tolerant real-time collaborative network edge analytics for industrial iot and cyber physical systems with communication network diversity. In 2018 IEEE 4th international conference on collaboration and internet computing (CIC) (2018).
23.
Nelson, A., Greg T. G., Hoffman, D., Nguyen, C., & Rhee, S. (2017). Towards a foundation for a collaborative replicable smart cities IoT architecture. In SCOPE ‘17: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on science of smart city operations and platforms engineering (pp. 63–68). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3063386.​3063763.
24.
Sharma, V., You, I., Atiquzzaman, M., & Song, F. (2017). Energy efficient device discovery for reliable communication in 5G-based IoT and BSNs using unmanned aerial vehicles (Vol. 97, No. c). Academic Press Ltd., London, UK, ISSN:1084-8045.
25.
Peng, Z., Juntao, G., Wenjuan, J., & Xuelian, L. (2019). Design of compressed sensing fault-tolerant encryption scheme for key sharing in IoT Multi-cloudy environment(s). Journal of Information Security and Applications, 47, 65–77.CrossRef
26.
Grover, J., & Garimella, R. M. (2018). Reliable and fault-tolerant IoT-edge architecture. In 2018 IEEE sensors.
27.
Qaim, W. B., & Ozkasap, O. (2018). DRAW: Data replication for enhanced data availability in IoT-based sensor systems. In 2018 IEEE 16th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing, pervasive intelligence and computing, 4th international conference on big data intelligence and computing and cyber science and technology congress.
28.
Power, A., & Kotonya, G. (2018). A microservices architecture for reactive and proactive fault tolerance in IoT systems. In 2018 IEEE 19th international symposium on “a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks” (WoWMoM).
29.
Albahri, O., Albahri, A., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M. A., & Mohsin, A. (2019). Fault-tolerant health framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors. IEEE Access, 7, 50052–55008.CrossRef
30.
Huang, C. Y., Chung, W. W., & Liu, C. Y. (2018). SCONN: Design and implement dual-band wireless networking assisted fault tolerant data transmission in intelligent buildings. In 2018 IEEE 88th vehicular technology conference (VTC-Fall).
31.
Lira, C., Mello, B., & Prazeres, C. V. S. (2019). Reactive microservices for the Internet of Things: A case study in fog computing. In SAC ‘19: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP symposium on applied computing (pp. 1243–1251). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3297280.​3297402.
32.
Li, X. A. (2020). Transient fault aware application partitioning computational offloading algorithm in microservices based mobile cloudlet networks. Computing, 102(1), 105–139.CrossRef
33.
Lin, J. W., Chelliah, P. R., Hsu, M. C., & Hou, J. X. (2019). Efficient fault-tolerant routing in IoT wireless sensor networks based on bipartite-flow graph modeling. In IEEE access (Vol. 7, pp. 14022–14034).
34.
Shao, Y., Xie, L., Jie Wu, J., & Guo, S. (2020). Adaptive and fault-tolerant data processing in healthcare IoT based on fog computing. In IEEE transactions on network science and engineering (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 263–273).
35.
36.
Umar, O. U., Xavier, E. X., Letondeur, L., Ottogalli, F. G., Salaün G., & Vincent, J. M. (2018). Resilience of stateful IoT applications in a dynamic fog environment. In MobiQuitous ‘18: Proceedings of the 15th EAI international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: Computing, networking and services (pp. 332–341).
37.
Woo, M. W., Lee, J. W., & Park, K. (2018). A reliable IoT system for personal healthcare devices. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 626–640.CrossRef
38.
Ramadas, A., Domingues, G., Dias, J.P., Ademar, A. A., & Ferreira, H.S. (2017). Patterns for things that fail. In PLoP ‘17: Proceedings of the 24th conference on pattern languages of programs (pp. 1–10).
39.
Modarresi, A., & Sterbenz, J. P. G. (2017). Multilevel IoT model for smart cities resilience. In CFI’17: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on future internet technologies (pp. 1–7).
40.
Ahmad, W., Hasan, O., Pervez, U., & Qadir, J. (2017). Reliability modeling and analysis of communication networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 78(15), 191–215.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Novel Hybrid Fault Tolerance Architecture in the Internet of Things
verfasst von
Mehdi Nazari Cheraghlou
Ahmad Khadem-Zadeh
Majid Haghparast
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-08019-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Wireless Personal Communications 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Learning-Based Security Technique for Selective Forwarding Attack in Clustered WSN

OriginalPaper

Hybrid Optimization Model for Energy Efficient Cloud Assisted Wireless Sensor Network

OriginalPaper

Influence of Clamor on the Transmission of Worms in Remote Sensor Network

ReviewPaper

A Survey of Thermal Management in Cloud Data Centre: Techniques and Open Issues

OriginalPaper

Measurements of Human Body Attenuation and Dual Polarized Diversity Gain for 38 GHz Millimeter-Wave Channel

ReviewPaper

Nash Bargaining in Resource Allocation for Cognitive Radio: A Review

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise