nach oben

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Erschienen in:

01.08.2015 | Original Article

A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate

verfasst von: Heidi Kreibich, Philip Bubeck, Mathijs Van Vliet, Hans De Moel

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Damage due to floods has increased during the last few decades, and further increases are expected in several regions due to climate change and growing vulnerability. To address the projected increase in flood risk, a combination of structural and non-structural flood risk mitigation measures is considered as a promising adaptation strategy. Such a combination takes into account that flood defence systems may fail, and prepares for unexpected crisis situations via land-use planning and private damage reduction, e.g. via building precautionary measures, and disaster response. However, knowledge about damage-reducing measures is scarce and often fragmented since based on case studies. For instance, it is believed that private precautionary measures, like shielding with water shutters or building fortification, are especially effective in areas with frequent flood events and low flood water levels. However, some of these measures showed a significant damage-reducing effect also during the extreme flood event in 2002 in Germany. This review analyses potentials of land-use planning and private flood precautionary measures as components of adaptation strategies for global change. Focus is on their implementation, their damage-reducing effects and their potential contribution to address projected changes in flood risk, particularly in developed countries.

Vorheriger Artikel An integrated approach to flood risk management and spatial quality for a Netherlands’ river polder area

Nächster Artikel Sharing the burden of increasing flood risk: who pays for flood insurance and flood risk management in the United Kingdom

http://www.region2coastal.com/faqs/advisory-bfe-faq

ABI (2003) Assessment of the cost and effect on future claims of installing flood damage resistant measures. Association of British Insurers (ABI), London

Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW (2011) Flood-resilient waterfront development in New York City: bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1227(1):1–82

Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, De Moel H et al (2013) Cost estimates for flood resilience and protection strategies in New York city. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1294:1–104

Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, Emanuel K et al (2014) Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal mega-cities. Science 344:473–475. doi:10.1126/science.1248222

Alexander ER (2002) The public interest in planning: from legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory 1(3):226–249

Arciniegas G, Jansen R, Rietveld P (2013) Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment. Environ Model Software 39:159–175

Ball T, Werritty A, Geddes A (2013) Insurance and sustainability in flood-risk management: the UK in a transitional state. Area 45(3):266–272

Barredo JI (2009) Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970–2006. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:97–104. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-97-2009

Becker A, Grünewald U (2003) Flood risk in central Europe. Science 300:1099

Beckers JVL, De Bruijn KM (2011) Analyse van Slachtofferrisico’s, Waterveiligheid 21e eeuw, Report 1204144-005, Deltares, Delft

Benoît R, Forget S, Rouselle J (2003) The effectiveness of flood damage reduction measures in the Montreal region. Nat Hazards 28:367–385

Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Böhm HR, Haupter B, Heiland P et al (2004) Implementation of flood risk management measures into spatial plans and policies. River Res Appl 20:255–267

Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors. Water Resour Res 45:W10440. doi:10.1029/2009WR007743

Bradford RA, O’Sullivan JJ, van der Craats IM et al (2012) Risk perception-issues for flood management in Europe. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2299–2309

Bubeck P, De Moel H (2010) Sensitivity analysis of flood damage calculations for the river Rhine. 32 Report IVM, DG Waters, The Netherlands

Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH (2012a) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal 32(9):1481–1495

Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Kreibich H et al (2012b) Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(11):3507–3518

Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Kreibich H et al (2013) Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1327–1338

Bubeck P, Kreibich H, Penning-Rowsell E, Botzen WJW, De Moel H, Klijn F (2014) Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and the USA—a comparative analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management (in press)

Burby RJ (2001) Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience. Environ Hazards 3:111–122

Burby RJ, Beatley T, Berke PR et al (1999) Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. J Am Plann Assoc 65(3):247–258. doi:10.1080/01944369908976055

Burby RJ, Salvesen D, Creed M (2006) Encouraging residential rehabilitation with building codes: New Jersey’s experience. J Am Plann Assoc 72(2):183–196. doi:10.1080/01944360608976738

BWG (Swiss Federal Office for Water and Geology) (ed) (2001) Hochwasserschutz an Fliessgewässern. BWG, Bern

Cabinet Office (2008) The Pitt Review—learning lessons from the 2007 floods, Cabinet Office, 22 22 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100807034701/http:/archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/pittreview/thepittreview/final_report.html. Accessed 17 Dec 2014

Chatterjee M (2010) Slum dwellers response to flooding events in the megacities of India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:337–353

Cho R (2011) Making room for rivers: a different approach to flood control. Water matters—news from the Columbia Water Center. http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/06/07/making-room-for-rivers-a-different-approach-to-flood-control/

Cohen GA (2000) If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich. Harvard Univ Pr, Harvard

Dawson RJ, Ball T, Werritty J et al (2014) Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmenmtal change. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):628–646

De Bruijn KM (2005) Resilience and flood risk management: a systems approach applied to lowland rivers. Delft University Press, Delft

De Bruijn KM, Klijn F (2009) Risky places in The Netherlands: a first approximation for floods. J Flood Risk Manag 2:58–67

De Moel H, van Alphen J, Aerts JCJH (2009) Flood maps in Europe—methods, availability and use. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(2):289–301

De Moel H, Aerts JCJH, Koomen E (2011) Development of flood exposure in The Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):620–627. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.005

De Moel H, van Vliet M, Aerts JCJH (2014) Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Reg Environ Chang 14:895–908

DECC-NSW (Department of Environment and Climate Change New South Wales) (2008) Reducing vulnerability of buildings to flood damage—guidance on building in flood prone areas. Prepared for the Hawkesbury-Nepean Floodplain Management Steering Committee. DECC-NSW, Australia

DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2005) Making space for water—taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. First government response to the autumn 2004 ‘making space for water’ consultation exercise. HM Treasury, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Department for Transport and DEFRA

DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2007) Flood resistance and resilience solutions: an R&D scoping study. R&D Technical Report, DEFRA, http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/documents/manage/frrs-scope.pdf. Cited 7 Nov 2014

DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2008) Developing the evidence base for flood resistance and resilience: Summary Report. R&D Technical Report FD2607/TR1. Environment Agency and DEFRA, London

Di Baldassarre G, Castellarin A, Brath A (2009) Analysis of the effects of levee heightening on flood propagation: example of the River Po, Italy. Hydrol Sci J 54(6):1007–1017

Egli T (2000) Gefahrenkarten für die Bauvorsorge und Notfallplanung. Workshop Vorbeugender Hochwasserschutz auf kommunaler Ebene 13./14.12.2000. Dresden Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin

Eikelboom T, Janssen R (2013) Interactive spatial tools for the design of regional adaptation strategies. J Environ Manage 127:6–14

FEMA (1998a) Homeowner’s guide to retrofitting—six ways to protect your house from flooding. FEMA Publications, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

FEMA (1998b) Repairing your flooded home. FEMA Publications, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

FEMA (1999) Protecting building utilities from flood damage—principles and practices for the design and construction of flood resistant building utility systems. FEMA Publications, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

FEMA (2009) Homeowner’s guide to retrofitting, 2nd edn. FEMA Publications, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=1420

Environment Agency (2003a) Damage limitation—how to make your home flood resistant. Environment Agency, Bristol

Environment Agency (2003b) Flood products. Using flood protection products—a guide for homeowners. Environment Agency, Bristol

Environment Agency (2010) Flood and coastal risk management risk mapping strategy 2010–2015. Environment Agency, Bristol

SEPA (2003) Flood alleviation products. Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Stirling

Erdlenbruch K, Thoyer S, Grelot F et al (2009) Risk-sharing policies in the context of the French flood prevention action programmes. J Environ Manage 91(2):363–369. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.002

European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Off J L 327

European Commission (2007) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Off J EU 6, L 288/27–34

Evans E, Ashley R, Hall J, Penning-Rowsell EP, Sayers PB, Thorne CR et al (2004) Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: Volume 2: managing future risks. Office of Science and Technology, London

Federal Environment Agency (2010) Water resource management in Germany. Part 1: Fundamentals. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau

Fleischhauer M (2005) Country report—France. In: Greiving S, Fleischhauer M, Wanczura S (eds) Report on the European scenario of technological and scientific standards reached in spatial planning versus natural risk management. ARMONIA Project, Dortmund

APFM (2007) The role of land-use planning in flood management—a tool for integrated flood management. Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM) Technical Document No. 12, Flood management tools series. World Meteorological Organisation, Global Water Partnership

MUF (1998) Hochwasserhandbuch—Leben, Wohnen und Bauen in hochwassergefährdeten Gebieten des Ministeriums für Umwelt und Forsten Rheinland-Pfalz. Ministerium für Umwelt und Forsten Rheinland-Pfalz (MUF), Mainz

Fraser Basin Council and Arlington Group (2008) Flood hazard area land use management. Review of flood hazard area land use management in B.C. Fraser Basin Council and Arlington Group, Vancouver, BC

Fuchs S, Spachinger K, Dorner W et al (2009) Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping. Environ Hazards 8(1):52–70

Gersonius B, Zevenbergen C, Puyan N, Billah MMM (2008) Efficiency of private flood proofing of new buildings—adapted redevelopment of a floodplain in the Netherlands. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 118: Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response. DOI 10.2495/FRIAR080241

Glavovic BC (2010) The role of land-use planning in disaster risk reduction: an introduction to perspectives from Australia. The Australian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 1 http://trauma.massey.ac.nz/issues/2010-1/editorial.htm

Graham M, Ogilvie J, Reid T et al (2012) Best practices for managing surface water flooding: applying lessons learned in the UK to Canada. Proc Annu Conf Can Soc Civ Eng 2:1053–1062

Green CH, Parker DJ, Tunstall SM (2000) Assessment of flood control and management options. WCD Thematic Review Options Assessment: IV.4. Prepared for the World Commission on Dams (WCD). Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London

Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):101–120

Hampshire Flood Steering Group (2002) Managing flood risks in parishes—a best practice guide, 2nd edn. Environment Agency, Bristol

Heiland P (2002) Vorsorgender Hochwasserschutz durch Raumplanung, interregionale Kooperation und ökonomischen Lastenausgleich. Schriftenreihe WAR 143, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt

Holub M, Fuchs S (2008) Benefits of local structural protection to mitigate torrent-related hazards. In: Brebbia CA, Beritatos E (eds) Risk analysis VI. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, WIT Press, Vol. 39, pp 401–411

Holub M, Fuchs S (2009) Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria—legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:523–537. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-523-2009

Holub M, Hübl J (2008) Local protection against mountain hazards—state of the art and future needs. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:81–99. doi:10.5194/nhess-8-81-2008

Holway JM, Burby RJ (1993) Reducing flood losses local planning and land use controls. J Am Plann Assoc 59(2):205–216. doi:10.1080/0194436930897586

Hooijer A, Klijn F, Pedroli GBM et al (2004) Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: synopsis of the findings of IRMA-SPONGE. River Res Appl 20:343–357

Hudson P, Botzen WJW, Kreibich H et al (2014) Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(7):1731–1747

ICPR (International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine) (2002) Non-structural flood plain management: measures and their effectiveness. ICPR, Koblenz

Jones CP, Coulbourne WL, Marshall J, Rogers SM Jr, Jones C, et al. (2006) Evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program’s building standards. American Institutes for Research and the NFIP Evaluation Working Group. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=2592

DKKV (2003) Hochwasservorsorge in Deutschland—Lernen aus der Katastrophe 2002 im Elbegebiet. Schriftenreihe des DKKV 29, Lessons Learned. Deutsches Komitee für Katastrophenvorsorge (DKKV), Bonn

Keessen AM, Hamer JM, Van Rijswick HFMW, Wiering M (2013) The concept of resilience from a normative perspective: examples from Dutch adaptation strategies. 18(2)

Kinzig AP (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4:709–715

Kleindorfer PR, Kunreuther H (1999) The complementary roles of mitigation and insurance in managing catastrophic risks. Risk Anal 19(4):727–738

Klijn F, Asselman NEM, Van der Most H (2010) Compartmentalisation: flood consequences reduction by splitting up large polder areas. J Flood Risk Manage 3:3–17. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01047.x

Koerth J, Jones N, Vafeidis AT et al (2013) Household adaptation and intention to adapt to coastal flooding in the Axios–Loudias–Aliakmonas National Park, Greece. Ocean Coast Manag 82:43–50

Koks EE, De Moel H, Aerts JCJH et al (2014) Effect of spatial adaptation measures on flood risk: study of coastal floods in Belgium. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):413–425

Kreibich H, Thieken AH (2009) Coping with floods in the city of Dresden, Germany. Nat Hazards 51(3):423–436

Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Petrow T et al (2005a) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures: lessons learned from the Elbe flood in august 2002. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(1):117–126

Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Müller M, Merz B (2005b) Precautionary measures reduce flood losses of households and companies—insights from the 2002 flood in Saxony, Germany. In: van Alphen J, Beek E, Taal M (eds) Floods, from defence to management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, pp 851–859

Kreibich H, Müller M, Thieken AH et al (2007) Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany. Water Resour Res 43:W03408. doi:10.1029/2005WR004691

Kreibich H, Piroth K, Seifert I et al (2009a) Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling? Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1679–1692

Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Grunenberg H et al (2009b) Extent, perception and mitigation of damage due to high groundwater levels in the city of Dresden, Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(4):1247–1258

Kreibich H, Seifert I, Thieken AH et al (2011a) Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany. Reg Environ Chang 11(1):59–71

Kreibich H, Christenberger S, Schwarze R (2011b) Economic motivation of households to undertake private precautionary measures against floods. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(2):309–321

Kreibich H, Christenberger S, Schwarze R (2012) Corrigendum to “Economic motivation of households to undertake private precautionary measures against floods” published in Nat hazards earth Syst Sci 11:309–321, 2011. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:391–392

Kreibich H, van den Bergh JCJM, Bouwer LM et al (2014a) Costing natural hazards. Nat Clim Chang 4:303–306

Kreibich H, Bubeck P, Kunz M et al (2014b) A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany. Nat Hazards 74(3):2279–2304

Kummu M, De Moel H, Ward PJ et al (2011) How close do we live to water? A global analysis of population distance to freshwater bodies. PLoS One 6(6):e20578

Kundzewicz ZW, Ulbrich U, Brücher T et al (2005) Summer floods in Central Europe—climate change track? Nat Hazards 36:165–189

Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI et al (2013) Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 59(1):1–28. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.857411

Kunreuther H, Meyer RJ, Michel-Kerjan E (2007) Strategies for better protection against catastrophic risks. Working Paper 2007-09-14. Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

Lane SN, Landström C, Whatmore SJ (2011) Imagining flood futures: risk assessment and management in practice. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:1784–1806

Lasage R, Veldkamp TIE, De Moel H et al (2014) Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(6):1441–1457

Li Y-S, Raso G, Zhao Z-Y et al (2007) Large water management projects and schistosomiasis control, Dongting lake region, China. Emerg Infect Dis 13(7):973–979

Lumbroso D, Vinet F (2011) A comparison of the causes, effects and aftermaths of the coastal flooding of England in 1953 and France in 2010. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(8):2321–2333

Maddux JE, Rogers RW (1983) Protection motivation and selfefficacy. A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude-change. J Exp Soc Psychol 19(5):469–479

Marco JB (1994) Flood risk mapping. In: Rossi G, Harmancioglu N, Yevjevich V (eds) Coping with floods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 353–373

Menendez M (2000) Design discharge calculations and flood plain management. European Commission (Directorate General XII): FLOODaware Final report, Cemagref, 53–82

Mens MJP, Klijn F, De Bruijn KM et al (2011) The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environ Sci Pol 14:1121–1131. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003

Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M (2007) Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In: Begum S, Stive MJF, Hall JW (eds) Flood risk management in Europe—innovation in policy and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 231–251

Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R et al (2010) Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1697–1724. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010

Merz B, Kundzewicz ZW, Delgado J, Hundecha Y, Kreibich H (2012) Detection and attribution of changes in flood hazard and risk. In: Kundzewicz ZW (ed) Changes in flood risk in Europe. IAHS Special Publication 10:435–458

Meyer V, Kuhlicke C, Luther J et al (2012) Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1707–1716

Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M (2008) Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol 28(2):164–173

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (2011) Besluit algemene regels ruimtelijke ordening

Ministry of Transport and Water, Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and Environment and Ministry of Agriculture Nature and Food quality (2009) Beleidsnota Waterveiligheid 2009–2015

Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management (2006) Beleidslijn grote rivieren (policy guideline major rivers)

Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection (2004) Flood hazard area land use management guidelines. Province of British Columbia

Munich Re (2014) Natural catastrophes 2013 analyses, assessments, positions. Munich Re, Munich

Neuvel JMM, Van den Brink A (2009) Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices. J Environ Plan Manag 52(7):865–880. doi:10.1080/09640560903180909

Fraser Basin Council (and Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd) (2006) Lower Fraser River hydraulic model—summary of results. Fraser Basin Council, Vancouver

OECD (2006) OECD Studies in Risk Management: Japan Floods. OECD

Olfert A, Schanze J (2008) New approaches to ex-post evaluation of risk reduction measures: the example of flood proofing in Dresden, Germany. In: Samuels P, Huntington S, Allsop W, Harrop J (eds) Flood risk management: research and practice. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 1173–1184

Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manage 34(1):75–90

Petrow T, Thieken AH, Kreibich H et al (2006) Improvements on flood alleviation in Germany: lessons learned from the Elbe flood in august 2002. Environ Manage 38:717–732

Pielke RA (1999) Nine fallacies of floods. Clim Change 42:413–438

Pieterse N, Tennekes J, Van de Pas B et al (2013) Flood hazard mapping for spatial planning: conceptual and methodological considerations. In: Klijn F, Schweckendiek T (eds) Comprehensive flood risk management. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 779–784

Pinter N (2005) One step forward, two steps back on U.S. Floodplains. Science 308(5719):207–208

PLANAT (National Platform for Natural Hazards) (2004) The cycle of integrated risk management. http://www.planat.ch. Cited 28 Oct 2004

Plapp T, Werner U (2006) Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: examples from Germany. In: Amman WJ, Dannenmann S, Vulliet L (eds) RISK 21—coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21st century. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 101–108

Pottier N (2000) Risques d’inondation, reglementations et territoires. Hommes et Terres du Nord 2:93–101

Pottier N (2002) Gestion du risque d’inondation et maıtrise de l’urbanisation dans le val de Saone. In: Bravard JP, Combier J, Commercon N (eds) La Saone: Axe de civilisation. Presses Universitaires de Lyon, pp 197–213

Pottier N, Penning-Rowsell E, Tunstall S et al (2005) Land use and flood protection: contrasting approaches and outcomes in France and in England and Wales. Appl Geogr 25:1–27

Poussin JK, Bubeck P, Aerts JCJH et al (2012) Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:3455–3471. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3455-2012

Poussin JK, Botzen WJ, Aerts JC (2014) Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environ Sci Pol 40:69–77

Raschky PA (2008) Institutions and the losses from natural disasters. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:627–634. doi:10.5194/nhess-8-627-2008

Rawls J (1973) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts

Reynaud A, Aubert C, Nguyen MH (2013) Living with floods: protective behaviours and risk perception of Vietnamese households. Geneva Pap 38:547–579

Rogers RW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol 91:93–114

Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo BL, Petty RE (eds) Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. Guilford Press, London

Seifert I, Botzen WJW, Kreibich H et al (2013) Influence of flood risk characteristics on flood insurance demand: a comparison between Germany and the Netherlands. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(7):1691–1705

Shrubsole D (2007) From structures to sustainability: a history of flood management strategies in Canada. Int J Emerg Manag 4(2):183–196

Siegrist M (2013) The necessity for longitudinal studies in risk perception research. Risk Anal 33(1):50–51

Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2006) Flooding risks: a comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Anal 26(4):971–979

Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2008) Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behaviour: people cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Anal 28(3):771–778

Sigmaplan (2014) Meet the Scheldt—The Sigma Plan: roadmap to an invigorated Scheldt region. Waterwegen en Zeekanaal NV, Sea Scheldt Department, Antwerp. http://www.sigmaplan.be/en/publications/general-brochures/general-sigma-brochure

Smith DI (1981) Actual and potential flood damage: a case study for urban Lismore, NSW, Australia. Appl Geogr 1:31–39

Smith DI (1994) Flood damage estimation—a review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. Water Sa 20(3):231–238

Stadt Köln (1994) Hochwasser-Merkblatt für Bewohner gefährdeter Gebiete der Stadt Köln, Köln

Stalenberg B, Vrijling J (2006) Interaction between Dutch flood protection and urbanization. International Symposium of Lowland Technology, Saga

Takao K, Motoyoshi T, Sato T et al (2004) Factors determining residents’ preparedness for floods in modern megalopolises: the case of the Tokai flood disaster in Japan. J Risk Res 7(7–8):775–787

Te Linde AH, Bubeck P, Dekkers JEC et al (2011) Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:459–473

Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kreibich H et al (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Anal 26(2):383–395

Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Muller M et al (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):1016–1037

Thieken AH, Cammerer H, Dobler C et al (2014) Estimating changes in flood risks and benefits of non-structural adaptation strategies—a case study from Tyrol Austria. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9602-3

MURL (2000) Hochwasserfibel—Bauvorsorge in hochwassergefährdeten Gebieten. Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (MURL), Düsseldorf

USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers (1995) Flood proofing. Washington, DC, EP:1165-2-314

USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (1996) Engineering and design. Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies. Washington, DC, Manual No. 1110-2-1619

Van Vliet M, Aerts JCJH (2014) Adaptation to climate change in urban water management—flood management in the Rotterdam Rijnmond Area. In: Grafton RQ, Daniell KA, Naugeset C (eds) Understanding and managing urban water in transition. Springer, Dordrecht

VAwS-Baden-Württemberg (2005) Verordnung des Ministeriums für Umwelt und Verkehr über Anlagen zum Umgang mit wassergefährdenden Stoffen und über Fachbetriebe, Anlagenverordnung Wassergefährdende Stoffe—VawS, Baden-Württemberg

VAwS-Bayern (2008) Verordnung über Anlagen zum Umgang mit wassergefährdenden Stoffen und über Fachbetriebe, Anlagenverordnung-VAwS, Bayern

VAwS-Hessen (2006) Verordnung über Anlagen zum Umgang mit wassergefährdenden Stoffen und über Fachbetriebe, Anlagenverordnung-VAwS, Hessen

BMVBW (2002) Hochwasserschutzfibel—Planen und Bauen von Gebäuden in hochwassergefährdeten Gebieten. Bundesministerium für Verkehr-, Bau- und Wohnungswesen (BMVBW), Berlin

Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C et al (2013) The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33(6):1049–1065

Wanczura S (2005) Country report—Poland. In: Greiving S, Fleischhauer M, Wanczura S (eds) Report on the European scenario of technological and scientific standards reached in spatial planning versus natural risk management. ARMONIA Project, Dortmund

Wasserhaushaltsgesetz (2009) Gesetz zur Ordnung des Wasserhaushalts (WHG)

Watt WE (2000) Twenty years of flood risk mapping under the Canadian national flood damage reduction program. In: Marsalek J et al (eds) Flood issues in contemporary water management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 155–165

Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625

Wind HG, Nierop TM, De Blois CJ et al (1999) Analysis of flood damages from the 1993 and 1995 Meuse floods. Water Resour Res 35(11):3459–3465

Wisner B (1998) Marginality and vulnerability: why the homeless of Tokyo don’t ‘count’ in disaster preparations. Appl Geogr 18:25–33

Zimmerman M, Pozzi A, Stoessel F (2005) Vademecum—hazard maps and related instruments, The Swiss system and its application abroad, PLANAT, Bern, http://162.23.39.120/dezaweb/ressources/resource_en_25123.pdf

Titel: A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate
verfasst von: Heidi Kreibich
Philip Bubeck
Mathijs Van Vliet
Hans De Moel
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

An integrated approach to flood risk management and spatial quality for a Netherlands’ river polder area

Preface: climate change proof flood risk management

Economic optimization of flood prevention systems in the Netherlands

Salt marshes to adapt the flood defences along the Dutch Wadden Sea coast

Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales

Flood risk management for an uncertain future: economic efficiency and system robustness perspectives compared for the Meuse River (Netherlands)