Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2022

07.03.2022

A Review on Energy-Aware Scheduling Techniques for Workflows in IaaS Clouds

verfasst von: Rambabu Medara, Ravi Shankar Singh

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cloud computing has emerged as the preeminent computing platform for multiple enterprises. All scales of organizations adopt cloud services to leverage cloud technology to drive their businesses ahead. It is prevalent to use the workflow paradigm in modeling a wide variety of problems to compute in distributed environments. Cloud computing is mostly adapting technology to deal with workflow applications, particularly applications with unpredictable workloads. Due to the increased demand for cloud services, excessive power utilization in cloud data centers is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. Scientific workflow applications, in particular, consume high amounts of electrical energy. Many studies have been conducted on the consumption of energy in the cloud environment, and this area of research attracts people from all fields, including both research and business. For this paper, a survey was conducted on existing energy-efficient techniques for scheduling various workflows in a cloud environment. We targeted the methods that minimize energy consumption with assured quality of service constraints. This study on energy-aware and proper workflow scheduling provide extensive knowledge about various energy-aware scheduling paradigms currently going on. The review will help in listing the future directions in this field along with other factors included.
Vorheriger Artikel Etched Triangle Resonator Dual Band Microstrip Band Pass Filter
Nächster Artikel Design of Three Tier Hybrid Architecture Combing TDMA-CDMA Techniques to Mitigate Interference in WBAN

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Rambabu, M., Gupta, S., & Singh, R. S. (2021). Data mining in cloud computing: survey. In: Innovations in Computational Intelligence and Computer Vision (pp. 48–56). Springer.
2.
Medara, R., Singh, R. S., Kumar, U. S., & Barfa, S. (2020). Energy efficient virtual machine consolidation using water wave optimization. In: 2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
3.
4.
Arroba, P, Moya, J. M., Ayala, J. L., & Buyya, R. (2017). Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling-aware dynamic consolidation of virtual machines for energy efficient cloud data centers. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 29(10), e4067.
5.
6.
Engbers, N., & Taen, E. (2014). Green data net. Report to it room infra. European Commision. FP7 ICT 2013.6. 2.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018). Assessing ict global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 and recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 448–463.CrossRef
12.
You, X., Li, Y., Zheng, M., Zhu, C., & Lifeng, Y. (2017). A survey and taxonomy of energy efficiency relevant surveys in cloud-related environments. IEEE Access, 5, 14066–14078.CrossRef
13.
Adhikary, T., Das, A. K., Razzaque, M. A., & Sarkar, A. M. J. (2013). Energy-efficient scheduling algorithms for data center resources in cloud computing. In 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications and 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing) (pp. 1715–1720). IEEE.
14.
Rodriguez, M. A., & Buyya, R. (2017). A taxonomy and survey on scheduling algorithms for scientific workflows in iaas cloud computing environments. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 29(8), e4041.CrossRef
15.
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, Stephen. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15.CrossRef
16.
Choenni, S., Bakker, R., & Baets, W. (2003). On the evaluation of workflow systems in business processes. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 6(2), 33–44.
17.
Barker, A, & Van Hemert, J. (2007). Scientific workflow: a survey and research directions. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, (pp. 746–753). Springer.
18.
Deelman, E., Gannon, D., Shields, M., & Taylor, I. (2009). Workflows and e-science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5), 528–540.CrossRef
19.
Liew, C. S., Atkinson, M. P., Galea, Michelle, A., Tan F., Martin, P. & Van HHemert. I., J. (2016). Scientific workflows: Moving across paradigms. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 49(4), 1–39.
20.
Gupta, S, Singh, R. S, Vasant, U. D., & Saxena, V. User defined weight based budget and deadline constrained workflow scheduling in cloud. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, p. e6454.
21.
Berriman, G. B., Deelman, E., Good, J. C., Jacob, J. C., Katz, D. S., Kesselman, C., Laity, A. C., Prince, T. A., Singh, G., & Su, M.-H. (2004). Montage: A grid-enabled engine for delivering custom science-grade mosaics on demand. In: Optimizing Scientific Return for Astronomy through Information Technologies, Vol. 5493, pp. 221–232. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
22.
Graves, R., Jordan, T. H., Callaghan, S., Deelman, E., Field, E., Juve, G., Kesselman, C., Maechling, P., Mehta, G., Milner, K., et al. (2011). Cybershake: A physics-based seismic hazard model for Southern California. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168(3–4), 367–381.CrossRef
23.
24.
25.
Livny, J., Teonadi, H., Livny, M., & Waldor, M. K. (2008). High-throughput, kingdom-wide prediction and annotation of bacterial non-coding rnas. PloS One, 3(9), e3197.CrossRef
26.
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Adhikari, R., Ajith, P., Allen, B., Allen, G., Amin, R. S., Anderson, S. B., Anderson, W. G., Arain, M. A., et al. (2009). Ligo: The laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory. Reports on Progress in Physics, 72(7), 076901.CrossRef
27.
Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., & Vahi, K. (2013). Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(3), 682–692.CrossRef
28.
Souri, A., Rahmani, A. M., Navimipour, N. J., & Rezaei, R. (2020). A hybrid formal verification approach for qos-aware multi-cloud service composition. Cluster Computing, 23(4), 2453–2470.CrossRef
29.
Konjaang, J. K., & Xu, L. (2021). Multi-objective workflow optimization strategy (mowos) for cloud computing. Journal of Cloud Computing, 10(1), 1–19.
30.
Fakhfakh, F., Kacem, H. H., & Kacem, A. H. (2014). Workflow scheduling in cloud computing: a survey. In: 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations (pp. 372–378). IEEE.
31.
Arya, L. K., & Verma, A. (2014). Workflow scheduling algorithms in cloud environment-a survey. 2014 Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS), pp. 1–4. IEEE.
32.
Cao, F., & Zhu, M. M. (2013). Energy-aware workflow job scheduling for green clouds. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 232–239. IEEE.
33.
Buyya, R., Beloglazov, A., & Abawajy, J. (2010). Energy-efficient management of data center resources for cloud computing: a vision, architectural elements, and open challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1006.​0308.
34.
Li, Z., Ge, J., Hu, H., Song, W., Hu, H., & Luo, B. (2018). Cost and energy aware scheduling algorithm for scientific workflows with deadline constraint in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 11(4), 713–726.CrossRef
35.
Yu, J., & Buyya, R. (2004). A novel architecture for realizing grid workflow using tuple spaces. In: Fifth IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, (pp. 119–128). IEEE.
36.
37.
38.
Alaei, M., Khorsand, R., & Ramezanpour, M. (2021). An adaptive fault detector strategy for scientific workflow scheduling based on improved differential evolution algorithm in cloud. Applied Soft Computing, 99, 106895.CrossRef
39.
Medara, R., Singh, R. S., & Amit. (2021). Energy-aware workflow task scheduling in clouds with virtual machine consolidation using discrete water wave optimization. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 110, 102323.CrossRef
40.
Medara, R., & Singh, R. S. (2021). Energy efficient and reliability aware workflow task scheduling in cloud environment. Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1–20.
41.
Ranjan, R., Thakur, I. S., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2020). Energy-efficient workflow scheduling using container-based virtualization in software-defined data centers. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(12), 7646–7657.CrossRef
42.
Asghari, A., Sohrabi, M. K., & Yaghmaee, F. (2020). A cloud resource management framework for multiple online scientific workflows using cooperative reinforcement learning agents. Computer Networks, pp. 107340.
43.
Li, C., Zhang, Y., Hao, Z., & Luo, Y. (2020). An effective scheduling strategy based on hypergraph partition in geographically distributed datacenters. Computer Networks, 170, 107096.CrossRef
44.
Li, C., Tang, J., Ma, T., Yang, X., & Luo, Y. (2020). Load balance based workflow job scheduling algorithm in distributed cloud. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 152, 102518.CrossRef
45.
Asghari, A., Sohrabi, M. K., & Yaghmaee, F. (2020). Online scheduling of dependent tasks of cloud‘s workflows to enhance resource utilization and reduce the makespan using multiple reinforcement learning-based agents. Soft Computing, 24(21), 16177–16199.CrossRef
46.
Stavrinides, G. L., & Karatza, H. D. (2019). An energy-efficient, qos-aware and cost-effective scheduling approach for real-time workflow applications in cloud computing systems utilizing dvfs and approximate computations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 96, 216–226.CrossRef
47.
Garg, R., Mittal, M., et al. (2019). Reliability and energy efficient workflow scheduling in cloud environment. Cluster Computing, 22(4), 1283–1297.CrossRef
48.
Qureshi, B. (2019). Profile-based power-aware workflow scheduling framework for energy-efficient data centers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94, 453–467.CrossRef
49.
Safari, Monire, & Khorsand, Reihaneh. (2018). Energy-aware scheduling algorithm for time-constrained workflow tasks in dvfs-enabled cloud environment. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 87, 311–326.CrossRef
50.
Stavrinides, G. L., & Karatza, H. D. (2018). Energy-aware scheduling of real-time workflow applications in clouds utilizing dvfs and approximate computations. In: 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), (pp. 33–40). IEEE.
51.
Wang, Z., Wen, Y., Chen, J., Cao, B., & Wang, F. (2018). Towards energy-efficient scheduling with batch processing for instance-intensive cloud workflows. In: 2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing and Communications, Big Data and Cloud Computing, Social Computing and Networking, Sustainable Computing and Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom), (pp. 590–596). IEEE.
52.
Juarez, F., Ejarque, J., & Badia, R. M. (2018). Dynamic energy-aware scheduling for parallel task-based application in cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 257–271.CrossRef
53.
Yao, G., Ding, Y., & Hao, K. (2017). Multi-objective workflow scheduling in cloud system based on cooperative multi-swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of Central South University, 24(5), 1050–1062.CrossRef
54.
Xu, X., Dou, W., Zhang, X., & Chen, J. (2016). Enreal: An energy-aware resource allocation method for scientific workflow executions in cloud environment. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 4(2), 166–179.CrossRef
55.
Khaleel, M., & Zhu, M. M. (2016). Energy-efficient task scheduling and consolidation algorithm for workflow jobs in cloud. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 13(3), 268–284.CrossRef
56.
Li, H., Zhu, H., Ren, G., Wang, H., Zhang, H., & Chen, L. (2016). Energy-aware scheduling of workflow in cloud center with deadline constraint. In: 2016 12th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), (pp. 415–418). IEEE.
57.
Tang, Z., Cheng, Z., Li, K., & Li, K. (2014). An efficient energy scheduling algorithm for workflow tasks in hybrids and dvfs-enabled cloud environment. In: 2014 Sixth International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Programming, (pp. 255–261). IEEE.
58.
Pietri, I., & Sakellariou, R. (2014). Energy-aware workflow scheduling using frequency scaling. In: 2014 43rd International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, (pp. 104–113). IEEE.
59.
Zheng, W., & Huang, S. (2014). Deadline constrained energy-efficient scheduling for workflows in clouds. In: 2014 Second International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data, (pp. 69–76). IEEE.
60.
Yassa, S., Chelouah, R., Kadima, H., & Granado, B. (2013). Multi-objective approach for energy-aware workflow scheduling in cloud computing environments. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.
61.
Thanavanich, T., & Uthayopas, P. (2013). Efficient energy aware task scheduling for parallel workflow tasks on hybrids cloud environment. In: 2013 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC), (pp. 37–42). IEEE.
62.
Pietri, I., Malawski, M., Juve, G., Deelman, E., Nabrzyski, J., & Sakellariou, R. (2013). Energy-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles. In: 2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, (pp. 34–41). IEEE.
63.
Huang, Q., Su, S., Li, J., Xu, P., Shuang, K., & Huang, X. (2012). Enhanced energy-efficient scheduling for parallel applications in cloud. In: 2012 12th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (ccgrid 2012), (pp. 781–786). IEEE.
64.
Wang, L., Von Laszewski, G., Dayal, J., & Wang, F. (2010). Towards energy aware scheduling for precedence constrained parallel tasks in a cluster with dvfs. In: 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, (pp. 368–377). IEEE.
65.
Zhu, Q., Zhu, J., & Agrawal, G. (2010). Power-aware consolidation of scientific workflows in virtualized environments. In: SC’10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, (pp. 1–12). IEEE.
66.
Minas, L, & Ellison, B. (2009). Energy efficiency for information technology: How to reduce power consumption in servers and data centers. Intel Press.
67.
Rivoire, Suzanne, Ranganathan, Parthasarathy, & Kozyrakis, Christos. (2008). A comparison of high-level full-system power models. HotPower, 8(2), 32–39.
68.
Khalil, K. M., Abdel-Aziz, M., Nazmy, T. T., & Salem, A.-B. M. (2017). Cloud simulators–an evaluation study. International Journal Information Models and Analyses , 6(1).
69.
Jiang, Q., Lee, Y. C., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2015). Executing large scale scientific workflow ensembles in public clouds. In: 2015 44th International Conference on Parallel Processing, pp. 520–529.
70.
Tyagi, R., & G., Santosh K. (2018). A survey on scheduling algorithms for parallel and distributed systems. Silicon Photonics and High Performance Computing, pp. 51–64. Springer.
71.
Kaur, Gurjit. (2016). A dag based task scheduling algorithms for multiprocessor system-a survey. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 9(9), 103–114.CrossRef
72.
Umarani Srikanth, G., & Geetha, R. (2018). Task scheduling using ant colony optimization in multicore architectures: a survey. Soft Computing, 22(15), 5179–5196.CrossRef
73.
Arunarani, A. R., Manjula, Dhanabalachandran, & Sugumaran, Vijayan. (2019). Task scheduling techniques in cloud computing: A literature survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 407–415.CrossRef
74.
Singh, P., Dutta, M., & Aggarwal, N. (2017). A review of task scheduling based on meta-heuristics approach in cloud computing. Knowledge and Information Systems, 52(1), 1–51.CrossRef
75.
Motlagh, A. A., Movaghar, A., & Rahmani, A. M. (2020). Task scheduling mechanisms in cloud computing: A systematic review. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(6), e4302.CrossRef
76.
Liu, S., Ren, K., Deng, K., & Song, J. (2016). A dynamic resource allocation and task scheduling strategy with uncertain task runtime on iaas clouds. In: 2016 Sixth International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST), (pp. 174–180). IEEE.
77.
Pingping, L., Zhang, G., Zhu, Z., Zhou, X., Sun, J., & Zhou, J. (2019). A review of cost and makespan-aware workflow scheduling in clouds. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 28(06), 1930006.CrossRef
78.
Ijaz, S., Munir, E. U., Ahmad, S. G., Mustafa R., M., & Rana, O. F. (2021). Energy-makespan optimization of workflow scheduling in fog–cloud computing. Computing. pp. 1–27.
79.
Lin, K.-J.., Natarajan, S., & Liu, J. W-S. (1987). Imprecise results: Utilizing partial computations in real-time systems.
80.
Kalra, Mala, & Singh, Sarbjeet. (2015). A review of metaheuristic scheduling techniques in cloud computing. Egyptian informatics journal, 16(3), 275–295.CrossRef
81.
Casavant, T. L., & Kuhl, J. G. (1988). A taxonomy of scheduling in general-purpose distributed computing systems. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 14(2), 141–154.CrossRef
82.
Talbi, E. G. (2009). Metaheuristics: From design to implementation, (Vol. 74). John Wiley & Sons.MATHCrossRef
83.
Shishira, S. R., Kandasamy, A., Chandrasekaran, K. (2016). Survey on meta heuristic optimization techniques in cloud computing. In: 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), (pp. 1434–1440). IEEE.
84.
Al-Roomi, M., Al-Ebrahim, S., Buqrais, S., & Ahmad, I. (2013). Cloud computing pricing models: A survey. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 6(5), 93–106.CrossRef
85.
Sharma, R. K., Kamal, P., & Singh, S. P. (2015). A latency reduction mechanism for virtual machine resource allocation in delay sensitive cloud service. In: 2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), (pp. 371–375). IEEE.
86.
Octavio Gutierrez-Garcia, J., & Sim, Kwang Mong. (2013). A family of heuristics for agent-based elastic cloud bag-of-tasks concurrent scheduling. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1682–1699.CrossRef
87.
Villegas, D., Antoniou, A., Sadjadi, S. M., & Iosup, A. (2012). An analysis of provisioning and allocation policies for infrastructure-as-a-service clouds. In: 2012 12th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (ccgrid 2012), (pp. 612–619). IEEE.
88.
Mohanapriya, N., Kousalya, G., Balakrishnan, P., & Pethuru Raj, C. (2018). Energy efficient workflow scheduling with virtual machine consolidation for green cloud computing. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34(3), 1561–1572.
89.
Hsu, Ching-Hsien., Slagter, Kenn D., Chen, Shih-Chang., & Chung, Yeh-Ching. (2014). Optimizing energy consumption with task consolidation in clouds. Information Sciences, 258, 452–462.CrossRef
90.
Wen, Y., Zhibin Wang, Y., Zhang, J. L., Cao, B., & Chen, J. (2019). Energy and cost aware scheduling with batch processing for instance-intensive iot workflows in clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 39–50.CrossRef
91.
Choi, H., Lim, J., Yu, H., & Lee, E. (2016). Task classification based energy-aware consolidation in clouds. Scientific Programming, 2016.
92.
Srichandan, S., Kumar, T. A., & Bibhudatta, S. (2018). Task scheduling for cloud computing using multi-objective hybrid bacteria foraging algorithm. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(2), 210–230.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Review on Energy-Aware Scheduling Techniques for Workflows in IaaS Clouds
verfasst von
Rambabu Medara
Ravi Shankar Singh
Publikationsdatum
07.03.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09621-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Design of Flexible Floating Point Processing Element (FFPPE) Architecture Based on Golay Code Strategy

OriginalPaper

Collision Avoidance Based Neighbor Discovery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

OriginalPaper

Greedy Weight Matrix Topological Adaptive Ad Hoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector Protocol for QOS Improvement in MANET

OriginalPaper

Reinforcement Learning Based Q-Routing: Performance Evaluation on Cognitive Radio Network Topologies

OriginalPaper

Application Centric Mobility Framework for Next Generation Networks

OriginalPaper

Dual Band PIFA MIMO Antenna Design with High Isolation for Mobile and Wireless Applications by Using the Genetics Algorithms and Non-uniform Overlapping Method

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise