Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Wearable Flexible Sensor Network Platform for the Analysis of Different Sport Movements Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Step in the Right Direction – Understanding Privacy Concerns and Perceived Sensitivity of Fitness Trackers

verfasst von : Chantal Lidynia, Philipp Brauner, Martina Ziefle

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Keeping an active lifestyle has been important and recommended for decades. The arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) offers opportunities to simplify the tracking and logging of data supporting that lifestyle. So-called activity or fitness trackers have become smaller and more affordable over the past few years. However, their use is not as widespread as could be. This explorative study with n = 82 participants investigates privacy concerns and sensitivity regarding data gathered with wearables. It was found that long-term storage location and possible recipients of the collected data do play important roles. However, the consensus was that the participants would prefer to keep said data to themselves. Furthermore, user factors such as age, gender, and privacy behavior could not be identified as having an effect on sharing said data.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Wearable Device Supporting Multiple Touch- and Gesture-Based Languages for the Deaf-Blind
Nächstes Kapitel Development of Customized Orthotics Based on Lower-Leg Anthropometric Data and Task
Literatur
1.
World Health Organization: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. WHO Press, Geneva (2010)
2.
Salmon, P.: Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depression and sensitivity to stress - a unifying theory. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 21, 33–61 (2001)CrossRef
3.
Alley, S., Schoeppe, S., Guertler, D., Jennings, C., Duncan, M.J., Vandelanotte, C.: Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 6, e011243 (2016)CrossRef
4.
Guo, F., Brown, M.S.: An evaluation of wearable activity monitoring devices. In: PDM 2013, pp. 31–34 (2013)
5.
Rasche, P., Wille, M., Theis, S., Schlick, C.M., Mertens, A.: Activity tracker and elderly. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), pp. 1411–1416 (2015)
6.
Case, M.A., Burwick, H.A., Volpp, K.G., Patel, M.S.: Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA 313, 625–626 (2015)CrossRef
7.
Kaewkannate, K., Kim, S.: A comparison of wearable fitness devices. BMC Publ. Health 16, 433 (2016)CrossRef
8.
Sasaki, J.E., Hickey, A., Mavilia, M., Tedesco, J., John, D., Keadle, S.K., Freedson, P.S.: Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. J. Phys. Act. Health 12, 149–154 (2015)CrossRef
9.
Meyer, J., Fortmann, J., Wasmann, M., Heuten, W.: Making lifelogging usable: design guidelines for activity trackers. In: He, X., Al, E. (eds.) MultiMedia Modeling, pp. 323–334. Springer, Cham (2015)
10.
Preusse, K.C., Mitzner, T.L., Fausset, C.B., Rogers, W.A.: Older adults’ acceptance of activity trackers. J. Appl. Gerontol. 36, 127–155 (2017)CrossRef
11.
Clawson, J., Pater, J.A., Miller, A.D., Mynatt, E.D., Mamykina, L.: No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In: UbiComp 2015, pp. 647–658 (2015)
12.
Fogg, B.J.: Computers as persuasive social actors. In: Fogg, B.J. (ed.) Persuasive Technology. Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, pp. 89–120. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003)
13.
Vervier, L., Zeißig, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Ziefle, M.: Perceptions of digital footprints and the value of privacy. In: International Conference on Internet of Things and Big Data and Security (2017, in press)
14.
Zeißig, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Vervier, L., Gadeib, A., Ziefle, M.: Online privacy perceptions of older adults. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2017, in press)
15.
Solove, D.J.: A taxonomy of privacy. Univ. PA. Law Rev. 154, 477–560 (2006)CrossRef
16.
Altman, I.: Privacy. A conceptual analysis. Environ. Behav. 8, 7–29 (1976)CrossRef
17.
Finn, R.L., Wright, D., Friedewald, M.: Seven types of privacy. In: Gutwirth, S., Leenes, R., de Hert, P., Poullet, Y. (eds.) European Data Protection: Coming of Age, pp. 3–32. Springer Science+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht (2013)CrossRef
18.
Wright, D., Raab, C.: Privacy principles, risks and harms. Int. Rev. Law, Comput. Technol. 28, 277–298 (2014)CrossRef
19.
Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35, 989–1015 (2011)
20.
Kokolakis, S.: Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: a review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comput. Secur. 2011, 1–29 (2015)
21.
Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., Horne, D.A.: The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41, 100–126 (2007)CrossRef
22.
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G.: Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4, 340–347 (2012)CrossRef
23.
Guo, X., Zhang, X., Sun, Y.: The privacy-personalization paradox in mHealth services acceptance of different age groups. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 16, 55–65 (2014)CrossRef
24.
Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus model for E-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 61–80 (2006)CrossRef
25.
Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Señor, I.C., Lozoya, P.Á.O., Toval, A.: Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review. J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 541–562 (2013)CrossRef
26.
Abbas, A., Khan, S.U.: A review on the state-of-the-art privacy-preserving approaches in the e-Health clouds. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 18, 1431–1441 (2014)CrossRef
27.
Li, H., Wu, J., Gao, Y., Shi, Y.: Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: an empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 88, 8–17 (2016)CrossRef
28.
Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Users’ privacy concerns about wearables. In: Brenner, M., et al. (eds.) FC 2015 Workshops, pp. 231–244. International Financial Cryptography Association (2015)
29.
Bellekens, X., Nieradzinska, K., Bellekens, A., Seeam, P., Hamilton, A., Seeam, A.: A study on situational awareness security and privacy of wearable health monitoring devices. Int. J. Cyber Situat. Aware. 1, 1–25 (2016)
30.
Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik [Locus of control when interacting with technology]. Rep. Psychol. 24, 684–693 (1999)
31.
Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 2904–2927 (2007)CrossRef
32.
Brauner, P., Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M.: Ubiquitous computing at its best: serious exercise games for older adults in ambient assisted living environments – a technology acceptance perspective. EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games 15, 1–12 (2015)
33.
Palacios, J., Potoglou, D., Feijoo, C.: Does privacy concern influence E-shoppers’ choices for online retailers? An application of the integrated latent variable choice model. In: International Choice Modelling Conference 2015, 10–13 May, Austin, Texas, USA (2015)
Metadaten
Titel
A Step in the Right Direction – Understanding Privacy Concerns and Perceived Sensitivity of Fitness Trackers
verfasst von
Chantal Lidynia
Philipp Brauner
Martina Ziefle
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60638-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60639-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60639-2_5

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise