Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Using Waste Concretes as Recycling Aggregate in Concrete Production and Sustainability Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Study on the Using of Game Theory in Sustainable Construction

verfasst von : Pınar Usta, Serap Ergün, Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök

Erschienen in: Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017)

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, population growth, consumption of natural resources as a result of industrialization and urbanization, environmental issues have increased rapidly and this increase has reached dangerous proportions. Therefore, Environmental concept has influenced the structure of the planning discipline, ecological approach to planning and sustainability has gained importance. In this area, using different methods have been made in the quest to produce fast and effective solutions. Game theory approach, which can be given as an example of such methods, is seen planning and structure design in the content of sustainability. In this paper, studies on the sustainability and game theory concepts in the literature have been investigated and evaluated, as a whole.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Using Waste Concretes as Recycling Aggregate in Concrete Production and Sustainability
Nächstes Kapitel Production of Insulations and Construction Materials from Expanded Perlite
Literatur
1.
Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39CrossRef
2.
Zimmermann M, Althaus HJ, Haas A (2005) Benchmarks for sustainable construction: a contribution to develop a standard. Energy Build 37(11):1147–1157CrossRef
3.
4.
Bragança L, Mateus R, Koukkari H (2010) Building sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(7)
5.
Edwards S, Bennett P (2003, Apr–Sept) Construction products and life-cycle thinking. UNEP Ind Environ, 57–61
6.
Forsberg A, von Malmborg F (2004) Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment. Bldg Environ 39:223–228CrossRef
7.
Forbes D (2008) Identification and analysis of risks in the sustainability assessment of housing. Ph.D. thesis, Division of Civil Engineering, The University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
8.
Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(6):595–616CrossRef
9.
AlWaer, Kirk (2012, June). Building sustainability assessment methods. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-engineering sustainability, vol 165, no 4, pp 241–253. Thomas Telford Ltd
10.
Aumann RJ (1989) Game theory. Game Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp 1–53
11.
Osborne MJ, Ariel R (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press
12.
Branzei R, Dinko D, Stef T (2008) Models in cooperative game theory, vol 556. Springer Science & Business Media
13.
Peleg B, Peter S (2007) Introduction to the theory of cooperative games, vol 34. Springer Science & Business Media
14.
Song YM et al (2013) Collaborative design process for encouraging sustainable building design: a game theory-based approach. In: International conference on cooperative design, visualization and engineering. Springer, Berlin
15.
Ali HH, Al Nsairat SF (2009) Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries–case of Jordan. Build Environ 44(5):1053–1064CrossRef
16.
Fowler KM, Rauch EM (2006) Sustainable building rating systems—summary (The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle, PNNL-15858
17.
Wang W, Zmeureanu R, Rivard H (2005) Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Build Environ 40(11):1512–1525CrossRef
18.
19.
Fu L, Huang W (2010) Study on game among government and construction units about green engineering. In: 2010 IEEE 17th international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IE&EM), IEEE
20.
Liu HW et al (2014) Government incentives to promote the development of green building based on games theory. In: Advanced Materials Research, vol 869. Trans Tech Publications
21.
Liang X, Yi P, Shen GQ (2016) A game theory based analysis of decision making for green retrofit under different occupancy types. J Clean Product 137:1300–1312
22.
Pan N-F, Dzeng R-J, Yang M-D (2011) Decision making behaviors in planning green buildings. In: 2011 international conference on computer distributed control and intelligent environmental monitoring (CDCIEM), IEEE
23.
Diamantini C, Zanon B (2000) Planning the urban sustainable development the case of the plan for the province of Trento, Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):299–310CrossRef
24.
Alawadhi S, Aldama-Nalda A, Chourabi H, Gil-Garcia JR, Leung S, Mellouli S, Walker S (2012, Sept). Building understanding of smart city initiatives. In: International conference on electronic government, pp 40–53. Springer, Berlin
25.
Nam T, Pardo TA (2011, June) Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times, pp 282–291. ACM
26.
Nam T, Pardo TA (2011, Sept) Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, pp 185–194. ACM
27.
Hurtado LA et al (2015) Comfort-constrained demand flexibility management for building aggregations using a decentralized approach. In: 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems (SMARTGREENS). IEEE
28.
Unsal HI, Taylor JE (2010) Modeling interfirm dependency: Game theoretic simulation to examine the holdup problem in project networks. J Constr Eng Manag 137(4):284–293CrossRef
29.
Ho SP, Liu LY (2004) Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding. J Constr Eng Manag 130(1):94–104
30.
Shi F, Wang Y (2015) Research on government cultivation behavior based on cultural construction in the building energy efficiency services market. In: ICCREM 2015, pp 343–350
31.
Antuchevičiene J, Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK (2006) Modelling renewal of construction objects applying methods of the game theory. Technol Econ Dev Econ 12(4):263–268
32.
Meng YE, Kunhui YE (2013) Game relationships between the stakeholders of angola mode-based construction projects
33.
Ding X, Han F, Fan M (2013) A study on indemnificatory housing assignments on the base of game theory. In: ICCREM 2013: construction and operation in the context of sustainability. ASCE
34.
Kibert CJ (1994, Nov) Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on sustainable construction, pp 6–9. Tampa Florida, November
35.
Hill RC, Bowen PA (1997) Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr Manag Econ 15(3):223–239CrossRef
36.
Peldschus F et al (2010) Sustainable assessment of construction site by applying game theory. Inz Ekon-Eng Econ 21(3):223–237
37.
Gu Z et al (2009) A study of Chinese strategies for energy-efficient housing developments from an architect’s perspective, combined with Swedish experiences and game theory. Civil Eng Environ Syst 26(4):323–338
38.
Naess P (2001) Urban planning and sustainable development. Eur Plan Stud 9(4):503–524
39.
Grant J, Manuel P, Joudrey D (1996) A framework for planning sustainable residential landscapes. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):331–34
40.
Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, Van den Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79(3):374–384CrossRef
41.
Purnomo H, Irawati RH. Landscape game: a model to understand the dynamics of land competition, policy measures and sustainability of a landscape
42.
Moretti S et al (2016) Sharing the costs of complex water projects: application to the west delta water conservation and irrigation rehabilitation project, Egypt. Games 7(3):18
43.
Lawson G (2003) Ecological landscape planning: a gaming approach in education. Landsc Res 28(2):217–223CrossRef
44.
Lin P-SS, Liu Y-L (2016) Niching sustainability in an Indigenous community: protected areas, autonomous initiatives, and negotiating power in natural resource management. Sustain Sci 11(1):103–113CrossRef
45.
Zhang X et al (2015) Resolving the conflicts of sustainable world heritage landscapes in cities: fully open or limited access for visitors? Habitat Int 46:91–100
46.
Buckley M, Haddad BM (2006) Socially strategic ecological restoration: a game-theoretic analysis shortened: Socially strategic restoration. Environ Manag 38(1):48–61CrossRef
47.
Loucks DP (2000) Sustainable water resources management. Water Int 25(1):3–10
48.
Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrology 381(3):225–238
49.
Kahil MT, Dinar A, Albiac J (2016) Cooperative water management and ecosystem protection under scarcity and drought in arid and semiarid regions. Water Resour Econ 13: 60–74
50.
Ramirez-Jaime A, Quijano N, Ocampo-Martinez C (2016) A differential game approach to urban drainage systems control. In: American control conference (ACC), 2016. American Automatic Control Council (AACC)
51.
Sechi GM, Zucca R (2015) Water resource allocation in critical scarcity conditions: a bankruptcy game approach. Water Resour Manag 29(2):541–555CrossRef
52.
Wang LZ, Fang L, Hipel KW (2003) Water resources allocation: a cooperative game theoretic approach. J Environ Inform 2(2):11–22
Metadaten
Titel
A Study on the Using of Game Theory in Sustainable Construction
verfasst von
Pınar Usta
Serap Ergün
Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017)

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63708-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63709-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_2